ML032970051
| ML032970051 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 11/19/2003 |
| From: | Marsh L NRC/NRR/DLPM |
| To: | Randolph G AmerenUE |
| Fretz R, NRR/DLPM, 415-1324 | |
| References | |
| TAC MB9270, TAC MB9374 | |
| Download: ML032970051 (4) | |
Text
November 19, 2003 Mr. Garry Randolph Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Ameren Union Electric Company Highway CC 5 Miles North of Highway 94 Portland, MO 65067
SUBJECT:
ORDERS MODIFYING LICENSE FOR REVISED DESIGN BASIS THREAT AND FOR TRAINING AND PHYSICAL FITNESS ENHANCEMENTS APPLICABLE TO SECURITY FORCE PERSONNEL (TAC NOS. MB9270 AND MB9374)
Dear Mr. Randolph:
On April 29, 2003, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) issued Orders modifying the operating license for Callaway Plant, Unit 1 to: (1) require compliance with a revised design basis threat (DBT); (2) implement new security force personnel training and physical fitness requirements; and (3) prescribe compensatory measures related to fitness-for-duty enhancements applicable to security force personnel.
When it issued the Orders, the Commission recognized that you voluntarily and responsibly implemented additional security measures following the events of September 11, 2001.
However, as part of the Commissions review of the security and safeguards program, the Commission determined that enhancements to the DBT, as currently specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 73.1(a), were required. The NRC further determined that security force personnel tactical and firearms proficiency, physical fitness, and fitness-for-duty requirements needed to be enhanced. The Commission also concluded that, based on the current threat environment, these Orders were to be effective immediately.
The Orders require responses and actions within specified time frames. This letter addresses your response to the Orders pertaining to the revised DBT and the new security force personnel training and physical fitness requirements. The Commission replied to your response to the fitness-for-duty Order in separate correspondence, dated July 10, 2003.
Section III.A.1 of the Order implementing new security force personnel training and physical fitness requirements states that licensees must comply with the new requirements described in the Order, except to the extent that more stringent requirements are set forth in the licensees security plan and security training and qualifications plan.Section III.A.1 of the DBT Order requires licensees to submit revised physical security plans, safeguards contingency plans, and guard training and qualification plans, including an implementation schedule, based on the revised DBT, to the Commission for review and approval no later than April 29, 2004. The Order requires licensees to implement the revised physical security plans, revised safeguards contingency plans, and revised security force personnel training and qualification plans no later than October 29, 2004.Section IV of both Orders noted that, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.202, licensees must submit an answer to the Orders and may request a hearing on the Orders, within thirty-five (35) days of the date of the Orders and, where good cause is shown, consideration would be given to extend the time to request a hearing.
The Orders also required licensees to notify the Commission within thirty-five (35) days if:
(1) the licensee was unable to comply with the requirements specified in the attachments to the Orders; (2) compliance with the requirements is unnecessary; (3) implementation of any of the requirements would result in a violation of the provisions of any Commission regulation of the facility license; or (4) implementation of any of the requirements described in the attachments to the Orders would adversely impact safe operation of the facility.Section III.C.1 of the security force personnel training and physical fitness Order required licensees to submit to the Commission, within thirty-five (35) days of the date of the Order, a schedule for achieving compliance with each requirement described in Attachment 2 to the Order.
By letters dated June 2, 2003, you submitted responses to the Orders for the Ameren Union Electric Company. In your responses, you indicated that you consented to the DBT and security force personnel training Orders and did not request a hearing. The NRC staff has reviewed your responses, and finds that you have satisfied the thirty-five (35) day reporting requirements for both Orders.
In your response to the DBT Order, you also requested that the NRC provide clarification of five DBT-related issues described in the safeguards attachment to a letter from Mr. Colvin, President and CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute, to Chairman Diaz dated May 16, 2003. By letter dated September 25, 2003, the NRC provided you a copy of Chairman Diazs response to Mr. Colvin, dated July 18, 2003, which clarified the five DBT-related issues.
