ML003745102

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1104, Draft Standard Review Plan for License Renewal, Draft Generic Aging Lessons Learned Report, and Public Workshop
ML003745102
Person / Time
Site: PROJ0690
Issue date: 08/30/2000
From: Charemagne Grimes
NRC/NRR/DRIP/RLSB
To: Walters D
Nuclear Energy Institute
Grimes C, NRR/DRIP, 415-1183
Shared Package
ML003745183 List:
References
Download: ML003745102 (4)


Text

August 30, 2000 Mr. Douglas J. Walters Mr. David Lochbaum Nuclear Energy Institute Union of Concerned Scientists 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 1707 H Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006-3708 Washington, DC 20006-3919

SUBJECT:

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE DG-1104, DRAFT STANDARD REVIEW PLAN FOR LICENSE RENEWAL, DRAFT GENERIC AGING LESSONS LEARNED REPORT, AND PUBLIC WORKSHOP Gentlemen:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is issuing a set of documents that constitute improved guidance for license renewal for formal public comment. Enclosed is a copy of the Federal Register notice announcing the availability of the documents, requesting comments, and announcing a public workshop. Copies of the following documents are enclosed with this letter for your convenience, and will be available on our web site for anyone you may want to inform who might want to comment:



Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1104, Standard Format and Content for Applications to Renew Nuclear Power Plant Operating Licenses and the endorsed Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) guidance document NEI 95-10, Industry Guideline for Implementing the Requirements of 10 CFR Part 54The License Renewal Rule, Revision 2.



A draft Standard Review Plan for License Renewal, Standard Review Plan for the Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants



A draft Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) report As described in the Federal Register notice, we will hold a public workshop on Monday, September 25, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the guidance documents and facilitate the development of formal comments. The staff is requesting that all comments on these draft reports be submitted by October 16, 2000. We are particularly interested in comments that will focus on the fundamental question of the extent to which existing programs adequately manage aging effects for the structures and components within the scope of license renewal. To that end, we encourage you to involve individuals and organizations who can comment on (1) how well the improved guidance articulates the attributes of existing programs that adequately manage applicable aging effects, and (2) how well the improved guidance identifies those areas where existing programs should be augmented. We would hope that the comments would include supporting justification in enough detail for the staff to evaluate the need for changes in the guidance, as well as references to operating experience, industry standards or other relevant reference materials that provide a sound technical basis for such changes. We are also interested in comments that will improve the clarity of the documents so that the improved guidance will ensure a stable and predictable evaluation standard for future renewal applicants.

August 30, 2000 Editorial and style comments are not necessary because we expect that the guidance documents will need to be reformatted and edited before they are finalized. We also intend to incorporate formatting changes that result from further improvements to the standard form and content for renewal applications.

The issuance of these draft documents for public comment is an important milestone for the license renewal program. We look forward to working with you and other stakeholders to develop constructive comments that will improve the safety benefits, effectiveness and efficiency of the license renewal process. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Raj Anand at 301-415-1146.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Christopher I. Grimes, Chief License Renewal and Standardization Branch Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Project No. 690

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/encl: See next page

- ML003745102 G:\\RLSB\\SEBROSKY\\IRGLETTER.WPD

  • See previous concurrence OFFICE LA:DRIP*

PM:RLSB*

PM:RLSB*

C:RLSB*

D:DET:RES NAME E Hylton J Sebrosky R Anand C Grimes M Mayfield DATE 08/17/00 08/17/00 08/17/00 08/16/00 08/22/00 OFFICE D:DRIP:NRR D:DSSA:NRR D:DIPM:NRR*

D:DE:NRR*

OGC NAME D Matthews G Holahan B Boger J Strosnider J Moore DATE 08/23/00 08/21/00 08/21/00 08/16/00 08/22/00

NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE Project No. 690 cc:

with Federal Register Notice without DG-1104, SRP-LR and GALL Mr. Dennis Harrison U.S. Department of Energy NE-42 Washington, D.C. 20585 Mr. Michael S. Tuckman Duke Energy Corporation Mail Stop EC-07H P.O. Box 1006 Charlotte, NC 28201-1006 Mr. Robert Gill Duke Energy Corporation Mail Stop EC-12R P.O. Box 1006 Charlotte, NC 28201-1006 Mr. Paul Gunter Director of the Reactor Watchdog Project Nuclear Information & Resource Service 1424 16th Street, NW, Suite 404 Washington, DC 20036 Mr. James P. Riccio Public Citizens Critical Mass Energy Project 211 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20003 National Whistleblower Center 3238 P Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20007-2756 Mr. Charles R. Pierce Southern Nuclear Operating Co.

40 Inverness Center Parkway BIN B064 Birmingham, AL 35242 Mr. Garry Young Entergy Operations, Inc.

Arkansas Nuclear One 1448 SR 333 GSB-2E Russellville, Arkansas 72802 Mr. Richard P. Sedano, Commissioner State Liaison Officer Department of Public Service 112 State Street Drawer 20 Montipelier, Vermont 05620-2601