|
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARL-2024-137, Second Supplement to NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Letter L-2024-108, “Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding One Time Extension to Technical Specification 3.8.1.1.a, Allowed Outage Time with One Independent .2024-08-12012 August 2024 Second Supplement to NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Letter L-2024-108, “Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding One Time Extension to Technical Specification 3.8.1.1.a, Allowed Outage Time with One Independent . IR 05000443/20240022024-08-0606 August 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000443/2024002 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Inspection Report 07200063/2024001 ML24163A0012024-08-0505 August 2024 LTR-24-0119-1-1 Response to Nh Letter Regarding Review of NextEras Emergency Preparedness Amendment Review L-2024-127, Supplement to Letter L-2024-108, “Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding One Time Extension to Technical Specification 3.8.1.1.a, Allowed Outage Time with One Independent2024-08-0505 August 2024 Supplement to Letter L-2024-108, “Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding One Time Extension to Technical Specification 3.8.1.1.a, Allowed Outage Time with One Independent L-2024-125, Notice of Intent to Provide Supplemental Information to License Amendment Request to Adopt Common Emergency Plan with Site-Specific Annexes2024-07-24024 July 2024 Notice of Intent to Provide Supplemental Information to License Amendment Request to Adopt Common Emergency Plan with Site-Specific Annexes L-2024-108, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding One Time Extension to Technical Specification 3.8.1.1.a, Allowed Outage Time with One Independent Circuit Between the Offsite.2024-07-16016 July 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding One Time Extension to Technical Specification 3.8.1.1.a, Allowed Outage Time with One Independent Circuit Between the Offsite. ML24193A2432024-07-12012 July 2024 – Interim Audit Summary Report in Support of Review of License Amendment Requests Regarding Fleet Emergency Plan L-2024-114, Quality Assurance Topical Report (FPL-1 Revision 31 Annual Submittal2024-07-10010 July 2024 Quality Assurance Topical Report (FPL-1 Revision 31 Annual Submittal L-2024-102, Official Service List Update2024-06-19019 June 2024 Official Service List Update ML24149A2862024-06-12012 June 2024 NextEra Fleet - Proposed Alternative Frr 23-01 to Use ASME Code Case N-752-1, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment for Repair/Replacement Activities in Class 2 and 3 Systems Section X1, Division 1 (EPID L-2023-LLR-0009) - Letter L-2024-098, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2024-06-12012 June 2024 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations L-2024-084, Relief Request 4A-01, Rev 1 - Revision to Relief Request for Examination of Control Rod Drive Mechanism (Rod) Housing H-4 Canopy Seal Weld2024-05-30030 May 2024 Relief Request 4A-01, Rev 1 - Revision to Relief Request for Examination of Control Rod Drive Mechanism (Rod) Housing H-4 Canopy Seal Weld IR 05000443/20240102024-05-29029 May 2024 Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection Report 05000443/2024010 IR 05000443/20240112024-05-24024 May 2024 Age-Related Degradation Inspection Report 05000443/2024011 IR 05000443/20240012024-05-13013 May 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000443/2024001 L-2024-061, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, License Amendment Request - One Time Extension to Technical Specification 3.8.1.1.a, Allowed Outage Time with One Independent Circuit Between the Offsite Transmission Network and the Onsite Class 1E Distribut2024-05-10010 May 2024 NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, License Amendment Request - One Time Extension to Technical Specification 3.8.1.1.a, Allowed Outage Time with One Independent Circuit Between the Offsite Transmission Network and the Onsite Class 1E Distributio ML24046A0512024-05-0707 May 2024 Issuance of Amendment No. 174 to Update the Period of Applicability (Poa) for the Pressure-Temperature Limits (PTL) and Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP) Curves ML24127A0632024-05-0606 May 2024 Supplemental Information to License Amendment Request to Adopt Common Emergency Plan with Site-Specific Annexes L-2024-078, 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2024-05-0101 May 2024 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report L-2024-077, 2023 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2024-04-30030 April 2024 2023 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report IR 05000443/20245012024-04-22022 April 2024 Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection Report 05000443/2024501 SBK-L-24030, 2023 Annual Environmental Operating Report2024-04-12012 April 2024 2023 Annual Environmental Operating Report L-2024-011, and Point Beach, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Reporting of Changes to, or Errors in Emergency Core Cooling System Models or Applications2024-03-13013 March 2024 and Point Beach, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Reporting of Changes to, or Errors in Emergency Core Cooling System Models or Applications ML24067A2622024-03-0808 March 2024 Issuance of Amendment No. 173 Revise Technical Specification 3/4.8.1 to Allow Replacement of Reserve Auxiliary Transformer (Emergency Circumstances) L-2024-038, to Seabrook Emergency License Amendment Request - One Time Extension to Technical Specifications (TS) 3/4.8.1 Action a.3 Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Offsite Source2024-03-0808 March 2024 to Seabrook Emergency License Amendment Request - One Time Extension to Technical Specifications (TS) 3/4.8.1 Action a.3 Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Offsite Source L-2024-037, to Seabrook Emergency License Amendment Request - One Time Extension to Technical