ML030640582

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Semi-Annual Fitness for Duty Report
ML030640582
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/21/2003
From: Peschel J
Florida Power & Light Energy Seabrook
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NYN-03011
Download: ML030640582 (25)
v • d • e


Text

a FPL Energy FPL Energy Seabrook Station Seabrook Station P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874 (603) 773-7000 February 21, 2003 Docket No. 50-443 NYN-03011 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Seabrook Station Semi-Annual Fitness-For-Duty ReDort In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.71(d), enclosed is the FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC Semi-Annual Fitness-For-Duty Report. This report includes data from June 30, 2002 through December 31, 2002.

Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed revisions, please contact Mr. James J. Pandolfo, Security Manager, at (603) 773-7047.

Very truly yours, FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC Rainls M. Peschel

( latory Programs Manager cc: H. J. Miller, NRC Region I Administrator V. Nerses, NRC Project Manager, Project Directorate 1-2 G. T. Dentel, NRC Senior Resident Inspector A C,_Q_ (

ENCLOSURE TO NYN-03011 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Semi-Annual Fitness-for-Duty Report July 01, 2002, through December 31, 2002

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station FPL Energy- Seabrook Station Semi-Annual Fitness-for-Duty Report for period ending December 31, 2002 Table of Contents Page

1. Performance Data Sheets (NUMARC format) 1 and 2 II. Management Summary
1. Program Effectiveness 3
2. Initiatives 4
3. Blind Specimen Report 5
4. Telephonically Reported Events 6 III. Graphic Analysis
1. Total Screenings vs. Failures by Test Type 7
2. Percentage of Failures by Test Type 7
3. Licensee Failures by Substance 8
4. Contractor Failures by Substance 8
5. Total Screenings vs. Failures by Day of Week 9
6. Reason for Failure by Day of Week 9
7. Random Screenings by Hour of Day 10
8. Random Screenings by Day of Week 10

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station IV. Graphic Trend Analysis 2001 vs. 2002

1. Total Screening vs. Failures by Test Type 11
2. Percentage of Failures by Test Type 12
3. Licensee Failures by Substance 13
4. Contractor Failures by Substance 14
5. Total Screening vs. Failures by Day of Week 15
6. Reason for Failure by Day of Week 16
7. Random Screenings by Hour of Day 17
8. Random Screenings by Day of Week 18

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 1 01-01 Attachment 5 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Six Month Period Ending: 31 December 2002 P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874

Contact:

James J. Pandolfo Phone: (603) 773-7047 Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) ii Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50/15 Amphetamines 1000/500 Nitrite 500 Cocaine 300/150 Phencyclidine 25/25 Opiates 300/300 Alcohol (% BAC) 0.04 Random Testing Rate Required: 50% Conducted: 53%

Licensee Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Employees Contractors Contractors Average Number with Unescorted Access 797 1 474 Categories # Tested # Positive # Tested # Positive # Tested # Positive Pre-Access 8 0 0 0 97 1 Post Accident 0 0 0 W O U

or For Cause Observed Behavior 3 1 0 0 5 0 Random 213 2 0 0 77 1 Follow-up 58 0 0 0 1 0 Other 0 0 0 0 2 0 Total 282 3 0 0 182 2 Rev. 02

01-01 Attachment 6 C-4 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Marijuana (D (D

NRCI FPL E Cutoff Level (D lOOnqj 50n Cocaine Opiates AmphetaminesI PhencvclidineI Alcohol IRefusal to TestI Nitrite1 2 1 3 1 41 Licensee Employees 1 2 (D Long-Term Contractors IShort-Term Contractors 1 2 A 2 10 0Total 0 02 0 "Ml t1 (D

1<

(D C/f) 0 0

rt rtJ P1 0

(D Rev. 02

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 3 PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS The data compiled during this reporting period is presented in the graphic analysis beginning after the management summary in this report.

The failure rate for all tests conducted during the second half of 2002 is 1.08% (5 of 464). The licensee failure rate is 0.65% and the short-term contractor failure rate is 0.43%.

" Licensees account for 3 failures -- 2 random (lalcohol, and 1 marijuana),

1 for cause (alcohol)

" Contractors account for 2 failures - 1 random (marijuana) 1 pre-badging (marijuana)

During this period 1 of 3 marijuana failures was detected at FPL Energy's 50ng cutoff level.

An internal audit of the FPL Energy FFD program was conducted by the Oversight Department in December. There were no findings.

