ML030710345

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TVA - Licensee Exhibit 62 - Rec'D 04/25/02: Operations Support'S Organizational Overview (Bi 1-229), Chapters 1 - 7
ML030710345
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry, Watts Bar, Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 04/25/2002
From:
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Byrdsong A T
Shared Package
ML030710346 List:
References
+adjud/ruledam200506, 50-259-CIVP, 50-260-CIVP, 50-296-CIVP, 50-327-CIVP, 50-328-CIVP, 50-390-CIVP, ASLBP 01-791-01-CIVP, RAS 5903, TVA-Licensee-62
Download: ML030710345 (121)


Text

Chapter 1 FY '96 VS. FY '97

SUMMARY

COMPARISON EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

ORGANIZATION CHART 03 CD

f* f OPERATI L6 SUPPORT EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

FISCAL YEAR 1997 MAJOR CHALLENGES AND RELATED INITIATIVES:

"* Refine and focus corporate roles consistent with long-term goals, providing maximum value-add to sites.

"* Transition previously provided functions to engineering and sites without loss of effectiveness.

"* Establish.more- effective INPO-like evaluation processes to support sites' SALP, INPO, and accreditation performance.

"* Maintain major equipment strategic plans and provide effective integration into long-term TVAl4 planning processes.

"* Implement a cost-effective S/G Integrity Program to extend the useful life of existing generators while minimizing life cycle costs.

_v-.-Provide effective S/G support for back-to-backWBN and SON outages. . o-,.- o t ta, -s 0 Assess TVAN lite cycle management process relative to industry processes/initiatives; initiate changes as appropriate.

SCoordinate implementation of Severe Accident Management plan for sites consistent with industry guidelines and regulatory commitments.

  • Establish TVAN outage optimization strategic plans using industry best practices and overall TVA cost considerations.

--z'-Developthe capability in Performance Assessment to perform activity based cost (ABC) process analyses whie-n dedto support -TV-*W-N ongoing process improvement and standardization programs.

"* Implement program changes as a result of new regulatory guidelines on initial license examinations.

"* Provide technical support for major chemistry projects such as hydrogen water chemistry at BIN, secondary chemistry optimization at SQN/WBN, comprehensive raw water treatment program, and chemistry data management system implementation.

", Develop strategy, through the Southeast Compact Generators Group (SECGG), for the disposal of low-level radwaste.

"* Develop strategy and implement radiation injury claim management/minimization.

" -Adjust:and optimize ERMI operation to meet increased workload for three operational sites and increased repair demand for electronic dosimeters.

"* Develop long-term business strategy for ERMI.

C)

CD-C:)

Updated: 4/29/96

'C OPERATION-o SUPPORT EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

FISCAL YEAR 1997 IIIGIILIGIITS OF THE OPERATIONS PLAN:

" ALL OPERATIONS SUPPORT

- Maintain and lrovide technical expertise to support site programs, processes, and problem resolution.

- Facilitate program/process benchmarking, optimization, and standardization.

- Facilitate and support INPO-like evaluations including increased discipline review and feedback 6n training effectiveness.

" MAINTENANCE SUPPORT

- Support sites in implementation of process improvements and reengineering, such as EMPAC and new Work Order process.

- Support sites in implementation of iNPO guidelines for Minor/Toolpouch maintenance and expanded utilization of "Fix-It-Now" teams.

" STEAM GENERATOR

- Implement consolidated S/G organization to provide improved resource focus and integration, ensure qualified and dedicated expertise/services, and optimize cost-effective program implementation.

- Incorporate S/G Level III position into new SIG organization in addition to SIG Specialists.

"* OPERATIONS, OUTAGE & FIRE PROTECTION

- Establish and facilitate Fire Protection optimization plan based on industry best practices.

  • PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT,

- Support increasing demand for work utilization studies and reviews to support TVAN reengineering and process standardization efforts.

0 NUCLEAR TRAINING

- Increase cost-effectiveness of and-optimizo-r-tum-oua TVAN training investment through benchmarking, standardization, cooperation, and innovation.

- Incorporate General Fundamentals Examination materials in CD-ROM format into several disciplines.

w - Support Program to develop/obtain multi-discipline System Descriptions for WBN and SQN (Phase I) and BFN (Phase II).

C C

C RADCITEM

- Finalize Radiological Control and Chemistry standardized procedures.

- Develop long-term strategic plan for Radiological Control and Chemistry program improvements.

- 6em\

UpdAted: 4/29/96 -'I..,

Chapter 2 BUSINESS ALIGNMENT MATRIX CD 0\

0\ 0°

( ( ( )

TVAN BUSINESS ALIGNMENT MATRIX FISCAL YEAR (FY) 1997 GOALS, PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, AND TARGETS TVASTRATEGIC CRITICALSUCCESS TVAN PERFORMANCE ACTUAL TARGETJFORECAS1JJ OUTYEAR PROPOSAL COALS FACTOR OBJECTIVES INDICATORS 1995 1996 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 CUSTOMER DRIVEN/ FINANCIAL EFFICIENTLY MANAGE PRODUCTION EXPENSE 17.47 16.25 15.95 14.98 14.89 13.99 12.78 13.20 12.61 12.22 GROWTII ORIENTED PERFORMANCE ALL ACTIVITIES TO 0 & M - (Milliaw) 11.41 10.75 10.52 1085 10647 9.32 7.84 8.31 8.37 8.00 REDUCE COSTS AND TO Fuel - (MitlxaWh) 6 06 5.50 5.43 4.13 4.42 4.67 4.94 4.89 4.24 4.22 ACItlEVE TOP (Excludes BFNI and BLN) 41 41- 4 II 4- 4- 4 4 4-PERFORMANCE BUDGET EXPENDITURES (Millions ofDollan) 0 & M - excluding fuel 269.0 374.3 372.5 443.0 428.2 383.9 340.5 347.1 347.1 347.1 CAPITAL- excluding fuel 811.1 318.7 318.7 150.9 135.8 122.2 110.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 Inventory change I i ... . ..- .

I-PLANT INCREASE ENERGY NET CAPACITY FACTOR (*.) 80 83 83 83 84 86 86 86 86 PERFORMANCE GENERATION Fiscal Year- 1994-1996 3 Year Avenge - 1997.2002 II 44 II. 4 14 4 4 4 .L .1.

ENHANCE AND SUSTAIN NRC COMPLIANCE A NUCLEAR SAFETY Level IV and V - Total N 65 56 56 46 30 30 30 30 30 30 FIRST CULTURE Levelt.II. and!I! -Total I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Licensee Events Reports (LERs) 14 22 22 39 38 27 20 20 20 20 Due To Personnel Errors Total I Pint Events Due to Personnel 0 9 9 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 Errors Which Cause Unplanned Power Reduction - Total N CD CD,

""*I -'"~

REV. 0

( C (

TVAN BUSINESS ALIGNMENT MATRIX FISCAL YEAR (FY) 1997 OA LS. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, AND TARGETS PERFORMANCE ACTUAL TARGET FORECASI OUTYEAR PROPOSAL TVA STRATEGIC CRITICAL SUCCESS TVAN 1996 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 FACTOR OBJECTIVES INDICATORS 1995 GOALS ENVIRONMENTALLI ENV!RORMENTAL PROTECT TIIE ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PERFORMANCE ENVIRONMENT Environmental Noncompliances- 9 26 26 *22 21 20 19 19 19 19 RESPONSIBLE Total I Notices of Violations With Fines - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total I RADWASTE GENERATED Cubic meters - PWR total 128 100 100 135 141 121 109 116 129 129 CubIc meters -DWR total 528 320 320 320 320 320 250 250 250 250 Fiscal Year- 1994-1996 3 Year Average - 1997.2002 EMPLOYEE WORK FORCE ATTRACT, RETAIN. AND SUCCESSION PLANNING DEVELOP NECESSARY Sutccession Candidate Readiness (*%) NA 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 SENSITIVE QUALIFIED PERSONNEL SUCCESSION CANDIDATE 70 75 80 85 99 99 DEVELOPMENT - IDP 11A) NA 70 90 95

