ML032380527

Submittal of Revision 5 of Nuclear Operating Business Practice, Restart Readiness Review Extended Plant Outage (DBBP-VP-0002)

ML032380527
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	07/30/2003
From:	Myers L FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Dyer J NRC/RGN-III
References
DBBP-VP-0002 Rev 5
Download: ML032380527 (61)

Text

-

FENOC FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Lew W. Myers 5501 North State Route 2 Oak Harbor. Ohio 43449 4 19-321- 7599 Fa: 4 19-321- 7582 Chief Operating Officer Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 1-1323 J u l y 30, 2003 Mr. James E. Dyer, Administrator United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 111 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL 60532-4351

Subject:

Submittal of Revision 5 of the Nuclear Operating Business Practice, Restart Readiness Review Extended Plant Outage (DBBP-VP-0002)

Dear Mr. Dyer:

On June 15,2003 (Serial 1-1318), the FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) submitted Revision 4 of the Nuclear Operating Business Practice DBBP-VP-0002, Restart Readiness Review Extended Plant Outage. This business practice provides the review process to ensure Davis-Besses materiel condition, programs and processes, and organization, including the organizations safety culture are ready for plant restart and safe, reliable operation.

This Business Practice was subsequently revised to enhance and refine the Restart Readiness Review process. The purpose of this letter is to submit Revision 5 of the Nuclear Operating Business Practice DBBP-VP-0002, Restart Readiness Review Extended Plant Outage, dated July 8, 2003 as an enclosure to this letter. This revision supercedes Revision 4 in its entirety.

No commitments are identified in the enclosure. Also, it should be noted that FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company may periodically update this document in the future.

If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Mr. Kevin L. Ostrowski, Manager - Regulatory Affairs, at (419) 32 1-8450.

Sincerely yours, GB/DG Attachment Enclosure

Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 1-1323 Page 2 cc: USNRC Document Control Desk J. B. Hopkins, DB-1 NRC/NRR Senior Project Manager C. S. Thomas, DB-1 Senior Resident Inspector Utility Radiological Safety Board

Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 1-1323 Attachment Page 1 of 1 COMMITMENT LIST The following list identifies those actions committed to by the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS) in this document. A n y other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions by the DBNPS. They are described only for information and are not regulatory commitments.

Please notify the Manager - Regulatory Affairs (419-321-8450) at the DBNPS of any questions regarding this document or associated regulatory commitments.

COMMITMENTS DUE DATE None NIA

Docket Number 50-346 License Number NPF-3 Serial Number 1-1323 Enclosure Revision 5 of the Nuclear Operating Business Practice Restart Readiness Review Extended Plant Outage (DBBP-VP-0002)

(57 pages to follow)

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Numbec DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED

&PLANTOUTAGE 05 Page 1 of 57 RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE Approved:

Vice President vI I Approved:Md d+

Ch-erating Officer Effective Date JR " 8

Number NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 2 of 57 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paae I.O PURPOSE....................................................................................................... 3 2.0 APPLICABILITY ............................................................................................. 3 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY......................... ................................................................. 3 4.0 DETAILS ........................................................................................................ 4 ATTACHMENT 1: RESTART READINESS REVIEW INDICATORS ..................... 7 ATTACHMENT 2: PLANT RESTART READINESS REVIEW INDICATOR MATRIX .................................................................................... 9 ATTACHMENT 3: RESTART READINESS REVIEW FOR PLANT SHUTDOWN............................................................................. 12 ATTACHMENT 4: PLANT INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION SHEET ..................13 ATTACHMENT 5: OPERATIONAL READINESS AFFIRMATION FORM.............. 14 ATTACHMENT 6 : CORE CONFIGURATION AFFIRMATION FORM ................... 15 ATTACHMENT 7: REACTOR STARTUP AFFIRMATION FORM .........................16 ATTACHMENT 8 SYSTEM ENGINEEWPROGRAM OWNER READINESS AFFIRMATION FORM .............. .............................................. 17 5 ATTACHMENT 9: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE .................................. 18 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA ................ 20

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002 Tile: Revision: 1 Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 3 of 57 1.o PURPOSE The purpose of this Business Practice is to provide assurance that the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station is ready to restart following the extended plant outage. The framework detailed here establishes a review process for areas not addressed by the Restart Test Plan and DB startup procedures to ensure that Davis-Besses materiel condition, programs and processes, and organization, including the organizations safety culture are ready for plant restart and safe, reliable operation.

2.0 APPLICABILITY This Business Practice applies to the first plant startup following this extended plant outage. It also applies to subsequent startups from this same outage and therefore shall be re-performed if the startup is halted resulting in an entry into a lower mode.

Adherence to this Business Practice is mandatory.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITY The Vice President-Nuclear is responsible for initiating the Restart Readiness Review Process.

Each Section Manager and 0350 Restart List Responsible Individual is responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the reviews performed, actions taken and action plans developed during the review process.

The Section Managers of Plant Engineering and Operations and the Director-Work Management (Maintenance) are responsible for ensuring plant walkdown inspections are conducted prior to power ascension.

The Manager-Operations is responsible for affirming: I ) the Operations Section has completed a review of operational readiness and is ready to support the safe and reliable startup and operation of the plant through the next operating cycle; 2) that the plant is in a condition of materiel readiness to support safe and reliable startup and operation and the operating crews are prepared and ready to startup and operate the plant in a safe and reliable manner through the next operating cycle.

The Supervisor-DB Reactor Engineering is responsible for: 1) following movement of fuel in the reactor core, changes to reactivity control components in the reactor core and/or changes to nuclear instrumentation in the reactor core, verifying that the reactor core is configured to support safe and reliable operation through the cycle.

This affirmation is required prior to installation of the reactor head; 2) prior to reactor startup, verifying that the required conditions exist to support a safe startup and power ascension.

r NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Paae 4 of 57 Each Director is responsible for the final review of the assessment and action plans developed during the review process by the sections in his department.

The Chief Operating Officer is responsible for final approval prior to plant restart.

4.0 DETAILS

1. The review process shall be initiated early enough to ensure it is completed prior to entry into Modes 6, 4 and 2. The review shall be completed by the milestone date as determined by the responsible Shift Outage Director. All Sections and 0350 Checklist Responsible Individuals, shall submit restart readiness reviews by the milestone dates; not all items have to be complete, provided bullet (4) in Step 3 is appropriately addressed.

2. The process consists of the review and assessment of the specified Restart Readiness Review Indicators. The matrix on Attachment 2 designates the minimum indicators from Attachment Ithat are applicable to each Section and/or 0350 Checklist Item. Each Section and 0350 Checklist Responsible Individual, shall address applicable indicators and should participate in the review and assessment of any indicator for which meaningful input can be provided.

3. The methodology for the review process consists of the following steps:

Monitor plant systemlcomponent work activity progress during the outage Monitor emergent worWissues during the outage for shutdown concerns Monitor personnel and administrative issues during the outage for restart concerns Assess Restart Readiness Review Indicators as identified on Attachment 1, as applicable per Attachment 2.

Assess Safety Culture as identified on Attachment 9, Page 18 Identify items to be complete prior to the designated Mode (6,4 or 2) that have not been completed as of the Shift Outage Director milestone date.

Ensure a reference is associated with each incomplete item that addresses completion of that item before needed in that mode.

4. Results of the individual indicator assessments, including the status of action plans to support plant restart, will be indicated on Attachment I,and acknowledged by the signature of the Section Manager or 0350 Checklist Responsible Individual. Indicator assessments should be marked as Final (all conditions are acceptable to support plant restart) or Preliminary (one or more indicators are not currently complete or acceptable and action plans will support

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: I Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 5 of 57 plant restart when complete). Details on incomplete items and the status of action plans to eliminate them shall be attached.

5. The signed original Restart Readiness Review Indicators (Attachment 1) should be provided to the Restart Action Process Administrator at the end of the 5 Readiness meetings for inclusion in the Mode Readiness notebook

6. Restart Readiness Review Indicators shall be reviewed by the Senior Leadership Team and approved by the Vice President-Nuclear or Chief Operating Officer, as

7. Completed Attachments 1 and 3 shall be included with the documentation package assembled in accordance with this Business Practice.

8. Walk down inspections shall be completed prior to power ascension as described in this document and in accordance with EN-DP-01503, System Walkdowns and Plant Engineering Policy PE-02, System Walkdown Checklist. Results of walkdown inspections shall be documented in Attachment 4 and submitted to the on-shift Engineering Manager.

9. The Shift Manager of each crew should:

a. Conduct reasonable and appropriate activities to accomplish the objective of attaining, demonstrating and affirming operational readiness. The Shift Manager should consider the following to support the affirmation of operating crew readiness:

-adequacy of staffing levels, personnel experience and qualification levels.

-assure no uneasiness remains among Operations personnel regarding the Stations ability to operate safely by eliciting any outstanding safety concerns from shift personnel and ensuring that the concerns are resolved.

-completion of appropriate personnel refresher training of shift personnel, including training on plant, procedures and process changes.

-completion of training of shift personnel on the startup and power ascension plan. This training shall include discussion on the expected behavior and characteristics of the core for this startup.

b. Affirm to the best of their knowledge and judgment that the plant is in a condition of materiel readiness to support safe and reliable startup and operation. The Shift Manager should consider the following:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBB P-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 6 of 57

-adequacy of the materiel condition of the plant, including the current status of operator work-arounds, to support safe and reliable restart and operation during the next operating cycle.

-all outage-related temporary fire suppression systems removed and fire protection requirements or commitments ready to support startup.

-temporary modifications, temporary power feeds, removed/MCCs restored, installed temporary power feeds, if applicable, reviewed to ensure they will not affect safety or operations.

c. Complete Attachment 5.

I O . The Supervisor-DB Reactor Engineering shall, following movement of fuel, changes to reactivity control components and/or changes to nuclear instrumentation in the reactor core, verify that the reactor core is configured to support safe and reliable operation through the cycle. This affirmation is required prior to installation of the reactor head. Attachment 6, Core Configuration Affirmation Form, details the required review areas and documents the affirmation.

11, The Supervisor-DB Reactor Engineering, shall, prior to a reactor startup, verify that the required conditions exist to support a safe startup and power ascension.

Attachment 7, Reactor Startup Affirmation Form, details the required review areas and documents that affirmation.