All available evidence indicates that the continued support of FPL Energy - Seabrook Station management and employees has provided the basis for the FFD program's effective implementation and continued advancement toward the goal of achieving a workplace free of drugs and alcohol and the effects of such substances.

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 4 INITIATIVES

1. Replaced RBT III's and Alco Sensor III's with RBT IV's and Alco Sensor IV's.
2. Trained and certified two nurses for proficiency in urine specimen collection and breath alcohol measurement.
3. Recertified four collection personnel for proficiency in urine specimen collection and breath alcohol measurement.
4. Site wide company transition from North Atlantic to FPL Energy - Seabrook Station.
5. Updated all Office Instructions, Protocols, Appendix's, and forms to reflect the company name change.
6. Revised the Blood Protocol to make it more user-friendly when used off-site at Exeter Hospital.
7. Reduced FFD collection staff to one technician.
8. Separated DOT from NRC - The DOT program responsibilities have been reassigned to a Small Business Consortium.
9. FFD staff participated in Oversight Audits and Industry Workshops.

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 5 BLIND SPECIMEN REPORT To ensure laboratory quality control, FPL Energy - Seabrook Station contracted with Duo Research Inc., Denver, CO, to provide blind performance test specimens in accordance with the NRC Guidelines (10CFR26, Appendix A). Approximately 80 percent of these blind performance test specimens were blank (i.e., certified to contain no drug) and the remaining samples were positive for one or more drugs per sample in a distribution such that all the drugs tested were included in approximately equal frequencies of challenge.

During the second half of 2002, FPL Energy submitted 56 blind performance test specimens to Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Norristown, PA. The following statistics are presented in such a way as to show that the requirements were met during each quarter of this six-month period as well as for the total reporting period.

Third Quarter of 2002 Fourth Quarter of 2002 Second Half of 2002 Tests Submitted: 239 Tests Submitted: 225 Tests Submitted: 464 Blinds Required: 24 Blinds Required: 23 Blinds Required: 47 Blinds Submitted: 30 Blinds Submitted: 26* Blinds Submitted: 56 Exceeded 10% by: 6 Exceeded 10% by: 3 Exceeded 10% by: 9 Negative: 25 (83%) Negative: 55 (81%) Negative: 11 (80%)

Positive: 5 (17%) Positive: 13 (19%) Positive: 45 (20%)

  • One of the blind specimens, containing the primary cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine, was reported as negative. It appears that the sample may have been inadvertently diluted at the time that it was first prepared, or when the contents were transferred into bottles provided by the laboratory. The sampling inconsistencies have been entered into the corrective action program for evaluation, trending, and corrective actions.
  • Another blind specimen submitted during this period containing d-amphetamine was incorrectly reported as negative. Duo Research is at this time conducting their investigation.

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 6 TELEPHONICALLY REPORTED EVENTS During this period there were no telephonically reported events under the reporting requirements of 10CFR26.

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station The following is a Graphic Analysis For the Period July 01, 2002, through December 31, 2002 (pages 7-10)

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 7 Total Screenings vs. Failures by Test Type Total Screenings: 464 Total Failures: 5 Screenings E Failures 0

q m E n 0S 0 0 a-E LL 00 a-L 0 Failures

  • Screenings Percentage of Failures by Test Type 20 15 12.5 10 5

1 03 0.1 0-Random Pre-Badging Pre-Employment Follow-up For Cause Other

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 8 Licensee Failures by Substance 4

3 --

2 1-I -

0 !

Random Pre-Badging Pre-Employment Follow-up For Cause Other N Alcohol(2) E Marjuana (1) NCocaine (0) *Opiates(0) 0 Phencyclidine (0) *Amphetamines (0) N Administrative (0)

Contractor Failures by Substance 4

3 2

1 0

Random Pre-Badging Pre-Employment Follow-up For Cause Other N Alcohol (0) N Marijuana (2) E Cocaine (0) *Opiates(0)

  • Phencyclidine (0) n Amphetamines (0) N Administrative (0)

CQZ-

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 9 Total Screenings vs. Failures by Day of Week 200 160 .1156 120 1-100 80 ý fUV 65 67 40 TE 1 1 1 2 0

Monday Tuesday Thursday Wednesday Friday Saturday Sunday E Total Screenings N Failures Reason for Failure by Day of Week 4

3

.2 2 UL 0

Mond ay Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday U Alcohol (2) n Marijuana (3) U Cocaine (0) M Opiates (0) 0 Phencyclidine (0) N Amphetamines (0) N Administrative (0)

