ML031110235
| ML031110235 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 10/29/2002 |
| From: | Matthew Kirk Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research |
| To: | Bass R Oak Ridge |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2003-0018 | |
| Download: ML031110235 (1) | |
Text
TrD-k-+
Trnnninni - Dorrrnnont cat `M~nq~iirmr1 in fl C.Ind Pg Page 1 t I I-7 From:
Mark Kirk I magi To:
Bass, Richard - ORNL Date:
10/29/02 9:28AM
Subject:
Permanent set "Measured" in DB Clad Richard -
Attached is a file with the measurements that you requested last week (& i forgot to send). The info you are looking for is on p. 19-20... by my very coarse interpretation of these data i'd say a permanent set of 0.18-in. was measured. I'd be interested to hear how well this number compares with the results of Paul's FE analysis. Since we have argued that the analysis is "intentionally conservative" (i.e. larger wastage area than actual modelled, reinforcing effect of J-groove weld not modelled) i'm hoping that the FE analysis predicts more set than 0.18-in..... but let's see.
Thanks Mark CC:
Nilesh Chokshi; Robert Tregoning; Williams, Paul - ORNL