ML032671114

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Transmittal of EP-PS-245, Dose Assessment Supervisor
ML032671114
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/2003
From: Dalpiaz T
Susquehanna
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
References
28401 EP-PS-245, Rev 5
Download: ML032671114 (6)


Text

Sep. 10, 2003 Page 1 of 1 MANUAL HARD COPY DISTRItYTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2003-41047 USER FORMATIONS Name:GE CH* SE M Address:

A2 Phone#:

4-TRAN TTAL INFORMATION:

EMPL#:28401 CA#:0363 TO:

Q";

Mop*PmSR

=

09/10/2003 LOCATION:

DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK FROM:

NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (NUCSA-2)

THE FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY OR ELECTRONIC MANUAL ASSIGNED TO YOU:

245 -

245 -

DOSE ASSESSMENT SUPERVISOR REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 06/26/2003

\\ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 09/09/2003 CATEGORY: PROCEDURES TYPE: EP ID:

EP-PS-245 ADD: PCAF 2003-1638 REV: N/A UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES.

PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY. FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.

PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM

1. PCAF NO.
2. PAGE 1 OF 5
3. PROC. NO. EP-PS-245 REV. 5
4. FORMS REVISED R,

R_

R R_

R R

5. PROCEDURE TITLE Dose Assessment Supervisor Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction
6.

REQUESTED CHANGE PERIODIC REVIEW E

NO 3

YES INCORPORATE PCAFS s

NO a

YES #

REVISION a]

PCAF Z DELETION

[](CHECKONEONLY)

7.

SUMMARY

OF / REASON FOR CHANGE Added step 3 to provide guidance in referring to Tab J to determine if there is on-routine radiological release In progress. This is an administrative PCAF since it provides a refee t

an existing Tab.

(0

/ n_

Continued s

8. DETERMINE COMMITTEE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Section 6.1.4)

PORC REVIEW REQ'D?

6 SO rl 7YES

9.

PORC MTG#

BLOCKS II THR U 16 ARE ON PAGE* OR FORM

17.

T.C. Dalpiaz 1

327 -

I 09/0412003

18. COMMUNICATION OF CHANGE REQUIRED?

PREPARER

--,,- DATE El NO v3 YES (TYPE) E Mail notification (Print or Type) a f

19.

a

)

SIGNATURE ATTESTS THAT RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR HAS CONDUCTED QADR AND TECHNICAL REVIEW UNLESS OTHERWISE L/1. IQ-A 9t L

q~t(ILo3 DOCUMENTED IN BLOCK 16 ORATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.

_ECC NSKIC!\\LOC OG DATEtnX ND bass CROSS DISCIPLINE REVIEW (IF REQUIRED) HAS BEEN COMPLETED cIEvWNSIMEIC4W>C; Su~eRVISOR DATE vt cBY SIGNATURE IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.

20.

kxx4L Cw a3.

-I L&MVPROVAL DvATE

21. RESPONSIBLE APPROVER ENTER N/A IF FUM HAS APPROVAL AUTHORITY 4A INITIALS DATE FP FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 1 of 2 (ElectroniC Formn)

L0 (I R~ is T

l I

DZXUMtNT CONTROL SE-.

SSS I

PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM

1. PCAF NO.
12. PAGE 2 OF 35 3 PROC. NO. EP.IPS-245 REV. 5
11. This question documents the outcome of the 50.59 and 72.48 Review required by NDAP-QA-0726. Either 11a, b, c or d must be checked YES' and the appropriate form attached or referenced.
a. This change is an Administrative Correction for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not YES 3 N/A applicable.
b. This change is a change to any surveillance, maintenance or administrative 3 YES z N/A procedure for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not applicable.
c.

This change is bounded by a 50.59172.48 Screen/Evaluation, therefore, no new

[ YES 3 N/A 50.59/72.48 Evaluation is required.

Screen/Evaluation No.

d. 50.59 and/or 72.48 are applicable to this change and a 50.59/72.48

[

YES 0 N/A Screen/Evaluation is attached.

