ML030780637
| ML030780637 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 03/12/2003 |
| From: | Nelson T Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 51396N RMA-2080-EPA-008, Rev 0 | |
| Download: ML030780637 (28) | |
Text
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL (03 CD z
Page 1 Transmittal#. 51396N Date: 03/1212003 Crea tor: TRACY NELSON
%. 4.. ISSUE OF I EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE e51-1i IPJIJf h Distribution Group(s): Procedures: EPP: RMA-2080-EPA-008 Section/Name Mail Zone Copies Comments Emergency Planning Coord 11 iC NDM. Library 1* 1C NRC: On Site 4A lC NRC: Region III P14 2C
ý.NRC: Washington ýP16. 2C State of Michigan P2 IC Training Lib:Master Copy 11 1U Transmitted Controlled Document Listing:
Document Revision Title P*OI:(:LU I- :L A I IAGH:U Controlled Document Transmittal Receipt and File Acknowledgemen CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS ONLY JLA Signature Date Please sign and return within 14 calendar days to: D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant Nuclear Documents Mgmt (Mail Zone #1)
Bridgman, Mi. 49106
Page 1 of 1 Search Results of Last Search Total of 1 items found L0 RMA-2080-EPA-008 Properties Actions Edit Revision: 000 AEP Status: Approved Pending Change Status: No
Title:
EMERGENCY PLAN MANAGEMENT Document Series: Procedures Document Type: Emergency Planning - Response Approval/Record Date: 03/07/2003 Effective Date: 03/12/2003 Top of Page httnrv/hennaa~q/rq-.hin/R*iaht~qiti dll /cqi4 lnaced ingviewfrlk qt-rch fqricit-fvktvne---iintvnr (Y' /19/9fl
REVIEW AND APPROVAL TRACKING FORM Rev. 0 Change: 0 Number: RMA-2080-EPA-008
Title:
Emergency Plan Management El Correction (Full Procedure) El Change (Full Procedure) with Review of Change Only El Correction (Page Substitution) [j Change (Page Substitution) with Review of Change Only El Cancellation Z New Procedure or Change with Full Review El Superseded (list superseding procedures):
-Ass6ciatedCo nfi guritioniniPacA Change Driver/CDI Tracking No(s).:
ur ---
Cross-Discipline Reviews: Programmatic Reviews:
El Training Dl ALARA E] Rea ctivity Mgmt Team
[] Chemistry (Safety & Health)
[] Maintenance El Work Control []Component Engineering E] SPSveillance Section
__ Design Engineering [] Sur
[] NDM E] _ tern Engineering
[]Operations [] Emerg Oper Proc Grp E] Sys MS Administrator El PAPV n__Environmental E] so E
I Z Reg Affairs _ _ nl ISI/IST Coordinator ie Required E Performance Assurance [ Noi E] RP fl None Required Date: 3. 1/-3/
[ Cognizant Org Review: ell Date: J / 7/63
[ Technical Review: _ /
Cocrec--,-.----
[j Ops Director Concurrence: N/A Date: / /
Yes Updated Revision Summary attached?
Tracking No.:Q t03 0 t"I71N -Ot 0 Yes E] N/A 10 CFR 50.59 Requirements complete?
A (Ref. Step 3.4.17) [] Yes 2 N/A Implementation Plan developed?
,. .. Date: .... / ..
Package Complete:
Appro-als- . Z" - " -
PORC Review Required: E] Yes M No Mtg. No.:
Administrative Hold Status: E] Released ssued [ N/A CR No.:
Approval Authority Review/Approval: ._ _ _ __,_ Date: ;. / 7/ )
Expiration Date/Ending Activity i [g Effective Date: ,_/2,/5 Periodic Review conducted? (Data Sheet 5 Complete) El Yes Z No Commitment Database update requested in accordance with PMP-7100-CMP-001?
El Yes [ N/A
[] Yes O N/A NDM notified of new records or changes to records that could affect record retention?
