ML031920282

Revision to EP-PS-121, TSC Telecopier Clerk Emergency Plan-Position Specific Procedure.

ML031920282
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	06/24/2003
From:	Susquehanna
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML031920282 (4)

Text

Jun. 24, 2003 Page 1 of 1 MANUAL HARD COPY DISTRIBUTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2003-29727 US RMATION 0 Na e:GERLA SEM ESA4PL#:28401 CA#:0363 Address:

Pho 254-3194 TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION:

TO: 06/24/2003 LOCATION: DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK FROM: NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (NUCSA-2)

THE FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY OR ELECTRONIC MANUAL ASSIGNED TO YOU:

121 - 121 - TSC TELECOPIER CLERK: EMERGENCY PLAN-POSITION SPECIFIC PROCEDURE REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 02/05/2001 ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 06/23/2003 CATEGORY: PROCEDURES TYPE: EP ID: EP-PS-121 ADD: PCAF 2003-1460 REV: N/A UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES. PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY. FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.

PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM

1. PCAF NO. 2. PAGE 1OF 13.I2t 5 3. PROC. NO. EP-PS-121 REV. 9

4. FORMSREVISED - R_, - R , - _ R - R__ - R-, -- R_

5. PROCEDURE TITLE TSC Telecopier Clerk Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction

6. REQUESTED CHANGE PERIODIC REVIEW E NO 3 YES INCORPORATE PCAFS 3 NO I] YES # # # #

REVISION [ PCAF 3 DELETION l (Cz1CK ONE ONLY)

7.

SUMMARY

OF I REASON FOR CHANGE f Periodic review Completed-no changes to body of procedure 4 Revised cover sheet to make procedure review requirement every two years  :

Continued D

8. DETERMINE COMMITTEE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Section 6.14A)

J' PORC REVIEW REQ'D? 'NO YES 9. PORC MTG#

BLOCKS 11 THRU 16 ARE ON PAGE OF FORM . 2

17. T.C. Dalpiaz 1 3227. 0610112003 18. COMMUNICATION OF CHANGE REQUIRED?

PREPARER A (Print or Type)

ETN DATE 3 NO E YES (TYPE)

19. f27 Czar 7SIGNATURE

- -) ATTESTS THAT RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR HAS 19l RESPO_ SIBLE S ERVISOR

_ 4(/00 CONDUCTED

/ I QADR AND TECHNICAL REVIEW UNLESS OTHERWISE DOCUMENTED IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.

DATECROSS DISCIPLINE REVIEW (IF REQUIRED) HAS BEEN COMPLETED RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR DATE BY SIGNATURE IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.

20. Z ..

7 WMbil ROVAL DATE

21. RES IBLE APPROVER ENTER N/A IF FUM HAS APPROVAL AUTHORITY

/ 4x 7 6/-

INITIALS DATE F) f~( I? f F) I n

) JUN 23 2 3 2L3 j)3 FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 1 of 2 (Electronic Form)

S 5ERVICES. SNRSES

PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM

1. PCAF NO. 12. PAGE 2 OF 3 13. PROC. NO. EP-PS-121 REV. 9

11. This question documents the outcome of the 50.59 and 72.48 Review required by NDAP-QA-0726. Either 11a, b, c or d must be checked 'YES' and the appropriate form attached or referenced.

a. This change is an Administrative Correction for which 50.59 and 72A8 are not a YES 3 N/A applicable.

b. This change is a change to any surveillance, maintenance or administrative 3 YES f NIA procedure for which 50.59 and 72A8 are not applicable.

c. This change is bounded by a 50.59172A8 Screen/Evaluation, therefore, no new ] YES 3 N/A 50.59/72.48 Evaluation is required.

Screen/Evaluation No.

d. 50.59 and/or 72.48 are applicable to this change and a 50.59172.48 ] YES s NIA Screen/Evaluation is attached.

12. This change is consistent with the FSAR or an FSAR change is required. 3 YES Change Request No.___

13. Should this change be reviewed for potential effects on Training Needs or Material? ] YES 3 NO If YES, enter an Action Item @ NIMS/Action/Gen Work Mech/PICN

14. Is a Surveillance Procedure Review Checklist required per NDAP-QA-0722? [ YES 3 NO

15. Is a Special, Infrequent or Complex Test/Evolution Analysis Form required per [ YES NO NDAP-QA-0320? (SICT/E form does not need to be attached.)

16. Reviews may be documented below or by attaching Document Review Forms NDAP-QA-0101-1.

REVIEWED BY WITH DATE REVIEW NO COMMENTS QADR TECHNICAL REVIEW REACTOR ENGINEERING/NUCLEAR FUELS

• IST **

OPERATIONS _

NUCLEAR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING NUCLEAR MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE HEALTH PHYSICS NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY CHEMISTRY _

OTHER 10 CFR 50.540

• Required for changes that affect, or have potential for affecting core reactivity, nuclear fuel, core power level indication or impact the thermal power heat balance. (58)

Required for changes to Section XI Inservice Test Acceptance Criteria.

FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 2 of 2 (Electronic Form)

iJ-Ff' o2O063.4Z&4,

.PAGLF Op -U WA-PROCEDURE COVER SHEET PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC I NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE TSC Telecopier Clerk: Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction EP-PS-121 Revision 9 Page 1 of 4 QUALITY CLASSIFICATION: APPROVAL CLASSIFICATION:

D QA Program 0 Non-QA Program E] Plant 5 Non-Plant ED Instruction EFFECTIVE DATE: L _- 77 PERIODIC REVIEW FREQUENCY: Two Year PERIODIC REVIEW DUE DATE: 6 o?

RECOMMENDED REVIEWS:

All Procedure Owner: Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Supervisor Primary TSC Administrative Coordinator Responsible FUM: Supervisor Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Approver V.P. Nuclear operations FORM NDAP-QA-0002-1, Rev. 3, Page 1 of 1