ML030420197

Init Exam - 11/2002 - Public Forms

ML030420197
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	01/04/2002
From:	Gody A Division of Nuclear Materials Safety IV
To:	Terry C TXU Electric
References
50-445/02-301, 50-446/02-301
Download: ML030420197 (25)

Text

Operations Branch Assignment Check Sheet:

(Includes ES-201-1 & ES-501-1 Rev. 8, Supplement 1 information)

Chief: H. BUNDY Facility/Task: CPSES IN EX U

Task Start Date: 11/11/2002 as of: 11/11/2002 25 Package Closed Out Jan 2, 2003 II JFinal Inspection Report Issued, Exam Package to OLA, Facility. Contact Notified of Results Not required for inspections, except as noted.

SNote Supervisor/Peer initials required.

[] Required NRC-auth. exams only.

When complete, for exams, add to pkg & fwd copy to BC, for insp, fwd orig'l to BC.

Last revised 10/15/01 S:\\DRS\\OB\\EXAMS\\CPSES\\November 2002 Exam\\exam assignment sheet.wpd w

,r 7 "

ITEM DESCRIPTION DUE DATE INIT DATE 0

Exam/Inspection Schedule Agreement (C.l.a;C.2.a&b)

May 15, 2002.TG 10/15/2001 1

NRC Staff & Fac. Contact Assigned (C.l.c;C.2.e)

May 15, 2002 KTG 10/15/2001 2

Facility contact briefed on security & other issues (C.2.c)

May 15, 2002 3

Corp. Notification Letter Sent (C.2.d) (Exams only)

May 15, 2002 3a Inspection Announcement Letter Sent (PIR & LORT if req'd)

Sep 27, 2002 4

Task Expectations, Issues, & Standards Discussed w/ BC Aug 13, 2002 5# [Reference Material Due (C.1.d;C.3.c)]

Jul 14, 2002

/

6#

Integrated Exam Outlines Due (C.l.d&e;C.3.d)

Jul 14, 2002 7'

Outlines reviewed by NRC & Feedback Sent (c.2.h;C.3.e)

Jul 28, 2002 8# Preliminary Applications Due (C.I.j;C.2.g;ES202)

Oct 12, 2002 9'

Draft Exams w/ Doc./Ref. Due (C.1.d/e/f;C.3.d)

Sep 12, 2002 10' Peer Reviewer Initials As Reviewed All Parts*

Sep 22, 2002 11' NRC Supervisor. Initials Approving for Fac. Rev. (C.2.h;C.3.f)*

Sep 22, 2002 Lk Exams Reviewed w/ Fac. (C.l.h;C.2.f&h;C.3.g)

Sep 22, 2002 13' Final Appl. Due & Assign. Sheet Prepared (C.I.j;C.2.h;ES202)

Oct 28, 2002 14' NRC Supervisor Approved Final Exams (C.2.i;C.3.h)*

Nov 4, 2002

/

15' Final Appl. Rec'd & Waivers Sent (C.2.g)

Nov 4, 2002 16' Proctor Rules Reviewed w/ Fac. & Written Authorized (C.3.k)

Nov 4, 2002

/,

17 Exam/Insp Material to Team (C.3.i)

Nov 4, 2002 A

A/,/,Z" 18' Fac. graded exam & Comments Rec'd Nov 23, 2002 19" NRC Written Grading Completed Nov 26, 2002 jQ 20# Examiners Finished Grading Op. Tests Nov 26, 2002 21' NRC Ch. Ex. Review Completed Dec 6, 2002 22 NRC BC Review Completed*

Dec 7, 2002

,4o 10 jo 23' RPS/IP # Examinees Updated Before Report Issued Dec 12, 2002

02.

24 License/Denials Signed & Report Issued Dec 12, 2002 e

Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 (R8,S1)

Facility: Comanche Peak Date of Examination: November 2002 Item Task Description Initials a

b*

c#

1.

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.

W R

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I

Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

T T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

E N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

2.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

S I

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M

mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*,

-Ale and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

g0

3.

a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W

(2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T

(4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance based activities.

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of M

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.

