ML030870852
| ML030870852 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 10/10/2002 |
| From: | Gody A NRC Region 4 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 50-416/02-301 50-416/02-301 | |
| Download: ML030870852 (3) | |
Text
C:\ORPCheckout\FileNET\ML030870852.wpd APPENDIX E - REGION IV OPERATING TEST JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE QUALITY REVIEW MATRIX
- 1. 2. 3. Attributes 4. Job Content 5. 6. 7.
JPM# Dyn LOD Errors Set U/E/S Explanation (D/S) (1-5) (See below for instructions)
IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link JPM-RO- D 2 S N3202 JPM-RO- D 3 X E CUE FOR ITEM 9 IS INCONSISTENT WITH PROCEDURE REQUIREMENT (PROCEDURE G3301 SAYS TO PERFORM THE STEPS IN ORDER, JPM CUE DOES NOT)
JPM-RO- D 3 X E 1) THE STANDARD FOR ITEMS 2 AND 3 ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE E2209 PROCEDURE
- 2) PROCEDURE DOES NOT DISCUSS A PRESSURE LOCK VALVE; 3) ITEM 6 OBSERVATION NOT DISCUSSED IN PROCEDURE; 4) ITEM 7 LINEUP IS FOR THE TEST RETURN LINE, HOWEVER, THERE IS NO GUIDANCE IN THE STANDARD THAT THE TEST RETURN LINE WILL BE USED; 5) STATEMENT AT THE END OF ITEM 8 IS INCORRECT IN THAT IT REFERS TO ITEM 6 IN LIEU OF ITEM 8.
JPM-RO- D 3 X E 1) INITIATING CUE IS INCOMPLETE; 2)ITEMS 2 AND 3 COMMENTS SAYS MAY NOT BE T4801 PERFORMED BUT IS REQUIRED BY PROCEDURE; 3) ITEM 10 DISCUSSES USE OF A KEY SWITCH THAT IS NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE PROCEDURE.
JPM-RO- D 3 X E 1) ITEMS 2, , 4, AND 6 DISCUSS A KEY SWITCH THAT IS NOT IN THE PROCEDURE; 2)
E1231 ITEM 11 COMMENT IS NOT CLEAR - DOES EXAMINER NEED TO WAIT FOR THE SIMULATOR OPERATOR BEFORE INITIATING THE CUE? 3) APPEARS TO BE A TYPO IN ITEM 16 - ARE E12-F042C AND E12-F0442C THE SAME VALVES? 4) ITEM 17 IS A CRITICAL STEP BUT THE COMMENT SAYS THAT THE OPERATOR SHOULD STOP THE PUMPS; 5) THE TEST SWITCHES IN ITEM 22 ARE NOT DISCUSSED IN THE PROCEDURE.
JPM-RO- D 3 X E THE MATCHING PROCEDURE STEPS FOR ITEMS 6, 10, AND 15 DISCUSS BREAKER R2730 RACK-INS, BUT THE JPM IS SILENT ON THIS REQUIREMENT.
JPM-RO- S 2 X S ITEMS 7 AND 11 DISCUSS COMPLETING AN ALTERATION LOG, BUT THIS EFFORT IS EP030 NOT DISCUSSED IN THE PROCEDURE.
JPM-RO- S 3 S C6108 JPM-NLO- S 3 X E ITEM 9, NEED TO ADD DP IS < 20 PSID AS A CUE.
C1101 JPM-NLO- S 4 S P6401
- Page 1 -
Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically an system reconfiguration or realignment.
- 2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.
- 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:
- The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.
- The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).
- All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.
- Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
- Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.
- 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:
- Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).
- Task is trivial and without safety significance.
- 5. JPM SET criteria sateisfied (i.e., number/distribution of safety functions, A.3 and A.4 integrated with parts B/C, Admin topics per section meet ES).
- 5. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 6. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column.
- Page 2 -