ML023250454

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Qa/Related Forms
ML023250454
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 09/30/2002
From: Hynes C
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To: Conte R
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
50-334/02-301 50-334/02-301
Download: ML023250454 (30)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201 -1 Facility: O \ Date of Examination: Examinations Developed by: F / NRC (circle one) Target Chief Date* Task Description / Reference Examiner's Initials 

     -180        1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1 .a; C.2.a & b)               -- F
     -120       2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1 .d; C.2.e)                  -_     __
     -120       3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)
     -120       4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1 .e; C.3.c)] NIA 

      -75       6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1 .e &f; C.3.d)                        F
      -70       7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)
      -45       8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.1 .e, f, g & h; C.3.d)
      -30       9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
      -14        10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1 .1; C.2.g; ES-202)
      -14        11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
      -14        12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1 .j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g)    -Tr_
       -7        13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
       -7       14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)
15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with
       -7            facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)
       -7       16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
  • Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee. [] Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC. NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 22 of 24

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility: FENOC BVPS Unit I Date of Examination: 9130/02 Initials Item Task Description

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. b cT W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically prepared and whether all knowledge and ability categories are 'A) /)i1, c R appropriately sampled. 1W / T T

T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. J
  • I"*

N d. Assess whether the repetition from previous examination outlines is excessive. N lP

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions,.

instrument and component failures, and major transients. / S I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of M applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeated over [ j/Ir 71 YE' successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.7F
3. a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, 7F 

    /        (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T         (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. (1)Verify that:are distribute the tasks c~a among -f ýSgx5 o the safe 4 rncnon +/-'f el; cgroupings i's sxvl~rW41is. as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure*,$. (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities.
d. Determine ifthere are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days. I l1
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam G

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. 4) N E c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. R __ A d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ,(
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author T.Woolri . 1
b. Facility Reviewer(*) OP11A5 .. 1-( -l7
c. Chief Examiner "7br D (5H 7 . L
d. NRC Supervisor -Ye

() Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations. BVPS-1 Outline Rev. 0 Page 1 of 1

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 (R8, Si)

1. Pre-Examination BVPS Unit I I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 9/30/02 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 9/30/02 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIj NTUR (1 DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 2.,,ki _ kV 3.

4. "ftv,.L
     '10'           ¥ P- `.,,,

WIoLo-t4 o7 z'e,,tA e.)e m m* 4a -k b-- _`W_"'°

5. x-WV6/

e/*sl 1,, " UfCrd I !&AIje~r ' A

6. 0 'k, b. OLA- 5id,,
7. 9,~? t &<cwzK -

1<ý fZ- YL Qk(At'vLOZ- At OP-s TIV6 _SURF, m I\ A"', J T, c iQc~-

12. 0 .,, M'LcE.I k !J ZA - _' m 1171- /"( Iu K . L*,t .'l*-

AAV. t7' n AI&C. 7#

14.
  • e -* '.-.,., . r "1 AIU*C.. J,--'0
  • t.,
                                                                                      .*~   ~      -I__
15. NO NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 (R8, Si)

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of '. , . as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of I -30 .-S 6. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NO TE

1. pe k4 /'Ior 7
2. TA. GA , =.,. -,, - "C 1?-Iloz _ . 0..."
3.
  • A r,..M4i)i I tric 7 C),aa "n- AA
                                                                               /*1**,*    ~h, *-.*          2,Z
                                                                                                                                           *m YZ
5. D16-1Y1 67z*lffY( f,") e
6. Q 0 W4- ii)
7. U 8.

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. NOTES: VtAqvozen4 61iAdpe.. JXQA'O~ 

                                                                                                             <AC,.
    .      4o                                4o-

ES-301 OPERATING TEST QUALITY CHECKLIST Form ES-301-3 Facility: BVPS Unit I Date of Examination: 9/30/2002 Operating Test Number. 2002-01 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b c
a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). _______
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered 4 3 during this examination. _
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section DA.1a). T
d. Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within /P -, "

acceptable limits._

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent 6.A applicants at the designated license level."
2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

Sinitial conditions 

           =      initiating cues
           -      references and tools, including associated procedures validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if                CIO deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee                                                                 TF specific performance criteria that include:
                  "o detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature "o system response and other examiner cues "o statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant "o criteria for successful completion of the task "o identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards "o restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
b. The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the j criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301. CIO (*tz 0-( U " .T ____,
c. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity. _ _
d. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified. IBDAT, 3 i .
3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA - T
a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. _

a Printed Name / Sature Date 4

b. Facility Reviewer(*) ( - II-S (0 ** 2
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) T?_DX Od
d. NRC Supervisor(*) (1. 3 "c' _ /.

