ML021270237
| ML021270237 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/14/2002 |
| From: | Primavera B - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Eselgroth P NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| Download: ML021270237 (2) | |
Text
U.n. EIU'LP.I. I'.5'JLD
I JI I '.UMMIaWUN Meeting Date:
March NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK 4
Meeting Conduct an End-Of-Cycle Review Meeting to Review Entergy's Performance in 14,2002
Title:
Operating the IP2 Facility Over the Period April 1. 2001 to December 31, 2001 The NRC recognizes the publids interest in the proper regulation of nuclear activities and is committed to understanding and including public input into our decisions. The NRC seeks to eli&it public involvement early in the regulatory process so that safety concems that may affect a community can be resolved in a timely and practical manner. This process is considered vital to assuring the public that the NRC is making sound, balanced decisions about nuclear safety. If you would like more informatior--...
about NRC, please visit our web site at www.nrc.gov.
- 1. Why did you attend this meeting?
- 10. Was the written material useful in understanding the
- a. I am a local resident topic?
LI b. I work for an interested organization
[2'a. Very
[] b. Somewhat [] c. Not at all
[]c.
I am concerned about environmental issues
- d. I am concerned about economic issues
- 11. Were NRC's presentations and material presented in LIe. Other clear, understandable language?
- 2. Were you familiar with the meeting topic prior to coming today?
iya.
Very
[] b. Somewhat E
- c. Not at all
- 3. How did you find out about this meeting?
LI a. NRC mailing list
- d. Internet Vrb. Newspaper We. Other Zc. Radio/TV
- 4. Have you attended an NRC meeting before?
F-a. Never n
- c. 3 to 5 times I.
1 or 2 times F] d. More than 5 times
- 5. Was sufficient notice given in advance of the meeting?
W a. Yes nI b. No
- 12. In your opinion, did the meeting achieve its stated purpose?
[(a.
Yes
-- b. No
- 13. Has this meeting helped you with your understanding of the topic?
[a.
Greatly
[j'b. Somewhat 0
- c. Not at all
- 14. How well did NRC staff respond to your concerns at this meeting?
[;a.
My concerns were directly addressed LI b. I was provided an alternate source of information to address my concerns
- 6. How well do you feel you understand the NRC's role with regard to the issues discussed today?.
[] c. I did not raise my concerns at this meeting
[] a. Very well
[/b.
Somewhat F c. Not at all
[] d. I raised my concerns but am not satisfied with the response
- 7.
Were you able to find all of the supporting information you wanted prior to the meeting?
- 15. Was adequate time allotted for discussion with NRC
[ýfa. Yes staff on the topic of today's meeting?
LI b. I did not try to find any information
- a. Yes
[] b. No L--c. No
- 8. Was the purpose of the meeting made clear in the
- 16. How satisfied are you overall with the NRC staff who preliminary information you received?
participated in the meeting?
[2. Yes
- b. No El a. Very
['.
Somewhat El c. Not at all
- 9. In your opinion, were people's questions answered
- 17. Were the next steps in this process clearly explained, dl*day, completely and candidly?
including how you can continue to be involyed?
,I
[;'a. Yes
[] b. No
[]a.
Yes
[b.
No 9r W If you would like someone to contact you, please provide your name and phone number or emil.
Name
- I1¶ j puv'//A, Telephone fYO(
E-Mai tOA,'i
&flAV4e" OMB NO. 31500197 E-xpk": 06rUO20o3 Pubic Protection Nofiftation: I a means used to impose an infonmatiof caction does not display a cuwy vylW OMB conedoxnmbr, the NRC may n conuc or spons, ad a pr*f-is wot r*t*d to rspond to, the oan{
cedmo Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.
1 F U. u%,,t.Xr r~U%7%^i.F*
% 0V
- MMIbZ5*IUN I
NRC is striving to improve its communications with the public and would appreciate any additional comments you may have on today's meeting:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE $300
-v I
I IILIE
a
NO POSTAGE 1STe NECESSARY 2rAPR F____ PM T7 KU Al
-1 DOU0II*IMr*,0.,
Mr-rf-'T IVII.-IL FIRST CLASS MAIL PERMIT NO. 12904-WASHINGTON DC POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-PETER W. ESEIGROTH, CHIEF PRoCJECts BANC02'
. DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECTS lU S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - REGION I J475 ALLENDALE RD KING OF PRUSSIA PA 19406-9866 IsnIIIsIuuIa.IIIg..gII,.tvI,,tumImuIIgtI.,ggIII
'Ti'.' oz
I.1