12. Each System Engineer and 0350 Program Owner shall complete Attachment 8, System EngineedPrograrn Owner Readiness Affirmation Form. The System Engineer forms shall be part of the Plant Engineering Manager's presentation for restart readiness. The 0350 Program Owner's form will be used as part of their readiness discussion. Selected systems (System Engineers) will be identified by the Manager-Operations, Manager-Plant Engineering and Plant Manager to be discussed during the Restart Readiness Review Meetings.

Number:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE DBBP-VP-0002 I

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Pane 7 of 57 ATTACHMENT 1: RESTART READINESS REVIEW INDICATORS Page 1 of 2 Plant Section or 0350 Checklist Item Acceptable to support Mode Restart?

Yes/No/NA 1 All assigned outage work activities are complete to support plant restart and operations. This includes a reconfirmationthat previous dispositions of nonconforming conditions or Preventive Maintenance deferrals continue to provide a justification for continued operation. (Attachment 2-a) -

2 Outstanding Operability Evaluations, CR corrective actions and new CRs generated during the shutdown have been evaluated for operability concerns are either closed or determined to have no impact on operability. (Attachment 2-b) -

3 Regulatory and internal commitments have been evaluated for operability concerns or restart restraints and are either closed or determined to have no impact on operability. (Attachment2-c) 4 Housekeeping walkdowns utilizing the guidelines of NG-DB-00215, Material Readiness and Housekeeping Inspection Program are complete. (Attachment 24) 5 The Power Ascension Schedule has been reviewed for accuracy and adequacy ensuring: (Attachment 2-3) a Post maintenance retest and special testing are identified and scheduled correctly with instructions in place.

0 Planned walkdowns are scheduled appropriately 6 Personnel, materials and special test equipment necessary to support power ascension retest and walkdown activities have been identified and availability is ensured during power ascension. (Attachment 2-9 7 Contingency plans are established for immediate response to plan and repair steam leaks or high-risk test failures. (Attachment 2-g) 8 Standing orders have been reviewed for continued applicability and system status sheets completed as required by DB-OP-06911, Pre-Startup Checklist. (Attachment 2-h) 9 Systemwalkdowns have been performed by Plant Engineering and Maintenance, as directed by Operations, to ensure system readiness for restart.

10 Operating Experience reports have been reviewed to ensure no potential operability concerns.

11 Procedure alterationslPCRs are ready for mode change or restart.

12 Work around and burdens identified prior to or during shutdown and not corrected have been confirmed acceptable. (Attachment 24)

1 NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 8 of 57 ATTACHMENT 1: RESTART READINESS REVIEW INDICATORS (Continued)

Page 2 of 2 Plant Section or 0350 Checklist Item Acceptable to support Mode Restart?

Yes/No/NA 13 All Managementand Human Performance Improvement Plan items required for restart are complete. (Attachment 2-j) 14 All 0350 Discovery Action Plan milestones identified as required for restart are complete. (Attachment 2-k) 15 All 0350 ImplementationAction Plan milestones identified as required for restart are complete. (Attachment 2-1) 16 All Section Corrective Action Program Improvement Plan activities required for restart have been validated as ready to support restart. (Attachment 24) 17 All Condition Reports and corrective actions, work orders, modifications (including EWRs and ECRs) categorized as 0350 are completed. (Attachment 2-m, n, 0) 18 All Condition Reports and corrective actions, work orders, and modifications (including EWRs and ECRs) designated as required for restart by the Restart Station Review Board are complete. (Attachment 2-q, r, s) 19 Any required for restart Condition Report or corrective action, work order or modification (including EWRs and ECRs), which cannot be completed prior to restart, has a written exemption from the RSRB. (Attachment 2-u) 20 All pending allegations have been reviewed and determined not to affect the restart of the plant. (Attachment2-v) 21 Integrated Restart Report per NG-VP-00100 signed by the SMT. (Attachment 2-w)

Check one Preliminary: I have reviewed the assessment of the Restart Readiness Review Indicators as indicated above and confirm that the attached plans will support plant restart when complete.

Final: I have reviewed the assessment of the Restart Readiness Review Indicators as indicated above and concur that the current conditions support plant restart.

Section Manager or 0350 Checklist Individual (Please Print Your Name)

Signature: Date Section Manager or 0350 Checklist Individual

ITitle:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

Revision:

DBBP-VP-0002 Page 1

RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 9 of 57 AlTACHMENT 2: PLANT RESTART READINESS REVIEW INDICATOR MATRIX Page 1 of 3 Security X 1 X X Organizational Development Training X X X X Safety X X X X Emergency X x x X Preparedness Other Departments OPIDIWQC x x x X X Supply Chain x x X X Client Services X X Business Services X X Human Resources I x X X

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 10 of 57 ATTACHMENT 2: PLANT RESTART READINESS REVIEW INDICATOR MATRIX Page 2 of 3 0350 CHECKLIST ITEM RESTART READINESS REVIEW INDICATOR MATRIX 0350 Checklist Item

1. Adequacy of Root Cause Determinations- X X X X S. Loehlein, M. Roder, D. Gudger, J. Powers, D. Eshelman, L. Myers'

2. Adequacy of Safety Significant Structures, X X X X X Systems and Components-D. Baker, A.

Stallard, T. Chambers, R. Hovland, J.

O'Neill*

3. Adequacy of Safety Significant Programs--A. X X X McAllister, L. Dohrmann, S. Loehlein, M.

Shepherd, J. Grabnar, R.Farrell, J. Lee, R.

Perry, K. Ostrowski*

4. Adequacy of Organizational Effectiveness X X and Human Performance-R. Fast, J.

Powers'

5. Readiness for Restart-C. Price, F. VonAhn, X R. Hovland, R. Schrauder, A. Stallard, J.

Hirsch*

6. Licensing Issue Resolution-J. Powers, K. X Ostrowski*

7. Confirmatory Action Letter Resolution-L.

Myers, K. Ostrowski"

• Or an approved designated alternate

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number.

DBBP-VP-0002 I

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Pane 11 of 57 ATTACHMENT 2: PLANT RESTART READINESS REVIEW INDICATOR MATRIX Page 3 of 3 REQUIRED FOR RESTART READINESS REVIEW INDICATOR MATRIX v)

.-C0 c .

aPs X

Board 1 Quality Services Employee Concerns X Program Station Review Board X (Plant Operating Review Company Nuclear Review Board I

-t.x 1 Restart Overview Panel I I X

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number.

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 12 of 57 ATTACHMENT 3: RESTART READINESS REVIEW FOR PLANT STARTUP RestarVMode Chancle Recommended By:

5 Plant Manager-Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Date Director-Davis-Besse Nuclear Engineering Date Director-Davis-Besse Work Management Date Director-Davis-Besse Support Services Date Director-Davis-Besse Restart Date Director-Davis-Besse Organizational Development Date RESTART /MODE CHANGE APPROVAL: 5 Vice President-Nuclear Date Chief Operating Officer Date

1I me:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE Paae 13 of 57 ATTACHMENT 4: PLANT INSPECTIONMIALKDOWN DOCUMENTATION SHEET Page 1 of 1 Mode ASSET LABEL:

Or AREA INSPECTED:

NOUN NAME:

LOCAT10N:

DESCRIPTION:

MAINTENANCE TAGWORK ORDER #:

CONDITION REPORT INITIATED (#)

MODE RESTRAINT: -Yes -No 5 SUBMITTED BY: DATERIME I (please print your name)

SIGNATURE:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: -

I Paae RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 14 of 57 ATTACHMENT 5: OPERATIONAL READINESS AFFIRMATION FORM Shift Designator:

Shift Manager:

(Please Print)

Mode Review Summarv:

The Shift Manager should intlial each item below to affirm that he/she and the operating crew have completed the required actions:

Shift staffing levels, including personnel experience and qualification levels, are adequate.

No uneasiness remains among Operations personnel regarding the stations ability to operate safely. All safety concerns have been identified and addressed.

Appropriate refresher training of shift personnel, including training on plant, procedure and process changes, has been completed.

Appropriate training of shift personnel on the startup and power ascension plan, have been completed, including discussions on core behavior and characteristics for this startup.

The materiel condition of the plant, including the current status of operator work-arounds, is adequate to support safe and reliable restart and operation.

Affirmation:

Based upon an evaluation of the considerationsset forth in Details, 4.0, and to the best of my knowledge and judgment, the plant is in a condition of materiel readiness to support the safe and reliable startup and power operation through the next operating cycle and the operating crew is ready to startup and operate the plant in a safe and reliable manner.

Shift Manager:

Print/Signature/Date  ! I Remarks: (Attach a continuation sheet if applicable)

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Paae 15 of 57 ATTACHMENT 6: CORE CONFIGURATION AFFIRMATION FORM Mode Review Summarv:

The Supervisor-DB Reactor Engineering, should initial each item below to a f i m that the required conditions exist following movement of fuel in the reactor core, changes to reactivity control components and/or changes to nuclear instrumentation in the reactor core. This affirmation is required prior to installation of the reactor head.

All new fuel assemblies loaded into the reactor core were inspected, as required, to ensure that the manufacturing and design specifications were met.

All irradiated fuel assemblies present in the reactor core were inspected, as required, and dispositioned as acceptable for operation through the cycle.

No fuet assemblies in the reactor core are known leaking assemblies.

A 10CFR50.59 Reload Safety Evaluation governing reactor core operation has been approved by the Plant Operating Review Committee (PORC)

The reactor core loading has been verified.

All reactivity control components in the reactor core will meet their design functions.

All nuclear instrumentation in the reactor core will meet their design functions.

Affirmation:

Based on my knowledge and judgment, the required conditions exist and the reactor core is configured to support safe and reliable operation through the cycle.

Supervisor-DB Reactor Engineering Print/Signature/Date I I Remarks: (Attach a continuation sheet if appropriate)

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: I Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 16 of 57 ATTACHMENT 7: REACTOR STARTUP AFFIRMATION FORM Mode Review Surnmarv:

The Supervisor-DB Reactor Engineering should initial each item below to affirm that the required conditions exist prior to reactor startup.

Estimated Critical Conditions have been prepared and independently verified.

Preparations are complete for any necessary Low Power Physics Testing (i.e. equipment, procedures, calculations, training)

Personnel are available, as required, to support reactor startup and power ascension to 100%.

Required training has been completed for Nuclear Fuels personnel.

Reactivity plans are available, as required, to support reactor startup and power ascension to 100%. These plans include expectations for reactor behavior with emphasis on any behavior that is different from recent plant operation.

The Core Monitoring System is operable.

All reactivity control systems will meet their design functions.

Sufficient nuclear instrumentation is available to safely startup and operate the reactor core.

There are no outstanding reactivity management issues impacting the safe operation of the reactor core.

