ML021760055

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TVA Employee Appraisal for Manager and Specialist Employees for G. Fiser, 9/26/89
ML021760055
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry, Watts Bar, Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/1989
From: Fiser G, Lagergren W, Vondra C
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
NRC/SECY
References
-RFPFR, 50-259-CIVP, 50-260-CIVP, 50-296-CIVP, 50-327-CIVP, 50-328-CIVP, 50-390-CIVP, ASLBP 01-791-01-CIVP, EA-99-234, RAS 3933
Download: ML021760055 (10)
v • d • e


Text

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL FOR MANAGER AND SPECIALIST EMPLOYEES for Fiscal Year ending September 30, 1989 NAME C. L.

p..gr ORGANIZATION LEVEL

SSN, IIA
l. i GROUP UP TITLEMýEt'51sitry Superintendent/M-9 OPERATION NPG TYPE POSITION (m or a) - Manager DIVISION SON MANAGER - W. R. Lagergren DEPARTMENT Plant Summary Statement of emvloveeas verformance votential:

5-..

4'-..-.

.9..

tot t1en nontanouelv.

Uhile aual ihemigt.rv renultn eta cood Hr. Vis*r's performance for MY8S was adequate and Improved to solid performan through the first three quarters of rY89. Through this period he demonstrate continued weaknesses in exxressiveness and communication skills.

Following specific discussions and coachinx in these areas. I have noted improvements.

although not to the degree I would have expected.

Personnel-related action i the weak-nesses noted last year persist.

Material condition improvements of chemistry ecuinment is niot being rushed adeouatelv

+S-i%4 i.

C. A. Vondra "DATE 9k1E9RP G. L. Fieer DATE

-4 1

.f.

41=

W n

9..

"St..'.

  • ev:.

o-,.....

p1 C.

d Us m

ecuivment to not beine vusbed adecuatelv B

4

EMPLOYEE APPRISL-as I

"d*AKE C, L*

.T.TLE/PG en Superintend ent /M-9 A

/.

S.S U-.-,\\'

  • r f

"r.---.,.

..,'tA.;'J

~

,J-* SI

'?.*

S":2NAME ",

v L,

Y~e'

    • J-.T*T P

t'e Su e'.

n*4 e den i-DAT FART

. A'..Perf.ormance ndards `-(o

'be completed at the be~in.Ln of

,.,.r:.

fiscal yeac) State the major accountabilities, specificprojects and/or assignments on which'the employee will be evaluated throughout the fisc

¥ ar,'--

S PERFORMANCE STANDARD TARGET DATE ICA-

  • ?*-*a V

.. ;. c

.4.;p MAAE W.

R.

LaegenD W it: - :L'

'**f t

".'g".,,'..

P

,YEAGE G. L. aser'.

DAT.

,5.

EXTHI"ERMAAGE.C A.Vodra"-

  • .j*

.EMPLLYEE, G. L.....e..

=

,,.o S

"a

Žj-rTJ-M;,~a~

~

  • ~*

Ir 1

W

7.

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL~ page 2a'~

RAKE G. L.

Iser

TITLE/PG Chem. Superintendent/H DATE -_.

PART I. A Performance Standards -: "(To be completed at* he tbeg:innin of the

.*-.-:-~-

fiscal year) State the major accountabilities, specific projects and/or..,.......

as*i.*

nments on which the employee will be evaluated throughout the fiscal ye r.-'

  • z 4'4

°

-'. 4

~A..

"MNAE W.

R.

Laege

,.,TIS EMPLOYEE',*

G. L. Floo DATE,'!::"

12Z;.r*.

mots*d t

.te a

eanndda n tm )

..4 L

.ANAG-RW.,..La:.r r-.DA.E NE.T.IGHERMANAER.C.A.-V.dra.-,:_;,.*.

-=

?'OE

. L i e

..,D TE.

.: **-.2:

  • Y 4,

4*.