(*) The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests; two independent NRC reviews are required. NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement I

ES-301 SIMULATOR SCENARIO QUALITY CHECKLIST Form ES-301-4 Facility: BVPS Unit I Date of Exam 9/30/2002 Scenario Numbers: I / 2 / 3 Operating Test No.: 2002-01 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b c

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators Into expected events. W1 A# T
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. __
3. Each event description consists of
             -       the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event                                                      -:
            -=       the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
             -       the expected operator actions (by shift position)
            -=       the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario r'p"2 "

without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. _._

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. r _ Tr
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

C TtFI,

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. / /

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. W/A N O{N Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. T
9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been AI evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. T-"

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All / AJ. " 10. other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301. P_,0__

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. P-,

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Actual Attributes (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 8 8 8
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3 3 3
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 4 4
4. Major transients (1-2) 2 2 1 r ,
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 3 2 2 1 0A4
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 0 1
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 3 ,__2 ___

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 SIMULATOR SCENARIO QUALITY CHECKLIST Form ES-301-4 Facility: BVPS Unit I Date of Exam 9/30/2002 Scenario Numbers: 4 / 5 / Operating Test No.: 2002-01 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b c

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of I{ .A service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 6 7 5
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. '_
3. Each event description consists of
                 -       the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
                -        the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
                 -      the expected operator actions (by shift position)
                -       the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario r.

without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. ______'_

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. _'______
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain ri"Aý complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. _
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. j O L Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. _
9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been 7,r' evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301. IZ L
11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). _'___
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensinh decisions for each crew position. 7.V TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Actual Attributes (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)
1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 8 (A. T,
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 3 _
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 4 4 T ,
4. Major transients (1-2) 1 1
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 3
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 0 __,___-_
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 3 3 /7") "

NUREG-1 021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 N/A 1 Normal 1 1 N/A RO/PO Instrument/ 4 2,4,5 2,3,5 Component Major 1 5,6 5 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component Major I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count t war the minimum requirement. Author: \~~L00 Ij?,4A 1 Chief Examine *r: \)UJ\.tL N 1 7 A. NUREG-1021, Revision 8 e e '.4.-,- I

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-2 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 N/A I Normal 1 1 N/A RO/PO Instrument/ 4 2,4,5 2,3,5 Component Major 1 5,6 5 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component Major I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's cpmpetence count toward th minimum requirement. Author: F Chief Examine r: Arl 14' NUREG-1 021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 N/A 1 Normal 1 1 N/A RO/PO Instrument/ 4 2,4,5 2,3,5 Component Major 1 5,6 5 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's cy m pe t ence count tqwar, the minimum requirement. Author: 

                          -,/( \,17/oor- / /1ý)' .

Chief Examine r: NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,4 Component Major 1 6 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5,6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's co 7petence count tow d th minimum requirement. Author: Chief Examine r: NUREG-1021, Revision 8 50ýp"'j'(

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-2 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,3 Component Major 1 5,6 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major I Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant' sompetence count tpwaro the minimum requirement. Author: l 1l l I I r *1 1 J! Chief ExaminE r: Ai iY- (2 NUREG-1021, Revision 8 5-~~A t,

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,4 Component Major 16 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5,6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.(refer to Section D.4.d) conditions (3) Whenever included; only those both practical, instrument and component malfunctions should be that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's cpmpetence count tpwarp the minimum requirement. Author: "I U60t,,,4 rl- 0, (c Chief ExaminE r: . ...L jA"- NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-4 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,3 Component Major 1 5,6 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's, cpmpetence count tucwardthe minimum requirement. Author: Chief Examine r: )">(Apt NUREG-1021, Revision 8 S'-VY4e4- I

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-5 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 3,4,5 Component Major 1 5 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5,6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's co petence countwarde minimum requirement. Author: -If \1 L t~rmnmmrqieet Chief Examine *r: NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-6 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal I RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,3 Component Major 1 5,6 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's ormpetence count t wa, the minimum requirement. Author: Chief Examine r: ýC6-NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-7 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 3,4,5 Component Major 1 5 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5,6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's ompetence count towar. the minimum requirement. Author: .f\dooLU,4 / r 0f Chief Examine r: NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-8 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity I Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,3 Component Major 1 5,6 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5,6 Component Major 1 6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that requirp verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants mpetence count t war the minimum requirement. Author: Chief Examine r: A'4- A- 1 NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-9 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,4 Component Major 1 6 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix 0. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's, mpetence count tywar the minimum requirement. Author: 