NUCLEAR DOCUMENT
.,'bffj-jfjfoi-- ihtio.a. r,a-*z..Ffi6ý r~~l on ,,Not-Piif-of lForiii...
S MANAGEMENT SECTION
- MAR 12 2003 This form is derived from the information in PMP-2010 -PRC-002, Procedure Correction, Change, and Review, Rev. 10a, Data Sheet 1, ._of Page Io CONTROLLED DOCUMENT Review and Approval Tracking Form.
REVISION
SUMMARY
Number: RMA-2080-EPA-008 Revision: 0 Change: 0
Title:
r..,~.nlfMD1 a0 -
UJ[Vl r AfiitIa- nofmnt "an+nt&
"tv.
Section or Step Change/Reason For Change
4.1.1 Change
New Step.
Reason: Specifies that an ESAT or CRA is needed to track proposed changes to the Emergency Plan.
4.1.4.f Change: New Step.
Reason: Specifies actions to be taken for implementation of Plan changes that required prior NRC approval.
4.1.9 Change
New Step.
Reason: Specifies that changes to implementing procedures changes should be made after the Plan changes have been implemented; clarifies that implementing procedures are not to be revised prior to implementation of the associated Emergency Plan changes.
4.3 Change
New Step.
Reason: Specifies use of Attachment 1 for instructions on revisions to the Emergency Plan. Change: New Attachment.
Reason: Provides for specific instructions on Emergency Plan revisions, including multiple reviews (CRA-02276062-03) and transmission of the Plan to Regulatory Affairs for submittal.
Data Sheet 2 Change: New Data Sheet.
Reason: Provides a means for review and approval tracking, similar to that of plant procedures (CRA-02276062-03).
Data Sheet 3 Change: New Data Sheet.
Reason: Provides a means for summarizing changes to the Emergency Plan, similar to that of plant procedures.
Rim RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Reference Effective Date: /i"IO.*
C. J. Graffenius S.M. Partin Emergency Planning Writer Owner Cognizant Orgamzation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PURPO SE AND SCOPE .............................................................................. ..................... 2 2 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................... 2 3 RE SPO NSIBILITIES ........................................................................................................ 2 4 D ETA IL S ................................................................................................................................ 2 5 RE FERE N CES ...................................................................................................................... 5 : Instructions for Emergency Plan Revisions ............................................. 6 Data Sheet 1: Evaluation of Proposed Change to the D. C. Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures .......................................................................... 8 Data Sheet 2: Emergency Plan Review and Approval Tracking Form ...................... 10 Data Sheet 3: Emergency Plan Revision Summary ...................................................... 11
Reference - RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 11 Emergency Plan Management 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to establish a standardized approach for processing proposed changes to the D. C. Cook Emergency Plan and to the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.
1.2 To document an evaluation that demonstrates whether the proposed change can be implemented without prior NRC approval, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).
2 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS Term Meaning ERO Emergency Response Organization ERF Emergency Response Facility 3 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The individual requesting the change is responsible for drafting the proposed wording for the change.
3.2 Emergency Planning Coordinators are responsible for evaluating the proposed change.
3.3 The Emergency Planning Manager is responsible for reviewing and approving any change request evaluations.
4 DETAILS 4.1 IF the requested change is for a change to the Emergency Plan, THEN:
4.1.1 Initiate an ESAT or add an action item to an existing applicable condition report to track the proposed change.
4.1.2 Prepare Data Sheet 1, Evaluation of Proposed Change to D. C. Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures, for each change.
"* Similar changes may be combined into one evaluation.
"* Equivalent computer generated forms may be used in lieu of the data sheet.
Reference T RMA-2080-EPA-008 I Rev. 0 Page 3 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Provide a complete justification regardless of the outcome of the determination as to the "Decrease in Effectiveness" of the plan.