____________________________ I + 1 I t t WORK FORCE DIVERSITY

% of Diverity New Ilirs IntaTargeted 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Underrepresented Schedules 1 - - -- --- 41 - i pi. i i i i i I PERSONNEL PROTECT TIll HEALTH LOST-TIME INJURY RATE SAFETY AND SAFETY OF InjMles/2f000 houri woiked 0.06 005 1 005 0 05 1 0 05 1 0.05 1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 EMPLOYEES RECORDABLE INJURY RATE C)

InJurdeV200.000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worted 0.58 065 1 065 0.65 1 0.65 1 0.65 1 065 0.65 065 065 C)

COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE Rem - PWR total 356 408 408 435 444 240 Rem . BWR total 644 581 581 329 512 J526 1 526 1459573 236 510 510 510 510

( ( ( ,

TVAN BUSINESS ALIGNMENT MATRIX FISCAL YEAR (FY) 1997 GOALS, PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, AND TARGETS "TVA STRATEGIC CRITICAL SUCCESSjj TVAN PERFORMANCE j ACTUALI TARGET FORECAS'] OUTYEAR PROPOSAL GOALS FACTOR OBJECTIVES INDICATORS 1995 1996 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1 2003 CU oa REV. 0

Chapter 3 OPERATIONS PLAN 00 0

C:)

0

S, ( (

OPERATIONS SUPPORT OPERATIONS PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1997 Department: Operations SupportFICLYAR19

____________________ (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS .($dOO'S) IIEADCOUNT OTHER MArIJ TRAVE/j TOTAL PROCESSI TVA PEIl SVS.

LINE BUDG ET CONTRACTS CONTRACTS EQUIP. OTHER COST IVA CONTR NO CATEGORY ACTIVITY LABOR SIPPOIAT 442 50 19 5 54 570 S I MANAGER 520 36 5 29 590 S 2 STEAM GENERATOR 910 43 13 41 1,007 9 3 MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 460 19 5 16 500 4 4 OPS & FIRE PROTECTION 1.113 32 127 24 1,296 16 5 ERMI 424 4 7 22 457 5 6 PERFASSESSMENT 638 3 13 23 677 6 7 TILAINING 12 10 ~I *** .

32 706 6 8 RADCIIEM 652 St~~t~i~~t~b

      • '-* '*-* ........0. . -0...~.0..0.  :.*.'*

.'" * '  ::: '**** ** ........ * * ... .. **......."::: ° ....... *'*

.. .......... ii!!! ' -1,296 ,* ::*W0-1,296 '.~S.... ....... '. *.....

. i***:i~~~*':

  • :**i'~:'::

.0.:::::::,*0,y t* ..... SITE RFIMBURSEMENTM (ERMI)

I1lAqE O&M 16 16 C) OWCP 264 264

_ RESOURCE GRP WK AGREEMENTS  !*** !!; ;"::-ii**:.

5,1751 50 168 -185 .791  : 4,787 -... 56 -.

TOTAL EXPENSE

  • Full Time Equivalent (FTE) =11800 Manhours for TVA employees and 2000 Manhours for Contric cimployees

Chapter 4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS PLAN 0\

00\

a'

OPERATIONS r-'ORT (7 DEI)ARTMI!NT. Operations Support INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS PlAN FISCAL YEAR 1997 EusIn Accountabil~tY Budget orciAndividual S pendin Cate go ries Are a 0 -1 I ourco~

e ACTIVITY AREA SffwaLe Other T 2q Labor RadCon managed Tasks - Projects modif REXS to accept other Dose Record devices 156

$ 15 I C I Sup r Lt Flannigan 280 Support 8 RadCon 289h C Flannigan Total . Projects under $100.000 *(See attached detail list)

$ 445

¥ 445 C - I Support I a INuclear Training -

Total Managed Taiks - Projects 272 C Support a Nuclear J. S. Training Laymon ContInuous Services:. 272 Application Baseline Support (73A) Red Con Mainframe Processing Charges Jim Flannigan Workstation / Server Charges ADP Hardware/Software Maintenance (25KI231)

Other IT Labor (Non-IS)

Dedicated IS Site Support Dedicated Communication Circuit Charges Telephone Charges (741-1.74J)

Cellular Charges (23G/23N)

Pager Charges (23P)

Total Continuous Services I I I I I I N/A I On Demand Services:

N/A.

IS professional Services (73A)

PC Maintenance (25K)

Moves/Adds/Changes Application Enhancements < $50K Tottal on Demand O erations Non-Prolect ADP ProcuremertiContracts; Contract Labor (25J)

N/A Hardware (3IJ)

Software (26F)

Other Total Non.Project ADP Procurement)Contracts ---- --- 4 IS Service Provision: (FortS u*se onrv InGlude Buu g ,

1717 For Your Organization Only TOTAL717iTOTAL 5 . Mkl / Custorrer Info 10o= Tech Applns (Non Nuclear) &

13usine is Functlona C-odesy Capita 1 . Administrative I Econ Dev 6 = Procurement I Malls 11 - Tech Appins (Arver Mgt) 12 = Work Mgt I Mailnt (Nuclear) Capital 2 = Employee Relations 7 = Records I Documents Support 8 = Reg Comp I WA Police I Legal 13 = Work Mgt I MaWn (Non-Nuclear) 3 .= Finance and Accounring 4 = Information Technology 9 a Tech AppIns (Nuclear)

= ept.uprvre Support rhead rcd o =theif t orporate Iniucear ) nformation eiceSCateo and Other. lIfthe source Is Other. indicate the orgarizationatg

( REX REQUESTED SUPPORT FY97 Jim Flanigan

(

REQUESTED FY97 MAN.OURS ISSUE SITES FOR NUCLEAR DURING CLEAN-UP AND DATA VERIFICATION POSSIBLE IoCFRSo t REMS DATA ANDCOlNERTED BASETHE DOSE DETAILVALUES NOT MATCH VALUES DOFROM THE ,,AAA VIOL.ATION DATA BASE.

NOBLE GAS SUBMERSION DOSE DIFFERENCES 0-8 CONVERSION DATA AWAITING SITE INPUT ON HOW TO RESOLVE CURRENTLY INTERFACED BY DISCONTINUED M4TE READERS VENDORHAVE BEEN EUMINATE CURRENT RESTRICTIONS ON 3 MONTHMONITORING PERIODS DOSIMETRY MONITORING BE UP PERIODS TO TO 385 DAYS AND TECHNICAL BASIS OF VERIFY ANDDOCUMENT REG.ULATORY COMPLETE V&V OF REXS OUAUTY ALLOUAUIY-RELATED DATA HANDUNG, C*PWERSCI RELATED MODULES BIOASSAY RESULTS REXS PHASE IFINCORRECTLY CONVERTED POTENTIAL INJURY RADIATION CLAIM DEFENSE (I70,855) IN THATTTHE PARENT (DEMOGRAPHIC DATA)CANNOT CHPEBSO30 IMPACT RESULTS).

fRESULTS CONVERSION DATA BE MATCH WITHCHILD (BIOASS&AY DATA ERRORS AND REDUCE MANtJAL DATA ENTRY TO ELIMINATE DATAVERIFICATION ACTIVITIES REXS CHEMISTRY INTERFACE MAJOR REXS MODIFY REXS TO pERMIT DEVICES SUPPORT THE USE OF ELECTRONIC DOSIMETERS.

EXPOSURE DATA.

MODIFICATION AFFECTING PERSONNEL OTHER THAN .DS TO BE USED AS SUBSYSTEMS ACCESS CONTROL. AND EQUIPMENT DOSE OF RECORD SUPERVISOR SCAR CHSCA0002. CORRECT IDENTIFIED DATA INABIUITYTO ACCESS AUDIT TRAIL PRODUCE AD HOC REPORTS FOR REXS REXg7BUD.XLSA I

4r27/96 I.°.