                        -- U 0Uo/.l p                     -

Chief Examine r: NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-10 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 3,4,5 Component Major 1 5 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D, (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count t ward the minimum requirement. Author: Chief Examine r: ZooIg.r-f rl i0 n/, NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-1 1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity I Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,3,5 Component Major 1 5 SRO-[ Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 I As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5,6 Component _ _ Major 1 6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's c mpetence count t ward the minimum requirement. Author: 4'0 J0 Chief Examine )r: tJ 39 Wd~ NUREG-1021, 

                                                                                       .4Veeqv{-Revision I    8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-12 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 Normal 1 RO/PO Instrument/ 4 Component Major 1 Reactivity 1 1 Normal 0 N/A As RO or PO Instrument/ 2 2,4 Component Major 1 6 SRO-I Reactivity 0 N/A Normal 1 1 As SRO Instrument/ 2 2,3,4, 5 Component Major 1 5 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument/ 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applican7t'ompetence count t oward the minimum requirement. Author: Chief Examine r: NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SROI-1 SROI-2 RO-1 CREW A Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 US RO RO US P0 RO 2,3 2,3,4 2,4 2,3 Understand and Interpret 2,3.4 2,4 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 2,4 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,4,5 2,3,5 Conditions 15,6 ,5 Understand Plant and 2,3,4 2,4,6 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,4,5 2,3,5 System Response 5,6 ,5 Comply With and 1-6 1,2,4 1,2,3 1-5 1,2,4 1,2,3 

                                                         ,5,6                      ,5,6     ,5 Use Procedures (1)                           ,6 Operate Control                 N/A        1,2,4        1,2,3    N/A              1,2,4  1,2,3 6         ,5,6                       5,6     5 Boards (2)

Communicate and ALL 1,2,4 1,2,3 ALL 1,2,4 1,2,3 

                                                          ,5,6                     ,5,6     ,5 Interact With the Crew                        ,6 Demonstrate Supervisory         ALL         N/A          N/A     ALL               N/A    N/A Ability (3)

Comply With and 4 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. Author: ;4 TU) ___ Chief Examiner: NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SROI-3 SROI-4 RO-2 CREW B Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 US RO RO US P0 RO 2,3 2,3,4 2,4 2,3 Understand and Interpret 2,3,4 2,4 ,5 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 2,4 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,4,5 2,3,5 Conditions 5,6 ,5 Understand Plant and 2,3,4 2,4,6 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,4,5 2,3,5 System Response 5,6 ,5 Comply With and 1-6 1,2,4 1,2,3 1-5 1,2,4 1,2,3 

                                                                                   ,5,6     5 Use Procedures (1)                          ,6          ,5,6 Operate Control                 N/A        1,2,4        1,2,3    N/A              1,2,4  1,2,3
                                             ,6           ,5,6                     ,5,6     5 Boards (2)

Communicate and ALL 1,2,4 1,2,3 ALL 1,2,4 1,2,3 

                                                          ,5,6                     ,5,6    ,5 Interact With the Crew                      ,6 Demonstrate Supervisory        ALL         N/A           N/A   ALL                N/A    N/A Ability (3)

Comply With and 4 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every a Hplicant. Chief Examiner: -,ýUýrl W ýý

  • w NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SROI-5 SROI-6 RO-3 CREW C Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 US RO RO US PO RO 3,4 2,3 2,3,4 2,4 2,3 Understand and Interpret 2,3,4 

                                                                  ,5 5

Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 3,4 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,4,5 2,3,5 Conditions ,5,6 ,5 Understand Plant and 2,3,4 1,3,4 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,4,5 2,3,5 5 ,5 System Response ,5,6 Comply With and 1-6 1,3,4 1,2,3 1-5 1,2,4 1,2,3 

                                                           ,5,6                    ,5,6     ,5 Use Procedures (1)                                  5 Operate Control                 N/A               1,3,4   1,2,3  N/A              1,2,4   1,2,3
                                                    ,5  ,  5,6                     ,5,6     ,5 Boards (2)

Communicate and ALL 1,3,4 1,2,3 ALL 1,2,4 1,2,3 

                                                   ,5      ,5,6                    ,5,6     ,5 Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory         ALL               N/A      N/A   ALL               N/A     N/A Ability (3)

Comply With and 4 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every appicant. Author: -1 r 4/r.Z t Chief Examiner: - " rk 7-,ýxý NUREG-1021, Revision 8 S-?,,

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SROI-7 SROI-8 SROI-9 CREW D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 US RO RO US RO US 3,4 2,3 3,4 2,4 2,3,4 Understand and Interpret 2,3,4 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 3,4 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,4 2,3,4 

