ML023030475
| ML023030475 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 10/24/2002 |
| From: | Schulman E Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Pacific Gas & Electric Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, US Federal Judiciary, Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California |
| References | |
| 01-30923 DM, 94-0742640 | |
| Download: ML023030475 (4) | |
Text
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 IRYAPM 13 RIME S14
- ?RAB1ON
,.m..,'AJ0 15 16 In re PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California corporation, Debtor.
Federal I.D. No. 94-0742640 Case No. 01-30923 DM Chapter 11 Case NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR VALUATION OF CLAIM FOR FEASIBILITY PURPOSES (SAMUEL ANDERSON, CLAIM NO. 178)
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER JAMES L. LOPES (No. 63678)
JEFFREY L. SCHAFFER (No. 91404)
ETHAN P. SCHULMAN (No. 112466)
LINDA Q. FOY (No. 148764)
HOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN 70--;V?5 A Professional Corporation Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor 3 -3 San Francisco, California 94111-4065 Telephone:
415/434-1600 Facsimile:
415/217-5910 Attorneys for Debtor and Debtor in Possession PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 HOWARD 13 Nm"I 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on October 21, 2002, the above-captioned Bankruptcy Court filed its Order approving Debtor's Motion For Valuation Of Claim For Feasibility Purposes (Samuel Anderson, Claim No. 178), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1.
DATED: October 24, 2002.
HOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN A Professional Corporation
" ETHAN P. SCHULMAN Attorneys for Debtor and Debtor In Possession PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
/
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 oP 13 cmNW 14 EUK
,o.
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4,
JAMES L. LOPES (Nc JEFFREY L. SCHAFF ETHAN P. SCHULvI LINDA Q. FOY (No. I HOWARD, RICE, NE FALK & RABKI A Professional Corpora Three Embarcadero Ce San Francisco, Califor Telephone:
415/434 Facsimile:
415/217-;
Attorneys for Debtor ai PACIFIC GAS AND E PACIFIC GAS AND E.
COMPANY, a Caliform De Federal I'D. No. 94-O714
).63678)
FILED ER (No. 91404)
FILED N(No. 112466) 148764) 0 C
1P MEROVSKI, CANADY, 02 OCT 21 PH3: 04 FN ition y.s. BANKRUPTCY COURT rater, 7th Floor NORTHERN DIST. OF-A.
ia 94111-4065 C A.
1600 HOWARD,RIC 5910 RECEIVED/CALENDARED BY:.
nd Debtor in Possession OCT 2 3 2002 LECTRIC COMPANY DATES TO BEMENTERED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NORTHERN DIVISION LECTRIC Case No. 01-30923 DM ia corporation, Chapter 11 case btor.
Date:
October 2, 2002 L2640 Time:
1:30 p.m.,
Place:
235 Pine Street, 22nd Floor Judge: Hon. Dennis Montali
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR VALUATION OF CLAIM FOR FEASIBILITY PURPOSES (SAMUEL ANDERSON, CLAIM NO. 178)
On October 2,2002, the motion by Pacific Gas and Electric Company, debtor and debtor in possession in this Chapter 11 case ("PG&E" or the "Debtor"), for an order valuing certain Employment Claims solely for purposes of determining the feasibility of the Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for Pacific Gas & Electric Company (dated April 19, 2002) filed by PG&E and PG&E Corporation on March 7, 2002 (the "PG&E Plan") came on regularly for hearing before the Court. Ethan P. Schulman of Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, A Professional Corporation, appeared
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR'S MOTION TO VALUE CLAIM (ANDERSON)
EXHIBIT
.1_
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 HOAARD 13 16 RXEE 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 for the Debtor; no appearance was made on behalf of or opposition filed by the Claimant, Samuel Anderson (Claim No. 178), or by any other party.
Accordingly, and for the reasons stated by the Court on the record of the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Claim of Samuel Anderson, Proof of Claim No. 178, in the amount of $10 million for "wrongful termination," shall be valued at zero for purposes of determining the financial feasibility of the PG&E Plan. This valuation shall be for feasibility purposes only, shall not determine or affect the allowance of the Claim, and shall not be binding on or admissible in the Superior Court in which the Litigation is pending.
DATED:
OCT 2 0 2002, 2002 DENNIS MONTALI HONORABLE DENNIS MONTALI UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE WD 100902/1-1419968:BIOI/166/10284821vl
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR'S MOTION TO VALUE CLAIM (ANDERSON) ý1-,