ITI

-r m

C C C>

OPERATIONS SUPPORT FINANCIAL PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1997 Department: Operatlons Support (DOLLARS INTItOUSANDS)

FY)196 FY 1996 FY 1991 FY ESTiMATE FY 1995 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2 003 BUDGET FORECAST PROPOSAL TOTA .,B UDGET ACTUALS BASE M ..

133 340 340 280 16 rVsource OrnopSupport & OWCP 4,321 4,478 4620 4750 4888 CoroateExpefue PerBP guidetinea 133 340 340 280 16 4321 4478 ' 4,20 4750 4888 SUtTOTALt OTrrAGEOANr OUTAGE-UNIT 0 INSERTROWSAS NEEDED 0 0 0 0 .'0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 SAT.ES.ENERAT, A ADMIN.- OTHER POWER EXI'NFh PROPERTY INS.

INJURIES & DAMAGES NRC ANNUAL FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL rAEITIA r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUC. PROD. CAPITAL 945 0 MATERIALS INVENTORY Flt!. INVENTORY CHIANGE 945 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

... SIUBTOTAL

  • on 5786 5933 5933 4507 4442 i1I EilYE LEX tENSEA_ " . . 627 .. . . . . . . . . .* .rA e . AOQO HO00 M TOTALEXPENSE ' . 6864 6273 6273 4787 4458' I. 3Z1 ql-tU 1,878 2,520 C:) REDUCTION NEEDED TO MEET TARGET

( 1,221

)

C) Generation:

C

...& Unit I N)*

N) Unit 2 0 C C a 0 0 a 0 C Unit 3 a 0 0 C C C a 0 0 Total Generation 0 lTotal Production C(sts(mills/kWh) I ___________ I ___________ A. I __________ A. __________

Budget categories are i'xpense. Capital, Support, and Fuel Expense. Budget categories should be grouped together.

"2 0 & 0 'C 4' > z

-3 0 C- C, 0~ -

0 4 lw C C) b C,,

0  ;

3i 0. Is ., C.'

0 0 0 0 -U CA 0

.j ' a Li, 3 Cfl

- - *0 II 0

0 -i z

000 19 0

I

-k--*-J Ci 0 A 8

S( C Chapter 6

.-WORK FORCE ACTION PLAN/

AT-RISK DESTAFFING C)

C)

C)

( (

(.

OPERATIONS SUPPORT AT-RISK STAFFING/FINANCIAL PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1997- CURRENT YEAR

)ept:Operations Support APR MAY JUNE JuL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1996 1996 1996 1997 1997 (H.E.ADCOUNT)

'VAN Destinffiu Employees at Risk -1 14 14 14 14 14 Employees planned for TVA Services 144 (BUDGET$ IN THOUSANDS)

IVAN Destaffille Employees at Risk

-O&M

-Capital . *

-Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Total Budget-Early Outs 0 0 0 0 Employees planned for TVA Services o -O&M

-x s, -Capital 01 -Support 107 108 107 108 107 108 107 108 107 108 107 108 108 107 108 107 108 107 108 107 108 107 108 Total IBudget-Transfers to TVA Services 107 10 17 "'10~c7 108 10760 108 107 10

-ng 10

. .~17 Toti )etalig1ndgt:~

d e"; ... -:;::0 -8

~~
:.108

DC ( (

OPERATIONS SUPPORT AT-RISK STAFFING/FINANCIAL F PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1997 Dept: Operations Support FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 199S FY 1996 FY 1996 FY 1997 ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ACTUAL APPROVED FORECAST PROPOSED (HU EADCOUNTn Employees at Risk 0 14 4 2 0 0 0 0 Employees planned for TVA Services 0 0 AInn~al/loury iEuploynieni col..ins shouldshio Jieadcoutn. at of Thca! Yea'-end ..... .:......:.'::*......

~Note:

S.....,. .,...

IT!

ro s 71ý1 on,1 (B UDGET $ IN THOUSANDS)

VAH.i..DtlnlL Employees at Risk

-O&M

-Capital

.Support Totnl lludset-.,arly.Outs-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TtlBddEryqtis0 Employees planned tor TVA Services 0 -O&M 198 0 -Capital 0 0 1,289 332 0 0 0 0 Support 0 0 0 0 1,289 332 198 0 0 0 0 Total Midget-Transfers to TVA Services

.. .... ... 2 " ... ....

Ing it gt 33 190

Chapter 7 AND TRAINING PLAN EDUCATION DC

C EXHIBIT 2A C FY 1997 EDUCATION and TRAINING PLAN

SUMMARY

($ooo's)

PROVIDER COST SITE:Corn - Ops.Sunport DEPT: Nuclear Trn' LA.BOuR Direct Indirect 619 Total 619 TRAVEL Direct Indirect 19 Total 19 CONTRACTS MATERIALS 13 EQUIPMENT w

C) OTHER 4 co C) TOTALS 655

EXHIBI*" 2B FY97 EDUCATION and TRAINING PLAN

SUMMARY

C

($000's)

Site:Corp PARTICIPANT Dept:Ops Support Reason for Training Required by Law/ TVAU Core Requisite "Regulatory/Compliance Training Other Training (examples: NRC, EPA, Executive Order, (examples: Dollars& Decisions, (examples: Personal Diversity Awareness, Developing Excellence, College Courses, TOTALS Certificationsrequiredin variousfields, Leaders, etc.) Semitars/Conferences,etc.)

Trainin Category etc.)

Business (examples: Business Planning,Supervisory Skills Courses, 1JIVIAIDS Awareness, Dollars

& Decis;onsetc.) 23,504 18,276 41780 "Technical (examples: Mahintienance, Craft Training, ProfessionalCertificationsHIVIAIDS Certification,efc.) - 33,880 3,078 36958 Individual/Professional Development (examples: College'Courses,Individual/

Personallmprovenehnt, Seninars!

Conferences, etc.) . 23,807 149,035 172842 V-- ~ -

Information i echnouioy Training w (examples: Microsoft Word, CAD, Piping 0 Support Software, Power Builder, Application Development Training,etc.) CO 11,705 7,300 19005 TOTALS 33880 62094 174611 f 270585

( (

(VUVNCR TVAUrrVAN CORE PARTICIPANT e: Corp - O Support Dept: Ops Support Roll-up EDUCATION AND TRAINING PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1997 (10)TVAU (1I)

(8) Rteaon I Number cf (12)

(s) Est. (6) Elective (7)1le'dve Toa~l (9)Tranlng Core Number of Trawl Est, Porloty far Category Category nIployezz employees Costs Course FY 1"99 (3) Course (4)Number of Employees Total es (S) Expenses (S) "fanlg Training (1-4) - FY4 91998 Training Objecas DuratIon FSCALYEAR 1997 (2) Course I I A 12 all em (all eral (liS) ot 02 03 (044 IHousa C3 14 Cate or Number I Course/A*l"v /Yue..rltsla 4 22 96 S3,918 $3,918 P2 PRIORITY #1 8 3 3 1 9 Ltiti IefL~erilRD082 24C S9,633 S9,633 n _

14 7* 1 - __ _ _ _

Barrier Analyslsflumsn Error Avddance MD 1 3 IIRD702 Awareness 3 7 178 S7.376 IIRD703 16 1 2 ercneS -iffer--nceS  ! US020 Understanding* IUS 2 TVA 'sflnances" Dotlara AndDedsio ns 1 192 $9.710 --- --. _ __--

IIRDOS7 1 6 2 $8,760 P1 3 coacing Skills .C2

, 3 1 176 $8,760 v-o-nmet hI"D 16 3 S3 _3 Sure.u son In A -- Nu.de- 4,190 S4,190 L2 21 2 2 s TVA Personnel Pdldes & ProceduresSMD 16 Conflict Resolutton/Fattlfl C'on e 1ED 23,015 P2 _9___

L _._-

PRIORITY 92 5 6 76 S3.178 4

"IVA fnCes:Tbe Current Pidur BUVSOieo_.-S S3,078 P2 "TVA: A New Business Era (Video) IIUJS024 CPP706 001 312 2 S3,021--===---=

$302 ! _2 PursuinaEhronmenil Qualit At VA V P2 Customer Drwtvn Performance (VidLe oT10230 r oundations Of Le er.shi IIRD.83 48 S2.800 3 __.--

1 1 C3 IUnderatasidltt Ourusiness l,,iatUioshOa .__.. _

___L,800 P2]._.

IRD707 1 120 63 Sa Teate Diel cment -2C e _TBED ----

Develo n Leaders: Sceln ThleExa VARIES*.. S6.360 P2 1,-3 _7_.._ I, S r aes Eecutiv Role Modeln ] VARIOUS C'3 VARIES...