4.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

G E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

tV A N

E

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

1k RA

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

4 L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

'41

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Printed N eSignature

a. Author MAKtrtt-W6ý_ý/*'-

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

X -1 " c-t e:

d. NRC Supervisor 50b e I*)obJ 1'

19

'-/4 r

Note:

• Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201 I

I

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility:

-T'PhE5 Date of Exam:

Exam Level:O0 Initial Item Description a

b*

c0

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility

2.

a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401

4.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

__the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

__ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

_Y the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question 20 distribution at right 7-mo

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right 11.51

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers A-ik 3

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified s1,

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines

-4

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Nam /Signature Date

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

/,,V__

_,4_____.___-

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

]EE, IF P_

-V

d. NRC Regional Supervisor gJN~oDVY

/

A Note

• The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: (L Date of Exam: k,(zoo Exam Level:*

Initial Item Description a

b*

cl

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility

2.

a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401

4.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

__ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

__ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or Y, the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question distribution at riglht 14/e

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are 7

written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author K4 k-,-Y 6

4A-,k*ak ql_ z

b. Facility Reviewer (*)_

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)2 6

d. NRC Regional Supervisor

\\-.\\

Note:

• The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46

Facility: Comanche Peak Date of Examination: November 2002 Operating Test Number: 1 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a

b*

c#

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

9614--

?W_

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

_fw

c.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.

14)

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues

• ..'*references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues M,*

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301.

c.

Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

d.

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

_4___

3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA 7...

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 6?,

Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name Sig ture Date

a. Author

HAM,

-\\w.9

-i.&

i e/,

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

• , 1'7 16y, 2V f/

/I A

d. NRC Supervisor A,%,v",

q/

/f--

ti NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

I=R-RI31 I

I

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 (R8, S1)

Facility:

Comanche Peak Date of Exam: November 2002 Scenario Numbers:

/

/

Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

__r

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

A044

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been A

evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events 1

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8)

,viia

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)

,/'/

I Ji-_

3.

Abnormal events (2-4)

/3/

A/tt

4.

Major transients (11-2)

/

/

F

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) i /

, / 3 a~fl

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)

I / *'/

I

'4&

7.

(Critical tasks (2-3) 3/3/ 3

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

OPERATING TEST#1 CPSES ILE-11/2002 Applicant:

U Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

4 Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument/

4 Component Major 1

Reactivity 1

Normal 0

as RO Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

as SRO Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

1 SRO-U Instrument/

2 2, 3, 4 Component Major 1

4,5 (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the pplicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Lf/(~~

NRC Reviewer:

Instructions:

Author:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

OPERATING TEST#1 CPSES ILE-1 1/2002 Applicant: 11,12,13 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

4 Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument/

4 Component Major 1

Reactivity 1

1 Normal 0

as RO Instrument/

2 2, 3, Component 4, 5 Major 1

6 SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

1 as SRO Instrument/

2 2, 3, Component 4, 5, 7 Major 1

6 Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the aplicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Ink Qi~a lJ4e ~

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, S1)

OPERATING TEST#1 CPSES ILE-1112002 Applicant:

14 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

4 Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument/

4 Component Major 1

Reactivity 1

Normal 0

as RO Instrument/

2 2, 3, Component 4, 5 Major 1

6 SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

1 as SRO Instrument/

2 2, 3, 4 Component Major 1

4, 5 Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

dZ 1Yig

(..*

6-

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

OPERATING TEST#1 CPSES ILE-11/2002 Applicant:

15 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

4 Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument/

4 Component Major 1

Reactivity 1

Normal 0

as RO Instrument/

2 2, 3, 4 Component Major 1

4,5 SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

as SRO Instrument/

2 2, 3, Component 4, 5, 7 Major 1

6 Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

Author:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the appliant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

OPERATING TEST#1 CPSES ILE-11/2002 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

4 RO BOP Reactivity 1

1 Normal 1

1 nO Instrument/

4 2, 4, 2, 5 Component 5, 7 Major 1

6 6

Reactivity 1

Normal 0

as RO Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

as SRO Instrument/

2 Component Major1 Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument/

2 Component Major1 Instructions:

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the appl' nt's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

M4,*kv j

Ae Applicant:

R1,R2

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

OPERATING TEST#1 Applicant:

R3,R5 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

4 RO BOP Reactivity 1

1 Normal 1

1 RO Instrument/

4 2, 4, 4

Component 5, 7 Major 1

6 4,5 Reactivity 1

Normal 0

as RO Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

as SRO Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applic nt's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

-'ý:pl 7c

ý

-Jý-tW, A4ýW-o (V" CPSES ILE-11/2002 v

• E f*l Ir J f #....