Affirmation:

Based on my knowledge and judgment, the required conditions exist and the reactor core is ready to support a safestartup and power ascension.

Remarks: (Attach a continuation sheet if appropriate)

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 17 of 57 ATTACHMENT 8: SYSTEM ENGINEEWPROGRAMOWNER READINESS AFFIRMATION FORM Mode

1. Name of SystemlProgram:

2. The status of the system/program is (For systems, a brief description of the physical status of the system including System Health status and Maintenance Rule status. For programs, a brief status of the program):

3. System/Program is ready for Mode Yes- or No-

4. The system/program is ready for Mode because: (if not ready, skip to #5) 5

5. The system/program is not ready for Mode because:

and the following actions are in place to address these issues:

The system/program will be ready for Mode by: (Date)

6. Items in abnormal status or configuration (workarounds, temporary modifications, Control Room deficiencies) identified and not corrected have been reviewed and determined to be acceptable: Yes- or No- (Attach a list of the above items)

7. Housekeeping issues associated with this system/program have been addressed for Mode  : Yes- or No- (Attach a list of those not resolved)

8. 1 have the following concerns about my system and its readiness for Mode Briefly identify concerns. (The Restart Readiness Review process will not resolve these concerns at the meeting. They should be scheduled for presentation to the Plant Support Center if there is a concern relative to this mode change.)

9. Open CRs, CAS, Work Orders or Engineering modifications required for Mode (Attach a list).

Name: Extension:

(Please Print)

Signature: Date:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002 Tine: Revision: I page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 18 of 57 ATTACHMENT 9: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE Page 1 of 2 ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE Assessment Summaw:

Improving safety culture is a long-term activity that will be constantly monitored by Davis-Besse senior management. For Restart Readiness, it is important to show an improving safety culture. The individual indicators that make up the Commitment Areas may be green, white, yellow or red. Some of the Commitment Areas may be yellow (Policy or Corporate Commitment Area, Plant Management Commitment Area or Individual Commitment Area) however restart will not be approved if any of the three are red.

indicators with corrective actions to identify an existing or new plan for improvement. Corrective Actions may take 5 credit for already existing activities. Red indicator corrective actions will be formally presented to the Senior The criterion for ratings follows in Appendix A. These criteria are guidelines. Management may consider other factors and adjust the ratings accordingly. If other factors are considered, they shall be documented in an attachment to the Rating sheet. The ratings are based on convergent assessment such as: performance indicators, management observations, demonstrated performance during critical plant conditions ad hoc surveys, training and feedback from independent safety culture reviews and Nuclear Quality Assurance Assessments.

Safetv Culture Commitment Area Ratinqs:

Green: all major areas are acceptable with a few minor indicator deviations White: all major areas are acceptable with a few indicators requiring management attention Yellow: all major areas are acceptable with several indicators requiring prompt management action Red: several major areas do not meet acceptable standards and require immediate management action Each Section Manager will provide a Rating sheet (ATTACHMENT 9, Page 19,) with the Final Restart Readiness Indicators. For any individual attribute where only site-wide numbers are available (e.g. 4Cs surveys, ECP etc.), or for any individual attribute not applicable to a section (e.9. operator work-arounds for other than Operations), the Manager will NA that attribute on his backup sheets and that attribute will not be used as part of the site-wide tally for the indicator. At the final Restart Readiness Review meeting for any mode, a site-wide Rating sheet will be prepared by the Management Team using the individual section ratings as a guideline. The final Rating sheet will be signed by the Vice President-Nuclearand maintained with the other Restart Readiness documentation.

Determination of the individual indicator or the commitment area color will be based on the following:

Greater than one red attribute or indicator means the indicator or Commitment Red=O points Area can be no better than yellow. If more than two or 1/3 (whichever is Yellow=l point greater) of the attributes or indicators are red, the indicator or Commitment White=:! points Area shall be red.

Green= 3 points Red = 5.75 Yellow = >.75to 4 . 7 5 White = 21.75 to ~ 2 . 5 Green= 22.5

lrlUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 19 of 57 ATTACHMENT 9: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE Page 2 of 2 Rating Safety Culture Mode Item -

Color

1. Policy or Corporate Commitment Area

a. Policies on Safety Culture and Safety Conscious Work Environment clearly state that safety is a core value and are understood by the organization -

b. Management values are clearly reflected in the Business Plan and are understood by the organization -

c. Resources are available or can be obtained to ensure safe, reliable operations -

d. Self-Assessment is a tool used to monitor, assess and improve our performance -

e. IndependentOversight is a tool used to validate acceptable performance and identify areas for improvement or corrective action -

2. Plant Management Commitment Area -

a. ThGe is a visible commitment to safety: nuclear, industrial, radiologicaland environmental

b. Goals and roles are clear and teamwork is reinforced C. Ownership and accountability is evident

d. Training and Qualificationare valued

e. Commitment to continuous improvement is evident

f. Cross-functional work management and communication

9. Creating an environment of engagement and commitment

3. Individual Commitment Area -

a. Drive for excellence-nuclear assets of people and plant are continuously improved to enhance margins of safety -

b. Questioning attitude--challenges are welcomed -

c. Rigorous work control and prudent approamerforming activities in a quality manner is the standard -

d. Open communications-associates are comfortable in voicing opinions, issues and concerns -

e. Nuclear Professionalism-persistence and urgency in identification and resolution of Problems is prevalent -

I have reviewed the Rating of Safety Culture as indicated above and concur that the current conditions support readiness for mode change.

Section Manager (Please Print Your Name)

Signature: Date Section Manager Adjustments to ratings from the standard criteria should be documented and attached to this page.

+

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: I Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 20 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page I of 38 POLICY COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO STATEMENT OF SAFETY POLICY Policies on Safety Culture and Safety Conscious Work Environment clearly state that safety is a core value and are understood by the organization AlTRlBlJTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN

~ ~~ -

Policy There is no policy. Policy statement is Policy statement Policy statement is statement on issued but only issued and is issued and is Safety Culture' occasionally frequently reinforced continuously reinforced reinforced by by management. by management.

management.

5 Policy There is no policy. Policy statement is Policy statement is Policy statement issued statement on issued but only issued and is and is strong statement Safety occasionally frequently reinforced of safety conscious Conscious reinforced by by management. work environment and Work management. often reinforced.

Environment (SCWE)*

Making Policy statements Policy statements Policy statements Policy statements are employees simply issued as distributed are communicated communicated to aware of policy part of FENOC separately to by at least two employees and statements* Business Plan. employees in memo. means. (e.g., hard emphasized regularly in copy distribution, meetings and face to newsletters, group face communication.

meetings, training, stand down).

Employee Surveydinterviews Surveys/interviews Surveys/interviews Surveydinterviews understanding indicate less than indicate that 70-80% indicate that 80-90% indicate that more than of policies 70% of employees of the employees of employees 90% of employees understandthe understand the understand the understand the policies policies. policies and policies and and consider safety a consider safety a FE consider safety a FE FE value and the value. value. normal way to do business.

Worker Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that understanding less than 85% of between 8590% of between 90-95% of more than 95% of of responsibility workers understand workers understand workers understand workers understand to raise safety their responsibilityto their responsibility to their responsibilityto their responsibility to concerns raise nuclear safety raise nuclear safety raise nuclear safety raise nuclear safety or or quality concerns. or quality concerns. or quality concerns. quality concerns.

I

• Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Senior Management

Title:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

Revision:

DBBP-VP-0002 Page

~ I RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 21 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 2 of 38 POLICY COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO MANAGEMENT VALUES Management values are clearly reflected in the Business Plan and are understood by the organization AlTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Corporate values' There is no There is a There is a corporate There is a corporate corporate level corporate level level statement of level statement of statement of statement of commitment to commitment to safety.

safety values. commitment to safety. FirstEnergy FirstEnergy FirstEnergy safety. management meets management meets 5 management FirstEnergy occasionally with frequently with plant does not management plant personnel to personnel to express its express its meets express its safety safety values.

safety values to infrequentlywith values.

plant personnel. plant personnel to express its safety values.

Statement of There is no The statement of The statement of The statement of mission, vision, statement of Mission, Vision, Mission, Vision, and Mission, Vision, and and values* Mission, Vision, and Values Values places Values emphasizes and Values and places some approximatelyequal safety over production employees weight on safety weight on safety and and profits.

believe focus is but greater production/profits.

on production weight on and profits. production or profits FENOC Business Business Plan Business Plan Business Plan Business Plan contains Ptan' contains no contains few contains Critical Critical Success Area Critical Success Critical Success Success Area Initiatives on safety and Area Initiatives Area Initiatives on Initiatives on safety all are being fully on safety. safety. with implementation implemented.

plans.

incentive program The Safety The Safety The Safety Culture The Safety Culture (FENOC Safety Culture Culture Assessment value is Assessment Value is cunure Assessment Assessment 60-80 points. above 80 points.

Performance value is 40 value is 40-60 Indicator)* points or less. points.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Senior Management

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-~UUZ

_--- I I RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED

Title:

I PLANT OUTAGE I

I Reviston:

05 tpaw

~

I I Paae 22 of 571 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 3 of 38 POLICY COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO RESOURCES Resources are available or can be obtained to ensure safe, reliable operations 1 AlTRlBUTE

~~

RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Adequacy of More than five More than five Five or less All management management manager or above supervisor or supervisor or above positions are filled with resources' positions are not above positions positions are filled ANSI qualified FENOC filled with ANSI are not filled with with ANSI qualified individuals.

qualified FENOC ANSI qualified FENOC individuals.

individuals. FENOC individuals.

Adequacy o f More than four Three or four One or two sections Each section has a full personnel sections do not have sections do not do not have sufficient complement of resources sufficient personnel have sufficient personnel to perform personnel (minus to perform their personnel to their assigned normal attrition) to assigned perform their responsibilities. perform its assigned responsibilities. assigned responsibilities.

responsibilities.

Adequacy o f Necessary activities, A number of Several identified Sufficient funding exists funding'* to improve nuclear identified improvementsto to perform safety, as defined by improvements to nuclear safety, as improvements, as the Senior nuclear safety, as identified by the PRC identified by the PRC in LeadershipTeam identified by the in the plant, plant, programs and and Project Review PRC in the plant, programs, or other other activities to Committee (PRC) programs, or activities, are not improve nuclear safety.

we not being other activities, sompleted in a timely sompleted in a are not manner due to lack of

imelymanner due completed in a 'unding.

o lack of funding timely manner

hatwas requested due to lack of m d rejected by funding.

