ML022900245

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reed College Reactor'S Annual Report for September 1, 2001 to August 31, 2002
ML022900245
Person / Time
Site: Reed College
Issue date: 09/25/2002
From: Frantz S
Reed College
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML022900245 (26)
v • d • e


Text

REED COLLEGE Portland,Oregon 97202 REACTOR FACILITY September 25, 2002 Document Control Desk US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Enclosed is Reed College Reactor's Annual Report for September 1, 2001 to August 31, 2002.

This has been another exciting year. We continue to make progress on many of our long term projects. Details are shown in the report.

Please feel free to contact me for additional information.

Regards, St~ep~hG. Frantz Director, Reed College Reactor

REED REACTOR FACILITY ANNUAL REPORT September 1, 2001 -- August 31, 2002 3203 Southeast Woodstock Blvd.

Portland, Oregon 97202-8199 503-777-7222 fax: 503-777-7274 reactor@reed.edu Stephen G. Frantz Director, Reed Reactor Facility Program Director, Nuclear Science Consortium of the Willamette Valley

ITABLE OF CONTENTS O VERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 3 PEOPLE ............................................................................................................................... 5 Facility Staff ........................................................................................................... 5 Oversight Com mittees .............................................................................................. 6 Radiation Safety Committee .................................................................................... 6 Reactor Operations Committee ................................................................................ 6 FACILITIES ......................................................................................................................... 7 Reactor Facility Floor Plan ....................................................................................... 7 Rotating Specim en Rack Facility .............................................................................. 7 Pneum atic Transfer System ..................................................................................... 8 In-Core Facilities ....................................................................................................... 8 In-Pool Facilities ...................................................................................................... 8 Beam Facilities ......................................................................................................... 8 U SERS ................................................................................................................................. 9 Reactor Visitors ....................................................................................................... 9 Reactor Operations Seminar ..................................................................................... 9 N uclear Science Consortium ................................................................................. 9 High School Student Projects ................................................................................. 10 Pacific University M odem Physics Lab ................................................................ 11 Concordia University ................................................................................................... 11 Scaler Kits .................................................................................................................. 11 Reed Classes ............................................................................................................... 11 Industrial and Commercial Applications ................................................................. 11 R EACTOR O PERATIONS .......................................................................................... 13 Operations ........................................................................................................... 13 U nplanned Reactor Shutdowns ............................................................................... 13 Security ....................................................................................................................... 13 Fuel Leak ..................................................................................................................... 14 R EACTOR M AINTENANCE ...................................................................................... 15 Significant M aintenance ......................................................................................... 15 Safety Review s ....................................................................................................... 15 R ADIATION PROTECTION ........................................................................................ 17 Personnel D osimetry .............................................................................................. 17 Fixed Area D osim etry ............................................................................................ 17 SG aseous Releases ................................................................................................... 18 Liquid Waste Releases ............................................................................................ 18 Solid W aste D isposal ............................................................................................ 18 Environm ental Sampling ........................................................................................ 18 A PPENDIX A - V ISITORS .............................................................................................. 19

IOVERVIEW This report covers the period from September 1, 2001 to August 31, 2002, and is intended to fulfill the reporting requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S.

Department of Energy, and the Oregon Department of Energy including:

-U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, License No. R- 112 (Docket 50-228)

° Oregofi Office of Energy Rule No. 345-030-010 U. S. Department of Energy Grant No.-DE-FG07-01ID14076

° U.S. Department of Energy Grant No. DE-FG07-01ID14153, We also wish to thahkl0ther funding sources and grants including Portland General Electric, Precision Cast Parts Corporation, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

The reactor is a Triga Mark I reactor with zirconium hydride / uranium hydride fuel elements in a circular grid array at the bottom of a 25-foot-deep tank of water and is surrounded by a graphite reflector.-The fuel is enriched to 19.9% in uranium-235.

The Reed College Reactor Facility has been a resource for research and educational projects in the Portland area since its establishment in 1968. The main uses of the Reed Reactor Facility are instruction and research,'especially trace-element analysis. In addition to providing student research opportunities, the reactor staff works to educate the surrounding community on the principles of nuclear energy and radiation safety.

There were 1690 individual visits to the Reactor Facility during the year. Most were students in classes at Reed College or area universities, colleges, and high schools.

Including tours and research conducted at the facility, the Reed Reactor Facility contributed to the educational programs of 9 colleges and universities in addition to 25 pre-college groups. The reactor was operated 286 times on 139 days. The thermal energy produced was 34.9 megawatt-hours.

The reactor staff consists of a Director, an Associate Director, a contract Health Physicist, Reed College undergraduate students, and some non-students who licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as reactor operators or senior reactor operators. The number of licenses varies from year to year. As this report is being written the licensed operators comprise 13 undergraduate women, 9 undergraduate men, and 4 men who are not students (including staff).

Rood RPr'tar Fnrilitv Annual Ronnrt 200-1i-2n0 PnP#, 7

During the reporting period, 9 reactor operator candidates passed their NRC exams and 5 senior reactor operator candidates passed their NRC exams. During the past ten years 79 people have taken the NRC reactor operator exam and 77 received licenses. During the same period 40 people liav6 tken the senior reactor operation exam and 39 have received senior reactor operation licenses.

There were no radiatibn exposures to individuals in excess of 1% of the limit during the year. There were no releases of liquid radioactive material from the facility and airborne releases were well withhi reulatory limits. There was one shipment of radioactive waste to the US Ecology site inRichlarid, Washington.

The facility experienced a small transient fuel leak this year. The leak disappeared before we were able to identify the source. Normial operations were resumed.

As to be expected, the facility was affected by the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and the security concerns that follow&t. There were significant security reviews of the facility, both internal and external. Our physical security barriers and procedures were modified.

The Nucleai Regulatory Commission conducted their annual inspection during the week of October 15, 2001. There were no violations, concerns, or follow up items. Additionally, the NRC visited the facility in Janiui.y of 2002 specifically to review our security condition.

"WReod Roartnr Farilitv Annual Rvnnrt qnnI-2wfO Pnpo, 4

PEOPLE Facility Fa-20 Staff atf August31, 200, e 6 ili-yý 9..U .c "Duringthe period September1,l2001 to August 31,2002, the fciiil tff conisted of:

ReactorDirector: . Stephen Frantz (4/94- Presei Associate Director:,, Eric Weis (6/01 -Present)',

ReactorSupervisor: Rachel Barnett (51011.-- 9/01),, .,:2 -"

Reid Burkland (§/1 - 5/02)

Megan Othus (5/02- Present),

Training Supervisor:. ,achel Barnett (5/01 -Preset),

RadiationSafety Officer: -Stephen Frintz (8/00 Present) ' "

ContractHealth Physicist: - Marshall Psairtt (8/91--ŽPre~sent) ."

