ML022480356
| ML022480356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/20/2002 |
| From: | Tkaczyk L Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response |
| References | |
| BVY 02-66 | |
| Download: ML022480356 (13) | |
Text
Entergy Nuclear Northeast Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc Vermont Yankee 185 Old Ferry Rd EnteigyPO Box 500 Brattleboro, Vr 05302 Tel 802-257-5271 August 20, 2002 BVY 02-66 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License No. DPR-28 (Docket No. 50-271)
Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Changes In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), enclosed are the latest changes to the Vermont Yankee Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures, OP 3524, Rev. 19, LPC#1 and OP 3541, Rev. 1, LPC#1, the change memos and the 10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklists. These changes were determined to not need prior NRC review and approval.
If you have any questions, please contact Audra Williams, Emergency Planning Coordinator, in our Brattleboro office at (802) 258-4177.
Sincerely, ENTERGY NUCLEAR NORTHEAST VERMONT YANKEE VLori Tkacz k Emergency Planning Manager Attachments cc:
USNRC Region 1 Administrator USNRC Resident Inspector - VYNPS USNRC Project Manager - VYNPS David M. Silk, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist, USNRC Region 1 Vermont Department of Public Service
/ Oq¢1
To:
Eplan Implementing Procedure Controlled Set Holders From: Diane McC<
\\QV Date:
08/19/02 Re:
VY EPlan Implementing Procedure Change #207, Instruction Sheet LPC's: The fol.lowing LPC should be incorporated into the appropriate procedures:
Proc/Rev #
LPC #
Procedure Title OP 3524/19 1
Emergency Actions to Ensure Accountability & Security Response OP 3541/1 1
Activation of the TSC a
Iona 1
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATING PROCEDURE OP 3524 REVISION 19 EMERGENCY ACTIONS TO ENSURE INITIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND SECURITY RESPONSE USE CLASSIFICATION: REFERENCE LPC Effective Affected Pages No.
Date 1
08/14/02 VYOPF 3524.02 Pg 1 of 3
_ I I__
I Implementation Statement: N/A I
Issue Date:
06/06/02 OP 3524 Rev. 19 Page 1 of 17
INITIAL SITE ACCOUNTABILITY CHECK-IN FORM FOR TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER RESPONSE PERSONNEL DATE:
POSITION TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER COORDINATOR SECURITY COORDINATOR MAINTENANCE COORDINATOR ENGINEERING COORDINATOR REACTOR ENGINEERING COORDINATOR OPERATIONS COORDINATOR RADIATION PROTECTION COORDINATOR CHEMISTRY COORDINATOR "G.E. ENGINEER (WHEN AVAILABLE)
DOC. & ADMIN. SERVICES COORDINATOR DECISION MAKER GATEHOUSE SLOT NO.
PLEASE PRINT NAME CLEARLY VYOPF 3524.02 OP 3524 Rev. 19 Page 1 of 3 LPC #1 DEPT.
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure(s) or any other document to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):
OP 3524, Rev. 19, LPC #1, Emergency Actions to Ensure Accountability and Security Response A. Screening Evaluation Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
A "YES" answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.
A "NO" answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.
- 1.
Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b):
(1) Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities YES NO (2)
Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response Organization personnel6,-.
YES NS (3)
Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources YESA (4)
Emergency Classification and Action levels, including facility system and effluent parameters YES (5) Notification Methods and Procedures YES (6)
Emergency Communications among principal response organizations the public YES N
(7)
Public Education and Information YES 0
(8)
Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES NO (9)
Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipment YES NO (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions YES (11) Emergency Worker Radiological Exposure Control YES NO (12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals YES 0
(13)
Recovery and Reentry Plans YES NO (14) Emergency response periodic drills and exercises YES NO (15) Radiological Emergency Response Training YES NO (16) Plan development, review and distribution YES NO VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page 1 of 3 RT No.
10.E06.171
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
- 2.
Could the change Appendix E to 10 (1)Section IV.
(2)
Section IV.
(3)
Section IV.
(4)
Section IV.
(5)
Section IV.
(6)
Section IV.
(7)
Section IV.
(8)
Section IV.
affect our ability to meet the following requirements of CFR 50.
A - Organization YES N
B - Assessment Actions YES NO C - Activation of Emergency Organizations YES NO D - Notification Procedures Y
YESN E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment YES NO F -
Training G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness YES 0 H - Recovery YES B. Effectiveness Determination For applicable item 10 CFR 50 13 of Section A above, this change (DOES/DOES NOT) decrease the effettiveness of the Emergency Plan and (DOES/DOES NOT) continue to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
BASIS FOR ANSWER:
This change removes the Technical Support Services Coord. position from the Initial Site Accountability Check-In Form. This change only removes the specific signature line for this position during accountability, not the position itself.
The removal of this position was done during the E-Plan Team Implementation and was previously subject to 10CFR50.54(q).
This change does not decrease the effectiveness and continues to meet the requirements VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page 2 of 3 For each applicable (i.e., a "yes" answer specified) standard to 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
A facsimile of the evaluation form may be used as needed and attached to this checklist.
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate information)
Mi The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
0l The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and decrease our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
The following course of action is recommended:
El Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.
0l Cancel the proposed changes.
o]
Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).
D. Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)
Keywordsoused in search:
SJ This change does not affect any other documents.
0l This change does affect other documents.
Document(s) affected:
Section(s) affected:
E.
Impact on the Updated FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.
Keywords used in UFSAR search:
Additional Comments:
Prepared By:
Reviewed By:
Audra Williams, OuaaA mf-ýate:
(Print/Si n)
U
(
e c
lan oDate:
(Emergency Plan toordinator) (Print/S"'n) 8/8/02 VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page 3 of 3
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATING'PROCEDURE OP 3541 REVISION 1 ACTIVATION OF THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER (TSC)
USE CLASSIFICATION: REFERENCE LPC Effective Affected Pages No.
