ML032320633

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Request for Concurrence on the Determination of Effects on Historic Properties for the Proposed Diablo Canyon Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
ML032320633
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 07/30/2003
From: Mellon K
State of CA, Office of Historic Preservation
To: Hall J
NRC/NMSS/SFPO
References
+sispmjr200505, -RFPFR
Download: ML032320633 (3)


Text

Ots UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

    • +

July 2, 2003 J

- -00 Q.-

fAC Dr. Knox Mellon 4 M State Historic Preservation Officer Ad' California Office of Historic Preservation 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1442-7 Sacramento, CA 95814

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR CONCURRENCE ON THE DETERMINATION OF EFFECTS ON HISTORIC PROPERTIES FOR THE PROPOSED DIABLO CANYON INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION

Dear Dr. Mellon:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is currently reviewing a license application submitted by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) on December 21, 2001, to construct and operate an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) on the site of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in San Luis Obispo County, California. An applicant for a license of this type must submit an environmental report as part of its application, as required under 10 CFR Part 51 of the NRC's regulations. The NRC staff reviews this information In accordance with the requirements of the Nationat Environmental Policy Act, as specified in 10 CFR 51.10.

In conjunction with Its environmental review of PG&E's application, the NRC staff has also considered the potential impact of the proposed action on historic properties, in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. On Aprl 24 and June 19, 2003, the NRC staff discussed Its assessme-fto information regarding historic properties provided In PG&E's application with Mr. H~ns Kreutzberg ot your staff. After reviewing the potential Impacts of the proposed atio iwe-ae rmined that there are historical properties present in the vicinity of the proposed facility; however, we have concluded that the proposed action will not adversely affect these historic properties. The supporting basis for this conclusion Is enclosed. We request your concurrence With this determination that the proposed action will not adversely affect any historical properties. We also request your written reply within 30 days of receipt of this letter, so that we may reference your response in our environmental assessment.

K. Mellon If you or your staff have any questions on this matter, please contact me at (301) 415-1336.

Sincerely,9/744 mes R. Hall, Senior Project Manager Spent Fuel Project Office Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Docket No.: 72-26 (50-275,50-323)

Enclosure:

As stated cc: Mailing list CONCUR:

<4a/

Officer

a A

p

)

A l

i State of California

  • The Resources Agency DEPARTIA!ENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION P.O. ox 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 02 1A

$ 00.370 0004328946 JUL 31 2003 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 05!1 4

':4 t.

3 James R. Hall Senior Project Manager Spent Fuel Project Office Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

+4bb-W iJ wft pull@lllllllllll2@l~~l