Senior Reactor Operators(SRO): Rachel Barnett teph

.' " Jay Bodiin ".:' Ryan Gaffney "

Mat Brener Rudy Gilmore Chris Hoefler, Tim Casssdy '. ,o" . - kater SReidPurkland.  ;-"

Murch .

Lily.Cool' -'; - Megaii Otius 7,.

Cilicia Dom-Lopez David Rkosoff. -.  :

-AnnErickson  ;' D:--d Rubinm-Joshua Filner Eric Weis Nicki Ford,.,

.~. .- .. . 1 - 7*

Reactor Operators(RO): Katie Bray Joaquin Ramsey Nick Chaimov Peter Rovegno

-; -Erin Freed . -Seth Samuel K

.Steve Katz,..,_: -Dan Spoth .

-Ariah Kidder, Nancy VanProoyen t

,. Judy Kim ,--,- -,Gabriel Ycas

-Eric Lawrence -- , Jon Youn2 '

-* 4,- , Kristina Lestik . JoyWattawa Andrea Neuhoff The list of operators includes everyone who held a license during the reporting period.

ROs who upgrade their licenses to SRO during the reporting period are listed under SRO.

All staff members were Reed College undergraduates except Mr. Frantz, Mr:Filner, Mr.

Gaffney, Ms. Fisher, and Dr. Parrott. - - .

The number of licenses and the gender ratio varies from year to year. As this report is being written there are 13 undergraduate women with reactor licenses, 9 undergraduate men with licenses, and 4 men who are not students (including staff) who have licenses.

"RPadRpartnr Farilitv Annual Rpnnrtu*2Ofl14fl2l,,- *,' , ,: , op-,, 5.........."...pa

Oversight Committees The Reed Reactor Facility has two oversight committees: the Radiation Safety Committee and the Reactor Operations Committee. When they meet together they comprise the Reactor Review Committee. The Radiation Safety Committee is concerned with emergency preparedness, health physics, radiation safety, physical security, environmental impact, and the interface between the Reed Reactor Facility and the Reed College and the surrounding community. The Reactor Operations Committee deals with the day-to-day operations of the reactor, reactor maintenance, reactor safety, operator training, and requalification. The membership of the committees during the reporting period is shown below:

Radiation Safety Committee Voting Members:. . -

John Frewing (Chair) (OregonIndependent College Foundation)

Wayne Lei (EnvironmentalDirector,PortlandGeneralElectric)

Jack Mahoney (NeighborhoodResident)

Tom Meek (RadiationProtectionManager, Tiojan Nuclear Power Plant)

Steve Reese (ReactorDirector,Oregon State University)

Kathleen Fisher (Reed EnvironmentalandSafety Director)

Ex Officio(without vote):

Ellen Stauder (Dean of the Faculty, Reed College)

Stephen Frantz (Director,Reed Reactor Facility)

Eric Weis (Associate Director,Reed ReactorFacility).

Marshall Parroitt(ConfractHealth Physicist)

Reid Burkland (Reactor Supervisor) - _

Rachel Barnett (Reactqr Training Supervisor)

Reactor Operations Committee Voting Members:

Robert Reynolds (Chair) (PhysicsFaculty,Reed College)

Daniel Gerrity (Chemistry'Faculty,Reed College)

Juliet Brosing (Physics Faculty,Pa'ciflc Uhiversity),

Jan Mieszkowski (GehnanFaculty,Reed College)

Raymond Mayer (Mathematics Faculty, Reed College):

Josh Filner (MediCal Student, .QiegohHealth Science University)

Ex Officio(without vote):

Ellen Stauder (Deanof the Faculty, Reed College)

Stephen Frantz (Director,Reed Reactor Fadcility)

Eric Weis (Associaie Director,Reed ReactorFacility)

Reid Burkland (ReactorSupervisor)

Rachel Barnett (Reactor TrainingSupervisor)

I,,' .

Rood Rpanrtnr Fliilitv Annuni Rpnnrt ?201L00P papp K

FACILIT I ES Reactor Facilty 'Floor Plan - , < " ......

In addition to the reactor, the Reed Reactor Facility ýas space for a radiochernistry lab. A floor plan appears asi u e. '  : '-o: c..' .. ,'., -,

Figure 1 -'Reed Reactor Facility Floor Plan'- -. ' . _ ' "

-B- A,"M ecf .

Rom, Stairs up to G.....- Psychology (ot&1d--O DSurnp F E D ' .

-t? .... ,' ump' Tank Room ', o"" - " Storage "R "" : .. Room S.. .. ~Reactor:'- " Racto

."-.. .:',,,,,Radiochemistry.

"---Lbi, .'*,, T . .

Rc' Rooni Lab. Bieak ""Room Counting

'7<;,-** , ]Room

-Exit Corridor-, - " '" ' , - R '

Letters in italics indicate - , , ,

the positions of the fixed ,,, .23 I ,

"-areadosimetry 0 1 2 3 "45 Meters (approximate) .. .

The equipment available at the reactor facility includes high purity germanium gamma spectrometers, X-ray florescence detector, surface barrier detectors, alpha s§,ectrometers, silicon lithium X-ray detectors, a whole body'Acounter, gts fiW pioportional counters, ion chambers, beta counters, Geiger Iullrr.tubesg,'heitron'dei*&brs, alpha detecrors; and thermoluminescent dosimeter readerq. The M ift~rlment are 'used for experigeints and training in nuclear science and Tadiation dtetiti&'T,'o liand 4nd'shoe-moiitors are in the reactor bay. A liquid scintillai6fi'detedtorser&es'the ca'mpus radioisotope e'ommittee. The reactor facility has several systems for *eifora-gi'tradiaii6ns;'de-scribed bel6w.

Rotating Specimen Rack Facility *' - '-<',.". .. -

The rotating specimen rack ("lazy susan") is,located in a well on top of the graphite reflector surrounding core. The rack consists of a circular array of 40 tubular receptacles; each of which can accommodate two irradiation tubes.,Vials holdingup to 17 ml (four drams) are used in this system. Samples are loaded in the specimen rack prior to the start up of the reactor. The rack automatically rotates during irradiation to ensure each sample receives the same neutron flux. Typically, researchers use the rotating rack when longer irradiation times (generally greater than five minutes) are required. The average 1thermal 2 2 neutron flux in the rotating rack position at full power is approximately 1.7 x10 n/cm s Ro,rd Raontnr Facilitv Annual Ron,:t'"7i-*?n2-f .' , 1 . A ' '.'", . , ý PaPo 7

with a cadmium ratio of 6. The specimen rack can be used for gamma irradiations (approximately 8 rad/min) when the reactor is shutdown.