Date 1
08/14/02 5 of 7; Table 2 Pg 1 of I
[Implementation Statement: N/A I
Issue Date: ' 06/06/02 OP 3541 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 7
TABLE:2.,,,
EQUIPMENT TLOCATIONS (PER 0P 3k04)
Area map/dispersion wheel, UHF radio,
-j Nomogram
ý EP Cabinets In the Support Area outside of the TSC In kitchen across from TSC, contains equipment
& FTS phones for use by the TSC Table 2 OP 3541 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 1 LPC #1 ITEM LOCATION
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist List of Emergency Plan Section(s)/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure(s) or any other document to be evaluated. (Include Title and Revision No.):
OP 3541, Rev. 1, LPC#l, Activation of the TSC A. Screening Evaluation Based on a review of the following questions, determine if the change has the potential to affect our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
A "YES" answer to any part of the questions requires that a written evaluation be done to determine whether the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan was decreased as specified in Section B of this checklist.
A "NO" answer to all questions requires no written evaluation as specified in Section B of this checklist.
- 1.
Could the proposed change affect our ability to meet the following standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b):
(1) Assignment of Emergency Response Organization responsibilities YES ONO (2)
Assignment of on-shift Emergency Response Organization personnel YESNC (3)
Arrangements for Emergency Response Support and Resources YES NCO (4)
Emergency Classification and Action levels, including facility system and effluent parameters (5)
Notification Methods and Procedures YE &
YES NO (6)
Emergency Communications among principal response organizations a the public YES NO (7)
Public Education and Information YES NO (8)
Adequacy of Emergency Facilities and Equipment YSNO (9)
Adequacy of Accident Assessment methods, systems and equipmet NO' YES NO (10) Plume exposure pathway EPZ protective actions YES (11) Emergency Worker'Radiological Exposure Control YES N
(12) Medical Services for contaminated injured individuals YES NO (13) Recovery and Reentry Plans YES NO (14)
Emergency response periodic drills and exercises YES NO (15) Radiological Emergency Response Training YES NO (16) Plan development, review and distribution YES NO VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page 1 of 3 RT No. 10.E06.171
10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation Checklist (Continued)
'K
- 2.
Could the change affect our ability to meet the following requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
(1)Section IV. A - Organization (2)
Section IV. B - Assessment Actions (3)
Section IV. C - Activation of Emergency Organizations (4)
Section IV. D - Notification Procedures (5)
Section IV. E - Emergency Facilities and Equipment (6)
Section IV.
F - Training (7)
Section IV. G - Maintaining Emergency Preparedness (8)
Section IV.
H - Recovery YES NO YES NO YES YES NO SNo YES YES YES (
B. Effectiveness Determination For ap lab item 10 CFR 50
__o_
Section A above, this change (D
DOES NO
' decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and
/*DOES ES NOT) continue to meet the stated applicable standard or
ŽL~irement.
BASIS FOR ANSWER:
The change is to identify the new location of the Emergency Planning Supply Cabinets.
No items were removed and all items on the inventory are still This chanqe does not decrease the effectiveness and does continue to meet the requirements.
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page 2 of 3 K>
For each applicable (i.e., a "yes" answer specified) standard to 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50 identified from Section A above, complete the evaluation form below to determine whether the change decreases the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and whether it continues to meet the stated applicable standard or requirement.
A facsimile of the evaluation form may be used as needed and attached to this checklist.
ý+-
J-d within the cabinets
10 CFR 50.54(q) EvaiiIation Checklist (Continued)
C. Conclusion (Fill out appropriate inf'rfiation) 0 The changes made do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and continue to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.
0 The changes made do decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and decrease our ability to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to-10 CFR 50.
The following course of action is recommended:
E]
Revise proposed changes to meet applicable standards and requirements.
o Cancel the proposed changes.
o1 Process proposed changes for NRC approval prior to implementation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q).
D. Impact on Other Documents (TRM, Tech Specs)
Keywords used in search:
E This change does not affect any other documents.
El This change does affect other documents.
Document(s) affected:
Section(s) affected:
E.
Impact on the Updated FSAR Use AP 6036 to determine if the proposed E-Plan change modifies existing UFSAR information or requires the addition of new UFSAR information and initiate UFSAR change(s) as required.
Keywords used in UFSAR search:
Additional Comments:
Prepared By:
Reviewed By:
ate:
8/8/02 Date:
A36I*
VYAPF 3532.01 AP 3532 Rev.
10 Page 3 of 3 K>
PROCEDURE NOTES Phones, Supplies & Equipment are stored in the EP cabinets in led the kitchen across from TSC.
Steps may be performed concurrently or out of sequence.
Designate person to complete 3541 Name (print):
Date:
Initials Time/Date 1.0 Turn on ARMs in the TSC Area. Notify RP Coordinator if ARMs do not appear to be operating properly.
2.0 Check wall mounted phones in TSC for dial tone. (See Figure 4 of OP 3504.)
3.0 Setup & check phones in NRC Office area for dial tone.
(See Figure 4 of OP 3504) 4.0 Arrange chairs and tables per Figure 1.
5.0 Layout EOP charts and markers against the East wall.
6.0 Setup sign-in board 7.0 Set out VYOPF 3524.02 sign-in forms.
8.0 Setup Plant Parameter Sheets on the West wall 9.0 Setup headings to the right of Parameter Sheets for:
- 1)
Next department head meeting (time)
- 2)
Current TSC Coordinator (name) 10.0 Place emergency classification label on the South wall.
/
/
/
_____________I_________/_
I
/___________________
/
I OP 3541 Rev. 1 Page 5 of 7 LPC #1