ML020870050
| ML020870050 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/14/2002 |
| From: | Eselgroth P Reactor Projects Region 1 Branch 4 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 02-008 | |
| Download: ML020870050 (54) | |
Text
NRC FORM 658 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL OF MEETING HANDOUT MATERIALS FOR IMMEDIATE PLACEMENT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN This form is to be filled out (typed or hand-printed)by the person who announced Person who issued the meeting notice). the meeting (i.e., the The completed form, and the attached materials, will be sent to the Document copy of meeting handout Control Desk on the same day of the circumstances will this be done later meeting; underno than the working day after the meeting.
Do not include proprietarymaterials.
DAEOF MEETING The attached document(s), which was/were 3/14/02 handed out in this meeting, is/are to be in the public domain as soon as possible. placed The minutes of the meeting will be issued near future. Following are administrative in the details regarding this meeting:
Docket Number(s) 50-247 Plant/Facility Name Indian Point 2 TAC Number(s) (ifavailable)
Reference Meeting Notice 02-008 Purpose (copy fromof meeting Meeting notice) Conduct an end-of.-cycle review meeting to review Entergy's performance in operating facility over the period 4/1/01 the IP-2
- 12/31/2001.
NE OPER N ISSUED MEETIN -NOTI E:I Peter W. Eselgroth Chief, Projects Branch 2 OFFICLE Region I DIVISIN Divi*donoof Reactor Projects Projects Branch 4 Distribution of this form and attachments:
Docket File/Central File PUBLIC NRC FORM 658 (9-1999)
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Thtsfonm was designed using kiFomis
,INDIAN POINT 2 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT MEETING PEEKSKILL, NEW YORK - MARCH 14,2002 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION - REGION I KING OFPRUSSIA, PA
AGENDA
"*INTRODUCTION
"*NRC RESPONSE TO 9111
- BACKGROUND REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM
, NRC REGULATORY APPROACH
"*ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER
SUMMARY
(APRIL - DECEMBER 2001)
"*NRC CONTINUED OVERSIGHT
"*LICENSEE PRESENTATION
"*NRC AVAILABLE TO ADDRESS QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
NRC Response to 9/11 Highest Level of Security Maintained Comprehensive Review of Security Closely Coordinated Response With:
- Our Licensees
- FBI
- Military, State, and Local Agencies
- Intelligence Conununities
"*Issued Security Advisories
- Increased Patrols
- Augmented Security Capabilities
- Added Barriers and Posts
- More Limited Access
- Enhanced Security Awareness
"* Issued Order on Security
"*NRC Monitoring Enhanced Security
REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM PROVIDES ASSURANCE PLANTS ARE OPERATING SAFELY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS RISK INFORMED PROCESS USES OBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS USES INSPECTIONS FOCUSED ON KEY SAFETY AREAS
"*DEFINES EXPECTED NRC & LICENSEE ACTIONS
Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas
-1 Safety Cornerstones Action Matrix I
IRegulatory Response
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS &
INSPECTION FINDINGS DEFINITION
- PERFORMANCE INDICATORS GREEN: NRC BASELINE INSPECTION WHITE: MAY RESULT IN INCREASED NRC OVERSIGHT YELLOW: MINIMAL REDUCTION INSAFETY MARGIN AND REQUIRES ADDITIONAL NRC OVERSIGHT
, RED: REDUCTION INSAFETY, BUT ADEQUATE PROTECTION TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY IS MAINTAINED; FOCUSED NRC OVERSIGHT mINSPECTION FINDINGS GREEN: VERY LOW SAFETY ISSUE WHITE: LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY ISSUE YELLOW: SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY ISSUE SRED: HIGH SAFETY ISSUE
