ML022620417

Initial Exam - 05/2002 - Public Forms

ML022620417
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	05/06/2002
From:	Gody A NRC Region 4
To:	Anderson C Entergy Operations
References
50-368/02303
Download: ML022620417 (5)

Text

P:\Retakechsheet.wpd APPENDIX I Operations Branch Assignment Check Sheet: as of: 5/8/02 (Includes ES-201-1 & ES-501-1 Rev. 8 information)

Chief: Gage Facility/Task: ANO2 Exam Task Start Date: 5/23/2002 ITEM DESCRIPTION DUE DATE INIT DATE 0 Exam/Inspection Schedule Agreement May 1, 2002 ATG 5/1/2002 1 NRC Staff & Fac. Contact Assigned May 1,2002 ATG 5/1/2002 2 Facility contact briefed on security & other issues May 1, 2002 ATG 5/1/2002 3 jCorp. Notification Letter Sent May 6, 2002 .* 5/6/2002 3 InpcinAnucmnLetrSn PR&LRifrqdN/ N/A N/A 4 Task Expectations, Issues, & Standards Discussed w/ BC May 1, 2002 -Pt 5/2/2002 5 [Reference Material Due] May 15, 2002 QX?-:1 ,02 6 Integrated Exam Outlines Due May 8, 2002 (5(oz..

7 Outlines reviewed by NRC & Feedback Sent May 9, 2002 'S 518 joz.

8 Preliminary Applications Due Apr 30, 2002 4 4/1ofol 9 Draft Exams w/ Doc./Ref. Due May 15, 2002 5/i 5"/12.

10" Independent Reviewer Initials As Reviewed All Parts May 20, 2002 51240 2 11" INRC Supervisor. Initials Approving for Fac. Rev. May 21, 2002 .. /4-(/5j 12 Exams Reviewed w/ Fac. May 21,2002 5//211/02_

13 Final Appl. Due & Assign. Sheet Prepared Apr 30, 2002 4 30,*'o.

14" NRC Supervisor Approved Final Exams May 22, 2002 *3 *'&p0 15 Final Appl. Rec'd & Waivers Sent May 6, 2002 "

16 Proctor Rules Reviewed w/ Fac. & Written Authorized N/A N/A N/A 17 Exam/Insp Material to Team May 15, 2002 18 Fac. graded exam & Comments Rec'd N/A N/A N/A 19 INRC Written Grading Completed N/A N/A N/A 20 Examiners Finished Grading Op. Tests N/A N/A N/A 21 NRC Ch. Ex. Review Completed Jun 17, 2002 5/29/02..

22" NRC BC Review Completed Jun 18, 2002 d-/io*;0 23 RPS/IP Examinees Updated Before Report Issued Jun 23, 2002 ,5-12,1210*Z_

24 License/Denials Signed & Report Issued Jun 23, 2002 (0/3 i0'Z.

25 Package Closed Out Jul-14, 2002 Final Inspection Report Issued, Exam Package to OLA, Facility. Contact Notified of Results

• Note Supervisor or Independent Reviewer initials required in for lines 10, 11, 14, & 22.

[]Required NRC-auth. exams only for line 5.

ADAMS ACCESSION NO TEMPLATE NO.- -

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility: ANO-2 Date of Examination: 5124/20002 Item Task Description Initials a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. 01 4/14 R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with 0)

T T Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled. NO E

N

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

G)

(D (D

1)

N/tA N/A

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of (0

-(

S evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients. /IA S M

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and GD 0G mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule NtA without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and ( ) A11A quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

1 3. a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, G ) NIA w (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, 0D 0 (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, 41/A (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities. r I

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days. 5" 4

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N R c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. (D

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. G) 1

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ir, Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author Michael F. Blancharcy ,WZ* 05/07/02

b. Facility Reviewer (*) Daniel R. Sealockl/ ;/., 05/07/02

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ?uLL C C1!!- o8(Oz-

d. NRC Supervisor " 6/ /* ,

Note:

• Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations. V

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column 'c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

10 Examination is limited to Category "A" administrative topics only. Waivers submitted to exempt candidate from other sections of exam 23 of 24 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: ANO-2 Date of Examination: 5124/2002 Operating Test Number: 2002-1 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA A B c

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with 09 C;%

sampling requirements (e.g, 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b- There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered  ! ", (J during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1 .a).

d. Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.

Cm (P NJA

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent ,* #/ .

applicants at the designated license level. £,4

2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA .. .. .

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

"+ initial conditions

"+ initiating cues

"+ references and tools, including associated procedures

"+validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

"+ specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria N/, A NMIA in Attachment 1 of ES-301.

c. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

d. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified. tie

3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA . . .

a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with (j* ,

Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author Michael Franklin Blanchard/ Z# -,rL ) 5/14/02

b. Facility Reviewer(*) Robert O. Byford/ 5/14/02

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) ",, t.= 3/.21/ o.

d. NRC Supervisor (

(*) The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests; two dependent NRC reviews are required.

(1) Exam material limited to admin section only.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement I

Page 1 of 1 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 05/08/2002 07:38:04 From 10/01/2001 To 09/30/2002 Report 21 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 Operational I Exam Week ri Site/Docket No./Insp Rpt # 11 # Candidates I* Type I Exam Author hi Chief Examiner I1 Examiners Assigned 01/14/2002 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2002301 Prep GAGE, PAUL C. GAGE, PAUL C.

TAC #: X02215 WERNER, G E.

02/11/2002 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2002301 RO - 6 Admin FFF GAGE, PAUL C. GAGE, PAUL C.

TAC #: X02215 SROU - 10 MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

WERNER, G E.

02/18/2002 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2002301 Doc GAGE, PAUL C. GAGE, PAUL C.

TAC #: X02215 MCKERNON, THOMAS 0.

MURPHY, MICHAEL E.

WERNER, G E.

02/25/2002 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2002301 GAGE, PAUL C. GAGE, PAUL C.

TAC #: X02215 05/06/2002 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / Prep GAGE, PAUL C. GAGE, PAUL C.

TAC #: X02252 SROU - 1 WERNER, G E.

05/23/2002 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / 2002303 Admin FFF GAGE, PAUL C. GAGE, PAUL C.

TAC #: X02252 SROU - 1 05/28/2002 Arkansas Nuclear One / 05000368 / GAGE, PAUL C. GAGE, PAUL C.

TAC #: X02252 SROU - 1 WERNER, G E.

Sites: ANO Orgs: 4620 Exam Author:ALL

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3(R8,S!)

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 516 thru 512412002 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide'performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical secuuty measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 516 thru 5/2412002. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE Daniel R. Sealock Supervisor Sim Support _______ _____' ______

Michael F. Blanchard U2 Simulator Instructor 4,f' 5 z/o_ Z George V.Woolf U2 Simulator Instructor V __ _-2 Robert 0. Byford Supervisor Sim Training NOTES:(Lk a~ 5l;t

ý-7-(4 C'I\,,-

/. -1/6*2- P* Woo-,

()AJ;,&d

9. 4at AU-Z* 3 - ;1-u~v( #