=ENOC Executive Management.

I

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Human Resources 5 "Site wide assessment only. Data provided by the chairman of the PRC

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 23 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 4 of 38 POLICY COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO RESOURCES (continued)

Resourcesare available or can be obtained to ensure safe, reliableoperations Adequacy of tools, Many necessary A number of Several scheduled Sufficient tools and material and tasks (PMs, scheduled tasks tasks (PMs, Work equipment exist to equipment Work Orders, (PMs, Work Orders, ECRs and perform assigned tasks ECRs and Orders, ECRs projects) are not for PMs, Work Orders, projects) are not and projects) are being completed in a ECRs and projects.

being completed not being timely manner due to in a timely completed in a lack of tools, material manner due to timely manner or equipment.

lack of tools, due to lack of material or tools, material or equipment. equipment.

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 24 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 5 of 38 POLICY COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO SELF-ASSESSMENT Self-Assessment is a toot used to monitor, assess and improveour performance I ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Use of Nuclear Less than 60% of Between 60-75% of Between 7590% of More than 90% of the Quality the sections have the sections have the sections have sections have used Assurance as used NQA as part used NQA as part used NQA as part of NQA as part of the self-part of the self- of the self- of the self- the self-assessment assessment process.

assessment assessment assessment process.

process* process. process.

Self- Less than 50% of Between 5045% of Between 6580% of More than 80% of assessments sections have sections have sections have sections have scheduled self- scheduled self- scheduled self- scheduled self-assessments for assessments for assessments for assessments for 2003-2003 and 2004. 2003-2004. 2003-2004. 2004.

~

Performance Performance A number of Several performance Performance indicators Indicators indicators related performance indicators do not exist and are being to safety and indicators do not exist (or need to be regularly updated for quality do not exist (or need to be improved) for important activities exist. improved) for important activities affecting safety and important activities affecting quality and quality.

affecting quality and safety.

safety.

Personnel The performance The performance The performance The performance Performance appraisal program appraisal program appraisal program appraisal program Appraisals** does not include includes ncludes includes assessments assessments of assessments of xsessments of of safety and quality of 5 safety or quality of safety or quality of safety or quality of performance and the 3erformance. performance but ierformance but appraisals are being most employee some appraisals performed in timely appraisals have not lave not been manner and all been performed. Ierformed in timely employees have a nanner and some current appraisal.

smployees do not lave a current 3ppraisal.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by NQA

-Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Human Resources

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 25 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 6 of 38 POLICY COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO OVERSIGHT Oversight is a tool used to show acceptable performance and identify areas for improvement and corrective actions.

I AlTRlBUTE RED 1 YELLOW WHITE GREEN Nuclear The Nuclear The Nuclear The Nuclear The Nuclear Committee Committee of Committee of the Committee Committee has has safety as a part of Board of Board has little occasionally safety as a part of the agenda every Directors focus on safety in discusses safety the agenda at least meeting.

the agenda. as a topic in the once per quarter.

agenda.

5 Company The CNRB has not The CNRB has not The CNRB has The CNRB has Nuclear Review implemented any implementeda implemented all but implemented the Board (CNRB)+ of the number of the one or two of the recommendationsfrom recornmendations recommendations recommendations the independent from the from the from the assessment of the independent independent independent CNRB.

assessment of the assessment of the assessment of the L

CNRB. CNRB. CNRB. The CNRB agenda has a safety discussion every The CNRB rarely The CNRB The CNRB agenda meeting.

78s a safety agendahasa has a safety assessment safety discussion discussion two out of discussion on the only once per three meetings per agenda. year. year.

Nuclear Quality Assurance W A is not Ierforming audits

' A number of NQA audits or NQA audits or assessments were NQA is regularly performing audits and L

(NQA)'* )r assessments of assessments were performed when assessments of mportant safety not performed required, but several important safety 3ctivities. when required or a important safety activities and identifying number of activities were not key issues for finding.

important safety subject to audits or activities were not assessments.

subject to audits or assessments.

'Site wide assessment only. Data providedby Senior Management

+Site wide assessment only. Data provided by NQA Manager or VP Oversight

• 'This item is assessed by NQA only.

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBB P-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 26 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 7 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO SAFETY There is a visible commitment to safety: nuclear, industrial, radiological and environmental AlTRl BUTE RED YELLOW

~~

WHITE 1 I

GREEN Management There is no There is a There is a There is a observations management management management management performed as observation observation program observation program observation program scheduled' program. and more than 65% and more than 75% and more than 90%

of management are performed as are performed as observations are scheduled. scheduled.

performed as scheduled.

Management Most management More than 50% of More than 75% of the More than 90% of the observations observations are the management management management are seN' not self-critical. observations observations observations critical' performed are self- performed are self- performed are self-critical and critical and corrective critical and corrective corrective actions actions implemented. actions implemented.

implemented.

Management No method has One method has Two means have Multiple means have emphasis on been used in the been used in the last been used in the last been used by safety to last month to month to provide month to provide management in the employees; provide emphasis emphasis on safety emphasis on safety to last month to provide questioning on safety to to employees (e.g., employees (e.g., town emphasis on safety to attitude employees (e.g., town hall meetings, hall meetings, 4 Cs employees (e.9.. town town hall 4 Cs meetings, meetings, hall meetings, 4 Cs meetings, 4 Cs newsletters, and newsletters, and meetings, newsletters, meetings, training). training). and training).

newsletters, and training).

Leadershipin Leadership in Leadership in Action Leadership in Action Leadership in Action Action Action does not includes discussions includes discussions includes discussions include on safety culture on safety culture on safety culture discussions on safety culture Leadership in Action Leadership in Action Leadership in Action training has been training has been training has been Leadership in completed for more completedfor more completed for more 4ction training has than 50% of than 75% of than 90% of not bean available supervisors and supervisors and supervisors and above for most above within 12 above within 12 within 12 months of supervisors and monhs of new months of new new appointment.

above. appointment. appointment.

'Site wide as585 ent only. Data providc by Management Obsen t.Site wide assessment only. Data provi d by Human Resources

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number.

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Paae 27 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 8 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO SAFETY (continued)

There is a visible commitment to safety: nuclear, industrial, radiolog al and environmental Problem solving A problem In several cases, With one or two The problem solving solving process the problem exceptions, the process, NOP-EN-3001 exists but there solving process problem solving has been properly is no use of the NOP-EN-3001 process, NOP-EN- implemented for document. has not been 3001hasbeen applicable conditions.

properly properly implementedfor implemented for applicable applicable conditions. conditions.

Decision making Safety Safety significant Safety significant Safety significant significant decisions are decisions, with few decisions are made with decisions are made with exceptions, are adequate information, made in isolation minimal made with adequate oversight, involvement without information, information, and peer checking.

adequate oversight, oversight, information, involvement and involvement and oversight, peer checking. peer checking.

involvement and peer checking.

Improvements in None of the Most of the Most of the All improvements in safety margin* improvements in improvements in improvements in safety margin are safety margin safety margin are safety margin are complete (e.g.

are complete not complete complete (e.g. emergency sump, cavity 5 (e.9. emergency (e.g. emergency emergency sump, seal, decay heat pit sump, cavity sump, cavity seal, zvity seal, decay modification, seal, decay heat decay heat pit ?eat pit modification, *efurbishmentof reactor pit modification, modification, ?efurbishmentof :oolant pumps, Flus refurbishment of refurbishment of *eactorcoolant nonitors, diesel air reactor coolant reactor coolant ,umps, Flus starting system).

pumps, Flus pumps, Flus nonitors, diesel air monitors, diesel monitors, diesel starting system).

