ML030300793

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Initial Exam - 08/26 - 08/30/2002 - Public Forms
ML030300793
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/10/2002
From: Murphy M
NRC Region 4
To:
References
Download: ML030300793 (19)
v • d • e


Text

Operations Branch Assignment Check Sheet: as of: 10/15/2001 (Includes ES-201-1 & ES-501-1 Rev. 8, Supplement 1 information)

Chief: M. Murphy Facility/Task: GG IN EX Task Start Date: 08/26/2002 ITEM DESCRIPTION DUE DATE INIT DATE 0 Exam/Inspection Schedule Agreement (C.l.a;C.2.a&b) Feb 27, 2002 TG 10/15/2001 1 NRC Staff & Fac. Contact Assigned (C.l.c;C.2.e) Feb 27, 2002 4,ATG 10/15/2001 2 Facility contact briefed on security & other issues (C.2.c) Feb 27, 2002 ,, /2 ./ ,

3 Corp. Notification Letter Sent (C.2.d) (Exams only) Feb 27, 2002 3a Inspection Announcement Letter Sent (PIR & LORT if req'd) Jul 12, 2002 ,",M- 1,cA 4 Task Expectations, Issues, & Standards Discussed w/ BC May 28, 2002 -,/7 ,

5" [Reference Material Due (C.l.d;C.3.c)] Apr 28, 2002 Al',4 6# Integrated Exam Outlines Due (C.l.d&e;C.3.d) Apr 28, 2002 -. //

7' Outlines reviewed by NRC & Feedback Sent (c.2.h;C.3.e) May 12, 2002, -*/ */

8" Preliminary Applications Due (C.I.j;C.2.g;ES202) Jul 27, 2002 V 9' Draft Exams w/ Doc./Ref. Due (C. 1.d/e/f;C.3.d) Jun 27, 2002 ,, ( j ,

10' Peer Reviewer Initials As Reviewed All Parts* Jul 7,2002 11" NRC Supervisor. Initials Approving for Fac. Rev. (C.2.h;C.3.f)* Jul 7, 2002 7X /z 12' Exams Reviewed w/ Fac. (C.l.h;C.2.f&h;C.3.g) Jul 7, 2002 , S'iY,/i 13# Final Appl. Due & Assign. Sheet Prepared (C.1.j;C.2.h;ES202) Aug 12, 2002 -;v-1,1 14' NRC Supervisor Approved Final Exams (C.2.i;C.3.h)* Aug 19, 2002 15' Final Appl. Rec'd & Waivers Sent (C.2.g) Aug 19, 2002 16# Proctor Rules Reviewed w/ Fac. & Written Authorized (C.3.k) Aug 19, 2002 17 Exam/Insp Material to Team (C.3.i) Aug 19, 2002 .<,j< /*

  • 18' Fac. graded exam & Comments Rec'd Sep 7, 2002 lj *r' *,.

19' NRC Written Grading Completed Sep 10, 2002 20' Examiners Finished Grading Op. Tests Sep 10, 2002 Z1.f 4, Ž 21' NRC Ch. Ex. Review Completed Sep 20, 2002 22 NRC BC Review Completed* Sep 21, 2002 1-a , 0 23# RPS/IP # Examinees Updated Before Report Issued Sep 26, 2002 -q 24 License/Denials Signed & Report Issued Sep 26, 2002 . i 25 Package Closed Out Oct17, 2002 ______

Final Inspection Report Issued, Exam Package to OLA, Facility. Contact Notified of Results

  1. Not required for inspections, except as noted.
  • Note SupervisorlPeer initials required.

[]Required NRC-auth. exams only.

When complete, for exams, add to pkg & fwd copy to BC, for insp, fwd orig'I to BC.

Last revised 10/15/01 S:\DRS\OB\EXAMS\GG\August 2002 Exam\exam assignment sheet.wpd

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Examination: August 26, 2002 Initials Item Task Description

_a c_*

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. _ I*f W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with RI Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled.

W, T_

T E

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

N 4

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of y __

normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

S I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or1 0, 4 significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*,

and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

g h *

3. a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, //

/ (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities.
d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 1.0 applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered inthe appropriate exam section.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N E c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

R AL d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO)_

Printed Name Vgna re Date

a. Author: A~ qt I, t/Z'~ 70L2
b. Facility Reviewer(*): &4& 961 , - W
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#): '- ' -- 1
d. NRC Supervisor: _-5' OD NOTE:
  • Not applicable for NRC-developed examindion/s.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG 1021 REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Examination: August 26. 2002 Item Initials Task Description Initials a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. 4f&

W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with ,d'- kP RI Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.-- - __

T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. * /1' T__

E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. 00 Al -- v1 N l

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

% 4 ,

S I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*,

and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative andI' quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

4

3. a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination,

/ (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, .1 4* "(

(3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based /

activities.

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 4 applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the j41 4 -l*'<

appropriate exam section.

G At_ AO E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N E c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

R A d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ____

Printed Name / gnat- e Date

a. Author: 1'7001
b. Facility Reviewer(*): ,"- / oc -
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#): --
d. NRC Supervisor: Z!& 1NJkWV --- M L,l I*

NOTE:

  • Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG 1021 REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Exam: August 26, 2002_Exam O/RO Initial Item Description A b* c#

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility _ J "*.4
2. a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions /*/ liP
b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available lip/
3. RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate 1 i jj per Section D.2.d of ES-401 '
4. Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process.
5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate.

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

-the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or 4-the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question 58 9 33 distribution at right
7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis enter the actual question distribution atlevel; right 49 51
8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers _
9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified
10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines J{. h ___
11. The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet k &<

Printed Name / Si natur Date

a. Author 1<./%-- ,i(H4iC D-,/,
b. Facility Reviewer(*) I
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) 42.-.2jj..,
d. NRC Regional Supervisor _ MCIA&

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG 1021 REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Exam: August 26, 2002_ExamLeeO R Initial Item Description A b* c#

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility ___,
2. a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions
b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available
3. RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate 11gJ/ 4/

per Section D.2.d of ES-401

4. Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams 1011 ,

appears consistent with a systematic sampling process.

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated be ow thaudit exam(check was the item that applies) systematically and a pears and randomly appropriate.

developed; or1 40

/

-the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

-- the examinations were developed independently; or

--- the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

-Other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question 57 kf Ml 9 34 distribution at right
7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are A written at the comprehension/analysis level; 46 54 enter the actual question distribution at right
8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers /
9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are ¥14 assigned; deviations are justified
10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines *L ' ,?I4*i
11. The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and ;A o y agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Name/ Signatu Date
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer(*) ___,_
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor 4, 0 Note:
  • The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG 1021 REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Examination: 08/26/2002 - 08/30/2002 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* C#
a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1 .a). 1 * "
d. Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable =j*/ AiP limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. " - 7
2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA iiiioN iii*!iiiiii:,
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
  • initial conditions
  • initiating cues
  • references and tools, including associated procedures* I 'z.
  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific Lf &

designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

  • specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria d ,

inAttachment 1 of ES-301. r~

C. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within ýki acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity. "

d. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified. 2'
3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA I.....
a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

4 y*

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author VMickd K, RA. ( )4A-,07 A~ Z~
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner #I'/
d. NRC Supervisor .*fl'oI3y I NOTE:
  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

Revision 0 NUREG 1021, REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Exam: 08/26/2002 - 08/30/2002 Scenario Numbers: I / 2 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event , 412 the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario i! hf without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. _ _
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. Iftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators LI .4 have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are *! /t f given.
8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ___ __
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.
11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). ____-______
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).--____

for each crew position. tV j

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D) Actual Attributes . . ..

1 Total malfunctions (5-8)

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 / 2_
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3/ 3 Alf
4. Major transients (1-2) 1/ 1
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 2 __,__
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 2 / 0
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 5 1 2 Revision 0 NUREG 1021, REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Exam: 08/26/2002 - 08/30/2002 Scenario Numbers: 3 Backup Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of J jl service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. _ _
3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

QP, jf "

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. _
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. Iftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are --ppwl given.
8. The simulator modeling is not altered. _
9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

. 40 *

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.

i/ ,

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events L i specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).-'
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D) Actual Attributes O ....

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 _/_f_

/ /

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3 / _/ _
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 /

____V_/ J/

4. Major transients (1-2) 1 / 9
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / Alf
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 / V
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 /

Revision 0 NUREG 1021, REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION BACKUP SCENARIO DATES: 08/26/2002 - 08/30/2002 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number

'ype Type Number SS ATC BOP 3 3 3 TOTAL Reactivity 1 1 ATC Normal 1 1 RO Instrument/ 2 2 Component Major Reactivity 0 0 BOP Normal 0 0 As RO Instrument/ 3 3 Component Major SRO-[

Reactivity Normal As SRO Instrument/

Component Major Reactivity 0 0 Normal 1 1 RO-U3 Instrument/ 4 4 Component Major_1_1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence countowArd r requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

Revision 0 NUREG 1021, REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION flRI2I2flfl2 flRI2flI9flfl9 DATF -

iype Applicant Evolution Type Minimum Number SS Scenario NumberTOTAL 1 TOTAL____

Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 0 0 Normal 1 1 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 5 5 Component Major 1_1_1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable attions that provide insight to the applicant's competen c a ium requirement.

Author:

NRC ReviewEer:

Revision 0 NUREG 1021, REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION DATES: 08/26/2002 - 08/30/2002 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Tfype Type Number ATC BOP 1 2 TOTAL Reactivity 1 1 0 1 Normal 1 0 1 1 RO 1,3,5,7 Instrument/ 4 2 4 6 Component Major 1 1 1 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and £omponent malfunctions should be included; only those that require vednfiab -actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence cout to, rdrnimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

. u __

Revision 0 ROsnNUREG 1021, REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION DATES: 08/26/2002 - 08I30/2002 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number BOP ATC 1 2 TOTAL Reactivity 1 0 1 1 Normal 1 1 0 1 Instrument/ 4 3 3 6 Component Major 1 1 1 2 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable aptions that provide insight to the applicant's compett owar inirum requirement.

Author:

NRC Review er:

/ - ,0 Revision 0 NUREG 1021, REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Dates 08/26/2002 - 08/30/2002 BACKUP SCENARIOS Applicant #1 ,,Applicant #2 Applica*t--*

RONSSRO-I/SRO-U R*,/SRO-I/SRO-U RO/SRO-IkS..RO-UI Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO ATC BOP ss 3 3 3 Understand and Interpret 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 4, 5 2, 3, 4, 5 Annunciators and Alarms 5, 6 Diagnose Events 3,5 3,4,5 3,4,5 and Conditions Understand Plant 1, 2, 3, 5 3, 4, 5 3, 4, 5 and System Response Comply With and ALL ALL ALL Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control 1, 3, s, 6 3, 4, s N/A Boards (2)

Communicate and ALL ALL ALL Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory N/A N/A ALL Ability (3)

Comply With and N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

(4) Only applicable to RO positions at GGNS.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

Revision 0 NUREG 1021, REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Dates 08/26/2002 - 08/30/2002 Applicant #1 R6 SRO-l/SRO-U !RO/ pplicant #2 RO-I/SRO-U Applicay-#-3--.,

RO/SRO( /SRO-U)

Competencies ATC SCENARIO BOP2 11 SCENARIO BOP ATC ss SCENARIO 1 2 1 2 I Understand and Interpret 2, 3, 4, 1, 3, 1,3, 2,3, 2,3, Annunciators and Alarms 5 5, 6 4,5 4,5,6 4, 5 Diagnose Events 2, 3, 4, 3, 5, 6 3,4,5 3,4, 2,3, and Conditions 5 5, 6 4, 5 Understand Plant 2, 3, 4, 1, 3, 1,3,5 2,3, 2,3, and System Response 5 5,6 4,5,6 4, 5 Comply With and ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 1,3,5 2,3, Boards (2) N/A 5 3, 5 5, 6 Communicate and ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory N/A N/A N/A N/A ALL Ability (3)

Comply With and N/A N/A N/A N/A 2

Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

(4) Only applicable to RO positions at GGNS.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competenc for e ery applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

Revision 0 NUREG 1021, REVISION 8 SUPPLEMENT 1

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:&j&Nb 6a*UA*CM.- Date of Exam: 9/20/ýPM Exam Levelhfl/SRO

,*-7,wjq Initials Item Description a b C

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading , /- .D ,
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented A) 50
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors 4 so*.2***s (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in Sot detail __._o__
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades ,* (

are justified AA& /V__

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of AIL questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date
a. Grader _,,*/,ŽA*,,* elz3kcoi
b. Facility Reviewer(*) s4R.fe, ( 2 ee*3
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) X4*Ž
  • 6Y/ 1, 6Y 't- 9 j_'
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:cl to ,c1.LF 0V&9(.6W, Date of Exam: Y/z21zo0-z- Exam Level: RO*R

,s*"t", Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading ,IW Sat
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented t,./A'6
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors sot (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in * .,* t-detail _J _J_/
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades , So 5( uf are justified ._/J 0m
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of /41 L .

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Grader i [/ Iqq _ _//,z As,
b. Facility Reviewer(*) ._. \0e.&Y& ., - J'I3/2Od 04_ Z
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) _ _,
d. NRC Supervisor (*) 7..__ _ ___/_____

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

Page 1 of 4 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 1011012002 08:20:43 Report 21 From 08/01/2002 To 09/30/2003 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 Operational Exam Week E1 Site/Docket No.Jlnsp Rpt # 11l #Canc didates T pe Exam Author Chief Examiner L.

ElExaminers Assigned I K

08/12/2002 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2002301 Prep MURPHY, MICHAEL E. MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

TAC #: X02231 08/26/2002 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / 2002301 RO - 7 SROI - 1 Admin MURPHY, MICHAEL E. MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

TAC #: X02231 SANCHEZ, ALFRED 09/08/2003 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / Prep MURPHY, MICHAEL E. MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

TAC #: X02237 09/29/2003 Grand Gulf / 05000416 / SROI - 2 Admin FFF MURPHY, MICHAEL E. DRAKE, JAMES F.

TAC #: X02237 SROU - 7 GAGE, PAUL C.

MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

STETKA, THOMAS F.

Sites: GG Orgs: 4620 Exam Author:ALL

C C ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 23 --3/Z11 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of -3J/io:-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATUR 2) DATENOTE 2 --- 6

_lOet.r .4-,  ::,d ,~Je

4. _Ts+/-J/__ fl . .
5. z _ _ _ gAdb 44;ob4 -----

0 _-_-----___

___ 0 AA* - ,

72_:*,s / ,_i-2 O'i -

9 6, A/ /

L&kI1rD ,vj -

. *o

__--1:B.__

VA /Ib/,4 7"1 0 A/

14. ROD 5lq

-_-114,_ P-Vr.w-

15. -, _-- - - -

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 9'/3-3&l4-'as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to-be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of V)23-70/&foh-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JlOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SNATURE (1) DATE RE (2) DATENOTE 2.C 3.

(2061-L -t LiL WS, Ara V_ -

5. _VfjV.-4A 6.
7. *c&Z._,. A'.,,fv,,M__ ,

Rg a'W 0j(2 A ....

-- 1 ,- -

L2

9. *e
8. _

9-;j* K *,*.----

  • ~ut!_ - ....

0/s 7~- *__(*~

~*

1440 - .. 7,*--

13.
  • 15.- l 5 V o2f5 /,,,T~i?

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML030300793&oldid=2676825"