• f m

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

OPERATING TEST#1 Applicant:

R4,R6 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

4 RO BOP Reactivity 1

1 Normal 1

1 RO Instrument/

4 2, 3, 4 2, 5 Component Major 1

4,-5 6

Reactivity 1

Normal 0

as RO Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

as SRO Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the app* ant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

M4 t2A~IE(~)

CPSES ILE-1 1/2002

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 (R8, Si)

Applicant Applicant Applicant U

I1, 12, 13 14 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 Understand and Interpret 2

2 2

2 2

Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 3

3 3

3 3

and Conditions Understand Plant 3

4 4

3 4

and System Response Comply With and 5

5 5

5 5

Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control 5

5 Boards (2)

Communicate and 5

5 6

5 6

Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory 5

5 5

Ability (3)

Comply With and 2

2 2

Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every ap licable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 (R8, Si)

Applicant Applicant Applicant 15 R1, R2 R3, R5 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 Understand and Interpret 2

2 2

2 2

4 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 3

3 3

5 3

5 and Conditions Understand Plant 4

3 4

5 4

4 and System Response Comply With and 5

4 5

6 5

5 Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control 4

5 5

5 4

Boards (2)

Communicate and 5

5 5

6 5

5 Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory 5

Ability (3)

Comply With and 2

Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 (R8, Si)

Applicant Applicant Applicant R4, R6 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 Understand and Interpret 2

2 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events 3

5 and Conditions Understand Plant 3

5 and System Response Comply With and 4

6 Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control 4

5 Boards (2)

Communicate and 5

6 Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

Al,,

NRC Reviewer:

1M.

COMANCHE PEAK OPERATING TEST SCHEDULE -11/2002 Revised 11/25/02 MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18 - Scenario 2, JPM A5 (as designated and all RO applicants), JPMs C1(except U)

Scenario 2, JPM A5 (U, 14) 0900-1100 U,R6,S [E4,E2]

1100-1130 LUNCH 1130-1330 S,R4,R3 [E3,E1]

1330-1530 14,15,R5 [E4,E1,E2]

JPMs C1 (except U) and A5 (all R applicants) 0900-1100 R3,R4,11,12 [El,E3]

1100-1130 LUNCH 1130-1330 R5,R6,14,15 [E2,E4]

1330-1530 13,R1,R2 [E3]

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19 - Scenario 1, JPMs Al, A2 and JPM A5 (for applicant in CRS position only)

Scenario 1, JPM A5 (11,12,13,15) 0730-0930 1l,Rl,S [El,E3]

0930-1130 12,R2,S [E2,E4]

1130-1200 LUNCH 1200-1400 13,R3,S [E3,E1]

1400-1600 15,R5,S [El,E2]

JPMs Al and A2 0730-0930 U,12,R2,R4 [E4,E2]

0930-1130 I1,13,Rl,R3 [El,E3]

1130-1200 LUNCH 1200-1400 14,15,R5,R6 [E4,E2]

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20 - Scenario 3, JPMs A3 and A4 (all)

Scenario 3 0730-0930 S,I1,Rl [El,E3]

0930-1130 S,12,R2 [E2,E4]

1130-1200 LUNCH 1200-1400 S,13,R6 [E3,E2]

1400-1600 S,14,R4 [E4, E3]

JPMs A3 and A4 (all) 0730-0930 U,12,R2,R3 [E4,E2]

0930-1130 I1,13,R13,R6 [El,E3]

1130-1200 LUNCH 1200-1400 14,15,R4,R5 [E4,E1]

Page 1 of 2

COMANCHE PEAK OPERATING TEST SCHEDULE -11/2002 Revised 11/25/02 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 21 - JPMs S1, S5, S6, P1, P3 JPMs S1, S5 and S6 (dynamic simulator - all except U only S5 and S6) 0730-1200 11,15,R3 [El]; 12,R5,R6 [E2]

1200-1230 LUNCH 1230-1700 13, R1,R4 [E3]; U,14,R2 [E4]

JPM P1 and P3 (plant - all) 0730-1200 13,R1,R4,15 [E3]; U,14,R2,11 [E4]

1200-1230 LUNCH 1230-1700 12,R5,R6,R3 [E2]

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 22 - JPMs S2, S3, S4 (all except U); P2 (all)

JPMs S3 and S4 (dynamic simulator - all except U) 0730-1200 11,15, R3 [El]; 12,R5,R6 [E2]

1200-1230 LUNCH 1230-1700 13,R1,R4 [E3]; 14,R2 [E4]

JPMs S2 and P2 (plant - all) 0730-1200 13,R1,R4 [E3]; U,14,R2 [E4]

1200-1230 LUNCH 1230-1700 11,15,R3 [El]; 12,R5,R6 [E2]

EXIT - 3:00 pm Applicant Assignments:

El = 11,15,R3 E2 = 12,R5,R6 E3 = 13,R1,R4 E4 = U,14,R2 NRC Personnel (E = examiners, ET = performing examiner-in-training, A = auditor):

El - Tom McKernon E2 - Mike Murphy E3 - Fred Sanchez E4 - Howard Bundy A - Tony Gody ET - Mark Haire Page 2 of 2

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:

Date of Exam:

