Text

Initial Exam - 10/2002 - Public Forms
	ML030610004
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	11/20/2002
From:	Gody A; Operations Branch IV
To:	Rueger G; Pacific Gas & Electric Co
References
	50-275/02-301, 50-323/02-301, ES-201, ES-201-2, ES-501-1 50-275/02-301, 50-323/02-301
	Download: ML030610004 (25)
	v • d • e

Operations Branch Assignment Check Sheet:

(Includes ES-201-1 & ES-501-1 Rev. 8, Supplement 1 information)

Chief: G. JOHNSTON Facility/Task: DC IN EX Task Start Date: 10/21/2002 as of: 10/21/2002 ITEM DESCRIPTION DUE DATE INIT DATE 0

Exam/Inspection Schedule Agreement (C.1.a;C.2.a&b)

Apr 24, 2002 ATG 10/15/2001 1

NRC Staff & Fac. Contact Assigned (C.1.c;C.2.e)

Apr 24, 2002 ATG 10/15/2001 2

Facility contact briefed on security & other issues (C.2.c)

Apr 24, 2002 GWJ 2/2002 3

Corp. Notification Letter Sent (C.2.d) (Exams only)

Apr 24, 2002 GWJ 7/2/02 3a Inspection Announcement Letter Sent,(PIR & LORT if req'd)

Sep 6, 2002 N/A 4

Task Expectations, Issues, & Standards Discussed w/ BC Ju123, 2002 GWJ 5# [Reference Material Due (C.1.d;C.3.c)]

Jun 23, 2002 GWJ 7/28/02 6# Integrated Exam Outlines Due (C.l.d&e;C.3.d)

Jun 23, 2002 GWJ 7/28/02 7# Outlines reviewed by NRC & Feedback Sent (c.2.h;C.3.e)

Jul 7, 2002 GWJ 7/28/02 8# Preliminary Applications Due (C.1.j;C.2.g;ES202)

Sep 21, 2002 GWJ 8/02 9#

Draft Exams w/ Doc./Ref. Due (C.1.d/e/f;C.3.d)

Aug 22, 2002 GWJ 7/28/02 10# Peer Reviewer Initials As Reviewed All Parts*

Sep 1,2002

,V.

10/21/02 111 NRC Supervisor. Initials Approving for Fac. Rev. (C.2.h;C.3.f)*

Sep 1,2002 o

12# Exams Reviewed w/ Fac. (C.l.h;C.2.f&h;C.3.g)

Sep 1,2002 GWJ 10/4/02 13# Final Appl. Due & Assign. Sheet Prepared (C.1.j;C.2.h;ES202)

Oct 7, 2002 GWJ 9/25/02 14# NRC Supervisor Approved Final Exams (C.2.i;C.3.h)*

Oct 14, 2002 4r t 0144 15" Final Appl. Rec'd & Waivers Sent (C.2.g)

Oct 14, 2002 GWJ 9/25/02 16" Proctor Rules Reviewed w/ Fac. & Written Authorized (C.3.k)

Oct 14, 2002 GWJ 10/21/02 17 Exam/Insp Material to Team (C.3.i)

Oct 14, 2002 GWJ 10/14/02 18# Fac. graded exam & Comments Rec'd Nov 2, 2002 0 1/6 19# NRC Written Grading Completed Nov 5, 2002 L/

20# Examiners Finished Grading Op. Tests Nov 5, 2002 d C (61P 21# NRC Ch. Ex. Review Completed Nov 15, 2002 1

(#

0 22 NRC BC Review Completed*

Nov 16, 2002 fl,7 g 23# RPS/IP # Examinees Updated Before Report Issued Nov 21, 2002 24 License/Denials Signed & Report Issued Nov 21,2002 25 Package Closed Out Dec 12, 2002 Final Inspection Report Issued, Exam Package to OLA, Facility. Contact Notified of Results

Not required for inspections, except as noted.

Note Supervisor/Peer initials required.

[]Required NRC-auth. exams only.

When complete, for exams, add to pkg & fwd copy to BC, for insp, fwd orig'l to BC.