C003

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 10 Random Screenings by Hour of Day 60 50 40- 36 3 30-__ _ __ _ - - - 2 29 232 20-1 0M-MEoý-=,-ý I I 10 07 I EA, 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Total Random Screenings: 290 Random Screenings by Day of Week 100 80 78 72 70 60 50-4-4 50 40 30 20 10 0

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Total Random Screenings: 290

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station The following is a Graphic Trend Analysis 2001 vs. 2002 (pages 11-18)

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 11 Total Screenings vs. Failures by Test Type 2001 Total Screenings: 1126 Total Failures: 13 S i002r0eing 500==.= ceeig o 0)

E 75 U w u 0 0 CL aL M Failures M Screenings 2002 Total Screenings: 1500 Total Failures: 32 Screenings

_E- q) 0)

CL IL 0 ,.C 00 U Failures U Screenings c oLq

I July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 12 Percentage of Failures by Test Type 2001 50 45 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0.5 1.5 0

Random Pre-Badging Pre-Employment Follow-up For Cause Other 2002 20 18.18 18 16 14 12 10 8

6 4 3A27 2

0.59 M U.M3 0

Random Pre-Badging Pre-Employment Follow-up Pre-mplymet For CauseFllo-up Other

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 13 Licensee Failures by Substance 2001 5

4 3

2 1

0 4-Random Pre-Badging Pre-Employment Follow-up For Cause Other N Alcohol (2) U Marijuana (1) U Cocaine (0) U Opiates (0) 0 Phencyclidine (0) EAmphetamines (0) N Administrative (0) 2002 5

4 3

2 1

0 Random Pre-Badging Pre-Employment Follow-up For Cause Other mAlcohol (6) mMarijuana (2) mCocaine (0) ElOpiates (0)

  • Phencyclidine (0) mAmphetamines (0) MAdministrative (0)

C05;

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 14 Contractor Failures by Substance 2001 20 15 10 5

0 Random Pre-Badging Pre-Employment Follow-up For Cause Other iAlcohol (3) U Marijuana (6) N Cocaine (0) U Opiates (0)

  • Phencyclidine (0) *Amphetamines (0)
  • Administrative (1) 2002 25 20 15 10 5

Random Pre-Badging Pre-Employment Follow-up For Cause Other U Alcohol (4) N Marijuana (15) U Cocaine (3) U Opiates (0) 1 Phencyclidine (0) I Amphetamines (0) EAdministrative (2) cOG

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 15 Total Screenings vs. Failures by Day of Week 2001 500 450 411 400 n

350 300 250 200 189 1Ito 1(4 159 150 100 50

[6 i4 005 13 0 T

0 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday U Total Screenings n Failures I 2002 500 462 450 400 350 300 i 269 250 216 200 187 150 100 50 6 7 23 61 8 0 4

0 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday I N*Total Screenings E Failures c('O1

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 16 Reason for Failure by Day of Week 2001 10 9

8 7

6 U.

5 U-4 3

2 1

0 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday N Alcohol (5) U Marijuana (7) U Cocaine (0) U Opiates (0) 0 Phencyclidine (0) EAmphetamines (0) N Administrative (1) 2002 10 9

8 7

6 (A

0l h-5 Iw-l 4

3 2

1 0

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday "UAlcohol (10) EMarijuana (17) U Cocaine (3) 0 Opiates (0)

"IPhencyclidine (0) N Amphetamines (0) N Administrative (2)

('00

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 17 Random Screenings by Hour of Day 2001 100 90 83 80 76 69 70 70 64 63 60 52 50 43 40 30 30 20 5 l8 8 6 4 10 3 3 4 3 2 12 2 2 0 2 3 0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Total Random Screenings: 600 2002 100 93 90 91 90 80 74 74 70 60 50 i jI" 48 40 '.xi I

l 30 I 21 I I 20 I 12 13 14 1-9

= 7 mmn I

10 i i II II I 4 2 3 m U

m.M Mm0Mmm 0 1 2 3

3 4

4 3

5 3

6 7 Ii 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 n

Im7EE....9 i 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 I3 m 22 23 Total Random Screenings: 676

July - December 2002 FPL Energy - Seabrook Station Page 18 Random Screenings by Day of Week 2001 200 159 150 118 121 102 100+-

86 50+-

11 3

0 +-

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Total Random Screenings: 600 2002 200 164 150 139 125 116 111 100 50 17 4

0 ---

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Total Random Screenings: 676

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML030640582&oldid=2672509"