Specifications (TS) 3/4.8.1 Action a.3 Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Offsite Source2024-03-0606 March 2024 to Seabrook Emergency License Amendment Request - One Time Extension to Technical Specifications (TS) 3/4.8.1 Action a.3 Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Offsite Source L-2024-035, Supplement to Seabrook Emergency License Amendment Request - One Time Extension to Technical Specifications (TS) 3/4.8.1 Action a.3 Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Offsite Source2024-03-0505 March 2024 Supplement to Seabrook Emergency License Amendment Request - One Time Extension to Technical Specifications (TS) 3/4.8.1 Action a.3 Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Offsite Source ML24065A2522024-03-0505 March 2024 Notice of Enforcement Discretion for Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (EPID: L-2024-033) L-2024-032, Emergency License Amendment Request- One Time Extension to Technical Specifications (TS) 3/4.8.1 Action a.3 Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Offsite Source2024-03-0404 March 2024 Emergency License Amendment Request- One Time Extension to Technical Specifications (TS) 3/4.8.1 Action a.3 Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Offsite Source L-2024-033, Request for Enforcement Discretion - Technical Specification (TS) 3/4.8.1.1 Ac. Sources Required Action Completion Time to Replace ED-X-3-B2024-03-0404 March 2024 Request for Enforcement Discretion - Technical Specification (TS) 3/4.8.1.1 Ac. Sources Required Action Completion Time to Replace ED-X-3-B ML24065A2892024-02-28028 February 2024 Relief Request 4A-01- Request for an Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Control Rod Drive Mechanism (Rod) Housing H-4 Canopy Seal Weld IR 05000443/20230062024-02-28028 February 2024 Annual Assessment Letter for Seabrook Station (Report 05000443/2023006) L-2024-016, Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 822024-02-13013 February 2024 Radiological Emergency Plan (Ssrep), Revision 82 IR 05000443/20230042024-02-12012 February 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000443/2023004 ML24009A1152024-01-29029 January 2024 Exemption from Select Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 (EPID L 2023 LLE-0043 (Security Notifications, Reports, and Recordkeeping and Suspicious Activity Reporting)) L-2024-010, Point Units 3 and 4, Seabrook, Duane Arnold, and Point Beach Units 1 and 2, Nuclear Property Insurance - 10 CFR 50.54(w)(3)2024-01-25025 January 2024 Point Units 3 and 4, Seabrook, Duane Arnold, and Point Beach Units 1 and 2, Nuclear Property Insurance - 10 CFR 50.54(w)(3) ML24022A0652024-01-22022 January 2024 Senior Reactor and Reactor Operator Initial License Examinations L-2024-003, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC - 10 CFR 50.46 - Emergency Core Cooling System LBLOCA 30-Day Report2024-01-11011 January 2024 NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC - 10 CFR 50.46 - Emergency Core Cooling System LBLOCA 30-Day Report ML23312A1822023-12-22022 December 2023 Issuance of Amendment No. 172 Revision to Cooling Tower Service Water Loop or Cell Requirements L-2023-173, Quality Assurance Topical Report (FPL-1) Revision 30 Update2023-12-15015 December 2023 Quality Assurance Topical Report (FPL-1) Revision 30 Update L-2023-180, Submittal of Changes to the Technical Specification Bases2023-12-13013 December 2023 Submittal of Changes to the Technical Specification Bases L-2023-177, Supplement to Seabrook Exemption Request Regarding Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Final Rule2023-11-29029 November 2023 Supplement to Seabrook Exemption Request Regarding Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Final Rule L-2023-155, Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information, Revised NextEra Common Emergency Plan, and Revised Site-Specific Emergency Plan Annexes Regarding License Amendment Request for Common Emergency Plan Consistent with NUREG-06542023-11-28028 November 2023 Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information, Revised NextEra Common Emergency Plan, and Revised Site-Specific Emergency Plan Annexes Regarding License Amendment Request for Common Emergency Plan Consistent with NUREG-0654, L-2023-160, Part 73 Exemption Request Regarding Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Final Rule2023-11-16016 November 2023 Part 73 Exemption Request Regarding Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Final Rule ML23318A0772023-11-14014 November 2023 Request for Information and Notification of Conduct of IP 71111.21.N.04, Age-Related Degradation, Reference Inspection Report 05000443/2024011 IR 05000443/20234032023-11-0707 November 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000443/2023403 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation 07200063/2023401 IR 05000443/20230032023-11-0606 November 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000443/2023003 IR 05000443/20230102023-10-19019 October 2023 Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Report 05000443/2023010 ML23346A1322023-10-0606 October 2023 Communication from C-10 Research & Education Foundation Regarding NextEra Common Emergency Fleet Plan License Amendment Request and Related Documents Subsequently Published ML23275A0522023-10-0202 October 2023 Requalification Program Inspection 2024-08-06
[Table view] |
Text
II
- r,, North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation "orthi P.O. Box 300 NortSeabrook, Nil 03874 Atlantic (603) 474-9521 The Northeast Utilities System October 31, 2002 Docket No. 50-443 NYN-02114 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 Response to Request for Information - Steam Generator Tubes North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation (North Atlantic), provides, in the enclosure, the information requested by the NRC staff during an October 9, 2002 conference call.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter please contact Mr. James M. Peschel at (603) 773-7194.