Last revised 10/15/01 S:\\DRS\\OB\\EXAMS\\dc\\October 2002 Exam\\exam assignment sheet.wpd

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility:

Date of Examination:

Item Task Description Initials a

b*

c#

1.

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.

W R

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I

Section D. 1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

T T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

4 A3 N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

2.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

S I

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M

mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*,

and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.

a. Verify that:

AJ I (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W

(2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination,

/

(3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T

(4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance based activities.

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.

W

4.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

G r

E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N

(,

E

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

I R

A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

M

a.

b.

C.

d.

rinted me/

i n ture Da Author jefAI 64j&'

Facility Reviewer (*)

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

`47 NRC Supervisor A

e _

\\\\

23 of 24 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 Note:

Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

I I

I

Oct 21 02 OS:27a PG&E -

LearninC Services 1805)545-2633 ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facili it

~Date of Exam: LA E

Exm ee O R Initial Item Description a

b-o

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility

,j

2.

a. NRC KAs referenced for all questions

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate pr Section D.2.d of ES-401 4

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screenlng/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

-the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

_ the examinations were developed independently; or Sthe licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (exlaiin)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new,

.)

and the rest modified); enter the actual question i

distribution at right

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are AV written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right _

'_O M

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers W

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are jus,,..

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines k

b

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point multiple choice items: the total is correct and a rees with value on cover sheet Printed Nam Signatire D e

a. Author 4r&AfA

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)i-

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:

The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c: chief examiner concurrence reuired.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46

p. 1

cPG&E Learning Services ES-401 Wdtten Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facilk

/

VA g2!

Al 6_P/v Date of Exam: /0A56ý1... Exam Level: RrRO

.Ut4A

,Initial T*

item Description a

b*

b

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility Rol <D& 9

2.

a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent and SRO questions are appropriate i

per Section D.2.d of ES-401

4.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams apepears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

_ the examinations were developed independently; or Xthe licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, I

and the rest modified); enter the actual question

,7 i, distribution at right W

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers IV

,7w

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are o'

assigned: deviations are justified

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items: the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed N me/Sig. ture t

a. Author A

b, Facility Reviewer (*)

a' iewIO.,

43

c. NRC Chief Examiner (f9 W-

d. NRC Regional Supervisor o-Dý.

Note:

The facility reviewer's initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial Items in Column c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement I 42 of 46 Oct 21 02 08:28a (805)545-2633

p. 1 I

C:\\DATA\\Web Downloads\\ADAMS\\NUREG-1 021 R8 Suppl.tif ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist

[Facilk.,L hv/d/

LOMK Date of Exam:CJ-

,'xam LeveJ:('4SRO Initial Item Description b

C#

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility 1

2.

a. NRC KWAs referenced for all questions

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available,

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate, per Section D.2.d of ES-401

4.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

- the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or 7 the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the exam(inations were developed independentlys, or he licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

___other (explain)_

__(

6.

Bank use meets limnits (no more than 75 Bank Modified

)New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, Q'

1 and the rest modified); enter the actual question distribution at right,

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) areI written at the comprehensiont/analysis level;

//

I enter the actual question distribution at right

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are iustified I

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and t

F agrees with value on cover sheet I

P)N tw

/NeSgt7

a. Author PCine N

/iI2z"

b. Facility Reviewer ()

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)

iVk"

' V I <V-'

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:

The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46 110 of

C\\DATA\\Web Downloads\\ADAMS\\NUREG-1021R8 Suppl.tif ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facilitv.-

d

,AAJ OV

M Date of Exam:O f

A 4Exam Leve: RO RO Initial Item Description a

b-cV

1.

Questions and answers technically, accurate and applicable to facility

2.

a.NRC KWAs referenced for all quston

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate S..

.per Section D.2.d of ES-401..

4.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screeningnaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

S the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; orw

- the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

the examinations were developed independently;, or Bthe licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or Sother (explain) 1 q

n

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, j

and the rest modified); enter the actual question at right

7.

