ML031690172
| ML031690172 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna |
| Issue date: | 06/10/2003 |
| From: | Susquehanna |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 28401 EP-PS-124, Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML031690172 (4) | |
Text
Jun. 10, 2003 Page 1 of 1 MANUAL HARD COPY DISTRIBUTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2003-27828 NRMATION :
RLAH*R E M
- TTAL INFOR~
ION:
EMPL#:28401 CA#:0363 TO:
06/10/2003 LOCATION:
DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK FROM:
NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER NUCSA-2)
THE FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY OR ELECTRONIC;MANUAL ASSIGNED TO YOU:
124 -
124 -
TSC RUNNER-CLERK:
EMERGENCY PLAN-POSITION SPECIFIC PROCEDURE REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 08/09/2001 ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 06/09/2003 CATEGORY: PROCEDURES TYPE: EP ID:
EP-PS-124 ADD: PCAF 2003-1395 REV: N/A UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES.
PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY. FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.
USER It Name:G Address Phone#:
TRANSM:
PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM
- 1. PCAF NO. =?5-8gq4 2. PAGE OF 3
- 13.
PROC. NO.
- 4.
FORMS REVISED R
R R
R_
R R
- 5. PROCEDURE TITLE TSC Runner/Clerk Clerk Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction
- 6. REQUESTED CHANGE PERIODIC REVIEW a
NO 0 YES INCORPORATE PCAFS 0 NO E YES #
REVISION F
PCAF 0 DELETION H
(C,HECK ONE ONLY)
- 7.
SUMMARY
OF / REASON FOR CHANGE Revised cover sheet to make procedure review requirement every two years id ta i
A_
L.
Continued F
- 8.
DETERMINE COMMITTEE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Section 6.1.4)
PORC REVIEW REQ'D?
NO F] YES
- 9.
PORC MTG#_
BLOCKS 1T JHRU 16 ARE ON PAGE 2 OFFORM
- 17.
T.C. Dalpiaz
'3227
/ 06/01/2003
- 18. COMMUNICATION OF CHANGE REQUIRED?
PREPARER f
ETN DATE 0 NO E YES (TYPE)
(Print or Type)
- 19.
SIGNATURE ATTESTS THAT RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR HAS CONDUCTED QADR AND TECHNICAL REVIEW UNLESS OTHERWISE DUMENTED IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.
E*btL'- CROSS DISCIPUNE REVIEW (IF REQUIRED) HAS BEEN COMPLETED Se s-#SlqL SUPERVISOR A E BY SIGNATURE IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.
- 20. IiA4zaLQ_
I UUM OPI~VAL
-D)ATE
- 21. RESPONSIBLE APPROVER ENTER N/A IF FUM HAS APPROVAL AUTHORITY INIVALb:S DATE FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 1 of 2 (Electronic Form)
DCCUMEN' CC'N1.OL SFVCES - Se REV. I-
PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM
- 1. PCAF NO. ;zB /275K 12. PAGE 2 OF 3
- 13. PROC. NO. EP-PS-124 REV. 1
- 11. This question documents the outcome of the 50.59 and 72.48 Review required by NDAP-QA-0726. Either 11a, b, c or d must be checked YES" and the appropriate form attached or referenced.
- a. This change is an Administrative Correction for which 50.59 and 72A8 are not
[
YES 3 N/A applicable.
- b. This change is a change to any surveillance, maintenance or administrative 3 YES a N/A procedure for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not applicable.
- c. This change is bounded by a 50.59/72.48 Screen/Evaluation, therefore, no new YES N/A 50.59/72.48 Evaluation is required.
Screen/Evaluation No.
- d. 50.59 and/or 72.48 are applicable to this change and a 50.59/72.48
[
YES 3 N/A Screen/Evaluation is attached.
z YES Change Request No.
- 13. Should this change be reviewed for potential effects on Training Needs or Material?
] YES NO If YES, enter an Action Item @ NIMS/Action/Gen Work Mech/PICN
- 14. Is a Surveillance Procedure Review Checklist required per NDAP-QA-0722?
0 YES 3 NO
- 15. Is a Special, Infrequent or Complex Test/Evolution Analysis Form required per a YES s
NO NDAP-QA-0320? (SICT/E form does not need to be attached.)
- 16. Reviews may be documented below or by attaching Document Review Forms NDAP-QA-0101-1.
REVIEWED BY WITH DATE REVIEW NO COMMENTS QADR TECHNICAL REVIEW REACTOR ENGINEERING/NUCLEAR FUELS
- IST**
OPERATIONS NUCLEAR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING NUCLEAR MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE HEALTH PHYSICS NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY CHEMISTRY OTHER 10 CFR 50.54Q
.e
,z
/
Required for changes that affect, or have potential for affecting core reactivity, nuclear fuel, core power level indication or impact the thermal power heat balance. (58)
Required for changes to Section Xl inservice Test Acceptance Criteria.
FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 2 of 2 (Electronic Form)
I
PROCEDURE COVER SHEET PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC I NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE TSC Runner/Clerk: Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction EP-PS-124 Revision 1 Page 1 of 4 QUALITY CLASSIFICATION:
APPROVAL CLASSIFICATION:
El QA Program Z Non-QA Program El Plant D Non-Plant 3 Instruction EFFECTIVE DATE:
PERIODIC REVIEW FREQUENCY:
Two Year PERIODIC REVIEW DUE DATE:
to 9-2 2
RECOMMENDED REVIEWS:
All Procedure Owner:
Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Supervisor:
Primary Adminisrtrative Coordinator Responsible FUM:
Supervisor Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Approver:
Vice president Nuclear operations FORM NDAP-QA-0002-1, Rev. 3, Page 1
.PAF of