4.1.3 Submit each requested change evaluation to the Emergency Planning Manager for review and approval.
NOTE: Because proposed changes to the Emergency Plan may include a combination of submittals that Do and Do Not 'Decrease the Effectiveness" of the plan, parallel paths for implementation of the proposed changes are penrissible.
4.1.4 IF the evaluation determines that the requested change will "Decrease the Effectiveness" of the Emergency Plan, THEN:
- a. Do not implement the proposed change.
- b. Prepare the proposed change for submittal to the NRC.
- c. Obtain PORC review and approval of the proposed change.
- d. Submit the change to Licensing for submittal to the NRC.
- e. IF the NRC approved the Emergency Plan change, THEN implement the change; OTHERWISE do not implement the change.
- f. To implement the change:
- 1. Update the Emergency Plan with the approved change and appropriate revision number.
- 2. Obtain the AEP Senior Vice President's signature on the coversheet.
- 3. Transmit the revised Emergency Plan to NDM for distribution.
4.1.5 IF the evaluation determines that the requested change will not "Decrease the Effectiveness" of the Emergency Plan, THEN:
- a. Verify an ESAT has been generated to track the change for the next Emergency Plan revision submittal to the NRC.
- b. Implement the change.
4.1.6 Evaluate the requested change to determine if a change to the Emergency Plan implementing procedures is required.
Reference - RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 4 of 11 Emergency Plan Management I
4.1.7 Review the appropriate implementing procedures.
4.1.8 IF any revisions to the procedures are required, THEN add action items to the ESAT to track the needed procedure revisions.
4.1.9 Implement any revisions to the procedure change AFTER the proposed changes have been implemented in the Emergency Plan.
NOTE: Step 4.2 need not be performed if the implementing procedures were reviewed in step 4.1 4.2 IF the requested change is for a change to an Emergency Plan implementing procedure, THEN:
4.2.1 Prepare Data Sheet 1, Evaluation of Proposed Change to D. C. Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures, for each change.
"* Similar changes may be combined into one evaluation.
"* Equivalent computer generated forms may be used in lieu of the data sheet.
" Provide a complete justification regardless of the outcome of the determination as to the "Decrease in Effectiveness" of the plan.
4.2.2 Submit each requested change evaluation to the Emergency Planning Manager for review and approval.
4.2.3 IF the evaluation determines that the requested procedure change vwill "Decrease the Effectiveness" of the Emergency Plan, THEN the requested procedure change cannot be implemented.
4.2.4 IF the evaluation determines that the requested procedure change will require a change to the Emergency Plan, THEN follow the actions in step 4.1.
4.2.5 IF the evaluation determines that it will not "Decrease the Effectiveness" of the Emergency Plan or require a change to the Emergency Plan, THEN implement the procedure change.
4.3 Plan Revisions 4.3.1 Use Attachment 1, Instructions for Emergency Plan Revisions, to implement changes to the Plan.
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 I Rev. 0 Page 5 of 11 Emergency Plan Management 5 REFERENCES 5.1 Use
References:
5.1.1 NUREG-0654, REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants" 5.2 Writing
References:
5.2.1 Source References
- a. 10 CFR50.47(b) 5.2.2 General References
- b. 10 CFR 50, Appendix E "Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities"
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 6 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Pages:
Attachment 1 Instructions for Emergency Plan Revisions 6- 7
- 1. All proposed changes to the Emergency Plan must have completed and approved 50.54(q) evaluations.
- 2. Determine the next revision number for the Emergency Plan. For minor changes use the currently approved Emergency Plan revision number and the next sequential letter. For example, Revision 16d becomes 16e. For major changes use the next sequential number.
For example, Revision 16e becomes Revision 17. For major revisions all pages of the Emergency Plan shall be updated with the new revision number not just those affected by the change. The Emergency Planning Manager will make the final determination on the revision number used.
- 3. Initiate Data Sheet 2, Emergency Plan Review and Approval Tracking Form.