Pneumatic Transfer System The pneumatic transfer system ("rabbit") consists of an irradiation chamber in the outer E ring of the core with its associated pump and piping. This allows samples to be transferred in and out of the reactor core very rapidly, while the reactor is at power.

Routine use of the pneumatic transfer system involves placing samples into vials, which in turn are placed in special capsules known as "rabbits." The capsule is loaded into the system in the laboratory next to the reactor and is then transferred pneumatically into the core-irradiation position. At the end of a predetermined tinie the sample is transferred back to the receiving terminal, where it is removed for measurement. The transfer time from the core to the terminal is about seven seconds, making this method of irradiating samples particularly useful for experiments involving radioisotopes with short half-lives. The flux in the core' terminal is approximately 5x1012 n/cm s when the reactor is at full power.

In-Core Facilities The central thimble is a waterzfilled irradiation chamber about 3 cm in diameter. It'provides the highest available neutron flux, about lxIO'" n/cm 2 s. Special sample holders are used in the central thimble to provide maximum flexibility, in experiment design.

A source holder assembly can also be used. The chamber fits into a fuel-element position within the core itself. It holds only one specially positioned irradiation container 7.5 cm in length and 2.5 cm in diameter.

Foil-insertion holes, 0.8 cm in diameter, are drilled at various'positions through the grid plates. These holes allow inserting special holders containing, flux wires into the core, to obtain neutron flux maps of the core.

In-Pool Facilities Near core, in-pool irradiation facilities can be arranged for larger samples. Neutron fluxes will be lower than in the lazy susan and will depend on the sample location.

Beam Facilities "

The central thimble can be evacuated with gas, producing a vertical neutron beam. This beam can be used to generate directional neutron flux, or for limited irradiations above the tank.

Neutron radiography is also possible. The flux above the beam exit is approximately 1xl0 3 n/cm 2 s when the reactor is at full power.

RWed Ronrtnr Farilitv Annual Rannrt  ?0l1-20)p Pn Po R

IIUSERS Reactor Visitors . A- .

A total of 1,690 individuals visited the Reed Reactor Facility. during the yearas derived from the visitor log'- Entry List B.-Individtals `whoviiited more than once are counted for each visit. Visitors include all individtials who 'are not listed as facility siaff, Thelvisitors included 1570 individuals for training or tours, of whom 563 were in programs funded in part by the U.Si DOE Reict6r Sharing'Program. A large percentage of these'were students in classes"at area cl6leges and schools as disciussWd belbv.A .nionthly breakdown of the number'of Wsitois is ihf6wn on Table'A; a list'is infclded as'Apptndix"'A Reactor Operations Seminar, ' - .i,. *', -:" . :.' .',':-,. ,

The Reed ReActor.Facility conducts an annual seminar, nes. fr ptudents-from Reed and other area educational institutions. This non-credit couise serves( as an introduction to nuclear reactor theory, health physics, and reactor operation. Some of the~students continue with in-depth reactor operator training and subsequently apply for iaixeator operator license.

If successful, the individual may be hired to operate the reactor. In addition; existing reactor operato-rs'ay0 '"t6ike -the NRC -seni6-rfehdtoi

. .,'*I '

bjpidtbit 7 '2 '

kamito"

, 7.'

upgrade&their

. 3*';,' ' ,

licenses.

During the rep6rtirig Pdriod; 9 out of'lO ieact6r 6perdtof-catdidates-passed their NRC exams and 5 out of 5 senior reactor operator candidates passed their NRC exams.

Histoncally m6ststuidents who fail the NRC exam 6/ly'failtbne sectionlatd theyye' allowed to retake that section later. During the past ten yeArg bnily't*6 students Who have taken the exam have ultimately failed to get an NRC license. During the past ten years 79 pe6pleha've'tdker*i'te NRC react6f 6olrat6r e3tarif dhdt 77 ieeelvýd licenseS' During'the samie eieriod':40 pople' ha', 1takdn' tiesemio -tur6jtor atibn exfam4ind 39 have received SRO licenses.

Nuclear Science Consortium "6Inier - 6 bettr use the fesourdes bf the'Reed Reactor Facility -several area colleges and ufiversities~ sfablistied the'NuclrafScienc& Cofisortium of the Willamette Valley in 1970.

Funding for the Consortium has been'derived from Reactor Use Sharing Grants of the U.S.

Department of Energy.'This made the facility available withoutcharge to classroom groups and unfunded research projects for consortium members. 2 The followinglinstitutioný have partiiipated i fai* (ytours, experiments; and research projects n the repoiting periiod. ,

"COLLEGETOURS/USERS -* 7'" -

  • - Concordia University '- ....... v ' . " .  :
  • Linfield College
  • Linfield School of Nursing
  • Pacific University

," .~Portland Community College  :. '

S'Portland State University ' ' ' '. -.

0 University of Texas Rvod Ronrtnr Farilitv Annual Rsnnrt - ",. , .. , Par,, 9

0 Warner Pacific College HIGH SCHOOL & MIDDLE SCHOOL TOURS/USERS

"* Cleveland High School

"* Creswell High School

"* David Douglas High School

"* Forest Hills Lutheran

"* Gold Beach High School

"* Heritage School

"* Hillsboro High School

"* Hood River Valley High School'

"* Jesuit High School

"* JFK High School

"* Lincoln High School

"* Oregon Episcopal School

, Rex Putnam High School,

  • Roosevelt High School
  • Sunset High School
  • The Sharon Academy
  • Tubman Middle School
  • Valley Catholic High School SPECIAL GROUPS
  • Apprenticeships in Science and Engineering
  • BoyScouts,
  • Bring Child to Work Day
  • NW Pottery Research

"* ,Pacific Northwest NationalLabs,

"* Reed College Women's Committee

"* Saturday Academy

"* Science Camp

"* Seniors Groups (SMILE)

Many reactor tours inclide hands-on use of facility equipment to conduct experiments in radiation science, health physics, and nuclear physics. A typical lab involves determining the background of a Geiger Muller scalar system and then determining the half-life of radioactive m'aterial" College classes are generally more closely tailored to the individual interests and needs of the Consortium faculty member involved. Experiments include more direct use of the reactor itself by the students, more detailed analysis of materials, and emphasize the incorporation of other classroom activities as much as possible.

Several special programs for gifted children used the reactor. These are designed to enrich their educational program and prepare them for college. Some of the groups who use the reactor target minority and disadvantaged youth who are historically under-represented in science professions.

High School Student Projects The Reed Reactor Facility continued to be used in independent science projects initiated by students from several Oregon high schools.

Rpod Ranrtnr Farilitv Annual RPnnrt 2f0-?n007 P17011 I0

Pacific University Modern Physics Lab Each year the Modem Physics Lab at Pacific University spends lab sessions at the reactor.

The students do several labs including basic healti physics, sub-critical multiplication, and neutron activation analysis.

