ML030220342

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Qa/Related Forms
ML030220342
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 12/16/2002
From: Hynes C
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To: Conte R
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
50-412/03-302
Download: ML030220342 (20)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility: FENOC BVPS Unit 2 Date of Examination: 12/2002 Task Description Initials Item

1. (a) Verify that the outline fits the appropriate model per ES-401. tf-, ,

W (b) Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared inaccordance R with section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all knowledge and ability categories are I appropriately sampled.

T (c) Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. -..

N (d) Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. c 2.

(a) Using form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number (b) of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets and spares to test the projected number

( 3 and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation S schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested I using at least one new scenario. Scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

M IV (c) To the extent possible, assess whether the outline conforms with the qualitative and

-4 quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

(a) Verify that:

I-4 42 (" 4 Or (1) the outline contains the reuired number of control room and in-plant tasks (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination (3)* no tasks are duplicated 0 from the applicant's audit test, and (4t nn mnnnth~n IgOAo/nf *nv onArAtino tA~t i. t~k~n dirmotlv from thA linnn.*'A' n*Am h~nk.* QC (b) Verify that:

(1)the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301 (2)one task Is conducted in a low power or shutdown condition

3. (3)40% of the tasks require the candidate to implement an alternate path procedure W/T ýJ (4)one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition (5)the in-plant walkthrough requires the applicant to enter the RCA (c) Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities.

(d) Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.

(a) Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in rJA'I i) ,)

4. the appropriate exam section. \

G (b) Assess whether the 10CFR55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. /-.

N (c) Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R

A" (d) Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. 0 '.

L (e) Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

(f) Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

  • Printed Ne/Sigaature Date
1. Author
2. Facility Reviewer () _" -- A 1
3. Chief Examiner NR d.2 ra
4. NRIC Supervisor IQ&k

-Ce1) ~ tI Z6

()Not applicable for NRC developed examinations NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 I Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: FENOC BVPS-2 Date of Examination: 1211612002 Operating Test Number: 2002-01 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a B* __#_
a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function '-4 distribution). o
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination. ____ ,W_
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section <

D.1.a). 4

d. Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. _
2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA - -
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

- initial conditions

- initiating cues

- references and tools, including associated procedures validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee specific performance criteria that include:

"o detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature "o system response and other examiner cues "o statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant "o criteria for successful completion of the task "o identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards "o restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the o, 4

criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301.

c. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and does not compromise test integrity.
d. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified. __,_ _--_
3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA -- -- -
a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. __, --

Printed Name / Si ature Date a.Author L fA 0<NI r1 9V, '- o

b. Facility Reviewer(*) ý3 . -So-vL
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) . ,
d. NRC Supervisor 60'"-C 'L3'Ad

(*) The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests

(#) Independent NRC reviewer initial items in column "C". Chief Examiner concurrence required.

I ES-301 I SIMULATOR SCENARIO QUALITY CHECKLIST I Form ES-301-4 Facility: FENOC BVPS-2 Date of Exam 12/1612002 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 Operating Test No.: 2002-02 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b c

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of P3 z-,

service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. , Ž!-L
3. Each event description consists of

-= the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

_- the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event

- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

_- the expected operator actions (by shift position)

-_ the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario f without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. TWA
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. NIA //*

Cues are given. _

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been "

evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. Z7

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301. 7*,.. L
11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. _i__ ____,_

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Actual Attributes (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 6 9
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 1 4
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 4 4 4 ', A5
4. Major transients (1-2) 1 1 1
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 2 3
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 0 1 d
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 4 2 __,_

I ES-301 ISIMULATOR SCENARIO QUALITY CHECKLIST Form ES-301-4 Facility: FENOC BVPS-2 Date of Exam 12116/2002 Scenario Numbers: 4 / / Operating Test No.: 2002-02 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b c

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of-.

service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. . ___--

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event description consists of

-= the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

- the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event

_- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

- the expected operator actions (by shift position)

