ML032671085
| ML032671085 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 09/10/2003 |
| From: | Susquehanna |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response |
| References | |
| 28401 EP-PS-104, Rev 17 | |
| Download: ML032671085 (7) | |
Text
Sep. 10, 2003 im Page 1 of 1 MANUAL HiRD COPY DISTRI8tjTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2003-40898 USER I RMATI/,
Name:GE C ROSE M Address:
A2 Phone#: 254-94 EMPL#:28401 CA#:0363 TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION:
TO:
E tfl rslnm-r-09/10/2003 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK FROM:
NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (NUCSA-2)
THE FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY OR ELECTRONIC MANUAL ASSIGNED TO YOU:
104 -
104 -
RADIATION PROTECTION COORDINATOR (RPC): EMERGENCY PLSN-POSITION SPECIFIC PROCEDURE REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 06/26/2003
'-ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 09/09/2003 CATEGORY: PROCEDURES TYPE: EP ID:
EP-PS-104 ADD: PCAF 2003-1640 REV: N/A UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES.
PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY. FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.
5~4
PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM i 1. PCAF NO.z
-l A1
- 12. PAGE 1 OF 6
- 3. PROC. NO. EP-PS-104 REV. 17
- 4.
FORMS REVISED C) R 7, -
R_,
R.
R R_
- 5. PROCEDURE TITLE Dose Assessment Supervisor Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction
- 6. REQUESTED CHANGE PERIODIC REVIEW
[
NO E YES INCORPORATE PCAFS [D NO El YES #_
REVISION f
PCAF DELETION E (CHE,,K ONE ONLY)
- 7.
SUMMARY
OF / REASON FOR CHANGE i
Added step 1b, 1c, &1d to provide guidance in referring to Tab N to deterrte if tkere i; a non-routine radiological release in progress. This Is an administrative PCAF since it tovidos a eference step to an existing Tab.
Continued E
- 8. DETERMINE COMMITTEE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS, (Refer to Section 6.1.4)
PORC REVIEW REQ'D?
s bO 2E YES
- 9.
PORC MTG#_
BLOCKS 11 THRU 16 ARE ON PAGE 2 OF FORM
- 17.
T.C. Dalpiaz 4/2i27 1 09/04/2003
- 18. COMMUNICATION OF CHANGE REQUIRED?
PREPARER ETN DATE E NO Z YES (TYPE) E Mail notification (Print or Type) t 19 o--., ' X
- i.
SIGNATURE ATTESTS THAT RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR HAS DOCUMENTED IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.
RS,2 lB CROSSDISCIPLINE REVIEW (IF REQUIRED) HAS BEEN COMPLETED R~SF~gUSIBW SUPERVI DATE BY SIGNATURE IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.
20.
( A MAPPROVAL DATE
- 21. RESPONSIBLE APPROVER ENTER NIA IF FUM HAS APPROVAL AUTHORITY A//A INITIALS DATE J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~E 11 8
2M FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 1 of 2 (Electronic Form)
UU DOCUMENT CONTROL SCPRVICES SSES
II rPROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM
- 1. PCAFNO.;M IQ4oY)12. PAGE 2 OF 1 3. PROC. NO. EP-PS-104 REV. 17
- 11. This question documents the outcome of the 50.59 and 72.48 Review required by NDAP-QA-0726. Either 11 a, b, c or d must be checked "YES" and the appropriate form attached or referenced.
- a. This change is an Administrative Correction for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not YES 3 N/A applicable.
- b. This change is a change to any surveillance, maintenance or administrative s
YES a
N/A procedure for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not applicable.
- c. This change is bounded by a 50.59/72.48 Screen/Evaluation, therefore, no new
[
YES Z N/A 50.59/72.48 Evaluation is required.
Screen/Evaluation No.
- d. 50.59 and/or 72.48 are applicable to this change and a 50.59/72.48 0 YES 3
NIA Screen/Evaluation is attached.
YES Change Request No.
- 13. Should this change be reviewed for potential effects on Training Needs or Material?
F YES 3 NO If YES, enter an Action Item @ NIMS/Action/Gen Work Mech/PICN
- 14. Is a Surveillance Procedure Review Checklist required per NDAP-QA-0722?
F YES 3 NO
- 15. Is a Special, Infrequent or Complex Test/Evolution Analysis Form required per YES 3 NO NDAP-QA-0320? (SICT/E form does not need to be attached.)
- 16. Reviews may be documented below or by attaching Document Review Forms NDAP-QA-0101-1.