- 4. Revise the appropriate steps within the Emergency Plan, documenting step changes and the reason for the changes on Data Sheet 3 (or comparable form). Reason(s) for the proposed changes can reference directly to an approved 50.54(q) determination to simplify documentation.
- 5. Obtain an independent review of the changes verifying the proposed change:
- Can be implemented as written.
- Complies with existing regulations and commitments.
- Does not exceed the bounds of an approved 50.54(q) evaluation.
- Does not introduce a 50.54(q) bypass mechanism.
- 6. Obtain an editorial review of the proposed changes. The independent reviewer may perfoim this review if necessary.
- 7. Obtain concurrence from the Emergency Planning Manager.
- 8. Obtain concurrence from Regulatory Affairs.
- 9. Develop an implementation plan for any proposed changes that will require the completion of additional actions prior to implementing the change.
- 10. Assemble the applicable final package documentation for review and approval:
- Updated Revision Summary
- 10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluations
- Implementation Plan
- 11. Obtain PORC approval.
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 [ Rev. 0 Page 7 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Pages:
Attachment 1 Instructions for Emergency Plan Revisions 6ages 6- 7
- 12. Obtain the AEP Senior Vice President - Nuclear Generation approval.
- 13. Enter the effective date of the Emergency Plan.
- 14. Transmit the Emergency Plan to Regulatory Affairs for submittal to the NRC per 10 CFR 50.4.
- 15. Transmit the plan to NDM for distribution.
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 8 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Evaluation of Proposed Change to the D. C. Pages:
Data Sheet 1 Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing 8- 9 CHANGE DESCRIPTION Does the proposed change delete or tend to weaken that portion of the current YES NO Emergency Plan revision regarding the following requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)
- 1. Assignment of state, local and site ERO responsibilities?
- 2. Assignment of onshift ERO personnel?
- 3. Arrangement for utilizing State or local resources and staff?
- 4. Emergency Action Levels (EALs)?
- 5. Notifications to offsite agencies, ERO, or the public?
- 6. Communications between offsite agencies, ERO, or the public?
- 7. Dissemination of public information?
- 8. Adequacy of emergency facilities and equipment?
- 9. Methods, systems, and equipment for offsite response to a radiological emergency?
- 10. Protective Action Recommendations/Determination?
- 11. Emergency worker radiological exposure control?
- 12. Medical services for contaminated/injured personnel?
- 13. Re-entry/Recovery plans?
- 14. Drills and exercises?
-15. Radiological emergency response training?
- 16. Plan development, review, and distribution?
Does the proposed change delete or tend to weaken that portion of the current YES NO Emergency Plan revision regarding the following requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E (I.)(II.)(III.) Emergency plans as described in the FSAR?
(IV) A. Organization for coping with radiological emergencies?
(IV) B. Assessment of radiological emergencies?
(IV) C. Classifications, EALs, and ERO activation?
(IV) D. Notification of Federal, State and local agencies and the public?
(IV) E. ERFs, equipment, and communications?
(IV) F. Training, drills and exercises?
(IV) G. Plans, procedures and surveillance of equipment and supplies?
(IV) H. Re-entry and Recovery following an accident?
(V) I. Implementing Procedures?
(VI) J. Emergency Response Data Systems?
Reference I RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 9 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Evaluation of Proposed Change to the D. C. Pages:
Data Sheet 1 Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing 8- 9 Determination per 10 CFR 50.54(q)
If any of the above are "yes" evaluate the proposed change in accordance with the detailed information in the sections of NUREG-0654, FEMA REP-1, Rev. 1 Considering the detailed intormation in the sections oi INU11.l'.-un O , %-AIL a ,uL ,Lpja.U11 and Evaluation of Radiological'Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants" that correspond to the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, this change in the Emergency Plan:
DOES DOES NOT decrease the effectiveness of the Cook Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan.