Very truly yours, NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY SERVICE CORP.
DirectortEngineering cc:
H. J. Miller, NRC Region I Administrator R. D. Starkey, NRC Project Manager, Project Directorate 1-2 G. T. Dentel, NRC Senior Resident Inspector
- NYN 02114 I r__
Enclosure 1, NYN-02114 NRC Request 1 Please explain the typical null signal and the procedure used to determine regions of stress by variations in the null signal?
North Atlantic Response There is no absolute null signal set. The null signal is established for each tube by the analyst to center the signal on the analyst's window. An absolute null signal is not required to detect the characteristic signature for a tube with elevated residual stress. It is the relative signal between a high stress and low stress region that characterizes the signal. Thus, in the low row u-bends, it is the presence of a deviation to the left that indicates the stress-free state, knowing that the straight legs have high residual stress (from pulled tube testing) and knowing that the u-bends were stress relieved (from record and process review).
Tests were performed for San Onofre in 1986 to explain a similar issue on the straight legs of the tubes. Mill Annealed tubes were thermally treated over part of their length, and tested with a bobbin probe. No specific null signal was set. A clear shift in the null signal was observed at the transition from Mill Annealed to Thermally Treated.
Therefore, the absolute value of the null signal is not relevant; rather the shift from the null signal voltage, is the important feature.
It is believed that the specific property of the material being measured by the eddy current probe is conductivity, which is known to vary with the degree of strain of the material.
Stress is not being directly measured, but is inferred from the knowledge that the pulled tubes have high residual stress in the straight legs, and that the low row u-bends were stress relieved. This knowledge, compared to the normal eddy current signal for the remainder of the low-row tubes in the "D" steam generator and all of the tubes in "A",
"B" and "C" steam generators, suggests that the u-bends material state is "different" than that in the straight legs. In addition, this difference can readily be explained by the data from the pulled tubes and from the destructive examination of the pulled tubes.
Page 1 of 3
A .- ;
Enclosure 1, NYN-02114 i NRC Request 2 Please explain the origin of the technique and the procedure used to detect the degradation.
North Atlantic Response As stated in the response to Request 1 above, the technique is based upon work performed for San Onofre in the mid 1980s. The technique being used is the standard bobbin technique and no special probes or setups are required. The (low frequency) 150k Hz absolute channel is used to identify the signal characteristic because it is sensitive to material property changes.
The characteristic signature of the degraded tubes was found during an eddy current data search for other artifacts that could help explain the root cause for the failures. It was noted that all of the degraded tubes had this characteristic signature, and with the exception of an additional 4 tubes in the "DM steam generator, none of the other tubes in the 4 steam generators exhibited this signal. The 100% correspondence of the degraded tubes with the signal characteristics is not considered to be coincidental.
NRC Request 3 Please describe how you will modify your process to evaluate the tubes in rows 11 to 59.
North Atlantic Response A relative comparison was made using the eddy current signals from the "D" steam generator rows 11-59 tubes. On average, the offset values provide an excellent correlation with the bend radius (row number), with scatter among the signal offsets for the tubes in each row. The scatter has not been fully analyzed and no conclusion has been reached.
However, there are no obvious outliers, (e.g., signal reversals or the absence of offsets) that would indicate that a particular tube is outside the "normal" scatter. If these data are interpreted that all the tubes are from a single population, then the absence of observed corrosion would suggest that none of the tubes possess the same or similar large residual stresses.
The correlation between the degraded tubes and the signal characteristic was 100%. The correlation between the signal characteristic and the observed degradation was almost 75% (15 of 19). A similar correlation should apply for the long row tubes since it is reasonable to assume that there is insignificant variation in the deposit chemistry in the radial direction. Therefore, if any rows 11-59 tubes were susceptible for the same reason as the degraded short row tubes, some indications should have been observed by now.
Page 2 of 3
.:-- - . 12:ý Enclosure 1, NYN-02114 In addition, a comparison standard could be derived by comparing the rows 11-59 u-bend signal offsets for Thermally Treated tubing to the signal offset from Mill Annealed tubing. The signals from good Thermally Treated Tubes and good Mill Annealed tubes will provide a comparison standard. If no Thermally Treated tubes look like Mill Annealed tubes, the result is good Thermally Treated tubes.
Page 3 of 3