Between So and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 now questions) are"7*J

)

written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are iustified

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct andalo s

M

)k agrees with value on cover sheet

~I 1

Printed Name ýSignature

ate

a. Author D 1$J Z

&416

7)

b. Facility Reviewer (#),.

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

t Xo E

A

d. NRC Regional Supervisor e A Note:

The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;- chief examiner concurrence required.

L, NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46 110 of

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: 17//A £/

CA-

) Wed _

Date of Exam:

Exam Level:

.O/SRO Initial Item Description a

b*

c#

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility

2.

a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401

4.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

7.

Bthe audit exam was completed before thes license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or rthe licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or et other (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, s

n tl and the rest modified); enter the actual questiona distribution at right justified

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are c;o written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously

/

approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines

11.

a reThe examwitcontainsvau o100, ovrne-pointsee multiple choice items; the total is correct and

(/

,r

/

.Printed N*0e / Signue

/

at

a. Author M*rJ*_X4f*/

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

s_*¢1*

KAd~

..T

/

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor

-(

Note:

The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46 7

I

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: J)/b/

6 kA IV0,/

/ A Date of Exam: /&//3Tb; Exam Level: RO Initial Item Description a

b*

c#

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility 7

-.5's i

2.

a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions l/i

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available---*1

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401

4.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

an the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

__the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

-1 the examinations were developed independently; or 7

the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 "Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new,"

and the rest modified); enter the actual question

- 7 "q

distribution at right 67

/

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are.*

written at the comprehension/analysis level;

/L enter the actual question distribution at right

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers MIA

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and W

PI agrees with value on cover sheet t

Ntar/

Signatue

/ate

a. Author A

9__&

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

_Z P *,**-2.

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

,-&z'L Q.4L)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor

_/

Note:

The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46

- 4 ve-'-

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:

DCPP Date of Examination: 10/21/2002 Operating Test Number:

I and 2 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a

b*

a#

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operationalimportance, safety function distribution).__

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered 5

o during this examination.

c.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' auciitest(s)(see Section D.1.a).

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and lessthan-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues

references and tools, including assciated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meethe criteria

'Vlf in Attachment 1 of ES-301.

IA

c.

Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

d.

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 1L Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name / Sign, Date

a. Author

.1'

.Ix

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

(A5 W/c C.-n ( LO0

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor C14 CT f_-_

O_.

NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRCdeveloped tests

Independent NRC reviewer initial in Column "c;' chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 23 of 26

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: DCPP Date of Exam: 10/21/2002 Scenario Numbers:

1 / 2 / BU Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

NO

11j,

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

&I

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain

y. j complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

PO

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been A'1 evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit l,

the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 6/617

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1/2/1

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3/3/4

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1/2/1 F

L-7

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/3/2

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1/11/ 0

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 2/3/2 24 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: DCPP Date of Exam: 10/21/2002 Scenario Numbers: 1 1 2 / 3 / BU Operating Test No.: 2 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of M

service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

L5

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event

-* s the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

'7

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

05

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

I

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All fr other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit tho the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

"AW TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 5/816/7

Ali,

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1/2A1/1

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3/5/4/5

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1/2/1/1

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 3/3/2/2 lips

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 011/ 1/ 0

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 4/6/2/6 24 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 BU N/A Reactivity 1

1 1

1 Normal 1

2 2

1 RO Instrument 4

5 4

6 Component Major 1

1 2

1 Reactivity 1

Normal 0

As RO Instrument /

2 Component I

I I

Major SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

As SRO Instrument /

2 Component Major I

Reactivity 0

1 1

1 Normal 1

1 1

1 SRO-U Instrument /

2 3

Component I

Major 1

1 2

1 Instructions:

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those t require v ifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's pet c/count to rd the minimum requirement.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 25 of 26

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: 2 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