air starting air starting system). system).

~~~

Vant activities Significant plant Condition Significant plant Significant plant eceive proper event occurs Adverse to activities have 3ctivities have a nanagement due to lack of Quality CR nanagement nanagement plan with a 3ttention and management written due to iversight scheduled nanagement sponsor safety focus attention or lack of or the duration of and management safety focus. management he activity. lversight scheduled for attention or lack he duration of the of safety focus. activity.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Outage Management and Work Con

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

D6BP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Paw RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Paae 28 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 9 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO ROLES AND TEAMWORK Goals ind roles are clear Id teamwork is reinfi ced ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Understanding Ad hoc surveys Ad hoc surveys Ad hoc surveys show Ad hoc surveys show that safety is show that less show that 70-80% that 80-90% of that more than 90%

highest priority than 70% of of employees employees of employees employees understands that understands that understand that understand that safety is the highest safety is the highest safety is the highest safety is the priority. priority. priority.

highest priority.

~~ ~ -

Program The majority of Some programs do With one or two All programs have ownership programs do not not have assigned exceptions, all assigned owners. In have assigned owners and many programs have general, program owners and program owners assigned owners. owners are program owners are not With several implementingtheir are not implementingtheir exceptions, program assigned implementing their assigned owners are responsibilities.

assigned responsibilities. implementing their responsibilities. assigned responsibilities.

~

There are no SCAQ Ownership of More than 5% of Between 2 4 % of Less than 2% of remedial and corrective SCAQ remedial SCAQ remedial or SCAQ remedial or preventivecorrective actions and preventive preventive preventive corrective actions overdue and corrective actions corrective actions actions and between less than 2% of CAQ and more than and 510% of CAQ 2-5% Of CAQ remedial and 10% of CAQ remedial and remedial and preventivecorrective remedial and preventive preventivecorrective actions are overdue preventive corrective actions actions are overdue for the previous corrective actions are overdue for the for the previous quarter.

are overdue for previous quarter. quarter.

the previous quarter.

Ownership of The quality of The quality of The quality of The quality of engineering engineering engineering engineering products engineering products products as products as products as as measured by the as measured by the 5 measured by fhe measured by the measured by the EAB is between 2.0 EAB is 1.O or less.

Engineering EAB is greater EAB is between 3.0 and 1.l.

Assessment than 3.0. and 2.1.

Board (EA8 )*

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Director-NuclearEngineering

Number:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: I page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 29 of 57 1

APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 10 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO ROLES AND TEAMWORK (continued)

Goals and roles are clear and teamwork is reinforced Efiectiveness of The individual The individual The individualerror The individual error rate supervision of error rate is error rate is ~0.31 rate is0.29 isc0.26 individual errors individuals' >0.30 individual individual errors individual errors per per 10.000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> errors per per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked.

10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked. worked.

worked.

lntra-department Ad hoc survey Ad hoc survey Ad hoc survey Ad hoc survey indicates teamwork and indicates there is indicates there is indicates alignment alignment and teamwork alignment no alignment minimal is improving and are obvious in all and little alignment and teamwork can be activities at the site.

teamwork some teamwork seen in some key among among activities.

managers. managers.

Expectations There are Although there There are There are statements of statements of are statements of statements of expectations for each expectations for expectations for expectations for section and managers individual some sections, most sections, and are reinforcingand sections but they are weakly they are being ensuring employees employees implemented. implemented. understand and routinely ignore implement them.

them.

Trust, openness 4Cs surveys 4cs surveys 4Cs surveys show 4Cs surveys show more and focused show less than show 50-70% Of 70-90% Of than 90% of employees commitment *' 50% of employees feel employees feel that feel that work groups employees feel that work groups work groups display display high levels of that work groups display high high levels of trust, trust, openness and display high levels of trust, opennessand commitment.

levels of trust, opennessand commitment.

opennessand commitment.

commitment.

'Site wide assessmentonly. Data provided by Human Performance Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Chief Operating Officer

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Paw RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 11 of 38 MANAGERS COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO ROLES AND TEAMWORK (continued)

Goals and roles are clear and teamwork is reinforced Clear goals and No clear goals Goals and Goals and priorities Most employees are priofiies and priorities priorities exist but exist at most levels clear about goals and have been are not and some priorities as well as how established. adequately employees their role contributes to understood and understand and own achieving them.

owned by them.

employees.

Input and No employee Only managers Managers and Employees are involvemeni input and and supervisors supervisors appropriately involved in involvement are involved in occasionally request developing the occurs in the the development inputlinvolvement in department business development of of department the development of plans, setting goals and department business plans, department business establishingwork business plans, setting goals and plans, setting goals priorities.

setting goals establishingwork and establishing and establishing priorities. work priorities.

work priorities.

I NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE I Number:

DBBP-VP-I REST,4RT READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED

Title:

II Revision:

I PLANT OUTAGE 05 I Paae31 of571 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 12 of 38 MANAGERS COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO OWNERSHIP AND ACCOUNTABILITY Ownership and accountability is evident I ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Performance Less than 70% of Between 70-80% Between 80-90% of More than 90% of appraisals Performance of performance performance performance appraisals appraisals are appraisals are appraisals are are completed on completed on completed on completed on schedule.

schedule. schedule. schedule.

Development Less than 70% of Between 70-80% Between 80-90% of More than 90% of plans managers and of managers and managers and managers and supervisors have supervisors have supervisors have supervisors have development development development plans. development plans.

plans. plans.

Restart There is no A restart A restart readiness A restart readiness Readiness restart readiness readiness review review process review process exists review process. process exists exists and is and is implemented but implemented with efficiently and with implementation is the majority of strong management poor as shown by management participation.

lack of participation.

management participation.

Worker Surveys indicate Surveys indicate Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that understandingof that less than that between 80- between 90-95% of more than 95% of their responsibility 80% of workers 90% of workers workers understand workers understand their to raise safety understand their understandtheir their responsibilityto responsibilityto raise concerns responsibility to responsibility to raise nuclear safety nuclear safety or quality raise nuclear raise nuclear or quality concerns. concerns.

safety or quality safety or quality concerns. concerns.

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

~~ __

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 32 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 13 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO OWNERSHIP AND ACCOUNTABILITY Willingness to Surveys show Surveys show Surveys show that Surveys show that more raise safety that less than that between 85- between 90-95% of than 95% of personnel concerns 85% of personnel 90% of personnel personnel are willing are willing to raise safety are willing to are willing to to raise safety concerns through their raise safety raise safety concerns through supervisor, a CR or concerns through concerns through their supervisor, a ECP.

their supervisor, a their supervisor, a CR or ECP.

CR or ECP. CR or ECP.

SRO reviews for Less than 80 % Between 80-85% Between 8595% More than 95% were Operability are were completed were completed were completed completed within 24 performed in a within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. hours.

timely manner*

'This item assessed by Operations only

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number.

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 33 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 14 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO OWNERSHIP AND ACCOUNTABILITY (continued)

Ownership and accountability is evident Sysfem None of the Most of the Most of the The improvements in assessments* improvements in improvements in improvements in safety are complete (e.g.

safety are safety are not safety are complete emergency sump, cavity complete (e.g. complete (e.g. (e.g. emergency seal, decay heat pit emergency emergency sump, cavity seal, modification, 5 sump, cavity sump, cavity seal, decay heat pit refurbishmentof reactor seal, decay heat decay heat pit modification, coolant pumps, Flus pit modification, modification, refurbishment of monitors, diesel air refurbishment of refurbishment of reactor coolant starting system).

reactor coolant reactor coolant pumps, Flus pumps, Flus pumps, Flus monitors, diesel air monitors, diesel monitors, diesel starting system).

air starting air starting system). system).

NQA field NQA field NQA field NQA field NQA field assessments assessments ** assessments assessments assessments show show that managers and show that show that that managers and supervisors are managers and managers and supervisors are generally effective.

supervisors are supervisors are generally effective, generally generally with a few ineffective. effective, with exceptions.

several noteworthy exceptions.

Management Less than 50% Between 50-74% Between 7549% of More than 90% of 3bservations of management of management management has management has held a

'eading to has held a has held a held a coaching coaching session in the

oaching coaching coaching session session in the last last month.

session in the in the last month. month.

last month.

Timeliness of Less than 50% Between SO% Between 75% and More than 90% of my

orrective actions of my section's and 74% of my 89% of my section's section's corrective corrective section's corrective actions actions designated as actions corrective actions designated as required for restart, are designated as designated as required for restart, complete.

required for required for are complete.

restart are restart are mmplete. complete.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Outage Management and Work Control

" This Item assessed by NQA only

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Paw RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 34 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 15 of 38 MANAGERS COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION Training and Qualification are valued ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Supervisory Most supervisors Between 50-74% Between 75439% of More than 90% of evaluations and managers of supervisors supervisors and supervisors and have not been and managers managers have been managers have been 5 evaluated to have been evaluated to assess evaluated to assess assess their evaluated to their competence for their competence for competence for assess their their current their current positions.

their current competence for positions.

positions. their current positions.

Restart training Most required Between 50-74% Between 7599% of 100% of required restart training is of required restart required restart restart training is not complete. training is training is complete. complete.

complete.

Initial Operator Less than 70% of Between 70-84% Between 85-95% of More than 95% of new training** new operators of new operators new operators operators passed their passed their passed their passed their initial initial license initial license initial license for license examination examination for the examination for the most recent for the most recent most recent class. 5 the most recent class class.

class. examination.

~~~

Qequalification Less than 70% of Between 70-84% Between 85-95% of Wore than 95% of the raining** licensed of the licensed the licensed icensed operators have operators have operators have operators have iassed their passed their passed their passed their squalification training.

requalification requalification requalification training. training. training.

Poof cause Less than 50% of Between 50% Between 75% and More than 90% of root raining root cause and 74% of root 89% of root cause m s e evaluation evaluation cause evaluation evaluation personnel )ersonnel have personnel have personnel have have received training ,eceived training on received training received training on TapRoot. rapRoot.

on TapRoot. on TapRoot, Site wide assessment only. Data providedby Human Resources T h i s item assessed by Operations only

Number:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE DBBP-VP-0002 Titie: Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED I PLANT OUTAGE I 05 1 Page 35 of 571 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 16 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION (continued)

Training and Qualification are valued

~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~

Operability Less than 50% of Between 50-74% Between 7590% of More than 90% of determination applicable of applicable applicable operators applicable operators training* operators and operators and and engineers have and engineers have engineers have engineers have received training on received training on received training received training operability operability on operability on operability determinations. determinations.

determinations. determinations.

Training on Less than 70% of Between 70-79% Between 80-89% of More than 90% of SC WE ** managers, of managers, managers, managers, supervisors, supervisors, and supervisors, and supervisors, and and operators have operators have operators have operators have received training on received training received training received training on SCWE.

on SCWE. on SCWE. SCWE.

Training on Less than 70 % Between 70-80% Between 80-90% of More than 90% of decision making of applicable of applicable applicable personnel applicable personnel process'* personnel have personnel have have received training have received training received training received training on the decision on the decision making on the decision on the decision making process. process.

making process. making process.

Training on Less than 70% of Between 7040% Between 80-90% of More than 90% of standards and applicable of applicable applicable personnel applicable personnel expectations personnel have personnel have have received training have received training received training received training on standards and on standards and on standards and on standards and expectations. expectations.

expectations. expectations.

Continuing Less than 70% of Between 70-80% Between 80-90%of More than 90% of training identified scheduled of scheduled scheduled training scheduled training by Cumculum training identified training identified identified by the CRC identified by the CRC is Review by the CRC is by the CRC is is completed in a completed in a timely Committee completed in a completed in a timely manner. manner.

(CRC)** timely manner. timely manner.

'This item assessed by Operations and Engineeringonly "Site wide assessment only. Data provided by NuclearTraining

ITitle:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

Revision:

DBBP-VP-0002 Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED

,PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 36 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 17 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Commitment to continuous improvement is evident ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Improvements in Most requisitions About 50% of About 75% of open At least 85% of open management for management open requisitions requisitions for requisitions for staffing' positions have not for management management management positions been filled in the positions have positions have been have been filled in the 5 past month. been filled in the filled in the past past month.

past month. month.

Restart Overview The ROP does The ROP has The ROP has The ROP is satisfied Panel (ROP)*' not believe DB is expressed expressed some with DB progress to ready to restart. concerns over DB minor concerns and restart.

restart. believes DB can restart.

Corrective Action There are no The CARB has The CARB has been The CARB has been Review Board directors on the been enhanced enhanced with enhanced with director-(CARB)+ CARB. with director-level director-level level personnel.

personnel. personnel.

The backlog of The backlog of documents The backlog of The backlog of documents awaiting awaiting CARB documents documents awaiting CARB review is less review is more awaiting CARB CARB review is less than one week.

than four weeks. review is less than two weeks.

than four weeks.

Engineering The backlog of The backlog of The backlog of The backlog of Assessment documents documents documents awaiting documents awaiting Board (AB)++ awaiting EAB awaiting EAB EAB review is less EAB review is less than review is greater review is less than two weeks. one week.

than four weeks. than four weeks.

I Benchmarking Less than 60% of Between 60-74% Between 7589% of More than 90% of the against industry the programs of the programs the programs have programs have been standards have been have been been benchmarked benchmarked against benchmarked benchmarked against industry industry standards.

against industry against industry standards.

standards. standards.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Human Resources "Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Chief Operating Officer or Executive Vice President 5

+Site wide assessment only. Data providedby Performance Improvement

++Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Director-Nuclear Engineering

Title:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number.

