ML022460378
| ML022460378 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 08/21/2002 |
| From: | Cotton S Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| OCAN080202 | |
| Download: ML022460378 (5) | |
Text
h Entergy Operations, Inc.
-- '--Ener n1448 S R 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Tel 501 858 5000 10CFR26.71(d) 0CAN080202 August 21, 2002 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Mail Station OPl-17 Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Arkansas Nuclear One - Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6 Fitness-For-Duty Performance Data
Dear Sir or Madam:
In accordance with IOCFR26.71(d), attached is the Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) Fitness For-Duty program Performance data for the period January - June 2002.
Sincerely, Sherrie R. Cotton Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance SRC/dh Attachment
0CAN080202 Page 2 cc:
Mr. Ellis W. Merschoff Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Arkansas Nuclear One P.O. Box 310 London, AR 72847 Mr. William Reckley NRR Project Manager Region IV/ANO-1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR Mail Stop 0-7 D1 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Mr. Thomas W. Alexion NRR Project Manager Region IV/ANO-2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR Mail Stop 04-D-03 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Attachment to 0CAN080202 Page 1 of 3 FITNESS-FOR-DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO IOCFR26 Entergy Operations, Inc.
Company ANO, PO Box 1448 SR 333, Russellville, AR 72802 Location M. J. Davidson, Acting Supervisor, AA/FFD/Med Contact Name Screen/Confirmatioi 50/15 300/150 300/300 Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol (%BAC)
June 30, 2002 6 Months Ending (479) 858-6832 Phone 03 Appendix A to IOCFR26 1000/500 N/A 25/25 N/A 0.04%
N/A Cutoffs:
Marijuana Cocaine Opiates
/
/
/
Testing Results Licensee Long-Term Short-Term Employees Contractor Contractor Personnel Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 1162 N/A 451 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 50 0/0 N/A N/A 752 3/3 For-Cause (Post Accident) 0 0/0 N/A N/A 1
0/0 For-Cause (Behavior) 0 0/0 N/A N/A 1
1/0 Random 306 0/0 N/A N/A 131 1/0 Follow-Up 11 0/0 N/A N/A 0
0/0 Other 0
0/0 N/A N/A 2
0/0 Total 367 0/0 N/A N/A 887 5/3
Attachment to 0CAN080202 Page 2 of 3 BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES January-June 2002 Refusal Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamine Phencyclidine Alcohol To Test 1
2 3
4 5
Licensee Employees 0/0 0
0 0
0 0
0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Long-Term Contractors N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Short-Term Contractors 2/3 1
0 0
0 2
1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A "i'
Totals 2/31 0
0 0
2 1
N/A N/A IN/Al N/A IN/AIR
Attachment to 0CAN080202 Page 3 of 3
SUMMARY
OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS January - June 2002 PROGRAM
SUMMARY
The Arkansas Nuclear One annual random testing rate is 50 percent.
During this reporting period, approximately 27.1 percent of the population was randomly tested.
The rate of positive tests from random testing was 0.23 percent.
POSITIVE RESULTS:
During the 6-month reporting period, 1254 samples were collected and tested. Eight of the samples were confirmed positive for illegal substances or alcohol.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:
Six of the eight persons who tested positive were pre-access contractors who were denied access. The seventh person was a randomly tested contract employee, and the eighth was a contractor supervisor who was for-cause tested. Both were denied access.
There was one for-cause drug test performed on an Entergy Operations, Inc. (EOI) employee during the 6-month reporting period. Test results were negative.
One for-cause drug test was performed on a contract employee during this 6-month period. Test results were negative.
One contractor refused to be tested during pre-badging screening and was denied access.
EVENTS REPORTED TO THE NRC:
During this reporting period, there was one violation of the fitness-for-duty program that was NRC reportable per 10CFR26.73(a)(2)(ii). This involved the positive for-cause test of a contractor supervisor.
PROGRAM EVALUATION:
No programmatic problems were identified during this reporting period.
Standardization of fitness-for-duty methods for EOI and the implementation of revised IOCFR26 requirements are still ongoing.