ML020770071
| ML020770071 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/2002 |
| From: | Nettles K South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML020770071 (6) | |
Text
Kenneth W. Nettles General Manager, Nuclear Support Services 803.345.4752 Very truly yours, SBR/KWN/sr Attachment c:
N. 0. Lorick S. A. Byrne N. S. Cams T. G. Eppink (w/o Attachment)
R. J. White L. A. Reyes G. E. Edison NRC Resident Inspector K. M. Sutton L. C. Hipp H. C. Lyons R. E. Enkeboll W. R. Higgins NSRC RTS (0-L-99-0402)
File (818.02-20, RR 2000)
DMS (RC-02-0026)
SCE&G I Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station - P. 0. Box 88. Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065
- T (803) 345.5209 -www.scona.com
&C)C>A 40
=ý ýIm
- March 1, 2002 A SCANA COMPANY Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION DOCKET NO. 50/395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 FITNESS FOR DUTY - SEMIANNUAL REPORT As required by 1 OCFR26.71 (d), attached is the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station's Fitness for Duty Report for the period from July 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001. This report includes the required test results, data analyses and a summary of management actions taken as a result of the testing.
Should you have any questions, please call Ms. Janet Thiel (803-345-4272) at your convenience.
FFD-105 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 1 OF 2 REVISION 2 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10CFR 26 South Carolina Electric & Gas Comp~anv Company V. C. Summer Nuclear Station, Jenkinsville, SC Location Leslie Hipp/Janet Thiel Contact Name Cutoffs:
Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50 / 10 Amphetamines Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine Opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (% BAC)
December 31, 2001 6 Months Ending (803)345-4705/345-4272 Phone (include area code)
[-i Appendix A to 10CFR 26 1000 / 500 25 / 25
.04 Testing Results Licensee Employees Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with 710 166 130 Unescorted Access Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Prp-Access 28 0
PS 0
50 For Pst accident 0
0 Q
0 Cause Observed behavior 1
0 0
0 1
1 Random 187 0
35 0
7 0
Follow-ur 5
0 0
0 0
0 Other 1
0 2
0 13 0
Total 222 0
62 0
36 1
FFD-1 05 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 2 OF 2 REVISION 2 CHANGE A BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES Marijuana*
Cocaine Opiates Amphe-Phency-Alcohol Refusal to Adulterated tamines clidine Test Substituted Licensee 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Employees 0
Long-Term 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Contractors 0
Short-Term Contractors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
Total o00 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
A
- Lower cut off levels than Appendix A to 10 CFR26 required. Upper number represents total number of confirmed positives per population group while the lower number indicates how many of these positives were detected due to lower cut off level.
V.C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION FITNESS FOR DUTY
SUMMARY
10 CFR 26.71(d) REQUIREMENTS FOR JULY 01, 2001 - DECEMBER 31, 2001 MANAGEMENT ACTIONS A.
Positive Test Results:
There were no confirmed positive test results during this reporting period.
There was one Refusal to Test during this reporting period. The result and subsequent management actions can be categorized as follows:
Refusal to Test:
There was one short -term employee who refused to be tested on a For-Cause test. This individual's unescorted access authorization was permanently revoked and employment was terminated.
B.
Split Samples:
No split samples were shipped to the back-up laboratory for testing during this reporting period.
C.
For-Cause Tests:
There were two For-Cause tests conducted during this reporting period. One test resulted from a permanent employee following inadequate procedural adherence. This individual tested negative.
There was one For-Cause test attempted on a short-term contractor for observed behavior. This individual refused to test and this individual's unescorted access authorization and employment were permanently revoked.
I
DATA ANALYSIS A.
Random Testing:
There were 229 random tests conducted during this reporting period with no confirmed positive tests. This constitutes a positive random test rate of 0%.
There were 457 random tests conducted in 2001 with an average population of 896, resulting in an annual random testing rate of 51%.
There were 28 random collections performed on backshift, weekends, and holidays during this reporting period.
B.
Lower Cut-off Levels:
The lower cut-off level for marijuana resulted in no confirmed positive tests.
C.
Blind Performance Testing:
During the third quarter of 2001, there were 170 genuine specimens and 20 blind performance test specimens submitted to the primary testing laboratory, which constitutes a blind performance test rate of 11.76%. In the fourth quarter of 2001, there were 151 genuine specimens and 20 blind performance test specimens submitted to the primary testing laboratory, which constitutes a blind performance test rate of 13.25%.
During the third quarter of 2001, there were no genuine specimens and 5 blind performance test specimens submitted to the back-up laboratory.
During the fourth quarter of 2001, there were no genuine specimens and no blind performance specimens submitted to the back-up laboratory for testing.
In both quarters, the percentage of positive and negative blind performance specimens submitted was 20% and 80%, respectively. All drugs tested by our program were included in the positive specimens. There were no discrepant test results.
D.
Population Groups:
One short-term contractor was responsible for a Refusal to Test after being identified for a For-Cause Test. This individual's unescorted access and employment were terminated.
2
E.
Contractor/Vendor Programs:
There were no pre-access tests conducted by contractors/vendors with approved fitness for duty programs during this reporting period.
REPORTABLE EVENTS There were no reportable events during this reporting period.
SUMMARY
In conclusion, as a result of the low rate of substance abuse among personnel enrolled at the V. C. Summer Nuclear Station, SCE&G maintains an effective Fitness for Duty Program. Providing a work environment free from the effects of drugs and alcohol remains a high priority for SCE&G.
3