JUSTIFICATION Originator: Date:
Date:
Emergency Planning Manager: __________
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 10 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Emergency Plan Review and Approval Tracking Pages:
Data Sheet 2 10 Form Information-. - - : " - "
Title:
Emergency Plan Revision:
Author:
RbevieWs:- - :-:--,:u<K :,-- - - .,
Independent Reviewer: Date:
Editorial Reviewer: Date:
Concurrence:-, -- - ;
0 Emergency Plan Coordinator Date:
0 Emergency Plan Manager Date:
O Regulatory Affairs Date:
Package Check: " "
Updated Revision Summary 0 Yes 10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluations [] Yes Implementation Plan Li Yes LI N/A Package Complete Date:
Approvals: " - .
PORC Review: Meeting Number:
Approval Authority: Date:
Emergency Plan Effective Date: -: - -' - - ;-
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 11 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Emergency Plan Revision Summary Paes Data Sheet 3
Title:
Emergency Plan Revision:
Section or Step Change/Reason For Change Change:
Reason:
Change:
Reason:
Change:
Reason:
Change:
Reason:
REVIEW AND APPROVAL TRACKING FORM Number: RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Change: 0
Title:
Emergency Plan Management Catejgory_(Select On&Only)--iý-- 1*~t 9~ Jr Fl Correction (Full Procedure) [] Change (Full Procedure) with Review of Change Only El Correction (Page Substitution) E] Change (Page Substitution) with Review of Change Only El Cancellation Z New Procedure or Change with Full Review El Superseded (list superseding procedures):
h:ssodated C6DivigifCitioingioctAsse)s.i:its:/.
Change Driver/CDI Tracking No(s).:_________________ N/A Rqi re RTh-P:w- -
Cross-Discipline Reviews: Programmatic Reviews:
[] Chemistry E] Training E] ALARA []Reactivity Mgmt Team E] Maintenance [] Work Control E] Component Engineering El SPS (Safety & Health)
El NDM E] [] Design Engineering El Surveillance Section fl Operations [] Emerg Oper Proc Grp E_ E] System Engineering Ml PA/PV
[ Reg Affairs El_
E] __
_ _ Environmental ISIIST Coordinator E] SOMS Administrator El I
RP F] None Required El Performance Assurance [ None Required
[ Cognizant Org Review: T- % e Date: 2 1-3
[ Technical Review: "v% 4,-,--- Date: 317163 Ops Director Concurrence: N/A Date: / /
Updated Revision Summary attached? Z Yes 10 CFR 50.59 Requirements complete? Tracking No.:Q - 0 11t)03
- Yes E] N/A Implementation Plan developed? A. (Ref. Step 3.4.17) El Yes Z N/A Package Complete: . Date: 3 /7/C-2)
Ap p-ro vals: J-oi2 21.~...........
PORC Review Required: [] Yes [D No Mtg. No.:
Administrative Hold Status: E] Released l.* yssi A .CRNo.:
Approval Authority Review/Approval: Date: 3/ 7/03 Expiration Date/Ending Activity V' Effective Date: 3 / ai/0.3 Re- v Pei-i Periodic Review conducted? (Data Sheet 5 Complete) ElYes No IFOIQ-l~ on.q---
Commitment Database update requested in accordance with PMP-7100-CMP-001? El Yes [ N/A NDM notified of new records or changes to records that could affect record retention? El Yes [ N/A 0 NULEARDOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SECTION This form is derived from the information in PMP-2010-PRC-002, MMAR 1 2 2003 Procedure Correction, Change, and Review, Rev. 10a, Data Sheet 1, Review and Approval Tracking Form. Page Of CONTROLLED I UtL&,U I - .l~
REVISION
SUMMARY
Number RMIA-2080-EPA-008 Revision: 0 Change: 0 V IDI 1%4.-
Ji a.-.-n
Title:
.U Mel Ku"i-j- all . r, Section or Step Change/Reason For Change
4.1.1 Change
New Step.