Concordia University .- ,* .

The reactor provides training and experiments involving radiation, radioactive material, environmental sampling, and trace element analysis for the Environmental Remediation &

Hazardous Material Management Program (ERHMM) at Concordia UJiversity Scaler Kits '>

Through the generosity of Portland General Electric, the react, Men "ut 9 suitcases containing a geiger counter, a scaler, and some small 'cempi u'ris g'toioalhigh schools for their use in their program.

Reed Classes .3

"* Chemistry 271 students conducted a lab using neutron activation analysis to determine chemical composition of an unknown.

"* A senior successfully performed computel'ssisted niue'ron tomography usifig the central thimble for his thesis project. This was a spectacular sutcess in imaging materials using neutrons. ( . " "',.,'*°'.., ,:' .t:-'ff*

4

"* A senior used the reactor to check the elemental complbsition'of a compound to check a synthesis process as part of her thesis'projbtt. '

Industrial and Commercial Applications -,

The Reed Reactor Facility is available for industrial or commercial concerns when it does not conflict with our,educational goals. As in past, thpprimary..perations involved neutron activation analysis of materials or environmentalsamples.-,, -,

The facility also provides radiation protection training to.interesteC4ppaties and kchools in the area. ,, , -I , r : 2 ..- *,;', .J.

. ,r n i ,

Rpird Rj'nrtnr Fne-ilitv Annual Rpnnrt",200l-2flfl '. ' *, *:, *.,* . -., * ,, -. ,. Pa~ 11

1REACTOR OPERATIONS Operations During-the year the reactor was taken critical 286 times on 139 days. Th6 total -energy r.*

.,produced was 34.98 megawatt-hours. Operating history bY ionth appear in Table A:

S' f!.- T +/- ..

"- - i ara nle A - uperainn ng s r, -H.. - *

  • -* Times Critical Days Operated ' MW-hrs - c Visitors SSep. *- *.. *-10 -9 -* , 4.847 - , -* '113

'Oct. 31 - 14 - . 7.382 A20 SNov. 27 13 -. 2.193 - 233 Dec. .. . 8 , 6 ° ,2.481 . .39 Jan. --21 - 13 3.480 252 Feb. 27 11 1.557 101 Mar. -24 .- 12- 1.803- -127.

Apr. - . 54 .... 23 ,2.051 .305 May - ,33 .-- 16 -2.927 -157

--Jun.- 10 . - --- 6 , 2.379;-r_ 106 -,

Jul. 31 10 -2.990, 56 Aug. 10 6 0.886 81

-Total '-- - 286 - 139 - -34.976 - 1690.,'

Ther wer e iReactor Unplanned nadv rtn Shutdowns,cueo shut o wn (s r a s as sh w in Tabl B; none wer There were 5 inadver'tent reactor shutdowns (scrams) as- shown in Table B; none were unexplained. The number of unplanned reactor shutdowns is about half of our past experience.

I , , ,- - Table B - Unplanned Reactor Shutdowns .

"' - -Date -. Scram Type Cause of Scram - -- -',- j-1_ 1' *..-.

10/25/01 Linear Power Inadvertent switch to manual ranging on linear channel 10/30/01 Period Electrical transient from switching into automatic 11/14/01 Linear Power Inadvertent switch to manual ranging on linear channel

- Percent and 2/9/02 Lineir Po6wer Electrical iransient .... ,

3/9/02 Linear Power Auto-ranging left in manual Securifty *=.,

,"There were signfcant security reviews of the~facil~ity, bo0th internial mand 6iternal. Our S-physical security barriers and pr~cedures'were modified ani imrvd.' ."

, I RPMd Reartor Facility Annual Rennrt :?nnl-nn0 -- , ', "-, - ,n_ .

Fuel Leak The Reed Reactor Facility exhibited characteristics of a fuel leak at 1135 on Monday 9/24/01. It was immediately following a short run of 20 minutes at 240 kW. The pool temperature was 29°C, which is a little higher than the normal 15-25 0 C. The limit is 48.9°C.

There was a very small release-too small to even classify. We found fission products (Cs 138 and Rb-88) in the stack Air Particulate Monitor (APM) filter. The highest APM reading was approximately 1800 (alarm set point is 10,000). The highest reactor room Continuous Air Monitbr (CAM) reading was approximately 20,000 (alarm set point is 10,000). The highest Gaseous Stack Monitor (GSM) reading.was approximately (alarm set pointis 500)_The peak radiation levels outside the reactor facility were 600 0.026 millirem per hour above background (ess thih 1%o of the fedmral limit for the public). The ventilation system was in isolation from the time of the fuel leak until the next morning. No one entered the reactor room from the time of the fuel leak until the next morning.

On Tuesday, 9/25/01, the radiation levels in the reactor room returned to normal. There were no fission products on the air filters or on surface wipes. This was the expected result because the longest-lived gaseous fission product has a 2.8-hour half-life. The plan was to see if the leak occurred again. If it were to leak again, we could-start trying to determine which one was leaking. I On Wednesday, 9/26/01, with the permission of the Reactor Review Committee, we operated the reactor at 240 kW (full power) for 3.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> and with the pool temperature at 28 0 C. We found fission products (Cs-138 and Rb-8 8) in the stack APM filter. The highest APM reading was approximately 1700. The highest CAM reading was approximately 26,000. The highest GSM reading was approximately 600. The peak radiation levels outside the reactor facility were 0.025 millirem per hour above background. It appeared that we

  • could produce the leak at power.

The Reactor Review Committee met 1800 Thursday, 9/27/01. They approved following SOP-91 Method A, which involves swapping out several fuel elements, operating the reactor to look for the leak, and then swapping out some more.

Between 09/28/01 and 10/9/01 we operated the reactor in various configurations, but were unable to determine which elements was leaking. Finally on Tuesday, 10/9/01, we operated the reactor in its original configuration for over four hours with pool temperature at 40°C without a leak. Either the leak stopped or the source was tramp uranium.

With the permission of the Reactor Review Committee normal operations were resumed.

Important footnote: While moving the fuel elements and graphite elements on 09/28/01 we dropped one of the graphite elements. There was no release of radioactivity. On Monday, 10/01/01, we extensively tested the fuel tool and were unable to repeat the event. We also retrieved the dropped graphite element. The lower pin on the graphite element appears bent, so it has been labeled and removed from the pool. The dose rate on contact with the graphite element was 5 millirem per hour.

Rood Ranrtnr F*arilitv Annual Ronnrt 20lf-?fP 1 PacPP 7

IREACTOR MAINTENANCE Significant Maintenance Routine equipment checks are conducted by reactor staff menbers,on a daily,weelkly, bimonthly, semiannual (January and July) and annual (January) basis as re quired by facility procedures. Reed College maintenance personnel assist with routine preventative .

maintenance to aixiliary equipment. Significnt maintenance operatio.nsiw hichwere not part

,of a regular schedule are listed in Table D. . . ,

-. TableD Significant-Maintenance Operations

,Date, Maintenance . '- , , :,

,9/20/01' New security system witing'and sensors installed- ",, .