VARIOUS Executive sA=ssmecnf PRIORITY 3 4 .-.- ,--

IRD708 ..........

Individual Develo mea Plant"InI 1 10 Total uallt At IVA deo TQT022 00O [P2 Strate cTeam Devel ent IIRD707 IUS0IO UnderstA...ln.g Our Eudness Reatldwshlps SIOULD) IBEENTERED ON Till! OIIIER I3LANK~

FORMS PROVIDED. 7 .2 2VAUELE~iVEORO~hE TRIMNIN 431 6,89I$ 88 9 III Buin s 'Ian Tous~tsI TVAU Cart Category!

I . Non-Supervisory Training Category 2 - rront-Line Super~isors CI Business Reason I Priority code for training sctivily C2 Technical 3 - Mid-Senlof Lne Managers 0 C3 Indivadu*Profesoonal Developmenlt I'1 RequIhed by IAw/RegL* atomrYCmnPIIsn't C* C4 Information TedcnologyTraining 4 -Executives P2 TVACoreTrklnlfnlg P3 professional Development 0 C0) 0O

EXHIIBIT 5b Sheet A TCp N Ops StipportTVAUITVAN-Confrihmtion

'~

Corp - PLANIIP E DUCATION AND TRAINING Corpl-UOPs up FISCAL YEAR 1997 (OTA

" (12) umero Cole (1OYIVAU Total (8) Reasoni Cr Nun0b&a RNunyetC Elective

()s. (6) C(Sss (7E1301ve 'st. priority fo (9)T lflS Esavel lC) 14 CSoatsnss(S 9 8FY 3poes19 (4) ?4umbet of EmployecS Total 4 Iy CueZ1 zpOei (3) Course rus ) C4tgr CC4 ItalAil1 O(all Fees() ol e p ) p n eSS 0 P 12 9 e (rA) E*TolxfB (all~

FISCALYEM 1997 R 127 (ol e e ! S46 (2) C orseif D urationt Numbe 2 01 04 Ilowrs 256 $10.40 51,000 P28 03

( Ies) C4 1716 bU t~uam 110.300 P2 Ou t~ ft~

(l)C ~~~ d M 7e1oAIS ~ 1256 51020 $465

()C u Tiis/ ngcli)/ leoy64 $5 800 5 200 S 49 0 3C 310 2rl 2 12 0 $C i A os 2 128 6 35,800151,500 16 2 2 2 cpCTIFadIn Mtn&SIo TVAU Core C sletor2y 17 9 T1 11 S565 1 dSOO Us N4l8r CQC t ncl w nlD vco ~ " e ui e 2.Fron-lineSttpPr45Of s lI priority -ode ror training Iactivity Re C 3 n rmnTc ,,g elP eft3M Reglaor Comlinc l/TJCtfllD P2 TrainingTeila pllCqured y A lC AC3jevd Dev Professional elopmeI~nt P3

( (

EXIIIBIT 6 (

ACCREDITED, TECHNICAL, OTHER PARTICIPANT Site: Corp - Ops Support gDUCATION AND TRAINING PLAN Departneflnt fRoll-Up i FISCAL YEAR 1997 (7) T (8)Reason) (10)

Numberof (11)

Numberof (4) (5) Est. (6) Travel Est. Priority for 9) Training Costs Course Expenses (S) Training Training Category Employees Employees

',3) Course ]Number of Total (2) Optional Training Otjects Fees ($) (Cl-.C4) PY 1998 FY 1999 Duration ]Employees (alt em I) Expense (S) (P1 -P3) 7 o Course C2

_I_ Cou rs eIAct iviTra nin Ca 0 Irs 1997 Ifours s3,016 P1 Number .-- - C2 35 35 Con f/Senina r/Worksilop 161 $3,016 S5,400 P1I 0.

$5,40.. C2 53 53 GET Initial

_.__..-,-= $2,449 P 1 55 $2,449 FFD Continuing TruiIn 2 Cl 2 S9,216 5S960 $10.176 P3 F3 2 3201 645

- _$6,500 S6,500 E _3_..C2 9 Tuition Reimbursement 22.5 S1.050 C2 I --'-- "--

2.59 "----------- 1`I

$1,095-----

9

.'2_..

4 _ 1... 24 $1,095 ND dyCurr'ent Trainln.B__._

321 32 $1,200_$1,200__ ___2,400 ,L_,_ CIC3 8 9

S27.325 L3 CI,C3 1 S2.000 C3 9 Seminrs /Wor-sho0_P .--- ,---- s 13.560._S9.75_0_E $1I4,000.___. L3_7,310 f -3 CJL- -

360 "professional Devlpmn - 40*

$3.600_ S2,500_. s2,o~~o 0_P3__

s$,1_.

_. 8.. 0 ctiit Bsed C~ost T an i m

co 18 12:S 0 42U01 118 07. Core Category:

Flusness Plan Totals: TraiingCateoryTVAU 0 Tr]lrdnln Cl Tlusiness Category I - Non.SupervisorY

--L Reason I Prfority code for training tctlvlty 2 - Front-L.1re Super[visors Pt Required by Law /Regulatory Compliance C2 Technical 3 -Mid-Senior Line Managers CA C3 Individus]ProfessionAl Development P2 TVA Cort Training 4 - Executives C4 Information Technology Training P3 professional Development

4 0.

I BI 000133

( ( C SUPPORT OPERATIONS Fiscal yearj,997 Key planning Assumptions 1ad1 ny 563.%(b 4, Headcount 3.7%0/ (ob! I i and 12 only) of living) Rate 23.9%

4 Escalation (Cost policy) 0 4 Benefit Rate (Salary 0

Overtime Rate* Percent of ST Hours 4 see schedule Percent of ST Dollars 4 Unit StartUP and outage schedules 03 0

C:

0 CD

.C.

lj E iO F E FECEI r ADD 960305 154 y, 2.ReCrEIVED e CWL&ý, ennessee

/*

March 8, 1996 r96-J Engg & Technical Services TA Nuclear Those listed on page 2 TVA NUCLEAR (TVAN) FISCAL YEARS (FYs) 1997-2001 BUSINESS PLANNING TARGETS The results of the targets we established for FYs 1997-2001 at the February 14 and February 21, 1996 TVAN Strategic Planning sessions are attached.

We agreed the O&M targets and mills/kWh cost were to be based on a cumulative annual 5% savings off of FY 1997 base O&M at Browns Ferry and Sequoyah, a cumulative annual 1% savings off of FY 1997 base O&M at Watts cost Bar, and a cumulative annual 4% savings in FY 1997 outage O&M per day at each site. This was to be applicable as long as it was fair and equitable as possible among the plants. The Central office targets were to be based on a cumulative annual 5% savings applied to FY 1996 Business Plan contained a real 10% reduction. The FYs 1997-2001 dollars which already The final Capital targets will be other targets were not to be changed.

its reviews and the issued after the TVA Capital Review Team completes results are approved by the TVA Executive Committee.

This case did not prove to be equitable among the plants. Higher first year base O&M targets for FY 1997 were established in the FY 1996 Business Plan for Browns Ferry and Watts Bar. This was due to FY 1997 being the first full year of operations for Browns Ferry Unit 3 and Watts Bar Unit 1. This skewed the results.