Exam Level: RO/SRO Initials Item Description a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading V. a-, t

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and O',

documented t4_It

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

M t/A

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in N/A detail_ _

_lM__A-_I N,

A, JA

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades A/,/

are justified M /A k/ A

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Li's A-K

_/A _

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Grader K

&Lk-p-ell

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

-N

/A--/

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)7'A,4,L/

34

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

A 6co2Ž,--\\a

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

10:39:58 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 06/01/2002 To 12/01/2002 Page 1 of 4 11/26/2002 Report 21 Region: 4 F Exam Week *I Site/Docket NoJInsD Rpt #

I

1. Candidates 1F Type

• I Exam Author Chief Examiner 11 Examiners Assigned 10/28/2001 Comanche Peak / 05000445 / 2002301 TAC #: X02227 10/28/2001 Comanche Peak / 05000446 / 2002301 TAC #: X02228 06/11/2002 Comanche Peak / 05000445 / 2002301 TAC #: X02227 06/11/2002 Comanche Peak / 05000446 / 2002301 TAC #: X02228 10/21/2002 Comanche Peak / 05000445 / 2002301 TAC #: X02227 10/21/2002 Comanche Peak / 05000446 / 2002301 TAC #: X02228 11/11/2002 Comanche Peak / 05000445 / 2002301 TAC #: X02227 11/11/2002 Comanche Peak / 05000446 / 2002301 TAC #: X02228 Prep Prep Prep Prep Prep Prep Admin RO -6 SROU - 1 SROI - 5 Admin BUNDY, HOWARD F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

SANCHEZ, ALFRED STETKA, THOMAS F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

SANCHEZ, ALFRED STETKA, THOMAS F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

BUNDY, HOWARD F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

SANCHEZ, ALFRED BUNDY, HOWARD F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

Sites: CP Orgs-4620 Exam Author:ALL Phase Code: 5 Operational I

Page 2 of 4 11/26/2002 10:39:58 Report 21 Region: 4 Phase Codi ISummary By Date 10/2001 CP - Comanche Peak RO - 0 SROI - 0 10/2001 RO - 0 SROI - 0 06/2002 CP - Comanche Peak RO-0 SROI - 0 06/2002 RO - 0 SROI - 0 10/2002 CP - Comanche Peak RO - 0 SROI - 0 10/2002 RO - 0 SROI - 0 11/2002 CP - Comanche Peak RO-6 SROI - 5 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 06/01/2002 To 12/01/2002 e: 5 Operational SROU - 0 SROU - 0 SROU - 0 SROU - 0 SROU - 0 SROU - 0 SROU - 1 LSRO - 0 LSRO - 0 LSRO - 0 LSRO - 0 LSRO - 0 LSRO - 0 LSRO - 0 Total for Comanche Peak: 0 Total for 10/2001: 0 Total for Comanche Peak: 0 Total for 06/2002: 0 Total for Comanche Peak: 0 Total for 10/2002: 0 Total for Comanche Peak: 12 Sites: CP Orgs: 4620 Exam Author:ALL

PaeI Phase Code: 5 Operational uP - Comanche Peak RO - 6 SROI - 5 SROU - 1 LSRO - 0 Total for Comanche Peak: 12 Sites: CP Orgs: 4620 Exam Author:ALL Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 06/01/2002 To 12/01/2002 P f 4 11/26/22UU Report 21 Region: 4 10:39:58 Summary By Site--

J

Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 06/01/2002 To 12/01/2002 Page 4 of 4 11126/2002 Report 21 Region: 4 ISummary By Region SROI - 5 SROU - 1 Total for Region 4:12 Sites: CP Orgs:4620 Exam Author:ALL Phase Code: 5 Operational 10:39:58 Region q RO - 6 LSRO - 0

C C

ES-201 Examination SecuritU Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) ofav,

• en**u of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of _

. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIG.NATURE IIR I r

S,

-A I Ui: (2) DA

-- -,_ unr, --

1.

C o

• _,_* =_

1.6. _.v 'v.. (

LAk.ý-i__

4.,tO S. Zo(y L~r!o/d

5.

6. J 4AJW

-A~a n ----

7.

-I ee, 02

8.

$,Oooo Av---

'0 v P

9.

10.

11----------------------.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

TENOTE NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24 C

SIGNATI IRI:: lt*

.._ OZ-.,Z_ z-

-_/------

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of/l'

z. *i"f yas of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who hav not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIG ATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE 12 90. lýPOI

ýS56LJt

-l 111111o 9A-0

2.

7 "5.

i---------

4.

6.

6.

8.

92.-----

10.

1,-----

11.

14

13.

14.

15 NOTES:

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24