ML021760066

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TVA Employee Appraisal for Manager and Specilaist Employees for G. Fiser, 11/7/90
ML021760066
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry, Watts Bar, Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 11/13/1990
From: Fiser G, Lagergren W, Vondra C
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
NRC/SECY
References
-RFPFR, 50-259-CIVP, 50-260-CIVP, 50-296-CIVP, 50-327-CIVP, 50-328-CIVP, 50-390-CIVP, ASLBP 01-791-01-CIVP, EA-99-234, RAS 3933
Download: ML021760066 (10)
v • d • e


Text

NAME SSN

~.,.,

TYE P MANAGE Gary's at.~~..corpor knowle iA..

_.'- '.1 -

-*s*..

4.;-,...,.-

p.

1

~ "

f

  • .a a..-. '

.a-.

S

a.

a "TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL FOR MANAGER AND SPECIALIST EMPLOYEES for Fiscal Year ending September 30, 1990 CaryvL. Fiser PG Chemistry & Environmental Supt.

OSITION (w or a) M R

William R.

Laizerren ORGANIZATION LEVEL NGP SQN GROUP NP OPERATION DIVISION DEPARTMENT y Statement of employee's performance potential:

management performance has been very good.

He can succeed into a ate chemistry management position.

Would need to aain detailed systems dge to go further at plant but has the ability to do so.

'VV.

SIGNATURES:

-W.

R.

erxren-1' JR (typed name)

DATE..

C. A. Vondra l

E IGHER M4AER (typed name)

DATE.

(typed name)

DATE

/

V,. O.

7,*

I Plant FA

4 EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL -page 2 NAME C. L. Fiser TITLE/PG Chemistry & Env. Supt.

DATE SSN PART I.A Performance Standards -

(To be completed at. the beginning of the fiscal year) State the major accountabilities, specific projects and/or Alk:;ý'-

assignments on which the employee will be evaluated throughout the fiscal year.

PERFORMANCE STANDARD TARGET DATE Chemistry Control Performance:

1. Chemistry index c0.22.

End of FY

2. Time auxiliary cooling water out of End of FT "spec (0.101.
3. Dissolved oxygen level (ppb) <2.5.

End of FY

4. Conductivity (ms/cm) C0.18.

End of FY Regulatory Performance:

1. Personnel error LER <=I.

End of FY

2. No NRC violations.

End of FY

3. Good SALP review.

End of FY

4. Good INPO review.

End of FY

5.

Open CAQRs reduced by 50%.

End of FY

6. )90% of CAQRs closed within 90 days.

End of FY 4

7.

100% of NRC cormnitments met.

End of FT

8. No missed surveillances.

End of FY SIGNATURES (indication of understanding the performance standards for the next 12 nt and that they may be amended at anytime):

W. R. La er ren GE.Ri (typed name)

DATE

" ()C.

A. Vondra

° J

NEXT H HER GE.

(typed name)

DATE G. L. Fiser 1-7-q0 LO(typed name)

DATE,.

Ie S.9.

7.:.*;

  • 1.*I S-.4 i

q irb Eft'Mn Ulm 3rb zr-A 'W-0 m'kJ-.'J

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL -. page 2a NAME C.L. Fiser' 4-SSN

'PART I.A Performance Standa2 fiscal year) State the major assignments on which the amp PERFORMA2NCE STANDA]

Other Performance:

A*

STITLE/PG Chemistry & Env. Supt.

DATE t

rds -

(To be completed at the beginning of the accountabilities, specific projects and/or Loyee will be evaluated throughout the fiscal year.

TRE WD TARGET DATE End of FY

1. Overtime hours worked (15%.

End of FY

2. Overall daily schedule performance 85%.

End of FY

3.

No lost-time injuries.

End of FT

4. Collective radiation exposure <1.0 manrem.

End of FY

5.

Personnel contamination reports (5.

End of FY SIGNATURES (i dication of understanding the performance standards for the next 12 mo*thsend hat they may be amended at anytime):

W. R. Lagerren AGER (typed name)ATE "to-P

.ý C. A. Vondra t.

NEXT MIAGER (typed name)

DATE

.EM*P*YEE (typed name)

DATE

.'4 r;*;- ;

'-4.'.

.9

-4...

'

-*

-v lm M*

MP irl*

fap*RB

+"".

E -,

fiýi S..-..,

  • 9~*.:.
  • .-I,:

..,ENMPOEE0. APRIA" Pa NAME',.Zý IEG' Chemistry & Env.*' Sut DAE

____r__B 4erfo~rmancee Standards'Anual Ary~

To b'completed thetd

--i j~o the fiscal year) ~State. the eimployees: a'Ccomplishuients.'relative'ýto the

ajhi accountabilitiesq'specific projects -.

and/or. assi~gnmenti'ýUls*e

-Z "I'

14.2 'ý:ý-,A':CCOMPLISHMN/PRORAC,,ý.,...,,

-,:,ACTUAL_ 2EPRAC 0O.KDT

'~~l Chemistry indek icO.22. ý

'`

154'"LUU o

PY'!

2'Time auxiliary' cooling water ou

~

Yea.~'

s' Endof'F" 3'Dissolved'oxygen"Ievel (ppb) (2.50 e.~J2:fdo Y

4. Conductivity ms/m is.l.-..Ye

-"'*7vndoFf Regulatory Performance:

-0 1 'Personnel error LER c-i.

Yes EdoFY

2. No NRC violations.Ye>->

Eno Y?

c!.

o~od SALP review.'

'Yes

-ý *

-- 4. Good INPO review.

Ys-'-EndofFY En of

'5. Open CAORs reduced by 50%.

Yes.Eno Y~

~'~*-6 ~9Zo AR lsd within 90 days.

'yen,"

End o T' 100 7

OOof NRC commitments met.

.Yesz~'-

End of Y

'~~

0N missed surveillances.

Yen' End o Y'

r~~

Z.Z Ac.

IN

.A

>-Xý 4A',

ft EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL'-* page 2c WM.-"'*

AM G. L. Fleer TITLE/PG Chemistry & Env. Supt.

DATE PART I.B Performance Standards Annual Summary (To be completed at the end of the fiscal year) State the employees accomplishments relative to the major

.,A accountabilities. specific projects and/or assignments listed in Part I.A.

acc.uta:-.....

t..

t "ACCOMPLISHMENT/PERFORMANCE ACTUAL PERFORM.

COMP.

DATE Other Performance:

A-..

1. Overtime hours worked (15%.

Yes End of FY

2. Overall daily schedule performance 85%.

Yes End of FY

3. No lost-time iniuries.

Yes End of FY

4. Collective radiation exposure cl.0 manrem.

Yes End of FY 4-.-..

.5.,

.,-" j-A.

4.?j k

S.C..,



5. Personnel contamination reports <5.

Yes End of FY SIGNATURES (in cation of understanding the performance standards for the next 12 month nd t they may be amended at anytime):

.4.-.o-W. R. Laeraren "GER (typed name)

DATE LOC.

A. Vondra 1-3.-qz)

NEXýTLHH AGER (typed name)

DT

..4:,

4'.'t.

.4.



'4 i

0388u...

4....

4--.

~.

7

.4<

o;.

..'S.

j :. -.

' o,.-..

N N

U U

U U

.

.4 i.. -:

-'.4..--.

4..

.4..

4*

  • 6,

-.4 4.4 4.-...,

3 "" - '-

'.> r

  • .,EMPLOYE

-APPRAISAL'o rpae p at NAME "G._L:

"Flair TITLE/PG Chemistry & Env. Supt.

DATE

    • PART ar a:Behaval rae Standards -

(To be revised at the beginning of the fiscal'.

year and evaluated at the end of the fiscal year) The following list those,.

behavioral standards against which each employee should be evaluated.. The.

extent to which, they are used will vary depending on the nature of the:

position of the employee and the. type of organization.

Others may be added as

  • .. appropriate*.. *:

1, FLEXIBILITY low /j..._.j_...1 I

'high Comments 2.

~A.

5.
6.

7.

F -

.1,. DECISION-MAKING lovw I__

.Il....

high Comments DEPENDABILITY low X////..... high Comments SELF-MOTIVATION low

//j/_Ihigh Comments INFLUENCING OTHERS low /

I/

/.I high Comments PROBLEM SOLVING AND ANALYSIS low /X_/

/

/X__[

high Comments TECHNICAL/PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE low /

/

/

IX/

high Coments lowI I _.t..X I.

8.

INNOVATING Comments I

I, 2

4V

(

'I

-

i"

9.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Comments low//I/

I high ',

.0388ua.
  • .4 -..~;

,/

-'"4 p

p p

p P

.4 f.

U'.

-4.

A' high

""I';

&-A.

3.

~10

.4 A
  • -+2..
12.
13.
14.

TZ,

,*/.., I 7-1*

15.

17.

18.
,j..]

q

19.
20.

4...

  • WRITTEN CO Comments SUPERVISING Comments 1-

,.l,.

.- 5

+

  • +

4

.+t...

.... +'*'

+.*

.P r

TITLE/PG,Chemistry

& Env. Supt.

DATE 1UNICATIONS low high lowl I

I Ix

/ high TEAMWORK low l_

_l IX high Comments

.. nfl+..:

PLANNING AND ORGANIZING low /_/__

/_

X high Comments SUPERVISORY IMPARTIALITY low /

I I

X I high Commeznt

-'.1 SUBORDINATE DEVELOPMENT lovw

/

/

i high Comcents ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE low

_II X

/ high Co-euts EMPLOYEE COMUNICATION low /_IlIX high Comments RESOURCE MANAGEMENT low

/j/

/

X

/

high Coumments l________

owl high/

Commnents

_________________low

//hihgh Commzents 4..-f

""0388u 4.,.*

.4 r

--r-

-777 4

EM

~

PLOYEE APPRAISAL -page 4

~

xAmI" G.' L.' Fiser TITLE/PG Chemistry & Env. Supt.

DATE SSN PART III Employee Appraisal-(To be completed at the end of each quarter)

  • §-.A

.".Summary statement of the employee's performance during each quarter of the "fiscal year as noted by the manager and discussed with the employee.

+I,=,;-

FIRST QUARTER Preparation for INPO good.

Handled several personnel issues well and managed a down sizing effort well.

Chemistry performance good.

77-

0) 1W G

RDATE 4.k-LOMDATE SECOND QUARTER SAL? period ended w:..th no weaknesses noted in Chemistry I

'~Z2 other than slowness to incorporate equipment upgrades. Gary has pushed upgrade effort well.

LOYtt "DATE 4,i 4,

2 D TE

2"

.:d.:~

4-4

¶ ot.-

4*

i

~~m

-OwAT

C-.

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL - page 4a NAME G. L. Fiser SSN TITLE/PG Chemistry & Env. Supt.

DATE PART III Employee Appraisal -

(To be completed at the end of each quarter)

Su-nary statement of the employee's performance during each quarter of the fiscal year as noted by the manager and discussed with the employee.

THIRD QUARTER Special NRC audit and INPO audits went very well.

Chemistry program has done very well.

A' SIG RE DATE EMPLOYEE DATE FOURTH QUARTER Continued good performance up to and including start of U2C4 refueling outage.

il-O-o DATE 11-790 DATE

  • '1

-9

  • ,'*. *../..;

.:.'-*;,*o

..*:*.'( '. -.....

  • ?./.-:,....

XANES G. L.F-

"'~"

'~

~TITLE/PG -Chemistry & Env. Supt"DATE

-p, S,

-(TO BE COMLETED B AKAGER)

DEVELOPMENT PLANS (considered the needs of both current and potential future.-i:'.,

8:.--.

¶ Z-A-- y.

  • .-.- '.. 4,;

.,,AreTo Be Developed.

L.edrship s...

!. '"Leadership skills

?-.-'. -..

workshop. EPRI conferencee-*-

DATE W

or. 44;e.

",-. -.4 AP HIGN

.4..-

0388u Y,. -

DA1-E3-9d DATE I

stI

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML021760066&oldid=5437025"