Therefore, in the interest of equity, modifications to our assumptions were made as shown below:

"* The cumulative annual 5% and 1% savings reductions for BFN and WBN, respectively, were applied to the FY 1996 Business Plan FY 1998 base O&M targets beginning in FY 1998.

"* The cumulative annual 5% savings reduction rate for SQN was reduced to 4% beginning in FY 1998.

of The results of these changes established targets that met our objective the industry while proving to be more equitable among becoming the best in the plants. As we revisit these targets in FY 1997, additional attention WBN to SQN for should be given to the improvement of the base O&M ratio of years 1999-2001.

BI 000135

Those listed Page 2 establish site In addition to the attached targets, I expect each of you to capture the additional cost specific goals to shorten refueling outages and Estimated savings (days and dollars) are shown with the savings.

assumptions for your use in establishing these goals.

attached target for Also, an additional 10% reduction to the Central Office no rate increase for FY 1997 will be required to support the TVA goal of that year.

the nation. We must These targets will move TVAN to becoming the best in TVAN must embrace communicate these targets to all levels of employees.

into business plans, identify performance gaps, these stretch targets reco ze opportunities, and establish action plans.

u Iar and Pr'se'iTV. Nficer Chief cl r LP 6A-C r R. J. Adney, OPS 4A-SQN D. E. Moody, LP 3B-C L. George, BR 5C-C P. L. Reynolds, LP 3B-C R.

C. Kazanas, OSA 1A-BLN J. A. Scalice, ADM lV-WBN N.

D. Machon, PAB IE-BFN K. Wj Singer, LP 3B-C R.

P. Maciejewski, LP 3B-C K. D. Stinson, LP 3B-C J.

J. McGrath, LP 3B-C 0. J. Zeringue, ADM 1V-WBN T.

WRH:JRW:LAS Attachments cc (Attachments):

J. W. Hutton, LP 6A-C S. E. Wallace, LP 6A-C RIMS, CST 13B-C 5281L BI 000136

( ADMINISTRATIVE( ONFIDENTIAL

(

TVAN FY 1997 Targets March 8, 1996 Com poundIn gBoundary - P Y 00 FY 1997 Reuc-o I?1998 Reductionl FY 1999 ReductionlF 20 Reduction F201Reduction rron rron tront 11Browns Ferry 96 BPI Targets FY96 BP FY 96 BP Targets FY96 BP FY 96 lIP Txrgets FYý96 B11 FY 96 P Targets FY96 BP FY 96 IlP Targets FY96 DP IFY 109.8 17.3 115.5 104.3 11.2 115.5 99.1 16.4 124.3 65 121.7 115.6 6.11 127.11

()&NJ Dollars - Base 130.8 4a. 19.0 13.2 58 14.9 3.3 26.1 20.2 5.9 17.9 13.8 Outage 19.7 18.9 08 18.2 9.4 153.2 130.1 23.1 133.4 118.1 15.3 134 5 112.3 22. 2 Tlotal Non-fuel 150.5 143.21 7.3 139.9 130.5 16.84 13.23 15 81 12.39 15.96 12.11 NfillslkWh - rotalw Fe 15.16 12.75 Sequoyall 101.7 165 118.2 97.6 20.6 115.0 6.1 115.8 110.4 5.4 125.1 105.9 192 118.2 O&M Dollars - Base 121.0 240 19.0 5.0 17.21 0.71 27.5 25.4 2.1 23.2 20.6 2.6 13.1 Outage 17 7.5 14839 26.5 2 L114 1.8 8 18.. 3 1l6635.6 Total Non-fuel 138.9 132.1 6.8 143.3 135.8

' 14.6 12.20 158 11.57 14.73 Mills/kWh - Total wl Fuel 13.49 11.601 Watts Bar .

0&M IDollars - Base 94.1 93.2 0.9 81.1 80.3 0.8 84Tl7.6 i T]8~i4 [ ~

13.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.1 12.8 3.3 5.5 17.9 17.2 0.7 15.0 80.1 78.7 1.41 96.2 90.7 Outage 7.5 7.2 100.4 1 :03. 90 9. . 96 .3 6.3 Total Non-fuel 101.6 2 9.0 97.5 1.5 [ 99.6 93.~A ~ 2 4 1~~2~~. 17.62 1.31~

17.88 1489 15.22 .42 J.2 4.31 16.97 15.31 17.51 15.48 Nfills/kWh - Total wl Fuel Central Office 8.2 1.9 10.1 7.8 2.3 0.6 11.5 10.4 1.1 11.5 9.9 1.6 10.1 O&NI Dollars - O&M. 11.5 10.9 24.1 4.01 25.4 20.7 4.7 25.4 19.7 5.7 33.0 31.4 1.7 31.1 28.1 3.0 28.1 Support" 0 0 0 0 19.4 1.0 28.7 25.9 2.8 0 0 0 0 Reserves . 20.4 5.7 5.7 7.0 39.61 34.0 5.6i 35.5, 28.9 6. 6 L 305.5 f0 8,2.

BFNI & BLN 67.41 3.2 71.3 64.3 Total 70.6 T AN  ::':::::'~:!*:'"i:~

168 389.9 370.6 19.3 37641 329.2 47.2 349.3 313.6 35.7 349.3 302.1 47.2 O&N! Dollars - Base 1 416.5 399.7 64.3 54.7 9 6 33.3 26.8 6.5 59.1 45.0 14 1 Outage 45.1 43.3 1.8 63.6 .57.5 6.1 383.9 56.8 382 6 340.5 42.1 408.4 347.1 61.3 461.6 443.0 18.6 453.5 428.1 25.4 440.7 Total Non-fruel 10.46 10.75 9.31 8.86 7.83 9.83 8.30 Mills/kWh- Non-fuelc) 11.33 10.87 11.10 16 92 13.*1 15.30 12.73 16.22 13.15 Total wI/Fuel C 16.98 15.01 17.03 1:i14.87 16.32 U." 15.27 :.:.,8 12.17 16.07 ...........

Less Benefits 0 1566 1714 16.06 Ii13.65 15.68 1..45 15.22 .12,75 14.99 127 TVA3 Yr Avg 15.97 15.2 15.67 14.31 1.01 10.38 Med top qtrl @ 6, , '131 12.37.11.67 MillIkhl -Industry 11.65 1 3 I31. 3 :2.. 0 12.11 Med top qtrl @ 41t 3 "3 5 M1, M e d t o p q t rl (@ 2 % ....: .'- . ,1 461 43.71 2.3 41.61 37. 4.1 37.51 24.1 ý 13.4 33.81 20.7 13.1 33.8 19.7 14.1 T'ota-lCetral 011ccSupport [

Cenintrl O11ice O&M has S6 illion fees in FY 1997 (INPO, NEI, F1F1MA EIMA, AEMA)

AlIocAtion to Capital stops at the end of FY 1998.

Page 1 of 6 318196

ADMINISTRATIVEL( ,NFIDENTIAL C

TVAN FY 1997 Targets March 8, 1996 FY 2000 FV 2001 FY 1998 1Y 1991 Red freon FY 1917 Red trains Red front Red Iro!

Red (rem I'/E91 UP VY0 BP Targets Targets FY96 UP FY 96 0P Targets FY*6 UP F'Y 9 UP I Targets "Y96 UP FY 96 UP "largcts FY 96?P 1155 1043 11.2 115.5 99.1 164 M o&ovnFerryl 121.7 115.6 6.1 127.1 109 8 17 3 FO&NIlDollars- Base 1308 124.3 65 17.9 13.8 4.1 19.0 132 58 08 18.2 14.9 3.3 2651 202 59 Outage 19.7 18.9 1334 118.1 153 1345 112.3 22 2 143.2 7.3 139.9 1305 9.4 15321 130.1 23.1 Total Non-fuel 1505 8.11 7.18 819 6 84 861 8.03 9 63 818 Ntills/kWIh- Non-fuel 9 67, 9.18 16 84 1581 1 1596 16.08 .14,48 1516 Total w/ Fuel 1562 iil32 1576 1642 15.70 1659 Less Benefilts 1599 TVA 3 Yr Avg 16.62 1$!*l*81 .

1586 "14,38 16 23 13.12 1597 It 6.62. 9.99 12163 110 13:10 "?"12,5 Mill/ffkh -Industry Med top qrl @ to6% 12.20 1*,60 Med top ctlrl @ 4% 11 84 13.36 Med top qlrl @ 2%

1182 97 5 206 Sequoyah 115.8 1104 54 125.1 1059 192 1282 101.7 16 O&M Dollars- Base 121.0 1150 6.1 23 2 20.6 26 154 13 1 24 0 19.0 50 27.5 254 2.1 2.3 Outage 17.9 17.2 0.7 126.5 21.8 133.6 1148 142.2 1166 256 143.3 1358 7.5 1483 188 Total Non-fuel 138.9 132A1 68 8 87 7.49 7.74 6558 851 6 90 873 823 Mills/kWh - Non-fuel 8 13 7.73 456 1:220 15.18 1473 "

1552 .... . 1*34 11471 Total w/ Fuel 13.49 :0 14.98 14 55 1527 1507 12,76 ti:ii;'22~s 1124 Less Brno.11s 23 838 X103 14.46 1..37 14 64 12.10 1486  :...,10.59 1493

.TVA 3,r Av_ _ 1437 M2.73 1190 :128.  : 1.20 hlills/&Wl -Industry Med top qlir @ 6% 1.61 1212 Med top qtrl @ 4% 13 Med top cirl @22%3 X 3 W illis 1121tr 79.5 80 1 78.7 1.4 80.1 77 9 2.2 81.1 803 08 84.6 5.1 O&M Dollars - Base 94 1 93.2 0.9 0.7 150 139 1.1 00 00 00 16 I 12 8 33 17.9 17.2 Outage 7.5 7.2 0.3 99 6 93.3 63 80 2 787 1.4 962 90.7 55 99.0 97 5 1.5 Total Non.fuel 101 6 1004 1.2 11 87 1 .07 844 821 I 45 1070 12.10 !1.91 MsllsrkWVl - Nun-fuel 13 42 13.26 17.88 2522 122 17.62 17.51 '14.15 Total w/ Fuel 1697 I$-1 18.16 17.77 19.17 11555 110i Less Benefits 18 43 7..9 17.30 1653  :" 1635 13.39 17.25 TVA 3 Yr Avg 1 96 15.81 ,>...... 1:69 14,25 13.42 hllsIk\Vh -Industry Med top qtrl @ 6%.: 1 Med top qtrl@ 4%/. 1$1o 1 at15, L iSt Med topclirl @ 2% _____ 2633 ______3 TVAN 3764 3493 302.1 47.2 370.6 19.3 329.2 47.2 349.3 313.6 35.7 w O&M Dollars - Base 4165 45.1 399.7 l 43 3 168ll 1.8 389 9 63 6 57.5 6.1 643 54.7 96 33.3 26 8 65 59.1 450 14.1 Outage 440.7 56 8 382 6 340.5 42.1 4084 347.1 613 443.0 186 453.5 428.1 254 383.9 Total Non-fuel 461.6 830

, 10.75 931 886 7 83 9 83 1 11.10 10.46 Malls/kWh- Non-fuel 11.33 1087 1530 1622 17.03 16.92 CA3 Total w/ Fuel 1698 1487 1632 1527 16 07 . 12,17 15.66 13 74 1606 Less Beinerits 1 165*'

1522 1499 ..: 12.27 cxo TVA 3 Yr Ave Id 1597 1-<46 15.67 14312;a 1565

.I1. 01 hfi ls/kV~h -Industry t

Med op qtrl @ 6% . 3:13,1I 2.065 Med top qirl @ 4% 13,62 "13,35 13,09

..!iiil4 17 hid top itrl na 2%

Page 2 of 6 318196

( ADMINISTRA'Tr CONFIDENTIAL TVAN FY 1997 Targets Capacity Factor Targets As a result of reviewing INPO year 2000 goals, it was agreed that capability factor increases were needed for SQN and WBN.

SQN & Watts Bar capability factors were increased from 86% to 87%. Capability loss factors for SQN & WBN decreased from 5.6% to 3.0%. The resulting change in capacity factors associated with capability factor changes are shown below.

Capa1ity lac997 FY99 FY 1999.:F-0 *:.FY200I FY 1996 Business Plan 82.3 83.6 83.9 88.4 85.0 Increase 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.6 Final Target 82.4 83.8 84.4 89.0 85.6 Geneir'tion Targets Generation results after above capability factor improvements and updated operating results.

.. i* WY1999.

  • i::.bWY.`997::!:.* .*9 FYIP.S Get.etatio x`***!*!*:!?.*.!i:**:;:i~ FY!:* ::2000:!: WY :'2001..iil FY 1996 Business Plan 40.23 40.84 41.01 43.2 41.54 Increase 0.02 0.09 0.22 0.28 0.26 Final Target 40.25 40.93 41.23 43.48 41.80 Capital Targets TVAN has proposed to Knoxville, a 1997 request for $150.9 million based on a review of individual projects. Beyond 1997, TVANs proposed targets will be based on an annual percentage reduclion of the $150.9 million level as shown below.

Capital Dollars;-F1.:..:*:....FYt997:. FY.:1998-... 1fY I1999!, FY:2000!i. FY 2001r ..

FY 1996 Business Plan 194.2 150.4 1388 111.9 111.9 Reduction NA 10% 10% 10% 20%

Revised Target 150.9 135.81 1 22.23 110.01 88

(:D Note: Allocation to Capital stops at the end of FY 1998 0

CO Page 3 of 6 318196

SADMINISTRAFIVE(vE bNFIDENTIAL TVAN FY 1997 Targets Other Targcts Chemistry Index: Browns Ferry 1.05, Sequoyah 1.06, Watts Bar 1.00 and no change for Browns Ferry.

Radiation Exposure: New goals were set at 106 for Sequoyah; 120 for Watts Bar; NRC Compliance: No Change will stay the same as (he previous Environmental Compliance: No change in targets at this time. The total goal for TVAN business plan. T. McGrath will investigate the basis for distribution among the sites.

Hadwaste Generated: No Change the scope of positions included in the Succession Planning: No change in numeric goals. P. Reynolds will investigate narrowing indicator calculation to senior level and other critical positions.

Work Force Diversity: No Change Lost Time Injury Rate: No Change Recordable Injury Rate: No Change 0

0 Page 4 of 6 3/8/96

( ADMINISTRATIVE( ONFIDENTIAL (

TVAN FY 1997 Targets Assumptions for Base $'s, Outage $'s, and Outage (lays Targets are based on the following:

  1. Browns Ferry has 5% imnprovement applied to FY 1997 base dollars 1998 base dollars of $121.7n from the FY 1996 Business Plan
  1. Browns Ferry has a 5% compounded annual improvement applied beginning with the FY
  1. Sequoyah has a 5% improvement applied to FY 1997 base dollars of $115.0mn resulting from the above calculation
  1. Sequoyah has a 4% compounded annual improvement applied beginning FY 1998 to base dollars
  1. Watts Bar has a 1% improvement applied to FY 1997 base dollars base dollars of S81.1m from the FY 1996 Business Plan
  1. Watts Bar has a 1% compounded annual improvement applied beginning with the FY 1998
  • Central office assumes a 5% compounded improvement off FY 1996 Bus Plan Targets (more aggressive)

Watts Bar begins compounding on the FY 1998 outage

  1. Refueling outage dollars assume a 4% compounded improvement on FY 1997 outage cost ner day.

outage was reduced by 4%

cost per (lay (first refueling outage, not FY 1997 maintenance outage). The Watts Bar FY 1997 maintenance for FY99, & 2.5 in FY00 & 01. The FY 1996 assumptions

  1. Fuel cost improvements assume a 1.5 mills/kWh improvement for FY97, 1.83 for FY98, 2.16 the fuel costs and has been incorporated in the above savings already included an unidentified savings of .33 for FY98, .66 for FY99, & 1.0 for FY00 & 01 on 2/5 for BFN and SQN, and 1/5 for WBN. The dollars
  1. The mill calculation for 'Less Benefits' and TVA 3 Yr Avg have central office costs spread to sites.with are reduced by 11.7% to exclude benefits for industry comparisons

, Browns Ferry Unit 1 layup cost of S5.5 million in FY 1997 is excluded from mill rate calculation for BWRs and 35/40 (lay refueling outages for PWRs.