9121/01,-i Installed'emergency shutdown biftton:forprimary and secondary, pumps 11115101' 'Newlog channelinstalled , .. , . ,  :

  • v ,'

1/7/02 Paging system repaired 1/10/02 Replaced potentiometer for safety-rod position indication ,"

4/28/02' Changed primary-water systemfilter.:,, ., .' '";* .,

.5/21/02 Replaced secondary inlet pressure' gage 5/24/02 Installed eye-wash fountain installed, ii mechanical room 6/11/02 Replaced elbow in air supply loop 6/12/02 Replaced air pump for CAM 6/14/02 .' Replaced high/low(w.water alarmfloat,. ' .' ... .. "-"

There we're no changes un'deri the provisions'of 10CFR50..59 r-e*vzie~w'p'eriorm"ed d_.ui'g the reporting period. All changed were under 10CFR50.59 reviews compl&*d in the'lprievious rprting perios

' 4,~ *

  • a. , , ,* * . .. , .

oi° Reed Ronrtnr Fnrilitv Annual Ronnrt 2n01-2f00 ,. , tii,, . .. . . A Pav M-,, 15

IIRADIATION PROTECTION Personnel Dosimetry ... ..

'During the period July 1,,2001 to June 30, 2002 personnel dosimeters were issued to 41

'Reed students' and staff and 1 contractor. Since dosimeters are chanhged on a calendar

-quarter schedule, this period is the closest to the reporting period. -Individuals were issued "beta-gammasensitive ring badges and whole-body badges. The Direct6r and Associate Director were issued beta-gamma-neutron sensitive dosimetry. .

During the year the largest reading on a whole body dosimeter was 12 mrem deep dose equivalent. The largest reading on a ring dosimeter was 50 mrem ihallow dose equivalent.

No one exceeded a quarter of a percent of his or her federal limits.

Fixed Area Dosimetry Radiation levels are continually monitored to provide an mirdicationfof the average radiation levels in the reactor bay and dose outside the facility. The locations of these dosimeters are

- -. :shown on Figure 1. All dosimeters monitor beta and gamma radiation.-Locations A and C alsomeasure neutron dose.

The deep dose equivalent radiation measured by fixed dosimeters during the period July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002 are shown in Table E. Since dosimeters are changed on a calendar quarter schedule, this period is the closest to the reporting period. -Thereare radioactive material sample storage locations along the north wall: a radioactive source storage safe and a lead enclosed sample boxiwhere samples are placed immediately upon removal from the reactor. Thie neutron howitzer is stored on'the east wall.

Table E - Area Radiation Dosimeters (doses are in mRem per calendar quarter)

Location Height Radiation Jul 1 - Oct 1 - Jan 1 - Apr 1 - Total (m) Detected Sep 30 Dec 31 Mar 31 Jun 301 1 A East Wall 1.5 f3,yn 125 58 125 214 522 B North Wall 1.6 13, 22 16 13 18 69 C West Wall 1.0 f3,yn 3 6 5 8 22 D South Wall 1.6 f3,y 7 2 7 6 22 E North Wall 2.3 Yly 30 34 21 24 109 F North Outside 2.8 14 3 7 7 31 G Roof Outside 0.4 3 Y, 2 3 0 5 10 H East Outside 1.5 Y3,Y 0 0 0 0 0 I South Outside 0.4 13, 0 0 0 0 0 Read Rpnrtnr Farilitv Annijal R.nnrt 2l01-2l02, - , __*,,- ,

PaPe 17

Gaseous Releases The only routine release of gaseous radioactivity is from Ar-41 (1.83 hour9.606481e-4 days <br />0.0231 hours <br />1.372354e-4 weeks <br />3.15815e-5 months <br /> half-life) and N 16 (7.13 second half-life).-These come from activation of pool water and air dissolved in the pool water and in the irradiation facilities. For calendar year 2001, the average gaseous activity at the site boundary was 1.18 x 10".1 pCi/ml, which would deliver a dose to a

- member of the public of approximately 0.06 mrem per year, well below regulatory guidelines and constraints.

Liquid Waste Releases No liquid radioactive waste was released from the Reed Reactor Facility during this report period.

Solid Waste Disposal A shipment of fobr barrels of low-level solid radioactive waste was made from the Reed Reactor Facility to the US Ecology site in Richland, Washington during this report period.

The volumewas 30 cubic feet containing 37 millicuries.

Environmental Sampling ...

Soil samples taken from the area surr1oiunding the fficility showed no activity above

' background. Water sampl*es taken froth thfedfacility's secondary cooling system showed no activity ab6&ý b*ickgr6und. .

RPpd Ronrtnr Fnrilitv Annual Rannrt 2001-2m1l. PaQO I1R

]IAPPENDIX A-: -- VISITORS

- Date Institution Purpose-. "-Number, U-Share Reed Tour 2 , wN 9/1/01 9/5/01 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 4 No 9/5/01 - ' Reed Tour-- " '" No "9/6/01 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 2 No

-9/6/01, ,-." Packard ,,Tr '- . tour -. '2 - No 9/7/01 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 2 -No

,-9/10/01 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 2 No

-9/10/01 ' Reed Training ' - 56 No 9/22/01 [- Reed "Todu--

-- *'""  :?.'1',-, No 9/22/01% USN Tour'- 1 No9 9/24/01 Hood River Valley HS Tour ' Yes

'9/26/01 Reed Training 6 ... No' Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 1 No

-- 9/27/01 9/27/01 Reed Thainlh*f".i . - , 14' No 9/28/01 Reed ' Training 1 No Reed'Physiedl Plant " Mairi'tinahc'e' '1 .No 10/1/01" 10/1/01 Reed "'Vinii'N

'10/3/01 Reed' ' Trai-ig-', ' '6 No' 10/4/01 "Reed - Training 8 , No' 10/6/01 Reed Tra-iin-v'*z ', 2,,i 2 No 10/9/01 Reed - Training 1" No, 10/10/01 " Reed ° -- ,'., T"raining. ', :'i.4, No 10/11/01 ' ' Reed " , " ' " *-Traiiiin* , r t: -'13, -No; 10/1 2/01 Reed Physical Plant Maintenance' "' -' :l'. No 10/1 2/01 ' Reed Thesis Experiment 1 No'