Revision:

DBBP-VP-0002 Page 1

RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 37 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 18 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRtTERlA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (continued)

Commitment to continuous improvement is evident Operator crew Less than 50% of Between 50 - Between 75 - 90% of More than 90% of the benchmarking' the operators 74% of the the operators have operators have visited have visited other operators have visited other plants to other plants to plants to visited other benchmark Davis- benchmark Davis-benchmark Davis- plants to Besse operations. Besse operations.

Besse operations. benchmark 5 Davis-Besse operations.

Management A management A management A management A management obsetvations** ObseNation observation observation program observation program program has been program has has been established. has been established.

established. Less been established. More than 80% of More than 90% of than 70% of More than 70% of management management management management observations are observations are observations are observations are performed as performed as performed as performed as scheduled and most scheduled and contain scheduled, and scheduled, and are considered quality information.

Dbservations are observations are acceptable.

ueak. weak.

Temporary There are more There are 11 or There are 8 or less There are 5 or less modifications+ han I 1 temporary less temporary temporary temporary modifications. modifications. modifications. modifications.

Number of rhere are more There are 2 There is 1 operator There are no operator Operator work- han 2 operator Dperator uorkarounds. workarounds.

arounds* workarounds. uorkarounds.

~~

Vumber of rhere are more There are 4 There are 1-3 Control There are no Control Control Room han 4 Control 2ontrol Room ioom deficiencies. Room deficiencies.

3e ficiencies' ioom jeficiencies.

ieficiencies.

This item assessed by Operations only "Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Management Observation program

+Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Engineering

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002 TiUe: Revision:

RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 19 of 38 MANAGERS COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT(continued)

Commitment to continuous improvement is evident Training on Less than 70% of Between 70-79% Between 80-90% of SCWE managers, of managers, managers, managers, supervisors supervisors and supervisors and supervisors and and operators have operators have operators have operators have received training on 5

received training received training received training on SCWE.

on SCWE. on SCWE. SCWE.

~~

Licensed Less than 70% of Between 7044% Between 8545% of More than 95% of new operator new operators of new operators new operators operators passed their pipeline

• passed their initial passed their passed their initial initial license license initial license for license examination examination for the examination for the most recent for the most recent most recent class.

the most recent class class.

class. examination.

I Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Nuclear Training This item assessed by Operations only.

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: . I Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 39 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 20 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT(continued)

Commitment to continuous improvement is evident SAFETY CONSCIOUS WORK ENVIRONMENT (SCWE)

CRITERIA RELATED TO SCWE REVIEW TEAM (SCWERT)

AITRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN use of More than 4 CRs Between 4-2 CRs Less than 2 CRs No CRs issued within SCWERT' issued within the issued within the issued within the past the past year related to past year related past year related year related to failure failure to properly 5 to failure to to failure to to properly conduct conduct SCWERT properly conduct properly conduct SCWERT review of review of Davis-Besse SCWERT review SCWERT review Davis-Besse work work disciplinary of Davis-Besse of Davis-Besse disciplinary actions actions prior to the work disciplinary work disciplinary prior to the action. action.

actions prior to actions prior to the action. the action.

Effectiveness of There are more There are 5 NRC There are 4 NRC There are 2 or fewer SCWERT in than 5 NRC allegations or allegations or ECP NRC allegations or avoiding allegations or ECP concerns of concerns of ECP concerns of discrimination ECP concerns of discrimination discrimination discrimination claims* discrimination submitted within submitted within the submitted within the submitted within the past year. past year. past year.

the past year.

Effecfiveness in There is more There is one There are no There are no avoiding NRC or than one substantiated substantiated NRC or substantiated NRC or ECP substantiated NRC or ECP ECP discrimination ECP discrimination substantiated NRC or ECP discrimination claims within the past claims within the past 2 discrimination discrimination claim within the year. years.

claims+ :laim within the past year.

3ast year.

• Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Employee Concerns Program

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: I Paw RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 40 of 57 APPENDfX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page21 of38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO CROSS-FUNCTIONAL WORK MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION Commitment to cross functional work management and communication is evident I ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Cross-functional No cross-functional Some cross- Cross-functional Cross-functional teamwork teamwork is functional teamwork frequently teams are constantly evident. teamwork exists occurs, enabling formingheforming L--

Department interfaces Many process breakdowns occur but work is sub-optimized.

Some process breakdowns occur efficient and effective workflow.

Minimal process breakdowns and around the best way to get work done.

Department interfaces are seamless; work with extensive with frequent rework occur with flows efficiently amounts of rework amounts of rework effective and efficient between departments needed. needed. resolution of throughout the entire emergency issues. organization.

I performance to Less than 70% of Between 70-80% Between 80 -90% of More than 90% of schedule* work is completed of work is work is completed on work is completed on on time, as completed on time, as scheduled, time, as scheduled, 5 scheduled, causing time, as with minimal within current resource major scheduled, with adjustments to capacity.

consequences to major adjustments resource capacity overall site to resource required to improve performance. capacity required performance.

to improve performance.

Interdepartmental Informationthat Information that Information that Informationthat communication impacts impacts impacts downstream impacts downstream downstream downstream implementation is implementation is implementation is implementation is frequently shared on a mmmunicated as not shared, causing inconsistently timely basis, enabling soon as it's known, significant negative shared, which department to Enabling all consequencesto keeps proactively plan and jepartments to work other departments. departments in a respond. xoactively on a

?eactivemode. mnsistent basis.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Outage Management and Work Control

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: I Paw RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 1 05 Paae 41 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 22 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO CROSS-FUNCTIONALWORK MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION (continued)

Commitment to cross functional work management and communication is evident

~

lnterdepartmentai Problem solving Cross-functional Cross-functional Cross-functional problem solving and decision stakeholders are stakeholders are stakeholders are and decision making occurs in seldom involved frequently involved consistently involved making isolation; non- when problems when problems are when problems are involvement of are being solved being solved and being solved and other department and decisions are decisions are made. decisions are made.

stakeholders. made.

Systemic learning Things are broken Discrete problems Attention is focused Streamlining and down, focus is on are fixed with on learning and improving systems the pieces and minimal discovering and process is discrete problems understandingof fundamental constant to resolve are fixed with no interdependencies solutions to resolving long-standing andlor understanding of long-standing andlor complex problems.

interdependencies. complex problems.

Incorporating Industry operating There is less than There is full 3perating Experience industry experience is not full implementation compliancewith the s consistently and Operating actively evaluated and minimal Operating fully utilized in every 5 Experience* and used to compliance to our Experience jepartment and is enhance site Operating Program. ivell integrated into performance. Experience sveryday activities to Program. mhance plant ierformance.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Operating Experience Program

Number:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Paw RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 42 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 23 of 38 MANAGERS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO CREATING AN ENVIRONMENT OF ENGAGEMENT AND COMMITMENT An environment of engagement and commitment is evident I

~~ ~

AITRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN FENOC values, FENOC values, FENOC values, FENOC values, basic Most management basic principles basic principles and basic principles principles and personnel have and leadership leadership and leadership leadership strategies internalized and are strategies strategies are not strategies are are frequently living the FENOC used by inconsistently demonstrated by some values, basic management demonstrated by management principles and personnet. some personnel. leadership strategies management as demonstrated in personnel. their day to day actions.

Quality of Employee Employee Employees Concerns Employee Concerns management and Concerns Program, Concerns Program, Quality Program, Quality employee Quality Assessment Program, Quality Assessment and 4Cs Assessment and 4Cs Assessment and survey data indicates survey data indicate 5 relatiofiships* and 4Cs survey data indicates that 4Cs survey data that more than 80% of more than 90% of employees openly indicates that employees will bring employees raise express fear of more than 70% concerns to issues directly with retaliation and will of employees management. management, work not raise safety will bring safety collaboratively to concerns with concerns to resolves issues and management. management. reflect favorable improvement.

Organizational Management Management Management Management commitment and focuses on what is occasionally frequently supports consistently supports shared success in the best interest supports what is doing what is in the doing what is in the criteria of their department in the best best interest of the best interest for the at the expense of interest of their whole organization whole organization what is in the best department rather than what is in rather than what is in interest of the without the best interest of the best interest for whole organization. consideration to their department. their department.

what is in the best interest of the whole organization.

I

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by ECP, NQA and 4Cs

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number: 1

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 I Paae 43 of 571 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 24 of 38 MANAGERS COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO COMMITMENT TO CREATING AN ENVIRONMENT OF ENGAGEMENT AND COMMITMENT (continued)

An environment of engagement and commitment is evident Ownership for Less than 70% of Between 70-80% Between 80-90% of More than 90% of Excellence performance of performance performance performance Performance appraisals are appraisals are appraisals are appraisals are Appraisals completed on completed on completed on completed on schedule. schedule. schedule. schedule.

Ownership for Less than 70% of Between 70-80% Between 80-90% of More than 90% of Excellence managers and of managers and managers and managers and Development supervisors have supervisors have supervisors have supervisors have Plans development plans. development development plans. development plans.

plans.

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 25 of 38 INDIVIDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO DRIVE FOR EXCELLENCE Nuclear assets of people and plant are continuously improved to enhance margins of safety AlTRlBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Maintenance Rule There are more There are 2 Red There is one Red There are zero Red (a)(1) Systems than 3 Red (a)(l) systems. (a)(l)system. (a)(l) systems.