An additional study was performed with revised generation ranges including 28/35 day refueling outages capability loss factors for SQN and WBN. Based on The first refueling outages on BFN3 and WBN maintained original outage lengths. It also included reduced shorter refueling outages, costs were reduced on a dollar per (lay basis rate of 2%, 4%, and 6% rate and are for The industry comparisons for each site are based on 1992-1994 median top quartile data, improved at a compounded multiunit sites for BFN & SQN and single unit sites for WBN The TVAN industry comparison is based on the above data weighted 4/5 multi unit and 1/5 single unit 1997 includes 3 years data for unit 2 The TVA 3 Yr Avg data for WBN in FY 1997 includes only the 2 years of operation. The TVA 3 Yr Avg data for BFN in FY and 2 years data for unit 3 w

C3 C:)

0

__Page 5 of 6 3/8/96

( ADMINISTRATIVE( ONFIDENTIAL TVAN FY 1997 Targets Assumptions for Base $'s, Outage $'s, and Outage (lays Refueling Outage Stretch Goals This table assumes the outage cost reduction will achieve 5

so% of tie per day savings due to certain outage fixed costs (i.e. contracts)

I FY 2000 I FY 2001 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Savings Outage Saving Outage Savings Outage Savings Outage Savings Outage (S 000's) flavs (5 0OO's'I Days ($ 000's) Days S 000's Days Original 62 51 72 51 51 hly 305 293 281 270 259 Outagein 62 28 49 51 29 BFN Revised r :3I2246 23p Original 50 77 65 43 65 344 330 317 304 292 Outage S/day

~~~~~~~~D y 67 I'S......

" :' ...... '8+

..40 00"0's") 43 41 :'......+ ":

"::*:" 58 SQN Revised 30 510 42 0 42 Original 344 330 317 304 Outage S/day 30 50 40 0 35 WBN Revised

,,, .:.'..:..::.....,.....0 ,, . 7...,

1ni...

142 178 179 94 158 Original 132 1453:!+i!i:5* 132 ,...!+i:1 92 122 I Revised Imib e n . ::::i:0yeiO n ti:i::+:+2 +::+; 1 : Ii:!i!:.. .. i .*(.+,!+!*:*i!:17 .* 4,]", ,,ie!n i~:3.,, .. 1 :++.,,,,,

.,,, ,+ ~i++ii!ii. 6 !~i~li1 ,

Imrvmn'~1) 1718 :3*.08:..47.07 2.34 $6i 6,9 0

0 0

Page 6 of 6 3/8/96

ADMINISTRATIVELY CONFIDENTIAL A13 960311 002 March 11, 1996 Those listed FISCAL YEAR (FY) 1997 BUDGET As stated in William R. Hamm's FY 1997 Budget memorandum dated March 11, 1996, I am forwarding to you the attached information regarding your TVA Nuclear headcount. This information indicates current headcount, including a detailed breakdown and FY 1997 targets from the FY 1996-1997 Business Plan. Please review this information and submit revised targets for FY 1997 headcount to me by March 15.

If there are any questions, please contact Sarah Roach at Chattanooga extension 7071.

Phillip L. We lds General Manager Nuclear Human Resources LP 3B-C R. J. Adney, OPS 4A-SQN J. A. Scalice, ADM 1V-WBN W. R. Hamm, LP 3B-C K. W. Singer, LP 3B-C R. D. Machon, PAB IE-BFN K. D. Stinson, LP 3B-C J. P. Maciejewski, LP 3B-C Vice President, Technical Services, LP 3B-C I.J.9._/cGra-.h_,LP_ 3B: -1 PLR:JSS Attachment cc (Attachment):

J. E. Boyles, LP 3A-C J. R. Haemsch, DSP IA-SQN J. W. Hutton, LP 6A-C

0. D. Kingsley, Jr., LP 6A-C N. C. Lindsey, LP 3B-C S. D. Moss, PAB 2P-BFN S. C. Roach, LP 3M-C K. J. Wallace, ADM IR-WBN S. E. Wallace, LP 6A-C R10*; kPENEI
0. J. Zeringue, LP 3B-C RIMS, CST 13B-C (L07 960311 800) 0750L MAR 1 2 1996 L~~'RMVE NAE ECA B1 000143

FY 1997 HEADCOUNT REVIEW (Excluding Non-Nuclear Matrixed)

Current Business Plan FY 1997 Revised FY 1997 3/11/1996 Target Target Central Office Ops Support 48 59 BI 000144

TVA NUCLEAR POWER PAGE 5 C

3/12/96 STAFFING BY MANAGEMENT/SALARY POLICY/TRADES AND LABOR INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 11, 1996 SALARY POLICY TRADES

& LABOR TOTAL ORGCODE DEPARTMENT MGRS SPECIALISTS ORGANIZATION c610000000 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS 2 05 OPS STAFF C611000000 OPERATIONS SUPPORT 3 5 05 OPS STAFF C611001000 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 1 2 05 OPS STAFF C611002000 OPERATIONS AND FIRE PR 1 05 OPS STAFF 1 C611002020 FIRE PROTECTION 5 7 05 OPS STAFF C611010000 NUCLEAR TRAINING 05 OPS STAFF 9 3 5 C611100000 MAINTENANCE & TECH SUP 5 6 05 OPS STAFF C611102000 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 8 05 OPS STAFF 1 7 C611103000 MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 3 5 05 OPS STAFF C611201000 RAD CONTROL 5 05 OPS STAFF 4 C611202000 CHEM & ENVIR PROT 30 9 48 05 OPS STAFF 05 OPS STAFF 9 48 9 30 05 OPS STAFF I qtgp2

'3

~cl 7 C-')

cIo vfr it c-')

0C2) vrP1Yr 2'!

-cq ,

.31 ni 4ý.I Co~

41, NUCLEAR HUMAN RESOURCES SUPPORT SYSTEMS

FY 1997 HEADCOUNT REVIEW (Excluding Non-Nuclear Matrixed)

Current Business Plan FY 1997 Revised FY 1997 3/11/1996 Target Target Central Office NETS 98 110 ISO 91 101 ERMI 20 21 NIPS 18 23 Total Billable 227 255 3/1 m

VV4 -f I "V I

&it*A r OL

?"I oP Bi 000146

FY 1997 HEADCOUNT REVIEW (Excluding Non-Nuclear Matrixed)

Current Business Plan FY 1997 Revised FY 1997 3/11/1996 Target Target Central Office Ops Support 48 485_*2 59 2 2 >Sr'JP

-Do, s. 4- L c-I-u_.cLf,_ - - P BI 000147

FY 1997 HEADCOUNT REVIEW (Excluding Non-Nuclear Matrixed)

Current Business Plan FY 1997 Revised FY 1997 3/11/1996 Target Target Central Office NETS 98 110 ISO 91 101 ERMI 20 21 20 NIPS 18 23 Total Billable 227 255

-ý,C)m W C (replace current recorders in poor condition)

"* Laptop Computer Paper $50

"* Laptop Computer with Modem for field-component communication: $3,500 Redesign/Process Improvement field work

"* MircoSoft Office reference books (2) $ 120 Total $7,140 Other Services (Training/Seminars) (Object 25)

  • IF Utility Conference Fee $ 545
  • TVAU Training $ 0
  • Computer User Training $ 665
  • ABC Seminar/Training $2,500 L Total $3,710 BI 000221

Other ujprent Use (Vehicles) (Ob;ect 72)

"Basedon FY 1996 budget of $5K and a mid-year variance of+$1K, FY 1997 Object 72 needs to be

._ budgeted at $6K.

ead~count 5(0)

FY 1997

_ 4(1)(2)

FY 1998 _ 4(1)

FY 1999 - 4(1)

FY 2000 _ 4(1)

FY 2001 Notes: (1) Salary and Benefits for 1 SC-4 and 1 SC-3 is assumed to be covered by equal chargebacks to BFN, SQN, WBN..

(2) Reduction of I employee in PA beginning in FY 1998. Reduction to be taken in Process Improvement/Redesign Work (site baseline, savings, cycle time evaluations).

BI 000222

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT BUDGET ASSUMING SITE CHARGEBACKS FOR WORK UTILIZATION STUDIES ($1000)

April 8,1996 FY'96 FY'97 FY'98 FY'99 FY'00 FY'01 Headcount 5 5* 4* 4* 4* 4*

Salaries 329 219 171 177 184 190 Benefits 79 52 40 42 43 45 Travel 13 13 13 14 14 14 Other 15 15 15 15 15 15 Total 436 299 239 248 256 264 Notes:

3.7% annual inflation and 2.5% leave accrual assumed for FY 1997. 3.7% annual inflation only assumed FY 1998 through FY 2001.