                                ,5,6                                   ,5                               ,5 Conditions Understand Plant and          2,3,4              1,3,4  2,3,5       2,3,4                     2,4,6  2,3,4
                                                    ,5                ,5,6                              5 System Response                 ,5,6 Comply With and                 1-6               1,3,4  1,2,3        1-6                       1,2,4  1-5 5    ,5,6                                    ,6 Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control N/A 1,3,4 1,2,3 N/A 1,2,4 N/A 

                                                    ,5    ,5,6                                    ,6 Boards (2)

Communicate and ALL 1,3,4 1,2,3 ALL 1,2,4 ALL 

                                                          ,,6                                      6 Interact With the Crew                             ,5 Demonstrate Supervisory       ALL                N/A     N/A        ALL                        N/A   ALL Ability (3)

Comply With and 4 N/A N/A 3 N/A 4 Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every app1icant. Author: -( JO00LFq/$ {j M Chief Examiner: NUREG-1021, Revision 8 sw I

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 CREWEE____________________ SROI-10 SROI-11 SROI-12 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 US RO RO US RO US 2,3 3,4 2,4 2,3,4 Understand and Interpret 2,3,4 5 3,4 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 3,4 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,4 2,3,4 Conditions 5 5 ,5 Understand Plant and 2,3,4 1,3,4 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,4,6 2,3,4 

                                                    ,5               ,5,6                              5 System Response                         ,5 Comply With and                        1-5        1,3,4       1,2,3  1-6                       1,2,4  1-5 Use Procedures (1)                                  5          5                                6 Operate Control                        N/A        1,3,4       1,2,3  N/A                       1,2,4  N/A Boards (2)                                          5          ,5                               ,6 Communicate and                       ALL         1,3,4       1,2,3 ALL                        1,2,4  ALL Interact With the Crew                             ,5          5                                6 Demonstrate Supervisory              ALL         N/A          N/A  ALL                         N/A   ALL Ability (3)

Comply With and 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A 4 Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every a plicant. 

                                     -     1            11 Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: BVPS Unit 1 Date of Exam: 9/30/2002 Exam level: RO Item Description Initial A B- C#

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to the facility f.W 00-*
2. NRC K/As referenced for all questions Facility learning objectives referenced as available /
3. RO/SRO Overlap is no more than 75%, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401 f/4%Es
4. Question selection and duplication from the last 2 NRC licensing exams appears to be I^ I consistent with a systematic sampling process
5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies and appears appropriate:

00 The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

  • The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or /
  • The examinations were developed independently; or
      **         *                                        ,pi*nor
  • Other (explain)
6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank Bank Modified New and at least 10 new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question distribution at right 10 9 81
7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the exam Memory C/A (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question 49r51 distribution on the right 49 51
8. References/handouts do not give away answers -?I TT
9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are
10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines
11. Theunexam containss 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet 0f Printed Name/Siqrature Date
a. Author .. 0 Lei
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor C Note: The facility reviewer's initial/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations
              # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in column 'c', Chief Examiner concurrence required NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: BVPS Unit 1 Date of Exam: 9/30/2002 Exam level: SRO Initial C# A I *i Item Description C# A B*

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to the facility
2. NRC K/As referenced for all questions Facility learning objectives referenced as available
3. RO/SRO Overlap is no more than 75%, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401 -{*
4. Question selection and duplication from the last 2 NRC licensing exams appears to be I /

consistent with a systematic sampling process IK"

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies and appears appropriate:
     *rx' The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
  • The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or JThe examinations were developed independently; or q*.. IIhtthf ere oai or
  • Other (explain)
6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank Bank Modified New and at least 10 new, and the rest modified); enter the I.-\ /

actual question distribution at right 13 10 77 '

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the exam Memory C/A (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question 46 54 distribution on the right
8. References/handouts do not give away answers
9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are /,/

justified 4 //If

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines
11. The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with A .

value on cover sheet -? Printed Name/Sionatur Date

a. Author _ /___

1\_ _ _ _ _ _ _

b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. ChiefExaminer(#) "rODD A1J_A-
d. NRC Regional Supervisor c6"4***.* /** - }//"

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initial/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations
               # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in column 'c', Chief Examiner concurrence required NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 (R8, Si) Quality Checklist Facility: FENOC BVPS Unit 1 Date of Exam: 10111/02 Exam Level: RO/SRO Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading _ TF
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented tl WT
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors ,/ -,

(reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) _-_

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in /,\ ,* ]"

detail /,--, L#,

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades /- /g/.N*

are justified __"

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date
a. Grader T. Woolev / ./,& /0-!1-01
b. Facility Reviewer(*) (2-;. V4X _"__t_.
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) 3-7," ,/ j /Z
d. NRC Supervisor (*) .' Q L., i

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML023250454&oldid=2684251"