ML021490286
| ML021490286 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/11/2002 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML021490286 (1) | |
Text
U.S. NUCLEAK KR.EULR I uI'r CUMMISIUON NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK Meeting Meeting Conduct an annual assessment meeting to review Entergy's performance in Date:
April 11, 2002
Title:
operating the IP3 facility over the period April 1.2001 to December 31, 2001.
The NRC recognizes the public's interest in the proper regulation of nuclear activities and is committed to understanding and including public input into our decisions. The NRC seeks to elicit public involvement early in the regulatory process so that safety concerns that may affect a community can be resolved in a timely and practical manner. This process is considered vital to assuring the public that the NRC is making sound, balanced decisions about nuclear safety. If you would like more information about NRC, please visit our web site at www.nrc.gov.
- 1. Why did you attend this meeting?
F] a. I am a local resident N b. I work for an interested organization Di c. I am concerned about environmental issues
- d. I am concerned about economic issues
- e. Other
- 2. Were you familiar with the meeting topic prior to coming today?
n
- a. Very
- b. Somewhat D c. Not at all
- 3. How did you find out about this meeting?
- a. NRC mailing list D d. Internet II b. Newspaper
- e. Other D c. RadioITV
- 4. Have you attended an NRC meeting before?
F] a. Never Q c. 3 to 5 times n
- b. 1 or 2 times
[Z d. More than 5 times
- 5. Was sufficient notice given in advance of the meeting?
N a. Yes n-b. No
- 6. How well do you feel you understand the NRC's role with regard to the issues discussed today?
[;
- a. Very well n
- b. Somewhat n
- c. Not at all
- 7.
Were you able to find all of the supporting information you wanted prior to the meeting?
9
- a. Yes
[] b. I did not try to find any information D1c. No
- 8. Was the purpose of the meeting made clear in the preliminary information you received?
Ma. Yes F] b. No
- 9. In your opinion, were people's questions answered clearly, completely and candidly?
[Aa. Yes 1l b. No
- 10. Was the written material useful in understanding the topic?
91 a. Very D
- b. Somewhat El c. Not at all
- 11. Were NRC's presentations and material presented in clear, understandable language?
W a. Yes El b. No
- 12. In your opinion, did the meeting achieve its stated purpose?
Sa.
Yes Fi b. No
- 13. Has this meeting helped you with your understanding of the topic?
El a. Greatly
[Tb. Somewhat
[- c. Not at all
- 14. How well did NRC staff respond to your concerns at this meeting?
F a. My concerns were directly addressed F-] b. I was provided an alternate source of information to address my concerns
[I] c. I did not raise my concerns at this meeting
- d. I raised my concerns but am not satisfied with the response
- 15. Was adequate time allotted for discussion with NRC staff on the topic of today's meeting?
- a. Yes II b. No
- 16. How satisfied are you overall with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting?
[]a.
Very El b. Somewhat LI c. Not at all
- 17. Were the next steps in this process clearly explained, including how you can continue to be involved?
V a. Yes El b. No If you would like someone to contact you, please provide your name and phone number or email.
Name Telephone E-Mail OMB NO. 3150-0197 Expires: 06/30/2003 Public Protection Notification: If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to. the information collection.
Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.