Inspection Areas Safegua Emergency Prpadess Phsia Proecio Inspection Procedures
"*Adverse Weather "*Operability Evaluation 0 Excercise Evaluation "*Sec Authorization
"*Evaluation of Changes "*Operator Workarounds 0 Alert and Notice Access
"*Equipment Alignment "*Permanent Mods-Online 0 ERO Augment "*Sec Search
"*Fire Protection "*Permanent Mods
- EAL "*Sec Response
"*Flood Protection "*Post Maintenance Test 0 EP Preparation "*Sec Plan change
"*Heat Sink "*Refueling Outage
- Drill Evaluation
"*In Service Inspection "*SSDI
- RAD Access
"*Operator Requalification "*Surveillance Testing 0ALARA Plan
"*Maintenance Rule Imp "*Temporary Modifications
- RAD monitoring
"*Maintenance Risk Assessment "*PI&R 0 RAD Effluents
"*Non-Routine Events "*Event Follow-up
- RAD Transport
"*PI Verification .".A t-% .aIVUUIIIIKIII
National Summary of Plant Performance End of Calendar Year 2001 Licensee Response 74 Regulatory Response 24 Degraded Cornerstone 4 Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 1 Unacceptable 0 Total Plants 103
National Summary mPerfonmance Indicator Results 4th Qtr Calendar Yr 2001 SGreen 1834 SWhite 8 o Yellow 0 o Red: 0
- Total Inspection Findings (April 2001 - December 2001) o Green 660 o White 23 o Yellow 2 SRed 0
Action Matrix Concept Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Degraded Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Cornerstone Performance
-7ý Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions
NRC ACTION MATRIX Licensee Response Regulatory Response Degraded Cornerstone Multiple/ Repetitive Unacceptable Column Column Column Degraded Cornerstone Performance I Column - Column All Assessment Inputs One or Two White One Degraded Repetitive Degraded Overall Unaccepi (Performarnce Inputs (in different Cornerstone (2 White Cornerstone, Multiple Performance; Plar'"
F* Indicators (PIs) and cornerstones) in a Inputs or I Yellow Degraded Not Permitted to
.1 Inspection Findings) Strategic Performance Input) or any 3 White Cornerstones, Multiple Operate Within this Cornerstone Area; Cornerstone Inputs In a Strategic Yellow Inputs, or I Red Band. Unacceptal SGre WL Objectivess Fully Met Performance Area; Input; Cornerstone Margin to Safety FOFCornerstone Objectives Objectives Met with Met with Minimal Longstanding Issues or Reduction in Safety Significant Reduction In
-. _., Margin Safety Margin Regulatory None Branch Chief (BC) or DD or Regional RA (or EDO) Meet with Commission meeting Performance Meeting Division Director (DD) Administrator (RA) Senior Licensee with Senior Licensee Meet with Licensee Meet with Licensee Management Management Licensee Action Licensee Corrective Licensee Corrective Licensee Self Licensee Performance
!.1, Action Action with NRC Assessment with NRC Improvement Plan with NOversight Oversight NRC Oversight I NRC Inspection Risk-Informed Baseline Baseline and Baseline and Baseline and If U) Inspection supplemental supplemental supplemental Program inspection procedure inspection procedure inspection procedure 95001 95002 95003 I Regulatory Actions None Supplemental Supplemental -10 CFR 2.204 DFI Order to Modify, Inspection only Inspection only -10 CFR 50.54(f) Letter Suspend, or Revr!---,
- CAL/Order Licensed Ativitle H Assessment Reports BC or DD review/sign DD review/sign RA review/sign RA review/sign assessment report (w/ assessment report assessment report assessment report inspection plan) (w/ inspection plan) (w/ Inspection plan) (w/ inspection plan)
-- _ __ _ _ _ Commission Informed I Annual Public Meeting SRI or BC Meet with BC or DD Meet with RA (or designee) EDO (or Commission) Commission Meel 0
SLicensee Licensee Discuss Performance Discuss Performance with Senior Licensw, with Licensee with Senior Licensee Management I Management SNrRLEAqINPSAF=TSGNIFIAN('F 2
2001 OVERVIEW
' . . .... ... I........ . .......... ..
"*95003 INSPECTION '(JANUARY - FEBRUARY)
"*REGULATORY PERFORMANCE MEETING (APRIL) o-95003 RESULTS FOLLOWUP ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MEETING (JUNE)
"*EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION (JUNE)
LICENSE TRANSFER FROM CONED TO ENTERGY (SEPTEMBER)
OPERATOR REQUAL CREW FAILURES (OCTOBER-NOVEMBER)
REGULATORY PERFORMANCE MEETING (DECEMBER) o.ENTERGY SELF-ASSESSMENT
SUMMARY
IP2 OVERSIGHT PROCESS STRUCTURED, DISCIPLINE IMPLEMENTATION OF ROP ACTION MATRIX 95003 INSPECTION - FOUNDATION FOR IP2 OVERSIGHT PLAN CONSISTENT FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES CLOSE OVERSIGHT BY STANDING, INTER-OFFICE TECHNICAL COORDINATION AND COMMUNICATION TEAMS OPENNESS TO EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS APPROPRIATE ADJUSTMENTS IN NRC ACTIVITIES
95003 INSPECTION
- WEAKNESSES IN:
, DESIGN CONFIGURATION CONTROL HUMAN PERFORMANCE EQUIPMENT RELIABILITY EMERGENCY PREPARDNESS
, PIR/CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
'We will continue heightened oversight of IP2 until we gain confidence that your performance improvement program has substantially addressed the performance weaknesses identified in this and previous NRC inspections"
Indian Point 2 Inspection Activities (Jan 1 - Dec 31,2001)
- At about 11,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of inspection related activity
- Two resident inspectors, many times augmented
- 13 inspections by regional inspectors o.Includes 3 team inspections
- Inspection Findings 44 GREEN findings S1 YELLOW finding
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER
SUMMARY
"*IP2 BEING OPERATED SAFELY AND AN ACCEPTABLE MARGIN OF SAFETY EXISTS
"*IP2 REMAINS INMULTIPLE/REPETITIVE DEGRADED CORNERSTONE COLUMN CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES SPROBLEM IDENTIFICATION & RESOLUTION HUMAN PERFORMANCE CONTINUED HEIGHTENED OVERSIGHT AND INSPECTION
NEXT STEPS INSPECTIONS ENTERGY SELF-ASSESSMENT INSPECTION (JANUARY)
OPERATOR REQUAL SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION (MARCHIAPRIL)
SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION (JUNE/JULY)
HUMAN PERFORMANCE EQUIPMENT RELIABILITY DESIGN CONFIGURATION CONTROL CORRECTIVE ACTION SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION - IF NECESSARY (DECEMBER)
- OTHER
, HEAT SINK (APRIL)
RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENTS (DECEMBER)
PROB IDENT & RESOLUTION (DECEMBER)
NEXT STEPS OVERSIGHT & ASSESSMENT FUNDAMENTALS IMPROVEMENT PLAN MEETING (FEBRUARY)
REVIEW PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PERIODIC MANAGEMENT MEETINGS REVIEW PROGRESS AGAINST PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT METRICS CONTINUED OVERSIGHT, INCLUDING SECURITY mCONTINUED OPENNESS TO PUBLIC
QUESTIONS &ANSWERS PLEASE FEEL FREE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS THROUGH THE "NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK" FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE THE TOPICS DISCUSSED CAN BE FOUND AT: www.nrc.gov Reactor Oversight Process http://www.nrc.gov/NRRIOVERSIGHTIASSESS/index.htmI Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.htmI Public Document Room 1-800-397.4209 (Toll Free)
'--Entergy-- Rev 12 End of Cycle Plant Performance Review Indian Point Unit 2 March 14, 2002
Agenda
- Overview Fred Dacimo, Vice President Operations
- Performance Larry Temple, Plant Indicators General Manager Paul Rubin, Operations Manager Geoff Schwartz, Director of Engineering
Overview of Performance Fred Dacimo Vice President, Operations
Indian Point 2 Improvement Strategy Focus on Leadership Focus on Operations Leverage Corporate Support
Leadership is the Foundation of Improvement V *Standards and Expectations V Alignment V* Accountability I A19
Operational Focus
- Operator Training r
i High Impact Training
- Human Performance Program
- Observational Skills/ Simulator
- Effective Corrective Actions Program
Corporate Support V Commitment to Indian Point g Bench Strength
- Procedures and Practices
- Peer Groups
Maintaining Operational Focus in an Era of Rapid Change
- New Processes
- Maximo- work control
- PCRS- problem identification and resolution
- Post 9/11 Environment
- r Site Integration
Safety Conscious Work Environment 0000D Safety Culture Survey nnn00 Safety Conscious Work Environment Training 0000* Fair, Square and Legal Training for managers I1
Fundamentals Improvement Plan Extensive Self-Assessment Focused on Results S... .. * * " -* - * .
- . A.
- . o-
Performance Indicators Larry Temple I -y Plant General Manager
Human Performance Error Rate
"--Entergy M Rate -Site Goal ,Annual Average I
0.9 0.8 0.7
- 0. 4 K ICr 0~
- 0. EI\
U- 0. 4
- 0. I I
- 0. 2
- 0. 1 _____
Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Nov-02 Dec-02
Industrial Safety Accident Rate Entergy SMonthly -Top Quartile/Decile -- 1-Yeai 2.00 1.80 1.60 I1
- . 1.40 '1 g 1.20 I1 0
U 1.00 C
0.80 S0.60 It.
0.40 0.20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0Goal0"00 0 = ,
0.00 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Nov-02 Dec-02
Number of Open CR CD I
CD, C"
CD, CD P9 m 0
9:
0 0
t41 0
0 0
0 0
- 0
-0 CD
'Entow Average Age of Open Corrective Actions SL I & 2 M SU WE SIP 200 180 160 140 120 ca 0 100 80 60 40 20 0
SCP-01 (ki-01 NOV-0 I Dec-01 la"2 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Stp-02 OrA-02 Nov-02 Doc-02
Performance Indicators Paul Rubin I A, Operations Manager
~-~Ltergy Corrective Maintenance Backlog Total CMV -Workdown Plan 600 500 Goal < 200 Before RFO 400 - _____
300 - __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
200 - - - - _ __
100 - -- -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
0-.- - - 1~~-- --
Sep-01 Oct-01 Nbv-01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 N~r-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Sep-02 -Oct-02 Nov-02 Dek)c- 02 Indicaor is measured at dhe end of the month
mEntergy Central Control Room CCRDIs and Alarms
- Alarms - CCRDI - CCFEJI Goal 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
0-Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
Operator Compensatory Measures
ýEntergy M Workarounds = Burdens 24 22 20 18 Goal < I Workaround 16 0 Workarounds for January 2002 Ft February 2002 14 12 10 8
6 4
2 0 -I-Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 Dec-01 0 I0 Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Au-02 Se"-2 Oct-02 Nov-02 Deck02
-ýEntieW~ Procedure Feedback
- tNbimber Now -ToWa Backlog 500 450 400 Goal < 120 Day Turn Around 350 300 4'250 2GO0 IS0 100 50 0
Sep-Of Oct-01 Nov01 Dec01l Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apir-O2 May-02 JiM02 hbil02 'Aug-02 'Oct-02 'Nov02z Dec-02
Days 0 _ _ _ _ _ -4 i ____
co 0
6 z
0 0
mmmmm.. ..
..... mmmm 6
CL C5 c
CD C-CD CD
Entergy Licensed Operator Re-qualification Success Index MA Trairing index cn C Training Index ED Training Index Ei E Training Index
- F Training Index w Staff X ndex U Slaff Y ndex 100 95 90 865 M B 75 70 85 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nbv-0I UK-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 May-02 Apr-02 hty. 02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-,02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Nbv-02 Dec-02
Performance Indicators Geoff Schwartz Director, Engineering I
Engineering Focus Items LZ Equipment performance and reliability Li Design Basis projects 1[14
OBEnteigy Systems in a(1) Status System Engineering Department Maintenance Rule Indicators - Past Twelve Months SUNo. in Monitoring
- 15 20 I(0 1
Cn E
G)5 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Frequency per Month I
PE Pol0 6
f9 t0
ý-EnteWg Temporary Facility Changes IFCS 1n~ta1d . . - WOrkdOWr Plan - Ste Goal 45 40 35
< 15 Goal 30 M M 10 25 20 15 to 5.
0- I I I Sep-0l Oct-01 Nov-01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb)-02 Mar- 02 Ar0 Apr--02 a-2J-2Jl0Jun-02 NUy-02 JaM tg0 Aug-02 e-2Ot0 Sep-02 Oct-02 o-2Dc0 Dec-02 Nov-02
is Entergy Design Basis Project Corrective Action Backlog I
IP2 Design Basis Initiative ICA Backlog Reduction Workoff Curve 700 600 500 0,
E 400 4-'
300 200 100 0-10131/01 11/30/01 12/31/01 1/31/02 2V28/02 3X31/02 4/30/02 5/31/02 6/30/02 7/31102 8/31/02 9/30/02 10/31/02 Months
inEuterg} Design Basis Project Preventive Maintenance Optimization (Component) 25,000
_.__lll231134-20,000.
17253 II
-l -a 0 15,000 0
E 0o 10,000 M Tt Component Review
/ Actual Compnents Cumulative Review 5,000 -- Component Cumlative Review no 0-2001 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2M0
EntenkW Design Basis Project Preventive Maintenance Optimization (Systems)
.hEntery Design Basis Project Calculation/Specification Roadmap 14 12 10 4
8 0
0 6
4 2
0~
302000 402000 1Q2001 2Q2001 3Q2001 402001 102002 202002 3Q2002 4Q2002 102003 2Q2003 Time Scale
Entergy Design Basis Project Design Basis Documents
Closing Remarks Fred Dacimo Vice President, Operations
Performance Indicators
-t I
-o (A
"(I