REVIEWED BY WITH DATE REVIEW NO COMMENTS QADR TECHNICAL REVIEW REACTOR ENGINEERING/NUCLEAR FUELS
- IST *_
OPERATIONS NUCLEAR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING NUCLEAR MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE HEALTH PHYSICS NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY CHEMISTRY OTHER 10 CFR 50.540
-t t
Required for changes that affect, or have potential for affecting core reactivity, nuclear fuel, core power level indication or impact the thermal power heat balance. (5M)
Required for changes to Section Xl Inservice Test Acceptance Criteria.
FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 2 of 2 (Electronic Form)
-Revision 17 Page 2 of 4 RADIATION PROTECTION COORDINATOR (RPCI:
Emergency Plan-Position Specific Procedure WHEN:
Technical Support Center (TSC) Is activated HOW NOTIFIED:
Paged, phone backup REPORTTO:
TSC Emergency Director WHERE TO REPORT:
TSG OVERALL DUTY:
Quantify and assess radiological conditions both on-and oft-est.then recommend emergency classification and protective actions.
MAJOR TASKS:
TAB:
REVISION:
Obtain briefing on the emergercy.
TAB A 4
Activate TSC Health Physics group and, if TAB B 5
needed, request 1OF activation.
Make sure Initial habitabiity is assessed.
TAB C 8
Take Inventory of information required to TAB D 6
7z analyze the radiological situation.
Brief Emergency Director in the ThC on what TAB E I
you know about radiological conditions and Health Physics staff.
Assess emergency classffication and confirm TAB F 6
or recommend changes to the Emergency Director.
Assess and recommend protective actions to TAB G 10 the Emergency Director.
Communicate with DEP/BRP.
TAB H 5
Continue assessing radiological situation, TAB I 10 updating Emergency Director, TSC staff, and Health Physics staff.
Evaluate and approve emergency exposure TAB J 4
extensions and/or revise RWPs.
- TAB D EP-PS-104-D Ut
- Revision-7 A
Page 1 of 3 X
MAJOR TASK:
Take inventory of information required to analyze the radiological situation.
SPECIFIC TASKS:
HOW:
Evaluate offsite radiological la.
Review available data such as:
conditions.
(1)
Valid release rates (airborne and liquid).
(2)
Field measurements.
(3)
Meteorological data.
(4)
Dose calculations.
(5)
Affected sectors.
lb. Refer to Tab N for assistance in determining if there is a non-routine Radiological release in progress.
Ic If there is a non-routine Radiological release in progress, insure the TSC Communicator indicates that on the ENR form.
Id. Insure that information is communicated to the Emergency Director and TSC personnel.
NOTE:
"White" PICSY data Is an indication of unreliable data. It may be normal and acceptable due to low or no flow In the SPING Monitor. It may also indicate a release exceeding the range of the Instrument or an Indication of instrumentation or computer Interface problems.
HELP TSC Dose Assessment Flowchart See TAB 16
.- - -
PCAF #
EL/1t20 TABD EP-PS-104-D LL
'Revisiona7r Page2of3
.3 SPECIFIC TASKS:
HOW:
le.
Use the default Noble Gas to Iodine ratio of 1,000 and the default Noble Gas to Particulate Ratio of 10,000 until Chemistry vent data is available.
HELP TSC Dose Assessment Flowchart See TAB 16 lf.
If low confidence (white) PICSY data exists:
(1)
If data is suspect, consult with Operationis or Engineering to determine if condition is normal.
(2)
Use appropriate alternate data such as grab sample (vent, PAVSS, HP air samples) results in Forward Calculation.
HELP TSC Dose Assessment Flowcharts See TAB 16 (3)
Ensure OSCAR is taking air samples as appropriate and is maintaining their exposure ALARA.
(4)
Report conditions as a potential unmonitored or an unmonitored release depending on measured to projected dose rate ratios.
(5)
Initiate Back Calculations if field data is available.
MrV.&L
-TAB D EP-PS-1 04-D
-Revisionk& '2 Page 3 of 3 SPECIFIC TASKS:
HOW:
- 2.
Evaluate onsite radiological conditions.
2a.
Review available data such as:
(1)
ARMs.
(2)
Containment integrity.
(3).
Containment high rad monitor.
(4)
Liquid release.
(5)
CAM's.
(6)
INDIA Team's survey data.
(7)
HVAC status/conditions.
(8)
Status of turbine building doors.
(9)
Status of blow-out panels.
_11111111111"MW -