- the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. __-_._
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain tO'- .1 complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario obiectives.',
7. Iftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. N(M /V'A Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. jj 4.,

,jj

9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.
11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). '--
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).-- rid __/
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. _____ _____

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Actual Attributes (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 6 _", "
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 ______
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3
4. Major transients (1-2) 1
5. EOPs entered/req ui ring substantive actions (1-2) 2 *f
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 Ott
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 a____a-

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 N/A 1 Normal 1 1 N/A RO/PO Instrument/ 4 2,3,8 2,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component

_ _Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component

_ _Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: TN/fA4z t at/

Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-2 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 N/A 1 Normal 1 1 N/A RO/PO Instrument/ 4 2,3,8 2,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component

_ _ _Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix 1D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's copetence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

Chief Examine .r:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 N/A 1 Normal 1 1 N/A RO/PO Instrument/ 4 2,3,8 2,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's co npetence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

Chief Examine r:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-4 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 N/A 1 Normal 1 1 N/A RO/PO Instrument/ 4 2,3,8 2,4,7 Component Major 16 5 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-l Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

Chief Examine r: /q+Q-4 /

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component I-_ _ Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 4,5,7 Component Major 6 SRO-l Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5

Component Major 1 6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions(refer AppedixD. to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's ompetence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: IUIA)Z JL Chief Examine r:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-2 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 I Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 4,5,7 Component Major 1 6 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5

Component Major 1 6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's cotmpetence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: / '- &T Chief Examine r:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,4,7 Component Major 1 5 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5,7,8 Component

_ _Major 1 6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applic9nt'scoppetence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

Chief Examine r:

ý1--

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-4 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 4,5,7 Component Major 6 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5

Component Major 6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's co rpetence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: I7T1AD47,/h 7 l* v, n Chief Examine *r:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROU-1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument! 2 Component Major I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5,7,8 Component Major 1 6 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix [D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's co petence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

Chief Examine r: - Lý///%'V ý21--

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SROU-1 SROI-1 RO-1 CREW A Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 US RO US PO RO 4,5,6 2,3,4 2,3,8 2,5 Understand and Interpret 3,4,5

,8 ,

5 Annunciators and Alarms 8 Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 4,5,6 2,3,4 2,3,8 2,5,7 Conditions ,5,6, 7 5,6 8

Understand Plant and 2,3,4 4,5,6 2,3,4 2,3,6 2,5,6 System Response 5,6 5,6 ,8 ,7 Comply With and 1,3,5 1,4,5 2,3,5 2,3,6 2,5,6

,7 ,6 ,8 ,7 Use Procedures (1) 6,7 Operate Control N/A 1,4,5 N/A 1,2,3 5,6,7 Boards (2) ,6,7 ,6,8 Communicate and ALL 1,4,5 ALL 1,2,3 1,2,5 Interact With the Crew 6,7 ,6,8 ,6,7 Demonstrate Supervisory ALL N/A ALL N/A N/A Ability (3)

Comply With and 3 N/A 2 N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: t.,4A(i, Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

-SRtU-2-,- SROI-2 RO-2 CREW B Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 US RO US PO RO 4,5,6 2,3,4 2,3,8 2,5 Understand and Interpret 3,4,5

,8 ,5 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 4,5,6 2,3,4 2,3,8 2,5,7 Conditions ,5,6, ,7 ,5,6 8

Understand Plant and 2,3,4 4,5,6 2,3,4 2,3,6 2,5,6 5,6 8 7 System Response 5,6 Comply With and 1,3,5 1,4,5 2,3,5 2,3,6 2,5,6 7 ,6 ,8 ,7 Use Procedures (1) ,6,7 Operate Control N/A 1,4,5 N/A 1,2,3 5,6,7

,6,7 ,6,8 Boards (2)

Communicate and ALL 1,4,5 ALL 1,2,3 1,2,5

,6,8 ,6,7 Interact With the Crew 16,7 Demonstrate Supervisory ALL N/A ALL N/A N/A Ability (3)

