ML020870732

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Request for Additional Information Re Component Cooling Water System Protection from Natural Phenomena (Tac No. MB1955)
ML020870732
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2002
From: Milano P
NRC/NRR/DLPM
To: Kansler M
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Milano, P , NRR/DLPM, 415-1457
References
TAC MB1955
Download: ML020870732 (5)


Text

April 8, 2002 Mr. Michael R. Kansler Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING COMPONENT COOLING WATER SYSTEM PROTECTION FROM NATURAL PHENOMENA, INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 (TAC NO. MB1955)

Dear Mr. Kansler:

In a letter dated April 24, 2001, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO) submitted a proposed amendment to change the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 (IP3). The proposed amendment would revise the FSAR to relect the original plant design for the component cooling water (CCW) system. Specifically, ENO had identified that a portion of one loop of the CCW system is routed in the nonsafety-related portion of the fuel storage building.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the information provided in the April 24 submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. The specific questions are found in the enclosed request for additional information (RAI). During a telephone call on April 3, 2002, the ENO staff indicated that a response to the RAI would be provided within 45 days.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Patrick D. Milano, Sr. Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate 1 Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-286

Enclosure:

RAI cc w/encl: See next page

April 8, 2002 Mr. Michael R. Kansler Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING COMPONENT COOLING WATER SYSTEM PROTECTION FROM NATURAL PHENOMENA, INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 (TAC NO. MB1955)

Dear Mr. Kansler:

In a letter dated April 24, 2001, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO) submitted a proposed amendment to change the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 (IP3). The proposed amendment would revise the FSAR to relect the original plant design for the component cooling water (CCW) system. Specifically, ENO had identified that a portion of one loop of the CCW system is routed in the nonsafety-related portion of the fuel storage building.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the information provided in the April 24 submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. The specific questions are found in the enclosed request for additional information (RAI). During a telephone call on April 3, 2002, the ENO staff indicated that a response to the RAI would be provided within 45 days.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Patrick D. Milano, Sr. Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate 1 Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-286

Enclosure:

RAI cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC PDI-1 Reading S. Richards J. Munday P. Milano B. Thomas K. Manoly S. Little P. Eselgroth, RGN-I S. Jones B. P. Jain OGC ACRS Accession Number: ML020870732 OFFICE PDI-1:PM PDI-1:LA SPLB:SC EMCB:SC PDI-1:ASC NAME PMilano SLittle BThomas KManoly JMunday DATE 04/3/02 04/3/02 04/4/02 04/5/02 04/8/02 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 cc:

Mr. Jerry Yelverton Chief Executive Officer Entergy Operations 1340 Echelon Parkway Jackson, MS 39213 Mr. Robert J. Barrett Vice President - Operations Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 295 Broadway, Suite 3 P. O. Box 308 Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 Mr. Dan Pace Vice President Engineering Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. James Knubel Vice President Operations Support Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Joseph DeRoy General Manager Operations Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 295 Broadway, Suite 3 P. O. Box 308 Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 Mr. John Kelly Director - Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Ms. Charlene Fiason Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Harry P. Salmon, Jr.

Director of Oversight Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. James Comiotes Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 295 Broadway, Suite 3 P.O. Box 308 Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 Mr. John Donnelly Licensing Manager Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 295 Broadway, Suite 3 P.O. Box 308 Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 Mr. John McCann Manager, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 295 Broadway, Suite 1 P. O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Resident Inspectors Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 295 Broadway, Suite 3 P.O. Box 337 Buchanan, NY 10511-0337 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. John M. Fulton Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 cc:

Ms. Stacey Lousteau Treasury Department Entergy Services, Inc.

639 Loyola Avenue Mail Stop: L-ENT-15E New Orleans, LA 70113 Mr. William M. Flynn, President New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority Corporate Plaza West 286 Washington Avenue Extension Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. J. Spath, Program Director New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority Corporate Plaza West 286 Washington Avenue Extension Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. Paul Eddy Electric Division New York State Department of Public Service 3 Empire State Plaza, 10th Floor Albany, NY 12223 Mr. Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Mayor, Village of Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511 Mr. Ray Albanese Executive Chair Four County Nuclear Safety Committee Westchester County Fire Training Center 4 Dana Road Valhalla, NY 10592 Mr. Ronald Schwartz SRC Consultant 64 Walnut Drive Spring Lake Heights, NJ 07762 Mr. Ronald J. Toole SRC Consultant Toole Insight 605 West Horner Street Ebensburg, PA 15931 Mr. Charles W. Hehl SRC Consultant Charles Hehl, Inc.

1486 Matthew Lane Pottstown, PA 19465 Mr. Alex Matthiessen Executive Director Riverkeeper, Inc.

25 Wing & Wing Garrison, NY 10524 Mr. Paul Leventhal The Nuclear Control Institute 1000 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 410 Washington, DC, 20036 Mr. Karl Copeland Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic 78 No. Broadway White Plains, NY 10603 Jim Riccio Greenpeace 702 H Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001

Enclosure REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING PROTECTION OF THE COMPONENT COOLING WATER SYSTEM FROM NATURAL PHENOMENA INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 (IP3)

DOCKET NO. 50-286 In a letter dated April 24, 2001, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee) submitted a proposed amendment to revise the Final Safety Analysis Report for IP3 to reflect the original plant design for the component cooling water (CCW) system. The licensee identified that a portion of one loop of the CCW system is routed in the non-safety-related portion of the fuel storage building. The NRC staff has the following questions regarding the information provided in the proposed amendment related to protection from natural phenomena and essential functions of the CCW system:

1.

Confirm whether the design assumptions and acceptance criteria used in your re-evaluation of the fuel storage building (FSB) for natural phenomena are consistent with your current licensing basis. If not, describe the differences and why acceptable.

2.

Describe the basis for the statement in Attachment II to your letter dated April 24, 2001, that the plant design basis is a single tornado missile.

3.

Describe the basis for the statement in Attachment II to your letter dated April 24, 2001, that a tornado would not cause a break or loss of function to the larger CCW piping or the heat exchanger it cools. Include a description of the method used in evaluating tornado effects and significant assumptions.

4.

Describe the dependancy of the charging pumps on CCW cooling for the reactivity control and the pressurizer pressure and level control functions.

5.

Discuss the seismic qualification of the spent fuel pit heat exchanger and the CCW piping and supports in the FSB including the seismic input used in the analysis. Provide a summary of the evaluation results.