-10/15/01 Reed -.- Tour '. 1- No 10/1 6/01 NRC Inspection 1 'No, 10/1 7/01 NRC Inspection 1 'No 10/17/01 Reed Training 8 No 10/18/01 NRC Inspection 1 No 10/19/01 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 1 No 10/23/01 Portland Fire Bureau Inspection 8 ' ' No 10/23/01 Portland Tribune' - Tour - . 1 -, No 10/23/01 Reed - Training 2 No 10/24/01 Portland Fire Bureau Inspection 8 No 1 0/24/01 ' Reed .... Training 3 'No 10/25/01 Portland Fire Bureau Inspection' 4 -No 10/25/01 , Reed*r Training' 4 No 10/25/01 Oregon Episcopal School . Tour ' 1' r Yes 10/27/01 Reed Training ' '6 No 10/27/01 Oregon Episcopal School --- Tour , ' ' 2 Yes "10/28/01 ' Reed" Training 1 No 10/29/01 Reed Training 1 No 1 0/30/01 Pacific, University Tour 20 .-Yes 10/30/01 Reed ' Thesis Experiment 2 No 10/31/01 Reed Training 6 No Rpd Rpntnr Fnr-ilitv Annyli RtnnrtflO1.iflfl2?-' -p 1. - k -'Pamp 79

Date Institution Purpose Number U-Share 11/2/01 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 1 No 11/3/01 Oregon Episcopal School Tour 6 Yes 11/3/01 Reed Training 4 No 11/6/01 Reed Training 1 No 11/8/01 Reed Tour/Class 12 No 1 1/8/01 Reed - Thesis Experiment 1 No 11/9/01 KOIN-TV News Story 2 No 11/9/01 Reed, Tour 81 No 11/10/01 Reed Tour. 2 No 11/1 3/01 General Atomic Maintenance 1 No 11/13/01 Pacific University Training 12 Yes 11/14/01 Reed, Training 1 No 11/1 5/01 General Atomic Maintenance 1 No 11/1 5/01 Reed Training 4 No 11/17/01 Tubman - - Tour, 12 Yes 11/17/01 Reed - Tour/Class 14 No 11/17/01 Reed Training 3 No 11/19/01 Reed Thesis Experiment 1 No 11/19/01 Reed -, Tour - 2 No 11/23/01 Reed -Tour , 8 No 11/23/01 Reed Training - 1 No 11/26/01 Reed - - Thesis Experiment 2 No 11/26/01 Reed. , Tour, -- 1 No 11/27/01 Reed ;. Training 1 No

'11/28/01 Reed Training- 7 No 11/29/01 Sunset High School Tour 27 Yes 11/29/01 Reed, Training 8 No 11/29/01 Reed Training 1 No 11/30/01 Gold Beach High.School Tour 1 Yes 11/30/01 Reed -- Training 3 No 11/30/01 Boy Scout Troop #252 Tour 12 Yes 12/3/01 Oregon Episcopal School Tour 1 Yes 1 2/3/01 Reed -'z- -, Training" 1 No 12/4/01 Reed - . Tour 1 No 12/5/01 Reed, ' Training 2 No 1 2/5/01 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 2 No 1 2/6/01 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 4 No

.12/6/01 Reed.' Training 1 No 1 2/7/01 Oregon ElectricGroup Maintenance 3 No 1 2/7/01 Reed Training 1 No 1 2/10/01 Reed Training 1 No 12/10/01 Pacific University Tour 1 Yes 1 2/12/01 United Fire Maintenance 2 No 1 2/14/01 - Oregon Episcopal School Tour 2 Yes 12/15/01 Reed , Tour 1 No 12/18/01 Reed Tour 2 No

,12/19/01 - Reed Tour/Class 13 No 1 2/1 9/01 1- Hillsboro High'School Tour -1 Yes Rppd Rpartnr Fnrilitv Annual Rennrt 20fll-2nn?02 Papoo 2

-, __F , , ,

4'-

'4.

V '

  • .Date Institution.- Purpose Number U-Share 1/5/01 Oregon Episcopal School Tour i 1 3 Yes 1/8/01 1- 1 TReed ,,.Traininq ,7 10 , -, No 1/9/01 Reed - Training 15' l No" 1/10/01 - Reed - Training 14 ., No:

1/11/01 Reed Training 11, -" , No, 1/14/01 Reed Training,. 1, No 1/16/01 f Reed L Training 9 -No

,"1/17/01 Reed - Training-- 5 . -No' 1/19/01 Reed t Training 4 -No, 1/19/01 ' Reed ., Tour. .1 -No 1/21/01 Reed v i Training. 1 No 1/21/01 "Reed - Tour :-, 1. No 1/22/01 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 1 No 1/23/01 Oregon Episcopal School Tour ,- 12 Yes 1/24/01 Oregon Episcopal School ' Tour .,-:. 1 Yes "1/25/01 Warner Pacific College Tour. ,2 Yes "1/25/01 . Reed -, - Weekly/Shutd6wn 1 --. INO 1/26/01 . Oregon State-University) Tour -.- I1 ' No 1/26/01 . Reed Training-- 2 . No, 1/26/01 , Oregon Episcopal School Tour-, 1 -' Yes

,1/26/01 PCC Engineering Club Tour z., 6 -,,Yes

'1/27/01 Reed " Training 3 -No,

-1/27/01 Concordia University Tour. is 7. - Yes

,1/28/01 Warner Pacific 'College Tour V.- I1 - Yes'

-1/30/01 Reed - Maintenance - 1' -t, NO.

'1/30/01 Reed r- Training.,. . 1, 'No 1/31/01 Reed,,'.: Training 1' No, "2/2/01 Reed Training-. 1 No, 2/3/01 Reed -.- L Training:. .. 2 . ' No

.. 1/7/02 Reed,.- Training, 12 -.No" 1/8/02 ' Reed- - .Traininf' , 15 .' No

- 1/8/02 . United Fire Maintenance: 2 ,' No 11/8/02 -NRC ' Inspection 1 . . '-No

' 1/9/02 Reedr- ' Training . . 14 - - No

-1/10/02 . Reed -,-.- Training-,,A 14 '- No 1/12/02 Reed "Tour :, 3 -- No 1/12/02 Reed" ,< Training- . 5 *' -No 71/14/02 Reed Training 16 - 'No 1/15/02 Reed -.- -- Training .. : 13 -No

'1/16/02 Reed - Tour.-" 4 C No

-'1/16/02 Reed , ' Training' 10 ' No

- 1/17/02 Reed" Training".: 2 c No "1/18/02 , ' Reed ... -Training --- "3 "7 No

'1/18/02 ROC - - Auditor:. . . 1 - No

- 1/21/02 NW Pottery Research Experiment 2 "No

",1/22/02 Reed Training 1 No 1/23/02 Reed , Training' 1 No

_1/24/02 " Reed. - '".Training ,,:'." 4 ', No

".*-,Rppd Rioartar Farilitv Annual Rsnnrt ,?n2l*fl?-.f ,,.,, '\. _. 4,-,, ,-J- ,, 1Pape