BU Reactivity 1

1 1

2 1

Normal 1

1 2

1 1

RO Instrument 4

4 5

5 6

Component Major 1

1 2

1 1

Reactivity 1

1 1

2 1

Normal 0

1 2

1 1

AsRO Instrument 2

4 5

5 6

Component Major 1

1 2

1 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

1 1

2 1

Normal 1

0 2

1 1

As SRO Instrument 2

2 3

2 4

Component Major 1

1 2

1 Reactivity 0

1 1

2 1

Normal 1

0 2

1 1

SRO-U Instrument /

2 2

3 2

4 Component Major 1

1 2

1 1

Instructions:

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(4) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(5) Whenever practical, h instruipent and component malfunctions should be included; only thos t t requir verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's c e n countoward the minimum requirement.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 25 of 26

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant #5 Applicant #6 Applicant #7 RO/SRO I/SRO U RO/SRO I/SRO U RO/SRO 1/SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1-1 2-1 N

BU-1 1-1 2-1 N

BU-1 RO BOP A

RO BOP RO A

BOP SRO N/A A

SRO 4-7 3-9 2-8 4-7 3-9 2-8 4-7 3-9 2-8 Understand and Interpret Annunciators and Alarms 4-7 3-9 2-8 3-7 3-9 2-8 4-7 3-9 2-8 Diagnose Events and Conditions 2-7 2-9 1-8 2-7 2-9 1-8 2-7 2-9 1-8 Understand Plant and System Response 1,6,7 3,4, 5-8 5,6,7 1,3,4, 5-8 4-7 3-9 2-8 Comply With and 6-9 6-9 Use Procedures (1) 1,3-7 2-9 1,3-8 1,4, 3,5-8 N/A N/A N/A Operate Control 2-7 6-9 Boards (2) 1,3-7 1-9 1-8 1,3-7 1-9 1-8 2-7 1-9 1-8 Communicate and Interact With the Crew N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2-7 2-9 1-8 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2

1-4 3

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competenc or e.a plicant.

Author:

0

,//IY-or NRC Reviewer:

IF -

,-,V 5A/!I "rU/I,',

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 26 of 26

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant #1 Applicant #2 Applicant #3 ROLSRA94tSR4OPU RO/SR Vt/SRO U RO/SRO tSROI t Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1-2 2-2 3-2 BU-2 1-2 2-2 3-2 BU-2 1-2 2-2 3-2 BU-2 RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP 2-7 2-11 N/A 2-9 2-7 N/A 1-9 2-9 N/A 2-11 1-9 N/A Understand and Interpret Annunciators and Alarms 2-7 2,4-11 N/A 2-9 2-7 N/A 1-9 2-9 N/A 2-11 1-9 N/A Diagnose Events and Conditions 2-7 1-11 N/A 1,2-9 2-7 N/A 1-9 1-9 N/A 1-11 1-9 N/A Understand Plant and System Response___

3,6,7 3,7-11 N/A 5,6-9 1,3,6, N/A 4-9 4, 6-9 N/A 3,5-11 1,

N/A Comply With and 7

4-9 Use Procedures (1) 2-7 3,4, N/A 1-9 1,3-7 N/A 1-9 1-9 N/A 1-3, 1-9 N/A Operate Control 6-11 5-11 Boards (2) 1-7 1-11 N/A 1-9 1-7 N/A 1-9 1-9 N/A 1-11 1-9 N/A Communicate and Interact With the Crew N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and evaluate every applicable competency Author:

NRC Reviewer:

or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 26 of 26

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant #4 RO/SRO VSRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1-2 2-2 3-2 BU-2 1

2 3

BU 1

2 3

BU SRO N/A N/A SRO 2-7 2-11 1-9 2-9 Understand and Interpret Annunciators and Alarms 2-7 2,

1-9 2-9 Diagnose Events 4-11 and Conditions 2-7 1-11 1-9 1-9 Understand Plant and System Response 2-7 1-11 1-9 1-9 Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

N/A N/A N/A N/A Operate Control Boards (2) 2-7 1-11 1-9 1-9 Communicate and Interact With the Crew 2-7 1-11 1-9 1-9 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) 1-5 2,4,5 4-6 2-5 Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter evaluate every applicable competency for Author:

NRC Reviewer:

numbers that will allow the examiners to NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 26 of 26

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant #8 Applicant #9 Applicant #10 RO!SRO ISRO U ROISRO I!SRO U RO/SRO-I/&RO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1-2 2-2 3-2 BU-2 1-1 2-2 3-2 BU-2 1-2 2-2 3-2 BU-2 RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP SRO RO SRO 2-7 2-11 N/A 2-9 2-7 N/A 1-9 2-9 2-7 2-11 N/A 2-9 Understand and Interpret Annunciators and Alarms 2-7 2,4-11 N/A 2-9 2-7 N/A 1-9 2-9 2-7 2-11 N/A 2-9 Diagnose Events and Conditions 2-7 1-11 N/A 1,2-9 2-7 N/A 1-9 1-9 2-7 1-11 N/A 1-9 Understand Plant and System Response 3,6,7 3,7-11 N/A 5,6-9 1,3,6,7 N/A 4-9 4,6-9 2-7 3,5-11 N/A 1-9 Comply With and Use Procedures (1) 2-7 3,4, N/A 1-9 1,3-7 N/A 1-9 1-9 N/A 1-3, N/A N/A Operate Control 6-11 5-11 Boards (2) 1-7 1-11 N/A 1-9 1-7 N/A 1-9 1-9 2-7 1-11 N/A 1-9 Communicate and Interact With the Crew N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2-7 N/A N/A 1-9 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1-5 N/A N/A 2-5 Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter og r more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competenc for e kry hpplicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 C/

A

-ý V Ir ---f 26 of 26

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 (R8, SI)

Quality Checklist Facility:

Date of Exam:

Exam Level: RO/SRO Initials Item Description a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and AO documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors 5

(reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades q

are justified I-'

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Grader Ja4

cwlc

,T

/,

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

3:ii1V, "ue1, I

Jd/76/OL.

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

?)

/

t

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

AJT7N1OTy -vob2

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2002 To 09/30/2003 I Exam Week 11 Site/Docket No./Insp Rpt #

11

Candidates Th]

Type hi Exam Author I Chief Examiner L*I Examiners Assianed 07/07/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2002004 Procedure #: 7111111Q 07/07/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2002004 Procedure #: 7111111Q 09/30/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2002301 TAC #: X02235 09/30/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2002301 TAC #: X02216 09/30/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2002301 TAC #: X02236 09/30/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2002301 TAC #: X02217 10/06/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2002005 Procedure #: 7111111Q 10/06/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2002005 Procedure #: 7111111Q 10/21/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2002301 TAC #: X02235 10/21/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2002301 TAC #: X02236 12/29/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2003005 Procedure#: 7111111Q 12/29/2002 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2003005 Procedure #: 7111111Q 03/30/2003 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2003006 Procedure #: 7111111Q 03/30/2003 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2003006 Procedure #: 7111111Q 05/12/2003 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2003006 Procedure #: 7111111B 05/12/2003 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2003006 Procedure #: 7111111B Sites: DIAB Orgs: ALL Exam Author:ALL Prep Prep Prep Prep RO - 7 SROU - 2 RO -7 SROU - 2 SROI - 1 SROI - 1 Admin Admin FFN FFN PROULX, DAVID L.

PROULX, DAVID L.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

PROULX, DAVID L.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

PROULX, DAVID L.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

JACKSON, TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

GAGE, PAUL C.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

GAGE, PAUL C.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

GAGE, PAUL C.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

JACKSON, TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

GAGE, PAUL C.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

GAGE, PAUL C.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

JACKSON, TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

STEARNS, DONALD L.

JACKSON TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

STEARNS, DONALD L.

JACKSON TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

STEARNS, DONALD L.