  • Two of these positions (one SC-4 and one SC-3) to be funded by site chargeback.

BI 000223

WBN - BEECKEN/CARNES/KNIGHT MEETING ON APRIL 9,1996 REGARDING SITE BUDGETING FOR WORK UTIUZATION STUDIES Rob Beecken (M&M Manaqer)

  • Will put in FY 1997 budget review process (will get visibility) - Refer to attachments.
  • Yes, must have service/no choice.
  • Site Budget - Doesn't make sense for site to control evaluation of their own people.

Jim Cames (Mods Manager)

Contractor Evaluation Factors:

Safety Quality Schedule Adherence Work Sampling Results } Key - uhard" data; other factors either not major or not "hard."

Site Budgeting/Control - People will know when evaluations will be done before he does. Was that way with Bechtel at FPL when he was there - will not work.

Has seen a lot of different work sampling - TVAN is the best - must have to manage (FPL changed their process to TVAN's process several years ago).

BI 000224

PROPOSED WORK UTILIZATION STUDY SITE CHARGEBACKS IN FY 1997 S. Babb's and S. Pemberton's total TVAN function is performance of Work Utilization Studies at BFN, SQN, and WBN.

Total FY 1997 expenses to perform this function are shown below:

Total BFN SQN WBN Salary $120,830 $40,277 $40,277 $40,276 Benefits 28,880 9,627 9,627 9,626 Total $149,710 $49,904 $49,904 $49,902 BI 000225

PROPOSED SITE CHARGEBACKS FOR WORK UTILIZATION STUDIES ($1000)

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT ($1000)

April 8, 1996 FY'97 FY'98 FY'99 FY'00 FY'01 Salaries 121 125 130 135 140 Benefits 29 30 31 32 34 Total 150 155 161 167 174 Notes:

3.7% annual inflation and 2.5% leave accrual assumed in FY 1997. 3.7% annual inflation only assumed FY 1998 through FY 2001.

BI 000226

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT (PA) BUSINESS PLANNING FY 1997 THROUGH FY 2001

\y~lj C%

FUNCTIONS Function FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 2001 Work Sampling - Corporate Work Sampling (Begin Work Sampling (Some 1 Special Evaluations Funded Implementation of Some Special Evaluations) - Site Implemented) - Site Funded Funded*

Cycle Time, Cost, Cycle Time, Cost, --Cyicle Time, Cost, 2

Manpower Baselining and Manpower Baselining and., Manpower Baselining and Cost Savings for Site Cost Savings for Site / Cost Savings for Site Process Redesign and Process Redesign and Process Redesign and Standardization SStandardization Standardization Organizational Evaluations. Organizational Evaluations. Organizational Evaluations.

3 Function competes for Function competes for Function competes for resources with functions 1 resources with functions 1 resources with functions 1 and 2 (which fully utilize PA and 2 (which fully utilize PA and 2 (which fully utilize PA resources). Function only resources). Function only resources). Function only performed at direction of performed at direction of performed at direction of "WVAN Senior Management. TVAN Senior Management. TVAN Senior Management.

Example: ERMI Evaluation Example: ERMI Evaluation Example: ERMI Evaluation

  • If site chargeback arrangements cannot be secured with site VPs for FY 1997, this will be accomplished for FY 1998.

BASIS Work Samplinq

"* Two Work Sampling experts site funded beginning in FY 1997

"* Function managed in Corporate - Independence, serve sites best

"* Without near monthly results, no meaningful way to achieve

- contractor accountability

- site-to-site comparison/competition which are major advantages of a single contract for all sites

"* Senior Management expects sites to know results monthly

"* Forty percent contract incentives based on work sampling results a In lieu of some monthly sampling, begin special craft work problem evaluations Site Process Redesign, Standardization

, Two Industrial Engineers plus major portion of PA Manager's time

  • PA Industrial Engineering expertise needed at present level to develop factual data for highest priority process redesigns through FY 2001
  • PA expertise, independence needed for this function past FY 2001 for continuous process improvement
  • Only highest priority process redesigns evaluated by PA since process redesign workload over this period at BFN, SQN exceeds PA resource capability BI 000227

(9 P -(.

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT (PA) FY 1997 THROUGH FY 2001 BUDGET PROJECTIONS tV 100Q7 (1) FY 2000 FY 2001

!V 4OO Fy 1998 FY 1999 r__

_ _ _ _ _ I I 199 F 19,9.......

5 5 5 5 5 5 (2 Work Personnel (2 Work (2 Work (2 Work (2 Work Sampling Sampling Sampling Sampling Sampling positions funded funded by BFN funded by BFN positions funded positions funded SQN, WBN by BFN SQN, by BFN SQN, SQN, WBN by BFN SQN, chargeback) chargeback)

WBN WBN WBN chargeback) chargeback) chargeback) 234K 243K 252K 325K 218K 226K Salaries(2) 69K 71K 74K 79K 64K 66K Benefits(2) 13K 13K 13K 13K 13K 13K Travel 15K 15K 15K 15K 15K 15K Services, Supplies, Equipment 31 OK 320K 331 K 342K 354K Total 432K 28% Flat Line Flat Line Flat Line Flat Line Reduction from FY 1996 C) (1) Based on BFN, SQN, WBN agreement for Work Sampling chargeback starting in FY 1997.

C)

C)

If cannot be negotiated for FY 1997, chargeback would begin in FY 1998.

(2) 3.7% annual inflation assumed.

00

RISKS OF SITE-BASED FUNDING FOR WORK SAMPLING VERSUS CONTINUING "WVAN'S POSITION THAT THIS FUNCTION/EXPERTISE IS ESSENTIAL FOR FUTURE TVAN SUCCESS With TVAN Site-Based Funding:

"* TVAN Corporate commitment to a standard work sampling process and its implementation for all sites not assured for FY 1997-FY 2001

"* Fails to acknowledge the value/need to TVAN of this function and the two implementing experts, both of which are recognized industry-wide

"* Provides reduced assurance that this industry recognized expertise (two individuals) will remain within TVA FY 1997-FY 2001 (multi-site contract period)

With Continued TVAN Corporate Funding:

"* Establishes that this tool and expertise are an essential part of TVAN future success

"* Would assure standard methods and application of these methods for all three sites resulting in a valid basis for site-to-site comparison and competition

  • Would provide increased assurance that the recognized expertise to perform this function will be available within WVAN Recommendations:

"* Recognize that this function is essential for future WVAN success and establish that it will be used by all sites

"* Continue Corporate funding of work sampling all sites from FY 1997 through FY 2001

"* The Performance Assessment Manager is prepared to discuss this recommendation with Senior TVAN Management BI 000229