' ' 21

Date Institution Purpose Number U-Share 1/25/02 Oregon Electric Group Maintenance 1 No 1/25/02 US Bank Tour 1 No 1/28/02 Reed Tour 1 No 1/30/02 Reed Training S No 1/31/02 Reed Training 2 No 2/1/02 Rex Putnam High Tour 16 Yes 2/1/02 Reed Tour 1 No 2/1/02 Reed Training 1 No 2/6/02 Reed Training 1 No 2/6/02 Reed TVaining I No 2/6/02 PNNL- Tour 1 No 2/7/02 Reed Thesis Experiment 2 No 2/7/02 Reed Training- 3 No 2/7/02 Reed Maintenance 1 No 2/9/02 Reed 'Training 3 No 2/9/02 Reed - Tour 5 No 2/11/02 Reed - Training 1 No

-2/12/02 Reed Training 2 No

,2/12/02 Reed Maintenance 1 No 2/13/02 Reed Traininn " 4 No 2/14/02 Reed ' Trairiirgq 3 No 2/15/02 Reed Training 2 No 2/16/02 Reed, Trainina 1 No 2/18/02 Boy Scouts Tour" 17 Yes 2/19/02 Saturday Academy Tour-- 13 Yes 2/20/02 Reed Training 1 No 2/21/02 Reed Tour - 2 No 2/21/02 The Sharon Academy. Tour 1 Yes "2/21/02 Reed Training - 4 No 2/21/02 Reed Tour - -1 I, No 2/23/02 Reed Training 1 No 2/23/02 Reed Tour: 1 No 2/26/02 Reed Maintenrrice 1 No 2/26/02 United Fire Maintenanbe 1 No 2/27/02 Reed, Training 1 No 2/28/02 IBEW Maintenance 1 No 2/28/02 Reed Training 3 No

'2/28/02 Reed, Tour 2 No 2/28/02 Museum of'Jurassic Tech. Tour 2 No 3/6/02 SMILE Tour 1 Yes 3/6/02 Reed Training 1 No 3/7/02 Reed Training 2 No 3/7/02 Macalister College Tour 1 No 3/8/02 Reed [ Tour 1 No 3/11/02 Reed Training 1 No 3/12/02 Saturday Academy Tour 9 Yes 3/13/02 .- Reed. Training, 1 No 3/14/02 Portland, Police j Training 2 No Rppd Rpnrtnr Farilitv Annual Ronnrt 21O01-flP? pnoo, 22

1ý JI -j Date Institution Purpose-'.- Number U-Share Reed . Training , 1 -' No 3/15/02 Tour -..0,.' 18 Yes

'3/15/02 Roosevelt High School .

3/18/02 Hunter Mech. Enginee.ring Maintenance 4 No

-Reed Training 1 . :No 3/18/02 Reed Training' 4. No 3/19/02 - .

-3/20/02 Lincoln High School Tour 23 ,- -Yes 3/20/02 -Reed . Training 2, -No 3/21/02 . Reed. . Training 2 - No Lincoln High School.*. Tour- 25 Yes 3/21/02

-3/21/02.- .. J, Reed -.. Training.:- 2 No w

'3/22/02  : . .Reed . ... - Training,.,-. 1 - No

-3/25/02 - , Saturday Academy ... Tour) 1 - Yes

':3/26/02 Reed I. Startup, 5 ' No 3/27/02 _.Saturday Academo. ' Tour..- 3.- ,Yes 3/2.7/02.- Reed .'Trainin 3 No 3/28/02-. . Reed. '.. Training, 4' No 3/28/02-, -. Reed . . . ,' Thesis Expefimbnt - 1. No.

Reed- . .. .. .. Maintenance . 1 - -- No 3/28/02 .- ....

'3/28/002 Reed ..... Tour -, 2 No,

- -3/29/02-.. . .. Reed. .. . -. hesis E.p t 4 No' 3/29/02 ....... Reedd - .. Maintenance'. 1 - No 4/1/02 -Jesuit High School .. Toqrý- -- 6, Yes 4/-1/02- -,. - ..Reed - :u.... . Tour .... 3- No'

- 4/1/02 .-.... Reed Traniig','" 1  %,No

.'4/1/02 ... ,Reed: - .. - Thesis.Experirent.-' 1. "No 4/1/02- Cleveland High' School . .Tour': 1, -Yes S4/2/02..-.. .. Reed:'.'- . .. . Tou,-K 3 No:

4/2/02--.-- .. . -Reed . ..... Theisitx)perimelt 1, Not

  • 4/3/02- ... Reed"' .. ... T.ainjincf. 3 No

-4/4/02.--......... Reed .. Training - . 3 No 4/6/02----..... Reed.- . . Training.', 1 t No 4/8102.---- .. SSI . , Tour'- 18 No 4/8/02..... College Counselbr Tour Tour-z 4 -. No 4/9/02- .... Concordi'UntIversity .. .. 'Toa r,.* ,, t-' 14 - - Yes 4/9/02 . L. Reed':- "- - Training 1 , No

- 4/11/02,' - .Re-d.' d t.. Trainihgp - - 10 r -- No Reed -College .Women's . ..... -"

4/111/02. - Committee' Tour ,- 27 -N 4/11/02 Reed :. . Thesis iExperiment 1- No 4/12/02 Reed - . Thesis Experiment 1 No

  • 4/15/02 . Reed "' Thesis Experiment - 1 - No "4/15/02 ... ..

Reed -. ,, Training' 1, No A.4/15/02. Reed -Tour.-* 1. 7 No

'4/16/02 -.Reed Thesis Experiment 1 -No 4/16/02 - Reed '- Training' 1 .No 4/1 6/02 Reed Vol Tour .9 No 4/17/02 .Reed -'  : Thesis Experiment 1 No A 4/17/02 Reed ____._,__r,_ _ 6 "-- No 21 RPpd Ra,,ntnr Pn,'qlitv Annual R,'nnrt 'nwflfl'1-2ff2 ,-~P~ .- -

Date Institution Purpose Number U-Share 4/17/02 Reed Training 1 No 4/18/02 Reed Training 3 No 4/18/02 Reed Tour 14 No 4/18/02 Reed Thesis Experiment 1 No 4/19/02 Reed Training 2 No 4/19/02 Reed Tour 10 No 4/19/02 Reed Thesis Experiment 1 No 4/19/02 Reed Env. Health Services 2 No 4/19/02. MRP _ Maintenance 2 No 4/20/02 Reed Thesis Experiment 1 No

- 4/21/02 Reed Training 2 No 4/22/02 -.... DDHS Tour 43 No 4/23/02-.. Reed- Training 1 No 4/24/02, . Reed Training 7 No 4/24/02 Warner Pacific College . Tour 7 Yes

