ML032250418

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision to Susquehanna Emergency Plan-Position Specific Procedure EP-PS-357, MOC Writer
ML032250418
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/2003
From:
Susquehanna
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML032250418 (4)


Text

Jul. 31, 2003

^i ?-

Page 1 of 1 MANUAL HARD COPY DISTRIBUTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2003-34517 USER INFORMATION:

Name:GERLACH*ROSE M EMPL#:28401 CA#:0363 Address: NUCSA2 Phone#: 254-3194 TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION:

TO: GERLACH*ROSE M 07/31/2003 LOCATION: DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK FROM: NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (NUCSA-2)

THE-FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY OR ELECTRONIC MANUAL ASSIGNED" TO YOU:

357 - 357 - MOC WRITER: EMERGENCY PLAN-POSITION SPECIFIC PROCEDURE REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 06/24/2003 Q ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 07/30/2003 CATEGORY: PROCEDURES TYPE: EP ID: EP-PS-357 ADD: PCAF 2003-1549 REV: N/A REMOVE: PCAF 2001-1717 REV: N/A REMOVE: PCAF 2003-1454 REV: N/A UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES. PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY. FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.

r -

PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM

!1. 0PCAF NO. ,5- j 1 f97 2.......

PAGE 1 OF 3 3. PROC. NO. EP-PS-357 REV. 7

4. FORMSREVISED- __R -- R , - - R_ -_ R ,- R
5. PROCEDURE TITLE MOC Writer.Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction
6. REQUESTED CHANGE PERIODIC REVIEW 0:[ NO .YES INCORPORATE PCAFS E NO 0 YES # 2001-1717 # 2003-1454 #  : __._#

REVISION 5 PCAF: 0 DELETION ] (CHECK1NE ONLY)

7.

SUMMARY

OF /REASON FOR CHANGE Incorporate previously issued PCAF's. The previous PCAPs documented ireviews. This is an administrative change Continued ]

8. DETERMINE COMMITTEE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS -

(Refer to Section 6.1.4))/

oI1 PORC REVIEW REQ'D? 0 YES 9. PORC MTG#  :

BLOCKS 11 THRU 16 ARE ON PAGd;2OF -FORM

17. T.C. Dalpiaz I 4;22 07/24/2003 18. COMMUNICATION OF CHANGE REQUIRED?

PREPARER 0 (Print or Type) ( /7, N

T 0 . DATE NO 0 YES

__________.:___=_-_-_._-_:

(TYPE)

19. SIGNATURE ATTESTS THAT RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR HAS lB 4 . DATE u i CONDUCTED QADR AND TECHNICAL REVIEW UNLESS OTHERWISE L~ -nJ.

DOCUMENTED INBLOCK 18 OR ATTACHED REVIEW d CROSS FORMS.

-$ F F g REVIEW OF REQUIRED) HAS BEEN COMPLETED dj 4 DISCIPLINE Rc ;,PQ ,B18 ,E PERVISOR -'DATE nX BY SIGNATURE IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.

20. A 2L o 2g7dL 0~~~~ APPROVAL  : DA-TE 0t
21. RESPONSIBLE PPROVER ENTER NIA IF FUM +IAS APPROVAL AUTHORITY INITU;LAS" Sf DATE FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 1 of 2 (Electronic Form)

II - - - ]-s PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM

1. PCAF NO. 1,2. PAGE 2 OF 3 13. PROC. NO. EP-PS-357 REV. 7
11. This question documents the outcome of the 50.59 and 72A8 Review required by NDAP-QA-0726. Either 11a, b, c or d must be checked 'YES' and the appropriate form attached or referenced.
a. This change is an Administrative Correction for which 50.59 and 72A8 are not J YES N/A applicable.
b. This change is a change to any surveillance, maintenance or administrative 3 YES 2 N/A procedure for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not applicable.
c. This change is bounded by a 50.59/72A8 Screen/Evaluation, therefore, no new a YES 3 N/A 50.59/72.48 Evaluation is required.

Screen/Evaluation No. _ _L__ _

d. 50.59 and/or 72.48 are applicable to this change and a 50.59/72.48 a YES N/A Screen/Evaluation is attached.
12. This change is consistent with the FSAR or an FSAR change is required. s YES Change Request No. __ -______-
13. Should this change be reviewed for potential effects on Training Needs or Material? [ YES 3 NO If YES, enter an Action Item @ NIMS/Action/Gen Work Mech/PICN
14. Is a Surveillance Procedure Review Checklist required per NDAP-QA-0722? ] YES NO
15. Is a Special, Infrequent or Complex Test/Evolution Analysis Form required per [ YES NO NDAP-QA-0320? (SICT/E form does not need to be attached.)
16. Reviews may be documented below or by attaching Document Review Forms NDAP-QA-0101-1.

REVIEWED BY WITH DATE REVIEW NO COMMENTS.

QADR _ _ __ _ _-

TECHNICAL REVIEW _ - _ _D REACTOR ENGINEERING/NUCLEAR FUELS

  • IST ** = _ __ _

OPERATIONS -

NUCLEAR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING i NUCLEAR MODIFICATIONS -

MAINTENANCE HEALTH PHYSICS -

NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY - _ _-

CHEMISTRY - -___=_-

OTHER 10 CFR 50.540 - _ _

  • Required for changes that affect, or have potential for affecting core reactivity, nuclear fuel, core power level indication or impact the thermal power heat balance. (5)

Required for changes to Section Xi Inservice Test Acceptance Criteria.

FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 2 of 2 (Electronic Form)

PROCEDURE COVER SHEET i-Unsj3F5 PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE MOC Writer Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction EP-PS-357 Revision 7 Page 1 of 3 QUALITY CLASSIFICATION: APPROVAL CLASSIFICATION:

0 QA Program 0 Non-QA Program' E] Plant O3 Non-Plant 0 Instruction EFFECTIVE DATE:

PERIODIC REVIEW FREQUENCY: 2 Year PERIODIC REVIEW-DUE DATE: // *)' ADVY RECOMMENDED REVIEWS:

Procedure Owner -Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Supervisor. Primary Public Information Manager-Responsible FUM: Supervisor Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Approver. General manager-Plant Support FORM NDAP-QA-0002-1, Rev. 3, Page 1 of I