|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML12200A4142012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (229) of Kimberly L. Prosser on Behalf of Brevard County Emergency Management, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML1020700442010-07-22022 July 2010
Comment (6) of Scott Boggs, on Behalf of Nextera Energy, on Proposed Rule PR-50, Regarding American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Codes and New and Revised ASME Code Cases
L-2009-230, 2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations2009-10-19019 October 2009
2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations
ML0929406172009-10-19019 October 2009
2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations
ML0828909442008-10-13013 October 2008
Comment (4) of Robert J. Hughes on Behalf of Florida Power and Light Company Regarding Proposed Rule Pr 73, Criminal Penalties; Unauthorized Introduction of Weapons.
L-2006-255, Comment (8) Submitted by Florida Pwr. and Light Company, Martin Gettler, on Supplemental Proposed Rule PR-2, 50, 51 and 52, Regarding Licenses Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants2006-11-14014 November 2006
Comment (8) Submitted by Florida Pwr. and Light Company, Martin Gettler, on Supplemental Proposed Rule PR-2, 50, 51 and 52, Regarding Licenses Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
ML0615600232006-05-26026 May 2006
Comment (13) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Company, J. A. Stall on Proposed Rules PR-1, 2, 10, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 72, 73, 75, 95, 140, 170 and 171 Re Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
L-2006-076, Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power and Light Company, J.A. Stall on Proposed Rule PR-50, Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Technical Requirements2006-03-15015 March 2006
Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power and Light Company, J.A. Stall on Proposed Rule PR-50, Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Technical Requirements
L-2005-266, Comment (71) Submitted by Florida Pwr & Light Co. and FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs2005-12-27027 December 2005
Comment (71) Submitted by Florida Pwr & Light Co. and FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs
L-2003-115, Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Co., J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 20032003-05-0202 May 2003
Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Co., J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003
ML0213300782002-05-0404 May 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on St. Lucie Environmental Impact Statement
ML0213300062002-05-0101 May 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Jim Woodfin on Extending the St. Lucie Facility'S License
ML0212605422002-04-30030 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on the Environmental Issue Scoping Proceedings for St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2
ML0212605022002-04-30030 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Stanley S. Smilan on St. Lucie Units 1 & 2 Relicensing
ML0212605282002-04-29029 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Sidney M. Ziring on Environmental Scoping for St. Lucie Units 1 & 2
ML0212605202002-04-29029 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Sara Case on Environmental Scoping for St. Lucie Units 1 & 2
ML0211904252002-04-24024 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on St. Lucie Environmental Impact Statement
ML0212605972002-04-24024 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Mark P. Oncavage on NRC Scoping Meeting for the St. Lucie Environmental Impact Statement
ML0213300212002-03-19019 March 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from William Vogel, the School Board of St. Lucie County, on Recommendation of Renewal of the Operating License for Florida Power and Light'S St. Lucie Plant
ML0210102472002-03-19019 March 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Renewal of the Operating License for Florida Power and Light'S St. Lucie Plant
2012-07-16
[Table view] |
Text
Jim Woodfin 8583 Sheridan Road Melbourne FL 32904-2127 Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration Mailstop T-6 D 59 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -//z .i5 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Hondas & St. Lucie Nuclear Power My 1986 Honda Accord was the most reliable automobile I have ever owned. Solid design and conscientious maintenance paid off-for 10 years and 120,000 miles, it was trouble-free. For an additional 5 years, extra maintenance was required, but it remained completely reliable. When at 15 years and 180,000 miles it left me stranded on 1-95, I was not pleased, but found no fault with the car, recognizing that no machine lasts forever.
Nuclear power plants are like Hondas-they don't last forever.
Nuclear power plants are different from Hondas-when they fail, the victims are not just inconvenienced travelers.
Recent events at many nuclear power plants suggest that they have already entered a period of higher maintenance and failure risks. When you consider extending the St. Lucie nuclear facility's license, I hope you will insist on a thorough accounting of the potential costs of safely maintaining this aging facility for 20 more years.
The cost impact analysis should include:
"* Risks of accidental radiation release from a nuclear energy facility
"* Risks of accidental radiation release from fuel transport and storage
"* Additional age-related risks due to materials corrosion, fatigue, and embrittlement
"* The potential of deliberate radiation release as a result of terrorist acts Thank you for performing the extremely valuable service of keeping our energy sources safe.
Sincerely, Woodfin
//'-Iý'-7-