(a)(l) systems. 5 Number of There are more There are 2 There is 1 operator There are no operator Operator than 2 operator operator workarounds. workarounds.

workarounds*' workarounds. workarounds.

~~~ ~~ ~

Number of Control There are more There are 4 There are 1-3 There are no Control Room than 4 Control Control Room Control Room Room deficiencies.

deficiencies" Room deficiencies. deficiencies.

deficiencies.

Number of There are more There are 11 or There are 8 or less There are 5 or less temporary than 11 less temporary temporary temporary modifications.

modifications+ temporary modifications. modifications.

modifications.

Individual Error The individual The individual The individual error The individual error rate Rate++ error rate is error rate is rate is ~ 0 . 2 9 is ~0.26 individual errors

> 0.30 individual -=0.3lindividual individual errors per per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> errors per errors per 10,000 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked.

10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> hours worked. worked.

worked.

• Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Plant Engineering T h i s item assessed by Operations only

+Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Engineering

++Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Human Performance

Number:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Paae 45 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 26 of 38 I NDlVlDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO DRIVE FOR EXCELLENCE (continued)

Nuclear assets of people and plant are continuously improved to enhance margins of safety Percent of self- Less than 80% of 80% or more of 90% or more of the 95% or more of the CRs identified the CRs the CRs CRs originated are originated are self-Condition Repods originated are originated are self-identified. identified. 5 (CRs)' self-identified. self-identified, Number of open Less than 80% of At least 80-90% At least 90% of All SCAQ evaluations Condition Report SCAQ of SCAQ SCAQ evaluations and 90% of CAQ evaluations' evaluations and evaluations and and 80-90% of CAQ evaluations were less than 70% of 7040% O f CAQ evaluations were completed on schedule CAQ evaluations evaluations were completed on for the previous quarter.

I were completed completed on schedule for the on schedule for schedule for the previous quarter.

the previous previous quarter.

quarter.

~~ ..~

Engineering The quality of The quality of The quality of The quality of Assessment engineering engineering engineering engineering products as Board (EAB) products as products as products as measured by the AI3 is index** measured by the measured by the measured by the 1.O or less.

EA6 is greater EAB is 3.0 or EAB is 2.0 or less.

than 3.0. less.

Performance More than one One significant Major plant Major plant evolutions during major plant significant event event has evolutions have have been performed in evolutions+ has occurred occurred during a been performed in the past month as during a plant plant evolution in the past month with planned.

evolution in the the past month some less than past month significant challenges or transients.

Operational trans nt is defined by INPO as a plant transient that occurs (reactor critical or while shutdown) and results in significant changes in primary or secondary plant parameters or results in significant changes in mechanical or electrical lineups.

Significant is defined by INPO as an event which caused or had the potential to cause an appreciable reduction in plant safety or reliability, excessive radiation exposure, the discharge of radioactivity offsite or serious harm to individuals. The significance of a particular event (including the discovery of a serious deficiency, lies in the actual or potential consequences of the event or in the likelihood that it is a precursor to a more serious event.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Performance Improvement

+Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Director-Nuclear Engineering 5

+Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Operations

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUStNESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: I Page RESTART READINESS REV1EW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 46 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 27 of 38 INDIVIDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO QUESTONING ATTITUDE C allenges are welc ned I ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Management Management Management Management observations and QA observations and observations and QA observations and field observations QA field field observations QA field show that most pre-job observations show show that, with some observations show 5 briefs are not that most pre-job exceptions, pre-job that pre-job briefs in acceptable. briefs are briefs are acceptable. general are acceptable. acceptable.

Percent of CRs Less than 13% of Between 13-15% Between 15-17% of More than 17% of per person per individualswrote CRs of individuals individuals wrote CRs individuals wrote group** during the past 30 wrote CRs during during the past 30 CRs during the past days. the past 30 days. days. month.

The number of The number of The number of The number of programmatic programmatic CRs programmatic CRs programmatic CRs programmatic CRs CRs** indicates that indicates that most indicates that a large indicates that individuals in general individuals are majority of individuals individuals in are reluctant to write willing to write CRs are willing to write general are willing CRs on programmatic on programmatic CRs on to write CRs on and management and management programmatic and programmatic and issues. issues. management issues. management issues.

Program and >0.48 program and <0.48 program <0.30 program and ~ 0 . 2 7program process error process errors per and process errors process errors per and process errors rate+ 10.000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked. per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> 10.000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked. per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked. worked.

Management Management Management Management observations and NQA observations and observations and observations and field observations NQA field NQA field NQA field show that most observations show observations show observations show individuals are not that most that a large majority that individuals in raising problems individuals are of individuals are general are raising encountered in the raising problems raising problems problems field. encountered in the encountered in the encountered in the field. field. field.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Management Observation Program and NQA.

• 'Site wide assessment only. Data pmvided by Performance Improvement

+Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Human Performance

I Number:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 47 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 28 of 38 INDIVIDUALS COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO RIGOROUS WORK CONTROL AND PRUDENT APPROACH Performing activities in a quality manner is the standard I ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Event Free Clock* The event free The event free The event free clock The event free clock is clock is less clock is between is 30 to 39 days on greater than 40 days on 5 than 20 days on 20 and 30 days average. average.

average. on average.

Industrial safety There are more There are There are 7 OSHA There are no more than performance** than 10 OSHA between 10 and 8 recordables per 3 OSHA recordables per recordables per OSHA year. year.

year. recordables per year.

I Individual error The individual The individual The individual error rate is c0.29 The individual error rate is ~0.26 individual errors rate

• error rate is error rate is

>0.30individual c0.31 individual individual errors per per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> errors per errors per 10,000 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked.

10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> hours worked. worked.

worked.

Program and >0.48 program ~ 0 . 4 8program c.30 program and ~0.27program and process error rate and process and process process errors per process errors per errors per errors per 10,000 10,000hours 10,000hours worked.

10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> hours worked. worked.

worked.

Significant human There are more There are fewer There are fewer than There were no performance than 3 significant than 3 significant 2 significant human significant human errors resulting in human human performance errors performance errors per plant transients performance performance per year resulting in year resulting in plant (see page 43 for errors per year errors per year plant transients. transients.

definition of resulting in plant resulting in plant transient)* transients. transients.

Backlog of There are more There are less There are less than There are less than100 procedure change than 200 open than 200 open 150 open PCRs. open PCRs.

requests (PCRs)+ PCRs. PCRs.

c 1 Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Human Performance Site wide assessment only. Data provided by IndustrialSafely

+Site wide assessment only. Data providedby Performance fmprovement

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 48 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 29 of 38 INDIVIDUALS COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO RIGOROUS WORK CONTROL AND PRUDENTAPPROACH (continued)

Performing activities in a quality manner is the standard Deficiency rate for Deficiency rate The deficiency The deficiency rate The deficiency rate for QCho/ds* for QC hold rate for QC hold for QC holds point is QC hold points is less points is more points is less than less than 15 %. than 7 %.

than 25%. 25%.

Rework rate** Rework rate is The rework rate The rework rate is The rework rate is more than 3%. is 2.5-3.0%. 2.1-2.5%. -<2.0%. 5 Ratio of completed Less than 50% More than 50% of More than 75% of More than 90% of to scheduled of scheduled scheduled work scheduled work scheduled work orders works orders per work orders are orders are orders are are completed.

week+ completed. completed. completed.

~ _ _ _ _ ~

Number of late Less than 50% More than 50% of More than 75% of More than 90% of preventive of scheduled scheduled PMs scheduled PM are scheduled PMs are maintenance (PM) work orders are are completed. completed. completed.

activities+ completed.

Backlog of There are more There are There are between There are less than 134 corrective than 230 CM between 229 and 149 and 134 CM CM activities maintenance (CM) activities 150 CM activities activities outstanding.

activities+ outstanding. outstanding. outstanding.

Number of There are more There are 2 Red There is one Red There are zero Red Maintenance Rule than 3 Red (a)(l) systems. are one or two (a)( 1) (a)(l) systems.

(a)(7) systems++ (a)(l) systems. systems.

Performance More than one One significant Major plant Major plant evolutions during major plant significant event event has evolutions have have been performed as evolutions.(see has occurred occurred during a been performed with planned. There are no page 43 for during a plant plant evolution in some transients or transients or significant definitions)@ evolution in the the past month. one significant event events during major past month. There are three during major plant plant evolutions prior to There are more or fewer evolutions prior to restart.

than three transients during restart.

transients during major plant major plant evolutions prior to evolutions prior restart.

to restart.

This item assessed y QC only.

This item assessed by Maintenance only

+Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Outage Managementand Work Control

++Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Plant Engineering Q Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Operation

I Tine:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

Revision:

DB BP-VP-0002 Page 1

RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 49 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 30 of 38 INDIVlDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO RIGOROUS WORK CONTROL AND PRUDENT APPROACH (continued)

Performing activities in a quality manner is the standard

~

Use ofprocedures Management Management Management Management and work orders* observations and observations and observations and observations and NQA NQA field NQA field NQA field field observations observations observations show observations show show that individuals show that most that most that a large majority in general are using individuals are individuals are of individuals are procedures or work not using using procedures using procedures or orders.

procedures or or work orders. work orders.

work orders.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by ManagementObservation Program and NQA

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002 Tine: Revision: I Pam-RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE I 05 Paae 50 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 31 of 38 INDlVlDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO OPEN COMMUNICATIONS 2 in voicing opinions, ssues and concerns ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Number of CRs per Less than 13% of Between 13-15% of . Between 15-17% of More than 17% of person per group individuals wrote CRs individuals wrote CRs individuals wrote individuals wrote during the past 30 during the past 30 CRs during the past CRs during the past days. days. 30 days. 30 days.

Ratio of concerns There are more NRC There are more ECP There are at least 4 There are at least 8 submitted lo allegations than ECP concerns than NRC times more ECP times more ECP 5 Employee Concerns concerns. allegations. concerns than NRC concerns than NRC Program (ECP) vs. allegations. allegations.

NRC allegations"

~

Worker confidence in Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that raising safety less than 80% of between 80-90% of between 90-95% of more than 95% of concerns workers believe they workers believe they workers believe they workers believe they can raise nuclear can raise nuclear can raise nuclear can raise nuclear safety or quality safety or quality safety or quality safety or quality concerns without fear concerns without fear concerns without concerns without of retaliation. of retaliation. fear of retaliation. fear of retaliation.

