ML030860430

E-mail S. Long, NRR, to W. Shack, Anl, Phone Number for Meeting at 1pm

ML030860430
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/13/2002
From:	Long S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Shack W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2003-0018
Download: ML030860430 (2)

Text

SSt~evenLong -Re, Phone number for meeting at 1 pm Page 1-1 From: Steven Long To: WJ Shack Date: 8/13/02 9:42AM

Subject:

Re. Phone number for meeting at 1 pm Bill, Mike Johnson (my new branch chief) wants to have a meeting that will allow him to "see" ifthere is a technical consensus supporting the draft preliminary SDP. It is basically a formalization of the quality check process I am going through now with you and others Mike added a PRA check as well as a check with the sources of the technical inputs. I think that's a good idea, something I've been trying to get started in this branch for a long time Anyway, the meeting of the PRA reviewers and as many technical input providers as possible is today at 1 pm. I had previously asked if you could participate, and you also should have received an e-mail from Mike Johnson, sent yesterday to wjshack@anl.gov.

Let me know ifyou can do it Steve

./>>> WJ Shack <wjshack@anl gov> 08/13/02 08"41AM >>>

On 8/13/02 7:34 AM, Steven Long at SML@nrc gov wrote:

Mike's meeting is in room 0986 The telephone number there is 301-415-2994 End Quote I'm drawing a blank. I remember you mentioning a meeting, but can't remember subject i dl

Steven Long -Re: Phone number for meeting at 1.pm pag~e1 From: Steven Long To: WJ Shack hI ". )

Date: 8/13/02 12.54PM

Subject:

Re: Phone number for meeting at 1 pm Bill, You are correct, Mike excluded you from his e-mail, although I put your name on the addressee list and he did not mention to me tha the removed it With regard to Neilish's involvement, I had asked that ONLY the people who made inputs review it to see if I had used their inputs in a manner consistent with what they had meant. THEN I would make the document ready for the wider review. As I suspected, management cannot stand back and allow that to occur. Thank you for your direct particpation. It will be intereting to see what RES says you say.

Steve

>>> WJ Shack <wjshack@anl gov> 08113/02 12 20PM >>>

On 8/13/02 9:04 AM, Steven Long at SML@nrc gov wrote I had previously asked ifyou could participate, and you also should have received an e-mail from Mike Johnson, sent yesterday to wjshack@anl.gov End Quote --

V No email from Mike. Without an invitation from Mike or Cullen/Nilesh, I don't think I want to call in. Nilesh is going to be asking his contractors for input on the SDP in an email this afternoon so I'll get a chance to provide some input