ML022060454

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
July 24, 2002 Meeting Handouts to Discuss the License Renewal for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
ML022060454
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  
(DPR-033, DPR-052, DPR-068)
Issue date: 07/24/2002
From: Jabbour K
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2
To:
References
Download: ML022060454 (13)


Text

NRC FORM 658 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (9-1999)

TRANSMITTAL OF MEETING HANDOUT MATERIALS FOR IMMEDIATE PLACEMENT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN This form is to be filled out (typed or hand-printed) by the person who announced the meeting (i.e., the person who issued the meeting notice). The completed form, and the attached copy of meeting handout materials, will be sent to the Document Control Desk on the same day of the meeting; under no circumstances will this be done later than the working day after the meeting.

Do not include proprietary materials.

DATE OF MEETING The attached document(s), which was/were handed out in this meeting, is/are to be placed 07/24/2002 in the public domain as soon as possible. The minutes of the meeting will be issued in the near future. Following are administrative details regarding this meeting:

Docket Number(s) 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 Plant/Facility Name Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 TAO Number(s) (if available)

Reference Meeting Notice 07/02/2002 Purpose of Meeting (copy from meeting notice)

To discuss the license renewal for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant NAME OF PERSON WHO ISSUED MEETING NOTICE TITLE Kahtan N. Jabbour Senior Project Manager OFFICE Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DIVISION Division of Licensing Project Management BRANCH Project Directorate II, Section 2 Distribution of this form and attachments:

Docket File/Central File PUBLIC NRC FORM 658 (9-1999)

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER This form was designed using InForms

Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Units 1, 2, and 3 Licensa Renewal Application w.

2fr

-0 0 AA,3 TVA I NRC Meeting Nuclear Reactor Regulation - Rockville, MD July 24, 2002 I

'ýi-

Agenda Introduction & Background Project Organization Unit 1 Licensing Basis Unit 1 Restart & Power Uprate Programs

--Synergies With License Renewal Application Format Application Methodology Project Status & Schedule Environmental Review Closing Remarks Tim Abney Ray Alexander Tim Abney Joe Valente Gary Adkins Gary Adkins Gary Adkins Mark Burzynski Tim Abney 4

4

4.

4 4

1

_V_

-ftAl

Introduction & Background

    • TVA voluntarily shutdown all three units in 1985 SUnit 2 restarted in 1991 Unit 3 restarted in 1995 Unit 1 defueled with a layup and preservation program in place
  • o Final SEIS published in the Federal Register on June 5, 2002 o:o Record of Decision issued June 18, 2002 o:o Unit 1 restart by May 2007 Tim Abney 2

Introduction & Background, continued TVA will submit an application to renew the operating licenses for Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2, and 3 by December 2003 SConsistent with NRC regulatory burden reduction policy and NRC strategic plan SMost economical, efficient path for both TVA ratepayers and NRC

)

Three-unit application has no safety impacts TVA NRC Reduced NRC fees Simultaneous review of three identical units is Optimizes staff resources the most efficient process Consistent with staff approach for other multi unit sites TVA will submit a complete application that will enable the staff to make a reasonable assurance finding Tim Abney

BFN License Renewal Project Organization Unit I Recovery Ce nineers Engineering Mgr.

Design Engineering Manager Staff Joe Valente Ray Alexander Browns Ferry Site BFN Project Design LicensingrManager Manager Licensing Manager Tim Abney License Renewal OGC Manager Licensing Project Ed Vigluicci Gary Adkins Management Mike Morrison Environmental Project Control Review Proj. Mgmt, Mark Burzynski Computer Scoping &

Mechanical Civil I&C/Electrical Engineers Screening 4

Ray Alexander

Unit 1 Licensing Basis

  • o The Unit 1 licensing basis is well-known, documented SUnit 1 elements of the FSAR have been maintained SUnit differences identified
  • o Key Unit 1 scoping documentation is available FSAR A-Technical Specifications R

Safe shutdown analysis o~

UFSAR update planned just prior to LRA submittal

ý-

Annual application updates will reflect the modification program o:o TVA has a clear vision of the ultimate Unit 1 licensing basis based on the Units 2/3 precedent as reflected in the 4

FSAR I

Technical Specifications SNuclear Performance Plan Programs SGeneric letter & Bulletin responses Tim Abney

Unit I Restart & Power Uprate Programs Synergies With License Renewal

    • Unit fidelity o

Same design and licensing basis, materials, and environments SCommon control bay for Units 1 and 2 SUnit 1 reactor building design same as Units 2 and 3

EQ calculations

)

RPV pressure - temperature curves

    • Unit 1 modification program predominantly involves commodity upgrades that do not change the licensing basis S750,000 feet of cable 10,000 feet of large bore pipe

)

15,000 feet of small bore pipe

    • Rigorous configuration management program in place Ensures the licensing basis continues to be maintained
  • Extensive pre-service Section Xl inspections in addition to other baseline condition monitoring and post-modification inspections SProvides enhanced opportunities for license renewal inspections Joe Valente 6

Application Format

+ :

SRP/ GALL format with lessons-learned from Demonstration Project and subsequent applications

  • ,. TVA's plan for Unit 1 will result in identical units at restart r

Any Unit 1 licensing basis differences will be annotated in combined application (multi-site) format

  • ,. Implementation of Unit 1 modifications (and incorporation into the licensing basis) are expected to have minimal impact on the application No new intended functions, materials or environments anticipated for Unit 1 No new aging management programs anticipated for Unit 1 Gary Adkins 7

Application Methodology Use the Unit 1 current licensing basis for scoping, screening, and TLAA identification Implement process for reviewing Unit 1 modifications for impact on the LRA

    • Operating experience Three identical units - Units 2/3 operating experience applicable to Unit 1 S

Unit 1 included in industry operating experience review Supplemented by Unit 1 layup program experience

)e Aging management programs will be evaluated against the GALL

  • e:.

AMP commitments will be implementation commitments SNo Unit 1 specific program commitments Gary Adkins 8

Project Status and Schedule Level 1 (CY) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 I tI I

I (UI/3)

System Boundary Definition/Drawings (U2/3)

S~System Boundary Definition/Drawings (U1)

System Scoping & Screening (U2/,

1 M System Scoping & Screening (Ul)

Component Material Evaluation (U2/3)

TVA SEIS Preparation Component Material Evaluation (Ul)

Aging Management Reviews (Ul/2/3)

TLAA Evaluations (U1/2/3)

TVA Board Decision!

External Peer Review+

Application Preparation External Peer Review Ul FP Program Analysis Complete Ul EQ Analysis Complete 0 Ul SBO CaIc. Updated Ul ATWS Updated C PUR Impl.

PUR Impl.

PUR Impl.

(U3)

(U2)

(Ul)

U2/3 PUR Submittal C)0 C

C PUR Submittal (U1)

C LRA Submittal C Renewed Licenses Issued C Ul Breaker Closure

  • Gary Adkins 9

Environmental Review

SEIS addresses NRC environmental review items Specifically incorporates the GElS SIncludes Part 51 plant-specific issues

  • . SEIS has been extensively reviewed Intergovernmental reviews EPA comments incorporated SCooperating federal agency efficiencies noted by EPA 4*:. Public participation accomplished Two public meetings SThree public comment periods
  • .* Process provides for NRC independent review prior to adoption
    • NRC adoption would allow for additional public input
  • . NRC (AEC) was a cooperating federal agency on the original Browns Ferry Construction/Operation EIS Mark Burzynski 10