ML030150414

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revised Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure EP-PS-115
ML030150414
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/07/2003
From:
Susquehanna
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML030150414 (7)


Text

Jan.

07, 2003 Page 1

of 1 MANUAL HARD COPY DISTRIBUTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2003-113 USER INFORMATION:

EMPL#:23244 CA#:

0363 Phone#:

254-3658 TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION:

01/07/2003

-LOCATION:

DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK VROM:

NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER K,,,NUCSA-2)

THE FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY OR ELECTRONIC MANUAL ASSIGNED TO YOU:

115 115 CHEMISTRY SAMPLING TEAM:

EMERGENCY PLAN-POSITION SPECIFIC PROCEDURE REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE:

10/25/2002 ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE:

01/06/2003 CATEGORY:

PROCEDURES TYPE:

EP ID:

EP-PS-115 ADD:

PCAF 2003-1010 REV:

N/A UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES.

PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY.

FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.

PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM 12r#

/tli

1. PCAF NO.

0

/6/10 PAGE 1 OF 1

PROC. NO.

EP-PS-OI5,0

4.

FORMS REVISED -6R. R-..t" R__

R R__

R-,

R

5. PROCEDURE TITLE TSC Chemistry Sampling Team Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction
6.

REQUESTED CHANGE PERIODIC REVIEW r* NO r-YES INCORPORATE PCAFS I*

NO r-YES REVISION

[l PCAF [

DELETION

[]

(CHECK ONE ONLY)

7.

SUMMARY

OF / REASON FOR CHANGE Added information.to Attachment C, D, E, and F that was inadvertantly omittiidffrnm Rev 5 when it was issued. This change is administrative and does not change any technical onteri.t Thlerefore, the PCAF can be approved by the responsible supervisor.

A Continued

8.

DETERMINE COMMITTEE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Section 6.1.4)

PORC REVIEW REQ'D?

E,'ý N

K[

YES

9.

PORC MTG#

N/A BLOCKS 11 THRU 16ARE ON PAGE 2 0F FORM;

17.

T.C. Dalpiaz

'3227 -1 /01/03/2003

18. COMMUNICATION OF CHANGE REQUIRED?

PREPARER

/",---ETN,,,

DATE 0] NO

[J YES (TYPE)

(Print or Type) i I 1ý

19.

.SIGNATURE ATTESTS THAT RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR HAS CONDUCTED QADR AND TECHNICAL REVIEW UNLESS OTHERWISE

'i

./

K'

  • U DOCUMENTED IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.

E SIL UPERVISOR A'E-CROSS DISCIPLINE REVIEW (IF REQUIRED) HAS BEEN COMPLETED SDT BY SIGNATURE IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.

20.

14, DAT FUM APPROVAL DATE

21. RESPONSIBLE APPROVER ENTER N/A IF FUM HAS APPROVAL AUTHORITY INITIALS DATE FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 1 of 2 (Electronic Form)

PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM

1. PCAFNO.J6,*3:

/6/'

12. PAGE2OF Je
13. PROC.NO. EP-PS-l11ý3

" REr.

'X&_

11. This question documents the outcome of the 50.59 and 72.48 Review required by NDAP-QA-0726. Either 11 a, b, c or d must be checked "YES" and the appropriate form attached or referenced.
a. This change is an Administrative Correction for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not YES I

N/A applicable.

b. This change is a change to any surveillance, maintenance or administrative Z

YES j-- N/A procedure for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not applicable.

c. This change is bounded by a 50.59/72.48 Screen/Evaluation, therefore, no new

[

YES Z

N/A 50.59/72.48 Evaluation is required.

Screen/Evaluation No.

d. 50.59 and/or 72.48 are applicable to this change and a 50.59/72.48 YES Z

N/A Screen/Evaluation is attached.

12. This change is consistent with the FSAR or an FSAR change is required.

YES Change Request No.

N/A

13. Should this change be reviewed for potential effects on Training Needs or Material?

YES Z

NO If YES, enter an Action Item @ NIMS/Action/Gen Work Mech/PICN

14.

Is a Surveillance Procedure Review Checklist required per NDAP-QA-0722?

r7 YES Z

NO

15. Is a Special, Infrequent or Complex Test/Evolution Analysis Form required per LI YES Z

NO NDAP-QA-0320? (SICT/E form does not need to be attached.)

16. Reviews may be documented below or by attaching Document Review Forms NDAP-QA-01010-1.

REVIEWED BY WITH DATE REVIEW NO COMMENTS QADR TECHNICAL REVIEW REACTOR ENGINEERING/NUCLEAR FUELS *_

IST **

OPERATIONS NUCLEAR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING NUCLEAR MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE HEALTH PHYSICS NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY CHEMISTRY OTHER 10 CFR 50.54Q review 3___

-&10__

Required for changes that affect, or have potential for affecting core reactivity, nuclear fuel, core power level indication or impact the thermal power heat balance. (58)

Required for changes to Section XI Inservice Test Acceptance Criteria.

FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 2 of 2 (Electronic Form)

PCAF #.23- ýl

?AGEýI..,F Cc Attachment C SPING PARTICULATEIIODINE SAMPLES

-arpl SI-jw*f.Lit Sm* SMa Dd&%rn Snl Stop DateJfuiw

-w Dio mkwft Stac Row f

SPIMO PARTICWLTE*

IODINE S)JJPLE Sml-Casuta Dag* Rawe *as ampl Ad~~ti, wiWA~IMCM PERFORM ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS OF IWAMPLL LU-TABO0 EP-PS-1 15 Revisiorl. ýk,V Page 14 of 18 1,

PCAF #klZ*_/2/o

-AGE__ZD_(OF (a Attachment D SA4PLE ACTIVITY BASED ON CONTACT DOSE RATE AT BOTTOM OF PARTICULATE/IODINE SAMPLE CASK TABO EP-PS-115-0",09 RevisionV4 Page 16o 18 C..)

0 10 20 so 40 50

.*Jhr at bottom of sample cask Ix-I I

PCAF #

,_/

PAGEi OF C_

Attadchmnt El, SAMPLE ACTIVITY BASD ON DOSE RATE AT 36 INCHES FROM PARTICULATE/IODINE SAMPLE TAB 0 EP-PS-115-O..

Revision,."b Page 17 of 18 500 1000 1500 mR/ hr bt 36 inches a

7 6

5 ai 4

3 0

0 2000 2500

PCAF #,.. //0 Attachment F SAMPLE ACTIVITY BASED ON DOSE RATE AT 18 INCHES FROM PARTICULATE/IODINE SAMPLE mci i

mR/hr at -IS Inches TABO EP-PS-115-0/,%

Revisiori5-ý' I 0 Page 18 of 18