ML030380433
| ML030380433 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 01/29/2003 |
| From: | Tkaczyk L Entergy Nuclear Northeast |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response |
| References | |
| BVY 03-13 | |
| Download: ML030380433 (41) | |
Text
SfS
'=v Entergy Entergy Nuclear Northeast Vermont Yankee P.O. Box 0500 185 Old Ferry Road Brattleboro, VT 05302-0500 Tel 802 257 5271 January 29, 2003 BVY 03-13 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTrN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License No. DPR-28 (Docket No. 50-271)
Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Changes - Change #213 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), enclosed are the latest changes to the following Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures including the change memos and the 10 CFR 50.54(q)
Evaluation Checklists:
OP 3504, Rev 35, LPC 1 OP 3545, Rev 1, LPC 2 OP 3524, Rev 19, LPC 2 OP 3546, Rev 2, LPC 1 OP 3510, Rev 26, LPC 1 These changes were determined to not need prior NRC review and approval.
If you have any questions, please contact Audra Williams, Emergency Planning Coordinator, in our Brattleboro office at (802) 258-4177.
Sincerely, ENTERGY NUCLEAR NORTHEAST VERMONT YANKEE Lori Tkaczyk Emergency Planning Manager Attachments cc:
USNRC Region 1 Administrator USNRC Resident Inspector - VYNPS USNRC Project Manager - VYNPS (no attachments)
David M. Silk, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist, USNRC Region 1 Vermont Department of Public Service
4 TO: k)E CNCT bOLLC (DOCMN
.ORM,
VERMONT YANKEE CONTROLLED DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM SECTION 1 DOCUMENT TITLE:
E-PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES COPY NUMBER:
544 CHANGE NUMBER:
213 ISSUE DATE:
01/29/03 INSTRUCTIONS:
- a.
Attached is an authorized controlled copy to the above listed document for retention as your assigned copy.
- b.
Review the revised material.
- c.
Incorporate new change into the controlled document by document issue date, if applicable.
- d.
Ensure that those who use the document are aware of the change.
- e.
Destroy all superseded pages.
- f.
Destroy obsolete forms and insert new forms into the files.
- g.
Sign and date this form and return to the Procedures Administrative Assistant (PAA) or Document Control Center (DCC).
- h.
Complete appropriate change information on VY Controlled Document Record of Changes.
TRANSMITTED BY:
Ann M. Pichette MC-1220 PAA or DCC Signature AFTER COMPLYING WITH THE ABOVE INSTRUCTIONS, PLEASE RETURN TO THE PAA OR DCC WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ISSUE DATE.
SECTION 2 The undersigned acknowledges completion of the preceding instructions.
Signature of Recipient:
Date:
VYAPF 6805.01 (Sample)
AP 6805 Rev. 19 Page I of 1 K>
- 1
'I To:
E-Plan Implementing Procedure Controlled Set Holders From: Technical Support - DCC - Ann M. Pichette Date:
01/29/2003 Re:
VY EPlan Implementing Procedure Change #213, Instruction Sheet A new Table of Contents is included.
LPCs:
The following LPCs should be incorporated into the appropriate procedures:
Proc/Rev #
OP 3504/35 OP 3510/26 OP 3524/19 OP 3545/1 OP 3546/2 LPC.#
1 1
2 2
1 Procedure Title Emergency Communications Off-Site and Site Boundary Monitoring Emergency Actions to Ensure Accountability and Security
Response
Activation of the EOF/RC Operation of the EOF/RC
Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Table of Contents--
tI1 I
Januarv 29. 2003 Use Title Number Revision LPC #
Use
_ClaQssification Emergency Plan Classification and Action Level Scheme AP 3125 Rev. 19 "Reference" Emergency Communications OP 3504 Rev. 35 1
"Reference" Emergency Preparedness Exercises and Drills OP 3505 Rev. 24 1
"Information" Emergency Equipment Readiness Check OP 3506 Rev. 41 3
"Reference" Emergency Radiation Exposure Control OP 3507 Rev. 29 2
"Reference" On-Site Medical Emergency Procedure OP 3508 Rev. 23 "Reference" Environmental Sample Collection During an Emergency OP 3509 Rev. 17 "Reference" Off-Site and Site Boundary Monitoring OP 3510 Rev. 26 1
"Reference" Off-Site Protective Action Recommendations OP 3511 Rev. 12 "Reference" Evaluation of Off-Site Radiological Conditions OP 3513 Rev. 21 "Reference" Emergency Actions to Ensure Accountability and Security OP 3524 Rev. 19 2
"Reference"
Response
iological Coordination OP 3525 Rev. 9 "Reference" Emergency Call-In Method OP 3531 Rev. 15 1
"Reference" Emergency Preparedness Organization AP 3532 Rev. 10 1
"Information" Post Accident Sampling of Reactor Coolant OP 3533 Rev. 6 "Continuous" Post Accident Sampling of Plant Stack Gaseous Releases OP 3534 Rev. 4 "Continuous" Post Accident Sampling and Analysis of Primary Containment OP 3535 Rev. 4 "Continuous" In Plant Air Sample Analysis with Abnormal Condition OP 3536 Rev. 1 "Continuous" Control Room Actions During an Emergency OP 3540 Rev. 2 "Reference" Activation of the Technical Support Center OP 3541 Rev. 1 1
"Reference" Operation of the Technical Support Center OP 3542 Rev. 1 2
"Reference" Operation of the Operations Support Center OP 3544 Rev. 2 "Reference" Activation of the Emergency Operations Facility/Recovery Center OP 3545 Rev. 1 2
"Reference" Operation of the Emergency Operations Facility/Recovery Center OP 3546 Rev. 2 1
"Reference" Security Actions During an Emergency OP 3547 Rev. 1 "Reference" Emergency Plan Training OP 3712 Rev. 16 "Information" K>
Page 1 of I J
J
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OP 3504 REVISION 35 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS USE CLASSIFICATION: REFERENCE LPC Effective Affected Pages No.
Date 1
01/24/03 Figure 5 Pg 1 of 1; Figure 6 Pgs 1 & 2 of 2 I Implementation Statement: N/A 1I Issue Date:
12/19/2002 OP 3504 Rev. 35 Page 1 of 23
C C,
Cm FIGURE 5 OPERATIONS SUPPORT CENTER - COMMUNICATIONS ARRANGEMENT cwEX"Et~ON TtE t fl 472 10EA I
MtN81O9tELEPEEN E
650.
2 GAI-TRONICS L 3 TXTENSMTELEPHONE 6472.
1 EU*HOIN 84e 4
GAI-TRON!*C CHEM L 5
T L
EXTENSIONLTBPO E
a GAS-TRONICS 7
EXTENSION TELEPHONE s5a16 2
GAI-TROPIC8S 1
GM-TRONICS 10 MULTIPLE INS EXTENSION TELEPONE0 COUNiN 11 MULT. LINE E~r TELEPHONE (AUTO RID) 48(15 12 OAI-TRONIOS 18 (Do"~ld 14 EXTENSION TELEPHONE am3 00 61 17 EXTENSION TELEPHONE 5489o 717 EXTENSION TELEPHONE
- 66.
1CHEMISTRYCS E19 EXTENSION TELEPHONE
~~~
20W
.4 GA,,-TRONMC 60-C O3 EXTENSION TELEPHONE 5502 LOCKE ROOM*'
FIE B OOM22 ON-TRON1C8 24 GAI-TRONICS 50 27 ALT.AUTO RINGDOWN MOP TOT OROM 26 (Osld C2 EXTENSION IELEPHONE a503.
3 0AI-TRONICS 32 EXTENSION TELEPHONE 5120 33 GAP-TRONICS 34 EXTENSION TELEPHONE 6498.
CONRLPOINT 3
EXTENSION TELEPHONE a FAX MACHINE 0480.
36 EXTENSION TELEPHONE 5479 GAI-TRONICS 0
coo 36 EXTENSION TELEPHONE GA (I-TRONIO 40 EXENIO ELEPHONE I2 42 GAI.TROMWO 44 OMI-TRONICS 47 EXTENSIONTELEPHONE a
FIR ROOM CXJAN HOWR 61 GOAITRONICS 52 4
EXTENSION TELEPHONE 54192 LOCKRROM BIGAD ROM53 GAI-TRONICS 51 GAJ-TRONMC 56 EXTENSION TELEPHONE 6466 56OWB 080 5210 II 85T INCLUDES PRIMARYAU1'O RINOOM"
- OPTIONAL DIftECT OFF-P4TEACCES-USING 266.XXOCX Figure 5 OP 3504 Rev. 35 Page. I of 1 LPC#1
W^9 C
FIGURE 6 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY/RECOVERY CENTER - COMMUNICATIONS ARRANGEMENT Figure 6 OP 3504 Rev. 35 Page I of 2 LPC#1 C
C
'"A
C "MM.
DEOGRPDoNi I
MAS PHONE 2
HAS PHONE 8
PRIMARYAUTO RINGOOW A
ALTERNATEAUTO RINGOOWN 6
FAX MACHINE (INCOMIN a
FAX MACHINE (OUTGOIN) 7 1
NRC FAX MACHINE 10 (DoleFtD)
IDA oefl 12 (Deed IS[1 CRONFERNCErOOM 1:
SAMPLE AALYSIS is SAMPLEANALYSIS Is NRC:
- 17.
NRO 19 NRC
- 1.
EOF COORDIMATOR 20 EOP COORDINATOR 21 W1RAODASSESOMEPI 210 MODEM 22 RAD ASSESSMENT, 23 230 DATA 24 INTERNALTOANNC 240 RCOEAR ENGINEER 260 (119 427
$PARE 12 260 RAD ASSESSMEN 29 B RAD ASSESSMENT-NRC 30 COMMUIATIONS 33 MEDtAAO0t8OOR 36 M SECURITYA0MANPOWER 38 NRCOAASSESSMENT 40 SITE RECOVERY MANAGER 400 LMTO DAXTA SWITCH 41 RECOVERY PLANNING 41D RECOVERY PLANNING DATAN 42D LA13127 430 DATA 440 45 46 MA PHONE 47 MA PHONE 48 MA FAX MACHINE 49 N" PHONE so H FAX MACHINE SI NH PHONE 62 VI PHONE 53 VT PHONE 54 VT FAX MACHINE as NH PHONE as VaLL PHONE 87 MPLLPHONE 56 ViALL PHONE so VANLLPHONE SRM OFFICE STATEASSEM.LY 8RM OFFICE 8RM OFFICE RECOVERY PLANNING RECOVERY PLANNING NRC PURCHASING CONFERENCE ROOM CHEM LAB CHEM LAB "NRC NRC "NRC RECOVERY PLANNING RECOVERY PLANNING RADASSES*MENT RADASSESSMENT RADASSESSMENr BRIEFINOARVA BRIEFINGAREA BRIEFING ARFA ROOM 122 ROOM 121 OSMTAREA OSMTAREA OGMTAREA RECOVERY PLANNING LOBBY "RCMIADBASSESSMENT RECOVERY PLANNING RECOVERY PLANNING RECOVERY PLANNING RECOVERY PLANNING CONTROL. LA5 RECOVERY PLANNING STATEASBEN.SY STTEASSEMBLY ST"TEASSEMBLY MTATEASSEMBLY SFATEASSEMBLY STATE ASSEMBLY SAMTE ASSEMBLY "1"TEASSEMBLY STATE ASSEMBLY TTEASSEMBLY SlATE ASSENMBY STAT BRIEFING ROOM 122 ROOM 121 4802 4682 4268.
4872 4873 4871 4870 4269.
2100.
427a 4854 487l 4961 48055 DAT 4287..
460" DATA 4283.
4272.
4875 2100.
4874 DATA 4264.
DIAT DATA DATA 4261.
4277.
4278o 4278a 42745 4280.
4270o 4278.
4274.
2191 4858 408 450" 4855 TEL MONS 60 VmLP9ONE BRIEFING ARVA
@1 M YALL PHONE RECOVMERY LANNING 2
VALL PHONE ENGINEERING SUPPORT a8 UALL PHONE CONFERENCEICONTROL LAS 84 VMLL PHONE CHEM LAB 05 ENGINEERING SUPPORT GROUP ENGINEERING SUPPORT as WTCHBARD POX TELEPHONE ROOM 07 IWI 815M ARrAMAPOWER LOBBY as aECURrMAmNPOWER LOBBY 09 NRC REACTOR SAFETY COUNTERPART UNK REOEYPLARNNI (P78) 70 NRC ENS PHONE PLANNING 71 NRG.PH PHONE RADASSESSMENT 72 NRC PROTECTIE MEASURES COUNTERPART UNK RAD.ASSESSMENT (P75) 78 NRC MANAGEMENT COUNTERPART LINK NKRO (P8) 74 NRC LOCALACCESS NEWYORK NRC: =S 75 VY-USE NR EaNS PHONE 76 VT-USE NRCI HPH PHONE RADASSESSMENT(FTS) 77 UHF RADIO SYSTEM OSM"ARffA 78 MAPHONE**
SI.TE ABSELY 70 PURCHASING COORDINATOR ROOM 122 i1
=X PONE WTATEASSEMBLY 652 EXT. PHONE STATEASSEMBLY 83 EXT. PHONE STATEASSEMBLY 84 MA PHONE STATEASSEMBLY (86 D(eked)o m
EXT. PHONE SIXTEASSEMBLY 87 809 EXT. PHONE N*
0, EXT. PHONE NRO DID DATA ENGINEERING SUPPORT 2D.
DATA NRC 930 DATA STATEABBEMBLY 94D (00W, m 00 DATA ROOM 122 em0 WRPIS ROOM 122 970 DAMh ROOM 121 0e0 ERS RECOVERY PLANNING 90D ERPWS RAD ASSESSMENT 1000 VT NUCLEAR ENGINEER ROOM 122 S1010 DATA RECOVERY PLANNING 102 SrITCHBOARD LOBBY 0
- PO'WER FAL. PHONE
- OP"TIONALDIRECTOFF-SITEACC*85 USNG 2560 Figure 6 OP 3504 Rev. 35
-Page 2 of 2 LPC #1 FIGURE 6 (Continued)
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY/RECOVERY CENTER-COMMUNICATIONS ARRANGEMENT il 4854 40510 4m 4881 4851 4271.
4299.
4875.
4877 700481-4330 7oo-46l.4,20 7oo.45G1.43'25 70f81.4327 700.861-4320 700-.01.4326 700A.81.43*2 "700.061.412 4202 4292 463 4832 4638 4634 420 4280 4261 DATA DAM%
DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA DATA
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure(s) r any other document to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):
OP 3504, Rev 35, LPC #1 - Emergency Communications A.. Screening Evaluation.
Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
A "YES" answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.
A "NO" answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.
I 1.
Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b):
(1)
Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities YES NO (2)
Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response Organization personnel YES NO (3) Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources YES NO (4)
Emergency Classification and Action levels, including facility system and effluent parameters..
YES NO (5) Notification Methods and Procedures YES NO (6)
Emergency Communications among principal response organizations aM the public YES NO (7)
Public Education and Information YES NO (8)
Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES NO (9) Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipment YES NO (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions YES NO (11) Emergency Worker Radiological Exposure Control YES NO (12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals YES -NO (13) Recovery and Reentry Plans YES NO (14) Emergency response periodic drills and exercises YES NO (15) Radiological Emergency Response Training YES NO (16) Plan development, review and distribution YES NO VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page 1 of 3 RT No. 10.E06.171
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
- 2.
Could the change affect our ability to meet the following requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
(1)
Section IV. A - Organization YES NO (2)
Section IV. B - Assessment Actions (3)Section IV. C-Activation of Emergency Organizations (4)Section IV. D - Notification Procedures (5)
Section IV. E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment (6)
Section IV. F - Training (7)
Section IV. G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness (8)
Section IV. H - Recovery YES NO YES NO.
YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES HO B. Effectiveness Determination For applicable item 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9) & Appendix E Section IV. E of Section A above, this change DOES NOT decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and DOES continue to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
BASIS FOR ANSWER:
The changes to the EOF floorplan is an improvement within the facility.
The SRM's office which was previously overcrowded will now have adequate space to allow personnel to communicate and function more effectively.
The Engineering Group will have a larger room with the necessary equipment to perform their duties. The OSC area change eliminated the lunch room and moved the AO room This change does not affect the operation of the facility.
Neither of these changes decreases the effectiveness of the EPlan and continues to meet the requirements.
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 2 of 3 For each applicable (i.e., a "yes" answer specified) standard to 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
A facsimile of the evaluation form may be used as needed and attached to this checklist.
ivntn thzat vncanecv.
into that vacancv I
10 CFR 50.54 (q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate information)
El The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements ofAppendix E to 10 CFR 50.
o The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and decrease our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
The following course of action is recommended:
o Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.
o Cancel the proposed changes.
o Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).
D. Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)
Keywords used in search:
o This change does not affect any other documents.
21 This change does affect other documents.
Document (s) affected:
OP.3506, Emeraencv Plan Section(s). affected:
E. Impact on the Updatpd FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.
Keywords used in UFSAR search:
Additional Comments:
o6 A'
+
S C
~{%
L~
~
Prepared By:
Reviewed By:
Audra Williams Date:
1/6/03
( ordi-n/i
)i 1.Date:
(Emergency Plan C ordinator) (Print/Sq n}
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page 3 of 3
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION io
~ ~RANG PR0c~UE OP 3510 REVISION 26 OFF-SITE AND SITE BOUNDARY MONITORING USE CLASSIFICATION: REFERENCE LPC Effective Affected Pages No.
Date 1
08/26/02 5 of 28 Implementation Statement: N/A I
Issue Date:
06/06/02 OP 3510 Rev. 26 Page I of 28
- 4.
Supplemental References K7LCI
- a.
AP 0505, Respiratory Protection
- b.
DP 0530, Report #51
- c.
OP 3525, Radiological Coordination
- d.
AP 6807, Collection, Temporary Storage and Retrieval of QA Records PRECAUTIONS/LIMITATIONS
- 1.
Use care not to contaminate monitoring equipment.
- 2.
During foul weather, use care not to damage filters by exposing them to the elements (e.g., sample under hood or inside car).
- 3.
The individual driving the vehicle shall not perform radio communications or take radiological readings while he is driving the vehicle.
- 4.
Boundary and off-site teams should attempt to minimize their radiation exposure while performing their duties.
- 5.
The monitoring teams should inventory their kits on the mezzanine of the Administration Building not in the OSC hallway.
PREREQUISITES
- 1.
If any equipment malfunctions or is missing, notify the appropriate facility.
- 2.
Qualified Radiation Protection personnel will ensure Site Boundary and Off-Site team members have current respirator qualifications (per AP 0505) prior to teams leaving Gate
- 2.
- 3.
Off-Site teams will perform respirator fits prior to leaving Gate 2.
OP 3510 Rev. 26 Page 5 of 28 LPC #1 NOTES The deployment of Site Boundary and Off-Site Teams will be initially directed by the Technical Support Center (TSC). Once the EOF becomes operational, the Radiological Coordinator will assume the responsibility and direction of these teams. The Site Boundary Team may be dispatched initially by the Plant Emergency Director (PED).
The radio base units will be designated and referred to as:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
PED 11cc.1)
10 OR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure(s) or any other docuitent to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):
OP 3510, Rev. 26, LPC#l, Off-Site and Site Boundary Monitoring A. Screening Evaluation Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
A "YES" answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.
A 'NO" answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.
- i.
Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b):
(1) Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities YES CO)
(2)
Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response organization personnelc (3)
Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources YES YES (NO)
(4) Emergency Classification and Action levels, including facility system and effluent parameters YES (5) Notification Methods and Procedures YES (6)
Emergency Communications among principal response organizations the public YES NO (7)
Public Education and Information YES NO (8)
Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES N (9)
Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipment (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions YES YES NO (11) Emergency Worker Radiological Exposure Control YES N
(12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals YES NO (13) Recovery and Reentry Plans YES NO (14) Emergency response periodic drills and exercises YES NO (15) Radiological Emergency Response Training YES N (16) Plan development, review and distribution VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page I of 3 RT No. 10.E06.171
10 CPI 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
- 2.
Could the change affect our ability to meet the following requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
(1)Section IV. A - Organization (2)
Section IV. B - Assessment Actions (3)
Section IV. C - Activation of Emergency Organizations (4)
Section IV. D - Notification Procedures (S)
Section IV. E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment (6)
Section IV. F - Training (7)
Section IV. G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness (8)
Section IV. H - Recovery YES NO YES NO YES NO YES N
YES 0
YES NO YES YES N
B. Effectiveness Determination For applicable item 10 CFR 50 N)A*
of Section A above, this change (DOES/DOES NOT) decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and (DOES/DOES NOT) continue to meet the stated applicable standard or reuirement.
BASIS FOR ANSWER:
This revision formalizes expectations that are not written in the procedure.
AlthOUqhl it nas been normal practice o fit.
test m
x---
fashion.
The procedure has been revised to add this expectation as a "This change does not decrease the effectiveness and Coes continue to meet tne requircments.
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 2 of 3 For each applicable (i.e., a "yes" answer specified) standard to 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
A facsimile of the evaluation form may be used as needed and attached to this checklist.
VLLLA.LDJ.l..
m W.Lr_%AL4.L0.L'--9.
S I
I I L
JA A
A.
Aone in that
10 CPR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate information)
IM The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
0 The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and decrease our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
The following course of action is recommended:
o Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.
o3 Cancel the proposed changes.
o Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10 CPR 50.54(q).
D.
Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)
Keywords used in search:
respirator fit test E]This change does not affect any other documents.
1 This change does affect other documents.
Document(s) affected:
Section(s) affected:
E. Impact on the Updated FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.
Keywords used in UFSAR search; respirator fit test Additional Comments:
Prepared By:
Reviewed By:
Audra Williams C JUaDate:
8/8/02 (Print--Sic*-
Date:
(Emergency Plan Coordinator)(Print/ ign)
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 3 of 3
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION Q'PEI ERMiNG IRCEDURJI'ý 1J;7 OP 3524 REVISION 19 EMERGENCY ACTIONS TO ENSURE INITIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND SECURITY RESPONSE USE CLASSIFICATION: REFERENCE LPC Effective Affected Pages No.
Date 1
08/14/02 VYOPF 3524.02 Pg I of 3 2
01/24103. 3,7 & 17 of 17; ADDED VYOPF 3524.03 Pg 1 of I Implementation Statement: N/A Issue Date:
06106/02 OP 3524 Rev. 19 Page I of 17
PURPOSE To define necessary actions by members of the security force, in conjunction with plant personnel, during emergency conditions at Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station.
DISCUSSION Under emergency conditions, the security force functions are to aid the Plant Emergency Director (Operations Shift Supervisor) and the Technical Support Center (TSC) Coordinator by providing supplemental security staff, providing pertinent information, regulating access to the site, and performing security functions as deemed necessary. Plant personnel are responsible for reporting to appropriate areas and aiding security in the accountability process.
Vermont Yankee personnel and contractors working within the Plant Support Building and Gate 3, located in the Owner Controlled Area (OCA), are required to attend OCA training and are exempt from having to wear a Vermont Yankee OCA Unescorted Access Badge.
Visitors to the Plant Support Building or Gate 3 require escort by an individual with current training for OCA unescorted access and are not required to wear an OCA Visitor's Badge.
In cases of an Emergency Plan drill or actual event, individuals within the Plant Support Building and Gate 3 shall follow the procedures presented during OCA training.
In accordance with AP 6002, Preparing 50.59 Evaluations, the results of an Applicability Determination (AD) has determined that an AD is not required for future changes provided the procedure scope is not changed. The basis for this conclusion is that this document is an Emergency Implementing Procedure and is subject to 10CFR50.54(q) to determine if the changes decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and if they have the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10CFR50.47(b) and the requirements of 10CFR50 Appendix E.
ATTACHMENTS
- 1.
VYOPF 3524.01 Initial Accountability Report Form
- 2.
VYOPF 3524.02 Initial Accountability Check-In Form 2
- 3.
VYOPF 3524.03 Emergency Plan - Vehicle and Radio Assignment Information
- 4.
Figure 1 Hallway Outside Control Room Map
- 5.
Figure 2 Technical Support Center (TSC) Layout
.6.
Figure 3 Operations Support Center (OSC) Layout
- 7.
Figure 4 Condenser Bay - Ground Floor OP 3524 Rev. 19 Page 3 of 17 LPC #2
- 2.
The TSC Coordinator shall designate Accountability Coordinators to:
- a.
ensure all personnel reporting to the TSC and OSC check in on VYOPF 3524.02,
- b.
promptly deliver completed VYOPF 3524.02 forms to the ACO at Gatehouse 2, C.
activate accountability posts to monitor all personnel entering/exiting the emergency response facilities located in the Administration Building, using VYOPF 3542.01.
NOTE Access to the Protected Area through Gate 2 may be suspended while accountability is being performed.
- 3.
The ACO shall:
a.-
assign an individual to read off the gatehouse slot number and name, in that order, from the VYOPF 3524.02's, the OCA badge rack and the Visitor's Log, if applicable,
- b.
check off the corresponding gatehouse slot number and name on the On-Site computer report, C.
when complete, verify that badges assigned to those personnel not checked-off on the On-Site computer report are not in the badge and OCA rack, or in the deposit slots, NOTE Should an individual incorrectly note their slot number or a printed" name is illegible, a cross-reference may be obtained using the current Employee Card Key Inventory List maintained at the ACO's desk.
- d.
list personnel not checked off on the On-Site computer report as unaccounted for on VYOPF 3524.01,
- e.
report the status of the accountability process to the TSC and the name(s) of any unaccounted for personnel, within 30 minutes of the announcement of the emergency classification, OP 3524 Rev. 19 Page 7 of 17 LPC #2 NOTE The ACO shall contact the TSC to ascertain the status of the VYOPF 3524.02 forms (check-in sheets) if they are not delivered following the evacuation of personnel.
E.
Status of Security Systems and Security Force. The SSS shall:
- 1.
report the status of plant security, perimeter integrity, location of security personnel, number of persons on-site, etc., as requested by the TSC Coordinator or Plant Emergency Director,
- 2.
ensure that all required security force emergency functions are completed,
- 3.
notify the Security Operations Supervisor and Security Manager in the event of an emergency situation.
F.
Issuance of Company Vehicles and Radios: Use VYOPF 3524.03 to record vehicles and radios issued to Site Boundary and Off-Site Teams.
VIII.
Criteria for Evacuation of Gatehouse 2 A.
During a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency it may become necessary to evacuate Gatehouse 2 due to habitability concerns.
B.
On notification by the TSC Coordinator of the need to evacuate Gatehouse 2, the Security Manager shall:
I.
assess relocation alternatives with the TSC Coordinator, 2..
develop a plan for the relocation of security personnel and equipment,
- 3.
determine necessary compensatory measures and actions as a result of the relocation.
FINAL CONDITIONS
- 1.
Return emergency equipment to normal location at Gatehouse 2.
- 2.
Return all completed forms to the Emergency Plan Coordinator who will ensure proper filing in accordance with AP 6807.
OP 3524 Rev. 19 Page 17 of 17 LPC #2
EMERGENCY PLAN - VEHICLE AND RADIO ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION VEHICLE #1:
Assigned to:
Q Blue Team
'] Green Team E] Black Team Team Members:
Portable Radio Number issued, if needed:
VEHICLE #2:
Assigned to:
E] Blue Team
" Green Team f' Black Team Team Members:
Portable Radio Number issued, if needed:
VEHICLE #3:
Assigned to:
E] Blue Team E] Green Team
" Black. Team Team Members:
Portable Radio Number issued, if needed:
VEHICLE #4:
Assigned to:
Site Boundary Team Team Members:
Portable Radio Number issued, if needed:
OTHER VEHICLE:
Assigned to:
Portable Radio Number issued:
VYOPF 3524.03 OP 3524 Rev. 19 Page 1 of 1 LPC #2
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure(s) or any other document to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):
OP 3524, Rev. 19, LPC #2, Emergency Actions to Ensure Accountability and Security Response A. Screening Evaluation Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
A "YES" answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.
A "NO" answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.
- 1.
Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b):
(1) Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities YES NO (2)
Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response Organization personnel YES NO (3)
Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources YES NO (4) Emergency Classification and Action levels, including facility system and effluent parameters YES NO (5)
Notification Methods and Procedures YES NO (6)
Emergency Communications among principal response organizations an the public YES NO (7)
Public Education and Information YES NO (8)
Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES NO (9)
Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipment YES NO (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions YES NO (11) Emergency Worker Radiological-Exposure Control YES NO (12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals YES NO (13) Redovery and Reentry Plans YES NO (14) Emergency response periodic drills and exercises YES NO (15) Radiological Emergency Response Training YES NO (16) Plan development, review and distribution YES NO VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 1 of 3 RT No. 10.E06.171
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
- 2.
Could the change affect our ability to meet the following requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
(1)
Section IV. A - Organization YES NO (2)
Section IV. B - Assessment Actions (3)Section IV. C -. Activation of Emergency Organizations (4)
Section IV. D - Notification Procedures (5)
Section IV. E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment (6)
Section IV. F - Training (7)
Section IV. G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness (8)
Section IV. H - Recovery YES NO YES YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO B. Effectiveness Determination For applicable item 10 CFR 50 N/A of Section A above, this change DOES NOT decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and DOES continue to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
BASIS FOR ANSWER:
This change allows Security to temporarily suspend anyone from entering Gate 2 while they are performing accountability.
This helps Security to perform site accountability within the 30 minute requirement.
Security currently does this, this change is to formalize that process.
The addition of the Vehicle and Radio Assignment form allows Security to control the issuance of vehicles and radios for off-site teams and should help expedite the process.
These changes are enhancements to the process and do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan.
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 2 of 3 For each applicable (i.e., a 'yes" answer specified) standard to 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
A facsimile of the evaluation form may be used as needed and attached to this checklist.
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate information) 0 The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
[3 The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency-Plan and decrease our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
The following course of action is recommended:
o3 Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.
o3 Cancel the proposed changes.
o Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).
D. Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)
Keywords used in search:
0 This change does not affect any other documents.
o This change does affect other documents.
SDocument(s) affected:
Section(s) affected:__
E. Impact on the Updated FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.
Keywords used in UFSAR search:
Additional Comments:
Prepared By:
Audra Williams Date:
1/17/03 S(Print/ Si9
,M.)
Reviewed By:
t7 k
Date:
(Emergency PlanlCoorLnator)(Print Sign)
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 3 of 3
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION If il OP 3545 REVISION 1 ACTIVATION OF THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY/RECOVERY CENTER (EOF/RC)
USE CLASSIFICATION: REFERENCE Implementation Statement: N/A Issue Date:
06/06/02 OP 3545 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 6 LPC Effective Affected Pages No.
Date 1
10/22/02 5 of 6 2
01/24/03 4 &6 of6;Table IPgs 1 &2 of 2; Table 2 Pg I of 1; Figure 1Pg I ofl; DELETEFIGURE2PG 1 OF 1;&Figure 3Pg 1 of 1
ATTACHMENTS
- 1.
Appendix A Delete
- 2.
Table I Personnel Assignment List
- 3.
Table 2 Equipment Locations "4.
Figure 1 EOF/RC Footprint Sample
- 5.
Figure 2 Deleted
- 6.
Figure 3 EOF/RC Layout REFERENCES AND COMMITMENTS
- 1.
Technical Specifications and Site Documents
- a.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Emergency Plan
- 2.
Codes, Standards and Regulations
- a.
None
- 3.
Commitments
- a.
None
- 4.
Supplemental References
- a.
AP 3125, Emergency Plan Classification and Action Level Scheme
- b.
OP 3504, Emergency Communications
- c.
OP 3507, Emergency Radiation Exposure Control
- d.
OP 3531, Emergency Call-in Method
- e.
OP 3540, Control Room actions During an Emergency
- f.
OP 3541, Activation of the Technical Support Center (TSC)
- g.
OP 3542, Operation of the Technical Support Center (TSC)
- h.
OP 3544, Operation of the Operations Support Center (OSC)
- i.
OP 3546, Operation of the Emergency Operations Facility/Recovery Center (EOF/RC)
- j.
OP 3547, Security Actions During an Emergency
- k.
AP 6807, Collection, Temporary Storage and Retrieval of QA Records PRECAUTIONS/LIMITATIONS
- 1.
Refer to OP 3504 for alternate methods of communication in the event that primary methods fail.
OP 3545 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 6 LPC #2
3.7.
1
(
FINAL CONDI
__/.c'e
?lace ER Commun ITIONS F Directories in Rad Assessment Area and ications Area.
I Time/Date Initials
- 1.
All required positions on Table 1 are filled.
- 2.
Report to the EOF/RC Coordinator, or EOF Coordinator's Assistant, that the EOF/RC is ready for Activation.
- 3.
Report to SRM that EOF is ready for activation.
- 4.
Return completed procedure to the Emergency Plan Coordinator for filing in accordance with AP 6807.
OP 3545 Rev. 1 Page 6 of 6 LPC #2 U.
NOTE Minimum staffing for activation of the'EOF/RC includes:
"* Site Recovery Manager
"* EOF Coordinator
"* Radiological Assistant
"* Communications Assistant
"* SRM Compliance Advisor
"* SRM Ops Advisor #1 I
f I
I
TABLE 1 PERSONNEL ASSIGNMENT LIST K>i Required for Activation Site Recovery Manager EOF Coordinator
(" Radiological Assistant Communication Assistant SRM Compliance Advisor (required to assume communication function)
SRM Ops Advisor #1 Positions to be Staffed K>
Purchasing Coordinator Radiological Coordinator Nuclear Information Director Personnel (not required for activation)
Table 1 OP 3545 Rev. 1 Page I of 2 LPC #2
TABLE 1 (Continued)
Other Positions to be Staffed (cont.)
SRM Ops Advisor #2 EOF Coordinator's Assistant SRM State Advisor NMC Technical Representative SRM Media Advisor SRM Radiological Advisor ERFIS Operator METPAC Operator Manpower & Planning Assistant Personnel & Equipment Monitors Personnel & Equipment Monitors Facilities Coordinator Telecommunications Coordinator Switchboard Operator Table 1 OP 3545 Rev. I Page 2 of 2 LPC #2
TABLE 2 EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS (per OP 3504)
Cabinet Location No.
I In the Site Recovery Manager's Office area.
T 2
In the hallway outside room 126, contains equipment for Room 125/126 and EOF Engineers.
3 In the Hallway across from the Chemistry Lab, contains equipment for use by the Radiological Assistant and staff.
4 In the hallway across from the Chemistry Lab, contains equipment for use by the Radiological Assistant and staff.
Other Equipment Areas to be opened Sprinkler Room (back of room 118) contains equipment for the Radiological Assistant and staff, Manpower/Planning and Personnel & Equipment Monitoring.
State Cabinets in Room 117. Upper and Lower cabinets. Contain equipment for tie *2 the State EOF responders. DO NOT REMOVE EQUIPMENT FROM THESE CABINETS -just open them.
"EOF Engineering Equipment Aperture cards, reader and printer are located on the second floor of the Training Building outside of Room 201.
Mini-Prints are located on the network and can be printed to any of the Canon copiers that contain 11 x 17 paper, or Uncontrolled hard copies are available in the TIC and Room 128.
Vendor Manuals are located at the Plant and PSB.
Table 2 OP 3545 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 1 LPC #2
C-FIGURE 1 EOF/RC FOOTPRINT SAMPLE
[Fjj2uSLWY Cabinet Board Projectlon PURCHASING rlVSTATE LIISON Figure 1 OP 3545 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 1 LPC #2
(
LP(
C
- 1) '-1 I
I U I
U I
I I
I I
U It
C C
FIGURE 2 EOFIRC FOOTPRINT (ROOM 125/126)
This page intentionally left blank by LPC #2.
LpCag-Figure 2 OP 3545 Rev. 1 Page 1 of I LPC #2 C
FIGURE 3 EOF/RC LAYOUT F I SWITCHBOARD Pa TLPOEEQUIPMENT ROOMI ENGINEERING I
I I
SUPPORT GROUP I
RECOVERY l
RAO)
S EOF PLANING SRM ASSESSMENT CONFERENCE ARABRIEFING AREA OSMT E
COMUNICATION AREA CONTROL LAB PURCHASING IOS "ONO
______A ARE Figure
/..P*,9,.OP 3545 Rev. 1
- Page 1 of LP #
PURJWLPC#2
"N~
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure(s) or any other document to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):
OP 3545, Rev. 1, LPC #1, Activation of the EOF/RC A. Screening Evaluation
- 1.
Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b):
(1) Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities YES (2) Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response organization personnel YES (3) Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources YES (4)
Emergency Classification and Action levels, including facility system and effluent parameters YES (5) Notification Methods and Procedures YES (6)
Emergency Communications among principal response organizations the public YES (7) Public Education and Information YES (8) Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and EquipmentYE (9) Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipment YES (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions YES (11) Emergency Worker Radiological Exposure Control YES (12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals (13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
Recovery and Reentry Plans Emergency response periodic drills and exercises Radiological Emergency Response Training Plan development, review and distribution YES YES YES YES YES NO no NO NO NO NO and NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO No VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 1 of 3 RT No. 10.E06.171 Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
A "YES" answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.
A "NO" answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.
l
'I 10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
- 2.
Could the change affect our ability to meet the following requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
(1)
Section IV. A - Organization YES NO (2)
Section IV. B - Assessment Actions
'(3)
Section IV. C - Activation of Emergency Organizations (4)
Section IV. D - Notification Procedures (5)
Section IV. E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment (6)
Section IV. F - Training (7)
Section IV. G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness (8)
Section IV. H - Recovery YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO B. Effectiveness Determination For applicable item 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) & (8) & Appendix E,Section IV. A & E of Section A above, this change DOES NOT decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and DOES continue to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
BASIS FOR ANSWER:
Reoroanization of the EOF floorplan to facilitate communication and enhance interaction.
The old SRM area was overcrowded and remote from the Rad Assessment area.
The new layout provides more room for staff and moves the assessment area adjacent to the SRM area.
All of the same communication and computer capabilities are retained the new layout also reduces activation time since the Recovery Planning area is the only room needing setup.
The duties of the EOF Coordinator's Assistant are covered by other individuals.
in the minimum staffing for activation list. Prior to implementation of teams, the first person to arrive became the EFOCA to begin facility activation.
Now that there are desiqnated team members on duty, the EOFCA position is not needed to perform this function for activation.
The position will still exist, but is not needed as part of the minimum staffing for activation.
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 2 of: 3...
For each applicable (i.e., a "yes" answer specified) standard to 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
A facsimile of the evaluation form may be used as-needed and attached to this checklist.'
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
K>
D. Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)
Keywords used in search:
[ This change does not affect any other documents.
0 This change does affect other documents.
Document(s) affected:
OP 3546 Section(s) affected:
E. Impact on the Updated FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.
Keywords used in UFSAR search:
Additional Comments:
Prepared By:
Reviewed By:
Audra Williams, Date:
. Print/S~e LONb141yk Date:
(Emergency Plan Coo dinator) (Printtign) 1/20/03 VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 3 of 3 C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate information) 0 The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
3 The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and decrease our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
The following course of action is recommended:
o Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.
o Cancel the proposed changes.
o3 Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OP.
G F1 OP 3546 REVISION 2 OPERATIONS OF THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY/RECOVERY CENTER (EOF/RC)
USE CLASSIFICATION: REFERENCE LPC Effective Affected Pages No.
Date 1
01/24/03 App APg 2 of 7
-Implementation Statement: N/A Issue Date:
01/20/03 OP 3546 Rev. 2 Page 1 of 8
APPENDIX A (Continued) 3.0 Assign EOF Coordinator:
I 4.0 Inform the EOF Coordinator, the SS/PED, TSC Coordinator, and the States representatives that the EOF/RC is activated.
5.0 IF a GENERAL EMERGENCY, THEN implement OP 3511, Off-Site Protective Action Recommendations.
6.0 If a release is in progress or expected, ensure that OP 3513, Evaluation of Off-Site Radiological Conditions, is implemented by the Radiological Assistant.
7.0 Act as the principal plant emergency response organization spokesperson in all interfacing with off-site authorities.
8.0 Act, or designate an individual, as the official point of contact for communications and information to the States.
(SRM State Advisor)
Name:
9.0 Contact the PED to ensure that the States have called back to affirm receipt of initial notification, if not re-contact the States. (SRM State Advisor) 10.0 Ensure that the State representatives at the EOF are updated on the status of the emergency periodically.
(SRM State Advisor)
G
/
(circle one)
A S
G ASG (circle one)
A S
G (circle one)
A S
-G Appendix A OP 3546 Rev. 2 Page 2 of 7 LPC#1 Time/Date Name:
>1pr Initials NOTE Minimum Staffing for activation (see white board in SRM office area):
Site Recovery Manager EOF Coordinator Radiological Assistant Communication Assistant Compliance Advisor Ops Advisor #1
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency.Plan Implementing Procedure(s) or any other document to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):
OP 3546, Rev. 2, LPC #1, Operation of the EOF/RC A. Screening Evaluation Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
A OYESO answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.
A "NO' answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.
- 1. Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b):
(1)
Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities YES NO (2). Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response Organization personnel YES NO (3)
Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources YES NO
.(4)
Emergency.Classification and Action levels, including facility system and effluent parameters YES NO (5)
Notification Methods and Procedures YES NO (6)
Emergency Communications among principal response organizations aM the public YES NO (7)
Public Education and Information YES NO (8)
Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES NO (9)
Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipment YES NO (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions YES NO (11) Emergency Worker Radiological Exposure Control YES NO (12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals YES NO (13) Recovery and Reentry Plans YES NO (14) Emergency response periodic drills and exercises YES NO (15) Radiological Emergency Response Training YES NO (16) Plan development, review and distribution YES NO VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 1 of 3 RT No. 10.E06.171
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
- 2.
Could the change affect our ability to meet the following requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
(1)Section IV. A - Organization YES NO (2)
Section IV. B -Assessment-Actions (3)
Section IV. C - Activation of Emergency organizations (4)
Section IV. D - Notification Procedures (5)
Section IV. E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment (6)
Section IV. F - Training (7)
Section IV. G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness (8)
Section IV. H - Recovery YES NO YES NO.
YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO B. Effectiveness Determination For applicable item 10 CFR 50.47(b) & Appendix E,Section IV. A of Section A above, this change DOES NOT decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and DOES continue to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
BASIS FOR ANSWER:
0,*.
- f*
A~A -L IOC 44x 44 Y"
V o.*kh jA
,o,'-r
-Th.2-"Qo.I. JL)Yn b* +/-, *
.O VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page 2 of 3 For each applicable (i.e., a "yes' answer specified) standard to 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
A facsimile of the evaluation form maybe usedas neededandattachedto this checklist..re 1%
/
10 CFR,50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate information) 0 The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
0 The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and decrease our ability to meet thestandards of 10 CFR 50A47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
The following course of action is recommended:
o Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.
o3 Cancel the proposed changes.
o3 Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).
D. Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)
Keywords used in search:
o3 This change does not affect any other documents.
0 This change does affect other documents.
Document(s), affected:
OP 3545, AP 0032 Section(s) affected:__
E. Impact on the Updated FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.
Keywords used in UFSAR search:
Additional Comments:
Prepared By:
Audra Williams Date:
1/17/03
__ (Prih/*ign)1/
AT
/
(
Reviewed By: _
4_______
-____Date:
/r (Emergency Plan CMordif ator) (Print/Sir)
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev. 10 Page 3 of 3