Comply With and 3 N/A 2 N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

Chief Examiner: If -

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SROI-3 SROI-4 RO-3 CREW C Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

_US RO RO US PO RO 4,5,6 2,3,4 2,3,8 2,5 Understand and Interpret 3,4,5 2,4 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 2,4,6 4,5,6 2,3,4 2,3,8 2,5,7 Conditions ,5,6, ,7 5,6 8

Understand Plant and 2,3,4 2,4,6 4,5,6 2,3,4 2,3,6 2,5,6 System Response ,5,6 15,6 ,8 r7 Comply With and 1,3,5 1,2,4 1,4,5 2,3,5 2,3,6 2,5,6

,5,6 ,7 ,6 ,8 ,7 Use Procedures (1) 6,7 Operate Control N/A 1,2,4 1,4,5 N/A 1,2,3 5,6,7

,6 ,6,7 ,6,8 Boards (2)

Communicate and ALL 1,2,4 1,4,5 ALL 1,2,3 1,2,5

,5,6 ,6,7 ,6,8 ,6,7 Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory ALL N/A N/A ALL N/A N/A Ability (3)

Comply With and 3 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Chief Examiner: zzpý ý NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 RO04 D

CREW Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 PO RO 2,4 Understand and Interpret 2,3,8 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and 2,3,8 2,4,7 Conditions Understand Plant and 2,3,6 2,4,7 System Response ,8 Comply With and 2,3,6 1,2,4 Use Procedures (1) 8 15,7 Operate Control 1,2,3 1,2,4 Boards (2) ,6,8 ,7 Communicate and 1,2,3 1,2,4 Interact With the Crew 6,8 ,5,7 Demonstrate Supervisory N/A N/A Ability (3)

Comply With and N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competerncy for every applicant.

Author: 7-/->/A .....

Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: FENOC BVPS-2 Date of Exam: 1211612002 Exam level: RO Initial Item Description C#

A IB*

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to the facility
2. NRC KIAs referenced for all questions Facility learning objectives referenced as available
3. RO/SRO Overlap is no more than 75%, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401 )

0

4. Question selection and duplication from the last 2 NRC licensing exams appears to be consistent with a systematic sampling process
5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies and appears appropriate:
  • ,i'he audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
  • The examinations were developed independently; or
  • The licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
  • Other (explain)
6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank Bank Modified New and at least 10 new, and the rest modified); enter the 7) actual question distribution at right 31 12 57
7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the exam Memory C/A (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question 45 55 distribution on the right
8. References/handouts do not give away answers
9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified f(
10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines (V, The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with 11.

value on cover sheet (1pJ 4-Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Author AVJ*ll ?0
b. Facility Reviewer (0 4
c. Chief Examiner (#) / V." /5...' , / *
d. NRC Regional Supervisor R " O}' /

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initial/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in column 'c', Chief Examiner concurrence required NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: FENOC BVPS-2 Date of Exam: 12116/2002 Exam level: SRO 1

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to the facility
2. NRC K/As referenced for all questions Facility learning objectives referenced as available
3. RO/SRO Overlap is no more than 75%, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401
4. Question selection and duplication from the last 2 NRC licensing exams appears to be consistent with a systematic sampling process
5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated 2,, elow (check the item that applies and appears appropriate:

The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

  • The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
  • The examinations were developed independently; or

, The licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

= Other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the ba and at least 10 new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question distribution at right
7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution on the right
8. References/handouts do not give away answers
9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified I
10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, gt
11. The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:
  • The facility reviewer's initial/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in column 'c, Chief Examiner concurrence required NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 (R8, Sl)

Quality Checklist Facility: FENOC BVPS Unit 2 Date of Exam: 12/13/02 Exam Level: RO/SRO Initials Item Description

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date
a. Grader T. Wooley/ .
b. Facility Reviewer(*) Iz-IL2L l.*-ol.

1

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*) A2 cklrjc 4z49k U,

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML030220342&oldid=2697689"