Reason: Specifies that an ESAT or CRA is needed to track proposed changes to the Emergency Plan.
4.1.4.f Change: New Step.
Reason: Specifies actions to be taken for implementation of Plan changes that required prior NRC approval.
4.1.9 Change
New Step.
Reason: Specifies that changes to implementing procedures changes should be made after the Plan changes have been implemented; clarifies that implementing procedures are not to be revised prior to implementation of the associated Emergency Plan changes.
4.3 Change
New Step.
Reason: Specifies use of Attachment 1 for instructions on revisions to the Emergency Plan. Change: New Attachment.
Reason: Provides for specific instructions on Emergency Plan revisions, including multiple reviews (CRA-02276062-03) and transmission of the Plan to Regulatory Affairs for submittal.
Data Sheet 2 Change: New Data Sheet.
Reason: Provides a means for review and approval tracking, similar to that of plant procedures (CRA-02276062-03).
Data Sheet 3 Change: New Data Sheet.
Reason: Provides a means for summarizing changes to the Emergency Plan, similar to that of plant procedures.
i --
CrT RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Reference Effective Date:?, 0-/o_
C. J. Graffenius S.M. Partin Emergency Planning Writer Owner Cognizant Organization TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PURPO SE AND SCOPE ................................................................................................... 2 2 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................... 2 3 RESPO NSIBILITIES ........................................................................................................ 2 4 DETAILS ................................................................................................................................ 2 5 RE FEREN CES ...................................................................................................................... 5 : Instructions for Emergency Plan Revisions ............................................. 6 Data Sheet 1: Evaluation of Proposed Change to the D. C. Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures .......................................................................... 8 Data Sheet 2: Emergency Plan Review and Approval Tracking Form ...................... 10 Data Sheet 3: Emergency Plan Revision Summary ...................................................... 11
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 i Rev. 0 Page 2 of 11 Emergency Plan Management 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to establish a standardized approach for processing proposed changes to the D. C. Cook Emergency Plan and to the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.
1.2 To document an evaluation that demonstrates whether the proposed change can' be implemented without prior NRC approval, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).
2 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS Term Meaning ERO Emergency Response Organization ERF Emergency Response Facility 3 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The individual requesting the change is responsible for drafting the proposed wording for the change.
3.2 Emergency Planning Coordinators are responsible for evaluating the proposed change.
3.3 The Emergency Planning Manager is responsible for reviewing and approving any change request evaluations.
4 DETAILS 4.1 IF the requested change is for a change to the Emergency Plan, THEN:
4.1.1 Initiate an ESAT or add an action item to an existing applicable condition report to track the proposed change.
4.1.2 Prepare Data Sheet 1, Evaluation of Proposed Change to D. C. Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures, for each change.
" Similar changes may be combined into one evaluation.
" Equivalent computer generated forms may be used in lieu of the data sheet.
Reference F RMA-2080-EPA-008 7 Rev. 0 Page 3 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Provide a complete justification regardless of the outcome of the determination as to the "Decrease in Effectiveness" of the plan.
4.1.3 Submit each requested change evaluation to the Emergency Planning Manager for review and approval.
NOTE: Because proposed changes to the Emergency Plan may include a combination of submittals that Do and Do Not "Decrease the Effectiveness" of the plan, parallel paths for implementation of the proposed changes are permissible.
4.1.4 IF the evaluation determines that the requested change will "Decrease the Effectiveness" of the Emergency Plan, THEN:
- a. Do not implement the proposed change.
- b. Prepare the proposed change for submittal to the NRC.
- c. Obtain PORC review and approval of the proposed change.
- d. Submit the change to Licensing for submittal to the NRC.
- e. IF the NRC approved the Emergency Plan change, THEN implement the change; OTHERWISE do not implement the change.
- f. To implement the change:
- 1. Update the Emergency Plan with the approved change and appropriate revision number.
- 2. Obtain the AEP Senior Vice President's signature on the coversheet.