.4/24/02. - . Reed - Tour 1 No 4/25/02 Reed Child to work day Tour 31 No

.'4/25/02 _ . Reed _ Tour 5 No 14/26/02 Reed - Tour T.. 2 No

'4/28/02.- Reed-.'.. Training 7 No A.4/29/02 ... United Fire'. .. .. Maintenance 2 No 4/29/02 .. Pacific University . Tour 26 Yes

.'4/29/02 . .. ... Reed " ..... Training 1 No 4/30/02- NRC/trainees:. .. NRC Exam 5 No 4/30/02 .... Reed- ' . Training 2 No 5/1/02 - NRC/trainees . NRC Exam 6 No 5/1/02 Reed . Training 1 No

-5/1/02 ..... Reed .- Tour 2 No 5/2/02 - .: NRC/trainees - NRC Exam 5 No 5/2/02 University of..Texas . Tour' 2 No 5/2/02 .Reed ..-. Tour .I 1 No 5/2/02 ... Reed Training 2 No 5/3/02 .. -...

Reed. _ Tour 2 No

  • 5/6/02 [infield School of Nursing Tour 17 Yes

-" 5/7/02 Reed' . ... Training 1 No 5/7/02 Creswell High School. Tour 10 Yes 5/8/02 Linfield College .. Tour 19 Yes 5/8/02 . MRP. Maintenance 2 No 5/8/02 , Reed .. Tour 1 No 5/10/02 ...... Reed . Tour 1 No 5/10/02. Linfield College . Tour 10 Yes 5/10/02 .. Reed . shutdown 1 No 5/12/02 . .. Reed ...- Tour 7 No 5/13/02 . . Reed. -Tour 4 No

-5/14/02, JFK High School Tour 12 Yes

.5/14/02 -. - Reed: Tour 4 No

  • 5/16/02 .. Reed ...... Maintenance 2 No 5/18/02 ...... Rbed. . Training' 1 No RMpooRponrtnr Fnrilitv Annunl Ronnrt 20(n1-2002P PnoCa 2

4' Date-Isttui--~ Purtiose -Number' -UShare 52/2 Portland Community College Tour -- 6'.- -'67. " Yes' 5/22/02 Portland Comr-hunity College Tor_3-___ 7Yes.

5/23/0 2 Portland Community College - Tour'--14 7, Yes 5/24/02 -MRP Mainteinanc'e - N 5/28/02 ' United Fire -- Mai-ntenance.i '1 7,No

-5/29/02 Reed EHS ~ No

-5/30/02 Reed. *--T Tesii Eiberime~t- -:'-1 ýNo-5/30/02 Portland Community Collegý . - iai ninq 13'1 Ne's

-~5/31/02 Good Sam. Hosp Trzain T, n i g-q 2'~ No -1 5/31/02 .Reed -- _.Tiai~ngnq_.' ~ 2 No, 6/2/0 2 -Reed Trairning --

  • 6/2/02 Reed, 5i TVilrffn6-7T' 1' ___

-6/4/02 . Reed.~- riig -~ 6J i

-6/6/02 -- Reed. - -iaining 10N 6/9/02 - Reed Reunions TJour.- 31 Wo

-6/10/02 - Reed Library To'u~r'_- _ '33o

-6/1 3/02 Reed -- -- The:Eis_ Uj rirj~ii i1 6/17/02 Reed. ~ig-~N

--6/1 7/02 Oregon Electric Group - Maiintenance- 'No"

-,6/18/02 Reed-, ~ V~-i~iig- N 6/19/02 Reed Reactor intern V I nrnY fi 7o 1 6/20/02 Reed Reactor Intern-N .tannYT --

6/21/02 Reed Reactor Intern - -- 1r~iiiný r 7 N 6/21/02 - UnitedFire-,'.- - Maiintenanciýe --  ?';- . -No 6/24/02 - Saturday,-Academy - -Toiir I----3ý *77 6/24/02 PSQJ - - ~Toir 7ý -1T *? 'Ndi 6/25/02 Reed - Tfiesii Exl~rimne-hT No

-6/26/02 Reed Reactor lnfemn- - Teahii'ng_-- Nof u- 2 12 s 6/26/02ý Science.Camp ,-- T 6/26/02 keed .- 1-u .N W 6/27/02 - Reed -- Trafining----- --------- N 6/27/02 Reed, ".Tbt~r~ -4 No 6/27/02 Reed ,.EI14S, - ', N6 4

7/3/02 - Reed .-. Tob~r77- - j-No, 7/9/02 Reed -&h.77 ~No 7/10/02 - Reed , 2 -

'Tu" No, 7/11/0 M' Heritage School ------- Tour T1 77 e 7/15/02 Saturday Academy------Tdur - 15 'Ye6

  • 7/17/02 Reed -'T6ir-u r._"__"7_N 7/17/02 - PF&R -------------- Toufr~ 1 No 7/18/02 Saturdlay A~ademy T~iir- 10 ýYes 7/18/02 UVA ~TC ~2' No 7/18/62 -Reed TuW i-No 7/19/02 Rkeed ~ Tbu ---------- No 7/22/02 Reed ------------- Mairit~inance -2' 7/29/02 FM Global- _Maidt~iiaii66 -1 No 7/30/02 ' - Reed -.-

- -- T6Thr' .7 -- 1 - No 7/30/02 United -Fire. antnnc 1 No Rppd Renrtnr R~~ RarnrFnrilitv Annual R#-nnrt,?qnfl-?flfl2,,_,$ -,., i.- P~-.11- *ý,' P*pjp 25

Date Institution Purpose Number U-Share 8/5/02 Reed Tour 1 No 8/6/02 Reed Tour 1 No 8/8/02 Heritage Tour 1 Yes 8/8/02 Agape Tour 1 Yes 8/8/02 Forest Hills Lutheran Tour 3 Yes 8/8/02 Valley Catholic High School Tour 5 Yes 8/13/02 Reed Tour 1 No 8/15/02 Mt. Hood College Tour 1 No 8/15/02 ASE Tour 1 No 8/1 6/02 Oregon OSHA OSHA 1 No 8/16/02 Reed EHS 2 No 8/16/02 Reed Maintenance 2 No 8/19/02 Reed Tour 1 No 8/22/02 Reed Tour 7 No 8/26/02 Reed Tour 26 No 8/27/02 Reed Tour 19 No 8/28/02 Reed Startup 1 No 8/28/02 Reed Tour 5 No 8/28/02 Reed Tour 1 No 8/28/02 United Fire Maintenance 1 No Ropd Ronrtnr Fnrilitv Annunl RPnnrt ?2001-200? Ppacp M6

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML022900245&oldid=2688482"