12. This change is consistent with the FSAR or an FSAR change is required.

0 YES Change Request No.

13. Should this change be reviewed for potential effects on Training Needs or Material?

Li YES 0 NO If YES, enter an Action Item @ NIMS/Action/Gen Work Mech/PICN

14. Is a Surveillance Procedure Review Checklist required per NDAP-QA-0722?

0 YES 0 NO

15. Is a Special, Infrequent or Complex Test/Evolution Analysis Form required per L YES 0 NO NDAP-QA-0320? (SICT/E form does not need to be attached.)
16. Reviews may be documented below or by attaching Document Review Forms NDAP-QA-0101 -1.

REVIEWED BY WITH DATE REVIEW NO COMMENTS QADR TECHNICAL REVIEW REACTOR ENGINEERING/NUCLEAR FUELS

  • IST OFF OPERATIONS NUCLEAR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING NUCLEAR MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE HEALTH PHYSICS NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY CHEMISTRY OTHER 10 CFR 50.540 3

Required for changes that affect, or have potential for affecting ie reactivity, nuclear fuel, core power level indication or impact the thermal power heat balance. (58)

Required for changes to Section Xi Inservice Test Acceptance Criteria.

FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 2 of 2 (Electronic Form)

PA6 EP-PS-245

-Revision 5

-Page 2 of 4 DOSE ASSESSMENT SUPERVISOR:

Emergency-Plan-Postion-Specific Instruction WHEN:

EOF Is activated HOW NOTIFIED:

Paged/telephone REPORTTO:

Recovery manager WHERE TO REPORT:.

Emergency Operations Facility OVERALL DUtlY:

Manage radiological functions In the EOF, which includes providing radiological component of protective action recommendations to the Recovery Manager.

MAJOR TASKS:

TAB:

REVISION:

Obtain, then keep current, Information you will TAB A 3

need to manage the radiological functions In the EOF.

Recommend changes to the emergency TAB B 2-classification to the Recovery Manager, f needed.

Recommend public protective actions to the TAB C 3

Recovery Manager.

Manage assessing and communicating TAB D 4

radiological Information from the EOF.

Recommend protective actions for PPL TAB E 3

emergency personnel to the Recovery Manager.

Provide direction for field monitoring strategy.

TAB F 1

Support termination activities.

TAB G 0

Assist re-entrylrecovery efforts.

TAB H 0

Make sure nformation and functions that are TAB I 1-in progress during shift relief are turned over smoothly.

Determine if there Is a non-routine TAB J 0

Radiological Release in Progress.

-- --- - -. -7



F, ", -,

1"I"

.1 PAB4J

'I I

rab a EP-PS-245-B L.

page IOf 2 MAJOR TASK:

Recommend changes In the emergency classffication to the Recovery Manager, when red.

SPECIFIC TASKS:

HOW:

1.

Evaluate aN radiological information.

1a.

Obtain and evaluate the foflowing:

(I)

Monitornng Teamn and RMtS results (2)

PICSY vent release data (3) dose projection resufts (4)

'study case' calculations

2.

Help classify emgeny according to radiological data.

2a.

if there Is a release in progres.

deternine the sppropriate Emergency Cassficaton.

2b.

f there Is potential for a release, utiie ft study case results crftera given In the Emergency Classification matrbx.

- 'HELPi EMRGENCY CLASSIFICATION See TAB 2

3. Assess if there is a non-routine Radiological release m progress.

3a. Refer to Tab lfor assistance in determining if there is a non-routine Radiological release in progress.

3b If there is a non-routine Radiological release in progress, insure the EOF Communicator indicates that on the ENR form.

3c. Insure that information is communicated to the recovery manager and EOF personnel.

VL 4

a

-7 7"t'- "".

V11..-':----

PCRF #943.. (b PAG6.. J Tab B EP-PS-245-B Revision r2-Page 2 of 2 V'

SPECIFIC TASKS:

HOW:

4.

Recommend changes in classification.

4a Keep presentation clear, concise, and in perspective. Address the following, where applicable:

(1)

Impact(s) on classification and protectve action recommendations.

(a)

Specify the EAL which has been exceeded.

(2)

Release:

(a) yes or no (b) monitored or unmonitored (3)

Dose rates (at EPB andlor two miles)

(a)

Use few significant figures (b)

Use "REM" vs. mrem as dose units for General Emergency declaration and PAR discussions.

(4)

Type of calculation and/orfield monitoring used to estimate dose.

(a)

Present key assumptions or imitations, when relevant (5)

Impact(s) on dassificaton and protective action recommendations.