- 3. Transmit the revised Emergency Plan to NDM for distribution.
4.1.5 IF the evaluation determines that the requested change will not "Decrease the Effectiveness" of the Emergency Plan, THEN:
- a. Verify an ESAT has been generated to track the change for the next Emergency Plan revision submittal to the NRC.
- b. Implement the change.
4.1.6 Evaluate the requested change to determine if a change to the Emergency Plan implementing procedures is required.
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 4 of 11 Emergency Plan Management 4.1.7 Review the appropriate implementing procedures.
4.1.8 IF any revisions to the procedures are required, THEN add action items to the ESAT to track the needed procedure revisions.
4.1.9 Implement any revisions to the procedure change AFTER the proposed changes have been implemented in the Emergency Plan.
iOTE: Step 4.2 need not be performed if the implementing procedures were reviewed in step 4.1 z .2 IF the requested change is for a change to an Emergency Plan implementing procedure, THEN:
4.2.1 Prepare Data Sheet 1, Evaluation of Proposed Change to D. C. Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures, for each change.
a Similar changes may be combined into one evaluation.
0 Equivalent computer generated forms may be used in lieu of the data sheet.
0 Provide a complete justification regardless of the outcome of the determination as to the "Decrease in Effectiveness" of the plan.
4.2.2 Submit each requested change evaluation to the Emergency Planning Manager for review and approval.
4.2.3 IF the evaluation determines that the requested procedure change will "Decrease the Effectiveness" of the Emergency Plan, THEN the requested procedure change cannot be implemented.
4.2.4 IF the evaluation determines that the requested procedure change will require a change to the Emergency Plan, THEN follow the actions in step 4.1.
4.2.5 IF the evaluation determines that it will not "Decrease the Effectiveness" of the Emergency Plan or require a change to the Emergency Plan, THEN implement the procedure change.
4.3 Plan Revisions 4.3.1 Use Attachment 1, Instructions for Emergency Plan Revisions, to implement changes to the Plan.
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 11 Emergency Plan Management 5 REFERENCES 5.1 Use
References:
5.1.1 NUREG-0654, REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants" 5.2 Writing
References:
5.2.1 Source References
- a. 10 CFR 50.47(b) 5.2.2 General References
- b. 10 CFR 50, Appendix E "Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities"
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 6 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Pages:
Attachment 1 Instructions for Emergency Plan Revisions
- 1. All proposed changes to the Emergency Plan must have completed and approved 50.54(q) evaluations.
- 2. Determine the next revision number for the Emergency Plan. For minor changes use the currently approved Emergency Plan revision number and the next sequential letter. For example, Revision 16d becomes 16e. For major changes use the next sequential number.
For example, Revision 16e becomes Revision 17. For major revisions all pages of the Emergency Plan shall be updated with the new revision number not just those affected by the change. The Emergency Planning Manager will make the final determination on the revision number used.
- 3. Initiate Data Sheet 2, Emergency Plan Review and Approval Tracking Form.
- 4. Revise the appropriate steps within the Emergency Plan, documenting step changes and the reason for the changes on Data Sheet 3 (or comparable form). Reason(s) for the proposed changes can reference directly to an approved 50.54(q) determination to simplify documentation.
- 5. Obtain an independent review of the changes verifying the proposed change:
- Can be implemented as written.
- Complies with existing regulations and commitments.
- Does not exceed the bounds of an approved 50.54(q) evaluation.
- Does not introduce a 50.54(q) bypass mechanism.
- 6. Obtain an editorial review of the proposed changes. The independent reviewer may perfoi-m this review if necessary.
- 7. Obtain concurrence from the Emergency Planning Manager.
- 8. Obtain concurrence from Regulatory Affairs.
- 9. Develop an implementation plan for any proposed changes that will require the completion of additional actions prior to implementing the change.