Feedback from 4Cs Feedback from the Feedback from the Feedback from the Feedback from the meetings+ 4Cs meetings 4Cs meetings 4Cs meetings 4Cs meetings indicates that most indicates that more indicates that more indicates that more individuals are not than 70% of than 80% of than 90% of willing to raise individuals are willing individuals are individuals are concerns to to raise concerns to willing to raise willing to raise management. management. concerns to concerns to management. management.

Keep Improving Each month's total Each month's total Each month's total Each months total Performance (KIP) Safe behavior is 59% Safe behavior is 60% Safe behavior is Safe behavior is program++ or less. to 69%. 70% to 79%. 80% or higher.

~ ~~~

Pre-job briefings@ Management Management Management Management observations and QA observations and QA observations and observations and field observations field observations QA field QA field show that most pre- show that most pre- observations show observations show job briefs are not job briefs are that, with some that pre-job briefs in acceptable. acceptable. exceptions, pre-job general are briefs are acceptable.

acceptable.

~~

• Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Performance improvement "Site wide assessment only, Data provided by EmployeeConcerns Program

+Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Chief Operating Officer

++sitewide assessment only. Data provided by industrial Safety

@site wide assessment only. Data providedby Management Observation Program and NQA

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002 Tltle: Revision: I Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 51 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 32 of 38 INDIVIDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO OPEN COMMUNICATIONS (continued)

Associates are comfortable in voicing - o inions, issues and concerns

~~

Intra-department No formal Infrequent Formal Formal communication information communication information communication structures exist and are sharing structures exist sharing exists structures exist and consistently used to for sharing within are occasionally used share informationwithin information departments. to share information departments.

within within departments.

departments.

Quality of 4Cs surveys 4Cs surveys 4Cs surveys indicate 4Cs surveys indicate communication* indicate less indicate 40-70% 70-90% believe more than 90% believe than 40% believe communication is communication is good. 5 believe communication is good.

communication good.

is good.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Chief Operating Officer

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: -

I Pam RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 52 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 33 of 38 INDIVIDUALS' COMMITMENTAREA CRITERIA RELATED TO OPEN COMMUNICATIONS SAFETY CONSCIOUS WORK ENVIRONMENT (SCWE) 1IA RELATED TO R SING CONCERNS WITHOUT FEAR OF E TALIAT10N I

RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN

~~

Employee Surveyslinterviews Surveyslinterviews Surveyslinterviews Surveyslinterviews awareness of indicate that less than indicate that 80-90% of indicate that 90-95% indicate that more thar SC WE policy 80% of employees employees are aware of employees are 95% of employees are are aware of policy. of policy and consider aware of policy and aware of policy and it a FE value. consider it an FE consider it an FE value value. and the normal way to do business.

Training on Less than 70% of Between 7079% of Between 80-89% of More than 90% of SCWE + managers, managers, managers, managers, supervisors, and supervisors, and supervisors, and supervisors, and operators have operators have operators have operators have received training on received training on received training on received training on SCWE. SCWE. SCWE. SCWE.

Ratio ot There are less than 2 There are at least 2 There are at least 4 There are at least 8 concerns times more NRC times more ECP times more ECP times more ECP submitted to allegations than ECP concerns than NRC concerns than NRC concerns than NRC ECPvs. NRC concerns. allegations. allegations. allegations.

allegations**

NQA interviews+ NQA interviews NQA interviews NQA interviews NQA interviews indicate that less than indicate that between indicate that indicate that more than 85% of individuals are 8590% of individuals between 90-95% of 95% of individuals are willing to raise are willing to raise Individualsare willing to raise concerns to their concerns to their willing to raise wncerns to their supervisors or ECP. supervisors or ECP. concerns to their supervisors or ECP.

supervisors or ECP.

Worker Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that Surveys indicate that confidence in less than 80% of between 80-90% of between 90-95% of more than 95% of raising safety workers believe they workers believe they workers believe they Norkers believe they Concerns can raise nuclear can raise nuclear can raise nuclear =n raise nuclear safety or quality safety or quality safety or quality safety or quality concerns without fear concerns without fear concerns without mncerns without fear Df retaliation. of retaliation. fear of retaliation. )f retaliation.

'Site wide assessment only. Data providedby Nuclear Training "Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Employee Concerns Program

+Site wide assessment only. Data provided by NQA

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: I paw RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 53 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 34 of 38 INDIVIDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO OPEN COMMUNICATIONS SAFETY CONSCIOUS WORK ENVIRONMENT (SCWE)

CRITERIA RELATED TO EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM (ECP) 1 ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Ratio of concerns There are more There are more There are at least 4 There are at least 8 submitted to ECP NRC allegations ECP concerns times more ECP times more ECP vs. NRC than ECP than NRC concerns than NRC concerns than NRC allegations' concerns. allegations. allegations. allegations. 5 Satisfaction of Less than 70% of Between 70-80% Between 80-90% of More than 90% of employees using employees that of employees that employees that use employees that use the the ECP* use the ECP use the ECP the ECP report being ECP report being report being report being satisfied with the satisfied with the satisfied with the satisfied with the process. process.

process. process.

I Complaints of There are more There are 2 There is 1 complaint There are zero breach of than 2 complaints complaints per per year. complaints per year.

confidentiality of per year. year.

ECP' Management Employee Employee Employee surveys Employee surveys support for ECP' surveys indicate surveys indicate indicate between 80- indicate more than 90%

less than 70% of between 70-80% 90% of individuals of individuals believe individuals of individuals believe management management supports believe believe supports ECP. ECP.

management management supports ECP. supports ECP.

'Site wide assessmentonly. Data provided by Employee Concerns Program

Number:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: pase RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 54 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 35 of 38 INDIVIDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO NUCLEAR PROFESSIONALISM Persistence ani urgency in identific ition and resoluti 1 of problems is preb ent ATTRIBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN Ownership for Less than 70% of Between 70-80 % Between 80-90% of More than 90% of Excellence applicable of applicable applicable employees applicable employees employees have employees have have completed the have completed the completed the completed the Ownership for Ownership for Ownership for Ownership for Excellence Excellence Excellence Excellence development plans. development plans.

development development plans. plans.

Training Training Training Training attendance Training attendance is aftendance* attendance is less attendance is is between 91-98%. greater than 98%.

than 85%. between 8590%.

Rework rate+ The rework rate is The rework rate The rework rate is The rework rate is 5 more than 3%. is 253.0%. 2.1 -2.5%. -<2.0%.

Results of EAB The quality of The quality of The quality of The quality of assessments++ engineering engineering engineering products engineering products as products as products as as measured by the measured by the EAB measured by the measured by the EAB is 2.0or less. is 1.O or less.

EAB is greater EAB is 3.0 or than 3.0. less.

Red and Yellow There are more There are 13-19 There are 6-13 yellow There are less than 6 windows in than 19 yellow or yellow or red or red windows in yellow or red windows training *+ red windows in windows in training. (80-90%). in training. (90% or training. (Less training. (70- better).

than 70%). 80%).

Radiation There are more There are 1-3 There is 1 radiation There are no radiation Protection than 3 radiation radiation protection event per protection events per events @! protection events protection events quarter. quarter.

per quarter. per quarter.

Chemistry The index is The index is The index is equal to The index is equal to or Petfomance greater than equal to or less or less than 1.004. less than 1.000.

Index"' 1.036. than 1.036.

'Site wide assessment onlv. Data Drovided by Nuclear 1 ,ining

+This item assessed by Miintenan'ceonly

++This item assessed by Engineering only. Data provided by Director-Nuclear Engineering T h i s item assessed by NuclearTraining only

@Sitewide assessment only. Data provided by Radiation Protection

"'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Chemistry

ITitle:

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PWCTICE Number:

Revision:

DBBP-VP-0002 Page J

RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED PLANT OUTAGE 05 Page 55 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 36 of 38 INDIVIDUALS COMMlTMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO NUCLEAR PROFESSIONALISM {continued)

Persistence and urgency in identification and resolution of problems is prevalent Procedure Management Management Management Management compliance* observations and observations and observations and observations and NQA NQA field NQA field NQA field field observations show observations show observations observations show that individuals in that most show that most that a large majority general are complying individuals are not individuals are of individuals are with procedures.

complying with complying with complying with procedures. procedures. procedures.

Personal Few employees Employees work Employees do what it Employees at all levels initiative routinely express hard to do whats takes to get the job take personal initiative why work cant be expected. done. to invent methods to done or improved. achieve higher quality and greater efficiency.

Ownership Employees dont Employees are Employees follow Most employees follow through on inconsistent in through and do what regularly volunteer to assigned following through is asked of them and ownllead project, commitments and to meet quality do what is defined develop plans, seldom volunteer and timing of within their job coordinate efforts and for ownership. assigned description. see work through to commitments. completion.

• Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Management Observation Program

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number:

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 37 of 38 INDlVlDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO NUCLEAR PROFESSIONALISM (continued)

Persistence in identificationand resolution of problems is prevalent CRITERIA RELATED TO THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM AlTRlBUTE RED YELLOW WHITE GREEN impiementation 1 Implementation Implementationof Implementation of The CAP improvements of CAP of the CAP the CAP the CAP designated for restart improvements' improvements improvements improvements for are completed and designated for designated for restart is completed associated training is restart has not restart is started but the associated completed. 5 started. but none are training is not completed. completed.

Root cause The root cause The root cause The root cause The root cause evaiuation evaluation evaluation evaluation approval evaluation approval rate quality' approval rate as approval rate as rate as determined as determined by the determined by determined by the by the CARB is CARB is 90% or greater.

the CARB is less CARB is between between 7590%.

than 50%. 50-74%.

CR category The CR category The CR category The CR category The CR category accuracy' accuracy rate is accuracy rate is accuracy rate is accuracy rate is 90% or less than 70% or between 7040%. between 80-90%. greater.

greater.

CR self- Less than 80% of 80% or more of 90% or more of the 95% or more of the CRs identification the CRs the CRs originated CRs originated are originated are self-rate ' originated are are self-identified. self-identified. identified.

self-identified. I

~~

Employee Employee Employee surveys Employee surveys Employee surveys 5urvey.p surveys indicate indicate that indicate that indicate that less than that more than between 10-5% of between 5-2% of 2% of individuals are not 10 % o f individuals are not individuals are not willing to use the CAP.

individuals are willing to use'the willing to use the not willing to use CAP. CAP.

the CAP.

I

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by Perfonnance Improvement 6ite wide assessment only. Data provided by Employee Concerns Program

NUCLEAR OPERATING BUSINESS PRACTICE Number.

DBBP-VP-0002

Title:

Revision: I Page RESTART READINESS REVIEW EXTENDED LPLANTOUTAGE 05 Page 57 of 57 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE CRITERIA Page 38 of 38 INDIVIDUALS' COMMITMENT AREA CRITERIA RELATED TO NUCLEAR PROFESSIONALISM (continued)

Persistencein identification and resolution of problems is prevalent CRITERIA RELATED TO THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM NQA interviews* NQA interviews NQA interviews NQA interviews NQA interviews indicate that indicate that indicate that between - indicate that less than more than 10% between 104% of 5-2% of individuals are 2 % of individuals are of individuals are individuals are not not willing to use the not willing to use the not willing to use willing to use the CAP. CAP.

the CAP. CAP.

Timeliness of Less than 50% of Between 50-74% Between 75-89%of More than 90% of corrective actions corrective actions of corrective corrective actions are corrective actions are are completed on actions are completed on completed on schedule without completed on schedule without schedule without extensions. schedule without extensions. extensions.

extensions.

'Site wide assessment only. Data provided by NQA