Please contact Robert Fretz at 301-415-1324, if you have any other questions on these issues.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Ledyard B. Marsh, Director Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483 cc: See next page
10 CFR 2.202, licensees must submit an answer to the Orders and may request a hearing on the Orders, within thirty-five (35) days of the date of the Orders and, where good cause is shown, consideration would be given to extend the time to request a hearing.
The Orders also required licensees to notify the Commission within thirty-five (35) days if:
(1) the licensee was unable to comply with the requirements specified in the attachments to the Orders; (2) compliance with the requirements is unnecessary; (3) implementation of any of the requirements would result in a violation of the provisions of any Commission regulation of the facility license; or (4) implementation of any of the requirements described in the attachments to the Orders would adversely impact safe operation of the facility.Section III.C.1 of the security force personnel training and physical fitness Order required licensees to submit to the Commission, within thirty-five (35) days of the date of the Order, a schedule for achieving compliance with each requirement described in Attachment 2 to the Order.
By letters dated June 2, 2003, you submitted responses to the Orders for the Ameren Union Electric Company. In your responses, you indicated that you consented to the DBT and security force personnel training Orders and did not request a hearing. The NRC staff has reviewed your responses, and finds that you have satisfied the thirty-five (35) day reporting requirements for both Orders.
In your response to the DBT Order, you also requested that the NRC provide clarification of five DBT-related issues described in the safeguards attachment to a letter from Mr. Colvin, President and CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute, to Chairman Diaz dated May 16, 2003. By letter dated September 25, 2003, the NRC provided you a copy of Chairman Diazs response to Mr. Colvin, dated July 18, 2003, which clarified the five DBT-related issues.
Please contact Robert Fretz at 301-415-1324, if you have any other questions on these issues.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Ledyard B. Marsh, Director Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483 cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC TMarsh DLPM Project Directors GGrant, Region III OGC CHolden DLPM Section Chiefs PD Reading Files ACRS JClifford DLPM Project Managers GTracy, NSIR RFretz VNerses DLPM Licensing Assistants JPeralta, NSIR ADAMS Accession Number: ML032970051
- See previous concurrence OFFICE PDI-2/LPM PDI-2/LA PDI-2/SC*
NSIR/DNS*
PDI/D*
DLPM/D NAME RFretz CRaynor JClifford GTracy CHolden LMarsh DATE 11/13/03 11/13/03 10/30/03 11/03/03 11/07/03 11/14/03 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Callaway Plant, Unit 1 cc:
Professional Nuclear Consulting, Inc.
19041 Raines Drive Derwood, MD 20855 John ONeill, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N. Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037 Mr. Mark A. Reidmeyer, Regional Regulatory Affairs Supervisor Regulatory Affairs AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector Office 8201 NRC Road Steedman, MO 65077-1302 Mr. Chris Younie Manager, Quality Assurance AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251 Manager - Electric Department Missouri Public Service Commission 301 W. High P.O. Box 360 Jefferson City, MO 65102 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4005 Mr. Ronald A. Kucera Deputy Director for Public Policy Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Mr. Rick A. Muench President and Chief Executive Officer Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KA 66839 Mr. Dan I. Bolef, President Kay Drey, Representative Board of Directors Coalition for the Environment 6267 Delmar Boulevard University City, MO 63130 Mr. Lee Fritz, Presiding Commissioner Callaway County Court House 10 East Fifth Street Fulton, MO 65151 Mr. David E. Shafer Superintendent, Licensing Regulatory Affairs AmerenUE P.O. Box 66149, MC 470 St. Louis, MO 63166-6149 Mr. Keith D. Young Manager, Regulatory Affairs AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251 Mr. Scott Clardy, Director Section for Environmental Public Health P.O. Box 570 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0570 Mr. Garry L. Randolph Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Union Electric Company Post Office Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251