ML032250410
| ML032250410 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/2003 |
| From: | Susquehanna |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| EP-PS-355, Rev 11 | |
| Download: ML032250410 (4) | |
Text
Jul. 31, 2003 A_ ~ - - Page 1 of 1 MANUAL HARD COPY DISTRIBUTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2003-34531 USER INFORMATION:
Name:GERLACH*ROSE M EMPL#:28401 CA#:0363 Address: NUCSA2 Phone#: 254-3194 TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION:
TO: GERLACH*ROSE M 07/31/2003 LOCATION: DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK FROM: NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (NUCSA-2)
'THE FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY OR ELECTRONIC MANUAL ASSIGNED:
TO YOU:
355 - 355 - MEDIA/PUBLIC OFFICIALS CONTACT: EMERGENCY PLAN-POSITION SPECIFIC PROCEDURE REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 06/26/2003 ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 07/30/2003 CATEGORY: PROCEDURES TYPE: EP ID: EP-PS-355 ADD: PCAF 2003-1548 REV: N/A REMOVE: PCAF 2001-1176 REV: N/A REMOVE: PCAF 2003-1453 REV: N/A UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES. PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY. FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.
- - N5.-
-Nt .:: - : = :PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM
- 1. PCAF NO. - 2. PAGE 1 OF 13. PROC. NO. EP-PS-355 IREV. 11
- 4. FORMS REVISED- __R , - R_, - R_, - R__ - R_, -R
- 5. PROCEDURE TITLE MediafPublic officials Contact Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction
- 6. REQUESTED CHANGE PERIODIC REVIEW 0 NO E YES INCORPORATE PCAFS E NO -YES -#2001-1176# 2003-1453 # _ # _ _
REVISION 5 PCAF DELETION 5 (CHECK ONE ONLY)
- 7.
SUMMARY
OF I REASON FOR CHANGE Incorporate previously approved PCAF's. The previous PCAF's documentectperiic reviews. This is an administrative change.
A~~~A
- Continu-d:
- 8. DETERMINE COMMITTEE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS T 2 -
- S (Refer to Section 6.1.4)
=
7 PORC REVIEW REQ'D? - 9. PORC MEG# -:
, * =
BLOCKS 11 THRU 16 ARE ON PAGE'2 OF FORM
- 17. T.C. Dalpiaz : I N7, I 0712412003 18. COMMUNICATION OF CHANGE REQUIRED?
PREPARER, D;t ATE 1 NO I] YES (TYPE) _ _ _
(Print or Type) N 19.\iet - 7 - ~ C l; - tSIGNATURE ATTESTS THAT RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR HAS CONDUCTED QADR AND TECHNICAL REVIEW UNLESS OTHERWISE dC soDt D f w J n~t/ai- DOCUMENTED INBLOCK 16 OR ATFACHED REVIEW FORMS.
R.MSMI ASO I R :
DAECROSS DATE -E"-R-V DISCIPLINE REVIEW OF REQUIRED) HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY SIGNATURE INBLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.
20.-
(4 UM WROVAL DATE
- 21. RESPONSIBUy APPROVER ENTER NIA IF FUM HAS APPROVAL AUTHORITY fLIAD INrrMAS --- I DATE - f-;:- $ -
FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 1 of 2 (Electronic Form)
PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM
- 1. PCAF NO. ,W 6 /4) 2. PAGE 20F 3 3. PROC. NO. EP-PS-355 REV. 11
- 11. This question documents the outcome of the 50.59 and 72A8 Review required by NDAP-QA-0726. Either I 1a, b, c or d must be checked "YES' and the appropriate form attached or referenced.
- a. This change is an Administrative Correction for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not [ YES §3 N/A applicable.
- b. This change is a change to any surveillance,-maintenance or administrative 3 YES f N/A procedure for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not applicable.
- c. This change is bounded by a 50.59/72.48 Screen/Evaluation, therefore, no new [ YES s N/A 50.59/72.48 Evaluation is required.
Screen/Evaluation No. __ _ _ _ -_X
- d. 50.59 and/or 72.48 are applicable to this change and a 50.59/72.48 [ YES N/A Screen/Evaluation is attached.
- 12. This change is consistent with the FSAR or an FSAR change is required. YES Change Request No. X_,_______-_=?
- 13. Should this change be reviewed for potential effects on Training Needs or Material? ] YES s NO If YES, enter an Action Item @ NIMS/Action/Gen Work Mech/PICN -
- 14. Is a Surveillance Procedure Review Checklist required per NDAP-QA-0722? D YES [g NO
- 15. Is a Special, Infrequent or Complex TestlEvolution Analysis Form required per [ YES 3 NO NDAP-OA-0320? (SICT/E form does not need to be attached.)
- 16. Reviews may be documented below or by attaching Document Review Forms NDAP-QA-0101-1..
REVIEWED BY WITH DATE REVIEW NO COMMENTS QADR TECHNICAL REVIEW -__________----_-_
REACTOR ENGINEERING/NUCLEAR FUELS
- _ _
IST OPERATIONS X_:_ _ _
NUCLEAR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING NUCLEAR MODIFICATIONS _ _
MAINTENANCE _ __ _
HEALTH PHYSICS _
NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY _ _________
CHEMISTRY =_X_::
OTHER 10CFR50.540 i__
Required for changes that affect, or have potential for affecting core reactivity, nuclear fuel, core power level indication or impact the thermal power heat balance. (58)
Required for changes to Section XI Inservice Test Acceptance Criteria.
FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 2 of 2 (Electronic Form)
IPROCEDURE COVER SHEET PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC I NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE 4
Media/Public officials
Contact:
Emergency Plan Positon Specific EP-PS-355 Instruction - Revision 11 Page 1 of 3 QUALITY CLASSIFICATION: APPROVAL CLASSIFICATION:
QA Program 0 Non-QA Program O Plant 0 Non-Plant 0 Instruction EFFECTIVE DATE:
PERIODIC REVIEW FREQUENCY: Two Year PERIODIC REVIEW DUE DATE: 2EV- 7 RECOMMENDED REVIEWS:
All Procedure Owner ~ Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Supervisor Primary Public Information manager Responsible FUM: Supervisor Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Approver. General manager-Plant Support FORM NDAP-QA-0002-1, Rev. 3, Page 1 of I