ML030760067
| ML030760067 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 09/25/2002 |
| From: | Nuclear Management Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2003-0094 | |
| Download: ML030760067 (3) | |
Text
,
.Nuclear Management Company STATE CHANGE HISTORY Initiate A
I Submit to Screening AR Screening ue Complete &
AR Pre-Screen Team 1/2/2002 5.22.11 Close Done 1/2/2002 10:42.46 PM 5/9/2002 8 50:10 bTHMS Owner (None)
Owner SCOfIl wer(oe by THOMAS PAM Owner (None)AF KENDALL
- 11 F
by JAMES SCHLEIF q
Pr byJULIE KREIL IV O SECTION 1 Activity Request Id:
Activity Type:
o One Line
Description:
O Detailed
Description:
CAP001763 CAP Submit Date:
1/2/2002 10:42:46 AM ISI scoping of AF-1 17, AF-4035, classification of AFW recirc lines.
1/2/2002 9:42AM - THOMAS KENDALL:
During review of AFW system recirculation line design for continuing risk assessment, it was identified that a check valve (AF-1 17) in the common recirculation line is a source of a possible single active failure (failure to open) that could render all 4 pumps inoperable. A disc separation of manual isolation valve AF-1 could have similar effects (although this valve is not required to actively reposition, and is therefore not considered to be a failure contnbutor).
This concern will need to be reviewed in light of the final resolution for the recirculation lines from the pumps. If it is determined that minimum flow recirculation is a necessary design feature to maintain operability of the pump(s), then this valve will likely have to be removed and/or tested as a safety related valve.
Note that while relief valve AF-4035 is also in this common line, it may not provide protection to all running pumps if the common recirculation line downstream is blocked / isolated. This is due to the phenomenon of the higher head pumps (1 or more turbine driven pumps) shutting off flow from the lower head pumps. This aspect was described in full in NRC Bulletin IE 88-04
"=Potential Safety-Related Pump Loss".
This AR is to identify a concern, and to track it's resolution. Discussion with PRA Engineering staff confirms that the aggregate risk of the common mode failure is acceptably low. This is a mechanistic issue that may result from reclassification of the line, and is not considered a risk significant issue at this time.
Initiator:
Date/Time of Discovery:
Identified By:
Equipment # (1st):
Equipment # (2nd):
Equipment # (3rd):
Site/Unit:
Why did this occur?:
Immediate Action Taken:
Recommendations:
- KENDALL, THOMAS 1/2/2002 10:33:47 AM Site-identified (None)
(None)
(None)
Initiator Department:
Date/Time of Occurrence:
System:
Equipment Type (1st):
Equipment Type (2nd):
Equipment Type (3rd):
EDT Engineering Design Thermal/Hydraulic Analysis PB Z2 1/2/2002 10.33:47 AM AF PB (None)
(None)
(None)
Point Beach Common 1/2/2002 9 42AM - THOMAS KENDALL The common recirculation line has not historically been considered to have a Safety Related function.
1/2/2002 9.42AM - THOMAS KENDALL:
None 1/2/2002 9:42AM - THOMAS KENDALL:
Upon final resolution of design functions of the recirculation line(s), review IST of AF-1 17 and AF-4035 to determine if further changes are needed ion https://nmc.ttrackonline.co*/tmtrack/tmtrack.dll?lssuePage&Tableld=1000&Recordld=99(...
9/25/2002 Page I of 3
[Nuclear Management Company 1/2/2002 4:22PM - JAMES SCHLEIF" Conduct an engineering review to ensure the AFW recirculation line design is adequate. This review needs to include the system/component classification, single failure analysis, relief valve performance and capability in event of check valve failure and adequacy of check valve and relief valve maintenance and testing. Results of this evaluation will determine any additional corrective actions as stated in the initiators recommendation.
0 Notify Me During Eval?:
Y 0 SRO Review Required?:
SECTION 2 Operability Status:
Basis for Operability:
0 Unplanned TSAC Entry:
Operable 0 Compensatory Actions:
N 1/2/2002 4:22PM - JAMES SCHLEIF:
AF-1 17, AFW Recirculation Line Check Valve is a non-QA and non-Safety Related component. The AFW System however is safety related and relies on the recirculation flow under low AFW flow conditions to maintain pump cooling and operation. A search of CHAMPS history shows no work orders have been written against AF-1 17, AFW Recirculation Line Check Valve. Discussion with the Shift Manager also revealed no recollection of any previous problems with this valve. This recirculation line is also protected with a relief valve upstream of AF-1 17, AFW Recirculation Une Check Valve however, the capacity of the relief valve, AF 4035 is questioned based on the initiator's comments. Flow through AF-117, AFW Recirculation Line Check Valve is verified during each AFW pump quarterly test (four tests per quarter). Recent operator training and enhancements to operating procedures have heightened attention to the necessity to maintain adequate AFW pump flow/recirculation flow, or shutdown the AFW pumps to prevent damage to the AFW pumps. All AFW pumps have successfully completed all required testing within the current periodicity and are therefore operable.
N 0 External Notification:
N SECTION 3 Screened?:
Y 0 Significance Level:
N Potential MRFF?:
N 0 OAINuclear Oversight?:
N 0 Licensing Review?:
N Good Catch/Well Doc'd?: NA SECTION 4 Inappropriate Action:
9/512002 6:50:36 AM - KEVIN BENNETT:
This is a legacy item. The site has decided to make the recirculation function of these pumps safety related. In order to ensure that flow is maintained in this line the internals of the check valve are being removed.
Process:
N/A - Not Applicable Activity:
N/A - Not Applicable Human Error Type:
N/A - Not Applicable Human Perf Fail Mode:
N/A - Not Applicable Equip Failure Mode:
(None)
Process Fail Mode:
N/A - Not Applicable Org/Mgt Failure Mode:
N/A - Not Applicable 0 Group Causing Prob:
(None)
Hot Buttons:
(None)
SECTION 5 CAP Admin:
0 Project:
KEVIN BENNETT Corrective Action Prescreener:
(None) https://nmc.ttrackonline.com/tmtrack/tmtrack.dll?IssuePage&Tableld=
OOO&Recordld=99(... 9/25/2002 Y
Page 2 of 3
. Nuclear Management Company 0 State:
0 Submitter:
AR Type:
- Last Modifier:
- Last State Changer:
NUTRK ID:
- of Children:
References:
Update:
Prescreen Comments:
Import Memo Field:
OPR Completed?:
OLDACTION_NUM:
subtsid:
originalissue_id:
Site:
Cartridge and Frame:
Process (CAP)
Done THOMAS KENDALL Parent KEVIN BENNETT JULIE KREIL 0 Active/Inactive:
0 Owner:
O Last Modified Date:
0 Last State Change Date:
- Close Date:
Inactive (None) 9/5/2002 6:50:36 AM 5/9/2002 8:50:10 AM 5/9/2002 8:50.10 AM 0
MR 01-144 MR 02-001 NPM 2002-0228 CLOSED TO COMPLETED ACTION.
N 0
001763 Point Beach original-projectid:
32 ATTACHMENTS AND PARENT/CHILD LINKS ZI Linked To CE000022 https://nmc.ttrackonline.comltmtrackltmtrack.dll?IssuePage&Tableld=1000&Recordld=99(...
9/25/2002 Page 3 of 3