JACKSON TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

STEARNS, DONALD L.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

Page 1 of 5 02/21/2003 Report 21 Region: 4 09:07:15 Phase Code: 5 Operational IFExam Author kFCh1ef Examiner 11 Examiners Assianed k

Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2002 To 09/30/2003 Page 2 of 5 02/21/2003 Report 21 Region: 4 I Exam Week hi Site/Docket No./Inso RDt #

I1

Candidste.q II1 Tvn_

Il F~vnm Aulthnrh fl hiaf I:vanminar 1

I 6;;Zwzfl Jýýs.ga~l~II0

%0I5I 06/29/2003 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2003007 Procedure #: 7111111Q 06/29/2003 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2003007 Procedure #: 7111111Q 09/28/2003 Diablo Canyon / 05000275 / 2003008 Procedure #: 7111111Q 09/28/2003 Diablo Canyon / 05000323 / 2003008 Procedure #: 7111111Q PROULX, DAVID L.

PROULX, DAVID L.

JACKSON, TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

STEARNS, DONALD L.

JACKSON, TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

STEARNS, DONALD L.

JACKSON, TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

STEARNS, DONALD L.

JACKSON, TERRY PROULX, DAVID L.

STEARNS, DONALD L.

Sites: DIAB Orgs:ALL Exam Author:ALL Phase Code: 5 Operational 09:07:15

Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2002 To 09/30/2003 Page 3 of 5 02/21/2003 09:07:15 Report 21 Region: 4 Phase Cod I Summary By Date 07/2002 DIAB - Diablo Canyon 07/2002 09/2002 DIAB - Diablo Canyon RO - 0 SROI - 0 09/2002 RO - 0 SROI - 0 1012002 DIAB - Diablo Canyon RO - 14 SROI - 2 10/2002 RO - 14 SROI - 2 12/2002 DIAB - Diablo Canyon 12/2002 03/2003 DIAB - Diablo Canyon 03/2003 05/2003 DIAB - Diablo Canyon 05/2003 06/2003 DIAB - Diablo Canyon 06/2003 09/2003 DIAB - Diablo Canyon SROU -0 SROU - 0 SROU -4 SROU -4 LSRO -0 LSRO - 0 LSRO -0 LSRO - 0 Total for Diablo Canyon: 0 Total for 09/2002: 0 Total for Diablo Canyon: 20 Total for 10/2002: 20 Sites: DIAB Orgs: ALL Exam Author:ALL e: 5 Operational

Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2002 To 09/30/2003 Page 4 of 5 02/21/2003 Report 21 Region: 4 Sumary By Site DIAB - Diablo Canyon RO - 14 SROI - 2 SROU - 4 LSRO - 0 Total for Diablo Canyon: 20 Sites: DIAB Orgs:ALL Exam Author:ALL I

Phase Code: 5 Operational 09:07:15

09:07:15 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2002 To 09/30/2003 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 Operational Summary By Region SROI - 2 SROU -4 LSRO - 0 Total for Region 4: 20 Sites: DIAB Orgs:ALL Exam Author:ALL Page 5 of 5 02/21/2003 Report 21 Region 4 RO - 14

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of Z-c 4

,,*fof the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge/I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of

?ý,

,M-, 1eZd.From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

2.

Ila k frct kajei1

3.

4. -,,

a C

5.

e'Il*e

7. *A

1. ý

-V #-:

12.

cv 6

.J

13. JAMES L,CtwUe,ý

14. "iý

& m. r-A. j..

,Leo r

15.,ke-'E 600q k-."

JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY

"hFT -

r" ClA H.1 FTr F9,M-tA.,AJ SIGNATURE (1)

-. 9 t-

,f,,,

DATE 9IGATURE/(2 DAEOTE

§7 2~3o2 d lft NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 NOTES:

i 24 of 24

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination Zý, 2; k I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of *dC 64) as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of lad*-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

2.

5. J`,.-1

,--,.o I-C_,

7.,"4C /,,. !

-. w-;

8. JA

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

JOB TITLE /RESPONSIBILITY

-- p %J -4f 5

(

Z. 4~,AAIO SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE 7

ý :;ý 11-13-07, t\\

C>

r

ýAo J=

IT NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 C) 6

.-I 0>

0 0

0 C,

00 Ct) 0 oI 0E

0 C.,

o.

24 of 24

ML030610004

Text

Navigation menu

Search