ML020880161
| ML020880161 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point |
| Issue date: | 03/19/2002 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2001-0256 | |
| Download: ML020880161 (2) | |
Text
PREDECISIONAL-NOT FOR RELEASE Indian Point 2 SG Tube Failure Lessons Learned Task Group Summary
-Interoffice Task Group established in accordance with Charter
-Objectives/Scope
-areas of improvement in NRC and Industry SG programs
-review of restart SE(terminated)
-considered OIG report findings and RES independent review
-did not take on DPO, 2.206, non SG issues
-No public stakeholder input yet
-Safety Significance
-Event had no impact on public health and safety
-TG agrees wtih SDP risk assessment insights
-Issues have generic implications
-Recommend IP2 experience be used in risk communication plans Industry
-ConEd
-Industry
-Licensee actions-Should request NEI/industry to coordinate
-NEI 97-06 Industry Initiative-Lessons should be incorporated Technical Specifications(requirements, leakage, reports)
Licensee Oversight of Vendors
-EPRI Guideline improvements NRC issue generic communication NRC Processes
"**Licensing
-Amendment review consistent with guidance
- Opportunities to pursue weaknesses in ConEd assessment
- Should have formal guidance for SG examination extensions
- TG believes that its not clear review results would change
- Event would have occurred with continuous operation w/o amend.
-Should improve guidance on information relied on in SEs
PREDECISIONAL-NOT FOR RELEASE
-Inspection
-Recommend improved guidance for SG baseline inspections
-Training should be reviewed relative to program objective
-NRC/Licensee telephone interaction should be put into a process
-SG technical information flow to inspectors should be improved
-Should assess PIs and program relative to trends in SG leakage
-Should establish risk informed SG degradation thresholds
-General
-Staff expertise/capability to support program objectives
-Review guidance for independent internal reviews RES Report Issues Addressed in the TG report
-If basis for 24 month extension adequate, 48d extension not significant
-Could not reconcile SE statements with information reviewed
-Thorough ConEd operational assessment would have predicted increased probability of rupture
-First U bend flaw, denting, hourglassing
-Flaw growth rates PREDECISIONAL-NOT FOR RELEASE