4

,.:. -.. ;.-t; IGA*U*$(in~ct*.n ude'stnd.n th

e'£r~n Z
  • Lnad

[*

hjx

"*-
  • i**-:-,be e~en4-at JnU N E.

MOLOEE APRAIAL P&Q 2

NAME..

G r

TIL/GCe.S~ritnetM9 DT

~PART R. APerformance Setanad Anua Sumar -~J..

(To beop a

n of the fica year Stt

'4*poesacopibetsrl t

h ao NAME

= M.LL.

Fi/PeR TITLE/

Cheiu.XO DATEted1tN-AE

.4.7 7

4e-V-.,,

a, PARTI.BPerfrmace tandrdsAnnal S~ar To b copleed a th.ea

  • V.
4il,

, 7.~

4,,

4f.

4

,ý

"

A ':'.-'-4*

- -':, 

'-4..4a>'-..,-.

a.--.a-..

a 4

'444 



-'a'.:---

.. N.



Y -a-..

-1



ima'-

-

s'.,.



'4 9

  • h
  • .EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL -page 3'

R AKE G. L. Figer TITLE/PG Chem. Superintendent/M-9 DATE ____

SsN

  • PART 11 Behavioral Standards -(To be revised at the beginning of the fiscal

-~

year and evaluated at the end of the fiscal year) The following list, those

- ~I

-~ -~behavioral standards against which each employee should be evaluated.: The extent to which they are used will vary depending on the nature of the Y position of the employee and the type of organization. Others may be added as appropriate.

1.FEIBLTlwhib.

Conets Tends to follow rather than lead, therefore appears to be ut flexible.

Was not actually In Personnel areas associated with RIF 7

process.

2. DECISIOU-MAYCING low/

I high Commentu I feel that I have to have prompt decision malcint.

3.

DEPENDABILITY low/............/.A.........high Comments-Meets work schedule as assigned.

Tj

4. SELF-MOTIVATION low/..

X I/../high Commnents

7
5.

INFLUENCING OTHERS low 1

.... L.........X.......

high Comments Y

6. PROBLEM SOLVING AND ANALYSIS low X

/

1/

hh Cc wnnts

-7. TECHINICAL/PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE low ijX_/...../.....j.L high

't Comm~ents Technically very competent.

8.

INNOVATING low I

... L..

X high..

1 Cosments Not a risk taker.

9 OIRAL COMMUNICATIONS low /.....jI high Comments is not assertive and tends to talik around subiect.

Ij 4t

'A'A

.5..

  • T'-.

+

  • +

4~~~.

-- f...

3... -,.',

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL -

page 3a NAM' G.

L-Fiser TITLE/PG Chem Superintendent/M-9 DATE SF+,*:...

'J,:+'+-,*

10.

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS low

/

/

X

//

hih ig Commes.,.

Co.m......"e-n s, 4.

, 4....*

+ -.....-.

12.

'13.

14.
16.
17.
    • 44

+

..,-o:

"* "I,""

1 i-.:,++..

,d *+-I+,.:+

a.

19.

20.

4.-.

S

7.
  • *







SUPERVISING low/

high Comments Relies almost exclusively on power of position.

Does not spend sufficient time with RLA.

TEAMWORK low x

h!igh Comments Is a team player.

Concerned primarily with chemistry. but helps team Put in context.

PLANNING AND ORGANIZING low

/

/

/

/

/ high Comments SUPERVISORY IMPARTIALITY low x

I/

/

high Comments SUBORDINATE DEVELOPMENT low /

/

X_/

/ high Comments Has not prepared a subordinate to assume his position.

ORGAN1ZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE low /

-/

/ I

/

/ high Comments EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATIOM low /

Ix I

/ high Comments Does not -et message over clearly.

Tends not to answer questions directly.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT low

/

I

/

I high Comments low /

/

/

/

/ high Comments low

/

/

/

/ high Comments 2.4

  • _.. +

-L***

9166MMOMM" I'

T3 "4

'I

.*o-

KEMPLOYEE APPRAISAL-page 4 TITLE/PG Chem. Supe intendent/M-9 DATE N:

AM E G. L. V serý

'-',TI*

.'G th e "k. :.."PART III Employee Appraisal

" (To be completed at.he end of each quarter)

..-;Z Summary statement of the employee's performanco during each quarter of the fiscal year as noted by the manager and discussed with the employee.

.FIRST QUARTER 79

_kv4 4.,.

1V SIGNATURES:

"-MANAGER DATE

.EMPLOYEE DATE SECOND QUARTER.

-,-A SIGNATURES:

..,Z

..-
M A N A G E R D A T E.

DATA EMPLOYEE D T o*..,

,*...W.."

'-7 on

"E*PLOYEE APPRAISAL page 4a WAKE 0. L. Visor TITLE/PG Chem. Superintendent/M-9 DATE PART III Employee Appraisal, -

(To be completed at the end of each quarter)

Summary statement of the employee's performance during.each quarter of the fiscal year as noted by the manager and discussed with the employee.:

THIRD QUARTER v

. EM.POE DATE h

i o

.t q

.:*'+:.-.-,SIGNATURES:

  • +

H.'

ANAGER DAT-E:

..4-:

EMPLOYEE DATE FOURTH QUARTER Mr. Fiser has iroved in this querter.

Airessiven@53 and h

bands-on management of personnel Problems is s8till not where it should be for a superintendent.

He did perform well with a technical problem that arose this quarter (DG fuel aid sampling).

I need to see a more can-do attitude and active decision making in the future.......

Z

".. :_,¥ DATE..,.

Li-

.'V

-4,.., -.,

I-tkn O¥Et DATE 3

4,t 4

9

,15 I J

ale 5.

v

  • ~.~

EM""PLOYEE:

f

( O B O P E TH EM LO E

.E N AS SE S D..

t SsIL z.,

.*$serve as an aid *identifyingcareer..and developmental* opportunities whichf*

e

ý

-... are in line with both the ooals.of the employee and the'needs of,. ýhe :*,'A organization..:.. Your. supervisor:.is'to add his/her comments" discus information with you," sugest, a development plan (as appropriate),:.'and. fo"ard 2.

this information to the next level,of supervision.- You will h+v..an.

opportunity to update this information once a year, or you may.request that it

" be udated any time you desire.durinl the course of the year..'

I:.';- 5t..

S

5. "
5..

]

,5 CAREER INTERESTS

.l

/

-1.

Describe your career interests and goal., both short-and long-ter.*

  • o.'

QUALIFICATIONS

2.

Describe your main strengths which support your career Interests.

DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

3.

Please describe any activities you have undertaken to develop your knowledge, skills, or abilities so that you are better prepared to your career goals.

pursue

.Ib

' 5S. -

Vt:

5*.

SUPERVISOR'S COWENTS SIGNATURE:A, A'.'*i EMLOYEE DATE.

."*" 5".

-U--.

5,

  • 5I.**.

S.-

)*:

, 'r TJm

  • EE.

D~

e 4"

'p,;.'.

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL -

page 5a NAME C. L. Fiser TITLE/PG Chem. Superintendent/M-9 DATE

~.,.* -

ssM A.

(TO BE COMPLETED BY MANAGER)

DEVELOPMENT PLANS (conoldered the needs of both current and potential future au8sigriments)

Area To Be Developed

£ Actions 1

£

-,,. ressveess

£ Areae of weakness can only be "Co mancsoE£ corrected in a line management.

Co

~unication vertically

£ position with increased coaching/

£ counseling by myself.

£ More active involvement from me.

2

£ E

£,..*

£

£

~

I

.*..-,L-.

-2.

£ E

E E

E 2;_

AN DATE

,.-,EXT

-AIGýHER MANAGER D

.~

.'.1 t"

%b

.2

__"I.

ý91 f

..*,*7
  • ,.,.
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML021760055&oldid=5437026"