- 10. Assemble the applicable final package documentation for review and approval:
- Updated Revision Summary
- 10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Implementation Plan
- 11. Obtain PORC approval.
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 7 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Pages:
Attachment 1 Instiuctions for Emergency Plan Revisions 6-7
- 12. Obtain the AEP Senior Vice President - Nuclear Generation approval.
- 13. Enter the effective date of the Emergency Plan.
- 14. Transmit the Emergency Plan to Regulatory Affairs for submittal to the NRC per 10 CFR 50.4.
- 15. Transmit the plan to NDM for distribution.
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 8 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Evaluation of Proposed Change to the D. C. Pages:
Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing 8- 9 SData Sheet 1 YES NO Does the proposed change delete or tend to weaken that portion of the current Emergency Plan revision regarding the following requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)
- 1. Assignment of state, local and site ERO responsibilities?
- 2. Assignment of onshift ERO personnel?
- 3. Arrangement for utilizing State or local resources and staff?.
- 4. Emergency Action Levels (EALs)?
- 5. Notifications to offsite agencies, ERO, or the public?
- 6. Communications between offsite agencies, ERO, or the public?
- 7. Dissemination of public information?
- 8. Adequacy of emergency facilities and equipment?
- 9. Methods, systems, and equipment for offsite response to a radiological emergency?
- 10. Protective Action Recommendations/Determination?
- 11. Emergency worker radiological exposure control?
- 12. Medical services for contaminated/injured personnel?
- 13. Re-entry/Recovery plans?
- 14. Drills and exercises?
- 15. Radiological emergency response training?
- 16. Plan development, review, and distribution?
YES NO Does the proposed change delete or tend to weaken that portion of the current Emergency Plan revision regarding the following requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E (I.)(II.)(11I.) Emergency plans as described in the FSAR?
(IV) A. Organization for coping with radiological emergencies?
(IV) B. Assessment of radiological emergencies?
(IV) C. Classifications, EALs, and ERO activation?
(IV) D. Notification of Federal, State and local agencies and the public?
(IV) E. ERFs, equipment, and communications?
(IV) F. Training, drills and exercises?
(IV) G. Plans, procedures and surveillance of equipment and supplies?
(IV) H. Re-entry and Recovery following an accident?
(V) I. Implementing Procedures?
(VI) J. Emergency Response Data Systems?
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 9 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Evaluation of Proposed Change to the D. C. Pages:
Data Sheet I Cook Emergency Plan and Implementing 8 - 9 Determination per 10 CFR 50.54(q)
If any of the above are "yes" evaluate the proposed change in accordance with the detailed information in the sections of NUREG-0654, FEMA REP-1, Rev. 1 Considering the detailed information in the sections of NUREG-0654, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological'Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants" that correspond to the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, this change in the Emergency Plan:
DOES DOES NOT __ decrease the effectiveness of the Cook Nuclear Plant JUSTIFICATION 4
I Originator: Date:
Emergency Planning Manager: Date:
Information,:,,-
Title:
Emergency Plan Revision:
Author:
Independent Reviewer: Date:
Editorial Reviewer: Date:
Concurrence.:, -: .-. ... , ,-' " - ,-° .-- ",. ,
"E Emergency Plan Coordinator Date:
"O Emergency Plan Manager Date:
"[] Regulatory Affairs Date:
Package Check::
Updated Revision Summary 0 Yes 10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluations 0 Yes Implementation Plan U Yes [ N/A Package Complete Date:
Approvals: - -- - - " .
PORC Review: Meeting Number:
Approval Authority: Date:
Emergency Plan Effective Date:- -- - . -.
Reference RMA-2080-EPA-008 Rev. 0 Page 11 of 11 Emergency Plan Management Emergency Plan Revision Summary Pages:
Data Sheet 3 11
Title:
Emergency Plan Revision:
Section or Step Change/Reason For Change Change:
Reason:
Change:
Reason:
Change:
Reason:
Change:
Reason: