ML011380410
| ML011380410 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/15/2001 |
| From: | Collins S, Travers W NRC/EDO, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Blough A, Brockman K, Ferdig M, Floyd S, Garchow D, Hill R, Krich R, Laurie R, Moorman J, Reynolds S, Scherer A, Setser J, Shadis R, James Trapp Exelon Generation Co, Ferdig, New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution, NRC Region 1, Division Reactor Projects I, NRC/RGN-III, Division Reactor Projects III, NRC Region 4, NRC/RGN-IV/DRP, Nuclear Energy Institute, Public Service Enterprise Group, Southern California Edison Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co, State of CA, Energy Commission, State of GA, Dept of Natural Resources |
| Monninger JD NRR/ADIP 415-3495 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML011380410 (14) | |
Text
June 15, 2001 Mr. A. Randolph Blough Director - Division of Reactor Projects, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415
Dear Mr. Blough:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. Kenneth E. Brockman Director - Division of Reactor Projects, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harris Tower, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064
Dear Mr. Brockman:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Ms. Mary A. Ferdig Principal, Ferdig, Inc.
Organization Research and Development 2419 South 102nd Street Omaha, NE 68124
Dear Ms. Ferdig:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. Steve D. Floyd Senior Director - Regulatory Reform Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street N.W., Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708
Dear Mr. Floyd:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. David F. Garchow Vice President - Operations PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, (MS-X04)
Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038
Dear Mr. Garchow:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. Richard D. Hill General Manager - Support - Farley Project Southern Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 1295 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295
Dear Mr. Hill:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. Rod M. Krich Director of Licensing MW ROG Exelon Suite 500, 1400 Opus Place Downers Grove, IL 60515
Dear Mr. Krich:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. Robert A. Laurie Commissioner - California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-31 Sacramento, CA 95814-5512
Dear Mr. Laurie:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. James H. Moorman, III Senior Resident Inspector - Palo Verde Site U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harris Tower, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064
Dear Mr. Moorman:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. Steven A. Reynolds Deputy Director - Division of Reactor Projects, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL 60532-4351
Dear Mr. Reynolds:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. A. Edward Scherer Manager, Nuclear Oversight and Regulatory Affairs Southern California Edison Company P.O. Box 128, MS D4C San Clemente, CA 92674
Dear Mr. Scherer:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. James L. Setser Chief - Program Coordination Branch Environmental Protection Division Department of Natural Resources 205 Butler Street, Suite 1152 East Tower Atlanta, Georgia 30334
Dear Mr. Setser:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. Raymond G. Shadis New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution P.O. Box 76 Edgecomb, Maine 04556
Dear Mr. Shadis:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
June 15, 2001 Mr. James M. Trapp Senior Reactor Analyst U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415
Dear Mr. Trapp:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/RA/
William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations
Mr. A. Randolph Blough June 15, 2001 Director - Division of Reactor Projects, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415
Dear Mr. Blough:
We are writing to thank you for taking part in the activities of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process Initial Implementation Evaluation Panel (IIEP). As a panel member, you provided valuable input representing your specific interests and your experiences with the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP). Your diligent work along with that of the other panel members helped achieve the consensus view that the ROP is a notable improvement over the NRCs previous licensee performance assessment program and that it should be continued. The NRC will evaluate the various issues and recommendations provided by the panel, and make the refinements and improvements necessary to further achieve the agencys performance goals.
Your frank and open discussions provided for effective communications between the various members of the panel and the organizations that they represented. Through these types of interactions with our stakeholders, we will continue to improve the NRCs regulatory programs to ensure our common goal of protection of public health and safety.
The work of the IIEP required a significant amount of your personal time, including attending multiple meetings at the NRCs Headquarters and Region II. We thank you for your personal investment in this effort and the support provided by your organization.
This exact same letter was sent to the Sincerely, following PPEP panel members: /RA/
Mr. A. Randolph Blough Mr. Kenneth E. Brockman Samuel J. Collins, Director Ms. Mary A. Ferdig Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mr. Steve D. Floyd Mr. David F. Garchow Mr. Richard D. Hill /RA/
Mr. Rod M. Krich Mr. Robert A. Laurie William D. Travers Mr. James H. Moorman, III Executive Director Mr. Steven A. Reynolds for Operations Mr. A. Edward Scherer Mr. James L. Setser Mr. Raymond G. Shadis Mr. James M. Trapp Distribution: HMiller, JDyer, EMerschoff ADAMS: ML011380410 Template: NRR-106 OFC NRR/ADIP Region II D:NRR EDO NAME JMonninger LPlisco via SCollins WTravers Phone DATE 05/16/01 05/18/01 06/13/01 06/15/01 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY