LIC-15-0146, Emergency Planning Implementing Procedure and Index
| ML16015A081 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 12/21/2015 |
| From: | Blome B Omaha Public Power District |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| LIC-15-0146 | |
| Download: ML16015A081 (3) | |
Text
--
mm Omaha Public Power District December 21, 2015 LIC-15-0146 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AT1TN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-40 NRC Docket No. 50-285
SUBJECT:
Emergency Planning Implementing Procedure and Index In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section V, and 10 CFR 50.4(b)(5), please delete the following Forms: FC-EPF-14, FC-EPF-17, FC-EPF-34, FC-EPF-41, FC-EPF-43, FC-EPF-46, and FC-EPF-47 for the Document Control Desk (holder of Copy 165) and the NRC Region IV Plant Support Branch 1 Secretary (holder of Copies 154 and 155). Individual index pages have been removed from plant procedures and are now part of the overall master index.
The document update instructions and summary of changes are included on the Confirmation of Transmittal form (Form EP-
- 1) attached to each controlled copy change package. Please return the Confirmation of Transmittal forms by February 13, 2016.
REMOVE SECTION IINSERT SECTION FC-EPF-14 Rev 14 FC-EPF-17 Rev 4 FC-EPF-34 Rev 2 FC-EPF-41 Rev 2 FC-EPF-43 Rev 4 FC-EPF-46 Rev 0 FC-EPF-47 Rev 0 This change was reviewed and does not constitute a decrease in effectiveness.
No commitments are made in this letter.
If you have any questions regarding the enclosed changes, please contact Mr. Eric Plautz at 402-533-7308.
Sincerly Bradley H. Blome Manager - Site Regulatory Assurance BHB :mec Enclosures 1_
c:
NRC Region IV Plant Support Branch 1 Secretary (2 sets)
A!4S C.F. Lyon, NRC Project Manager (w/o enclosures)
/
- s. M. Schneider, NRC Senior Resident Inspector (w/o enclosures),
0 Emergency Planning Department (w/o enclosures)
I Fort Calhoun Station, P0 Box 550 Fort Calhoun, NE 68023/9610 Power Lane, Blair, NE 68008
EP-1 Confirmation of Transmittal for Page 1 of 1 Rev. 9 Emergency Planning Documents/Information Radioloical EmrgencyEmergency Plan Ee Pann om
[] Rdioogial merenc
[]
Implementing Procedures
[
Emrgency Pann om Response Plan (RERP)
(EPIP)
(EPF)
D] Emergency Planning Department Manual D] Other Emergency Planning Document(s)!/Information (EPDM)
Date:
Transmitted to:
Name:
Document Control Desk Copy No: 165 Date: __________
Plant Support Branch Secretary Copy No: 154 Plant Support Branch Secretary Copy No: 155 The following document(s) / information are forwarded for your manual:
REMOVE SECTION INSERT SECTION FC-EPF-14 Rev 14 FC-EPF-17 Rev 4 FC-EPF-34 Rev 2 FC-EPF-41 Rev 2 FC-EPF-43 Rev 4 FC-EPF-46 Rev 0 FC-EPF-47 Rev 0 Summary of Changes: FC-EPF-14 Rev 14, FC-EPF-17 Rev 4, FC-EPF-34 Rev 2, FC-EPF-41 Rev 2, FC-EPF-43 Rev 4, FC-EPF-46 Rev 0, and FC-EPF-47 Rev 0: have been deleted from procedure.
Maae mergency Planning Ihereby acknowledge receipt of the above documentslinformation and have included them in my assigned manuals.
Signature:
Date:
Please sign above and return by: 02113116 Tammy Collinson Fort Calhoun Station, FC-2-1 Omaha Public Power District 444 South 1 6 th Street Mall Omaha, NE 68102-2247 NOTE: If the document(s)/information contained in this transmittal is no longer requested or needed by the recipient, or has been transferred to another individuals, please fill out the information below.
E] Document(s)/Information No Longer Requested/Needed E] Document(s)/Information Transferred to:
Name: _______________
Mailing Address:
Summary of analysis:
The following is a list of Forms/Procedures/Manuals deleted; a description of how this change still complies with the regulation and has been determined not to be a reduction in effectiveness:
FC-EPF-14, Emergency Response Organization Assignment Form, Revision 1%4, FC-EFP-14, was used to assign individuals to the ERO, and show their qualifications have been completed. This has been replaced with the ERO Roster program software, TQ-FC-113, PQD, and form TQ-FC-113-F001. This is related to EC67058. Since there is a process in place to track ERO assignees to replace this form, there is no reduction in effectiveness. Planning Standard
_1OCFR5O.47(b)1, _10CFR50.47(b)2, _10CFR50.47(b)15_
Program Element _NUREGO654 II.A.1,4, II.B.1,2,3, 11.0. 1-5_
Appendix E Section _ IV.A.2,3,4, IV.F-I _RERP Section A, 2.2, RERP Section B, RERP Section 0 FC-EPF-17, Pager Response Follow-up Questionnaire, Revision 4, FC-EPF-1 7 was used to follow up on why ERO Members did not call-in when paged. The reasoning behind this was to check if pagers were working, and ensure the ERO could have been properly staffed, also may have been used for accountability. Now, Everbridge gives the information needed for staffing, and FCS is using Duty Teams to ensure minimum staffing positions. Since the pager system is no longer used and was taken out of the plan, this form is not needed. The staffing, is still being tracked for both minimum and non-minimum staffing and individuals maintain their own telephone for Corporate. The numbers of responders has significantly increased with Everbridge and since it is a two-way system, the form does not help in this.
See EC63331. Because the deletion of this form will not affect staffing, or ensuring of staffing, this is not a reduction of effectiveness. Planning Standard 10CFR50.47(b)2_and 10CFR50.47(b)1 Program Element _NUREG 0654 IIB.5_
Appendix E Section _IV.A.2.a-c, IV.A.3 RERP Section E, 2.1.2 FC-EPF-41I, Emergency Planning Simulator Critique, Revision 2, FC-EPF-41, Emergency Planning Simulator Critique has been replaced with Exelon procedures, EP-FC-125-1 002 Attachment 1, R.EP.01 AND EPPI.01a-c PI
SUMMARY
and EP-FC-122-300-F-0I. These forms are used for simulator EP sessions and for EP drill/exercise critiques when the ERO including Chemistry and RP are present. In non-EP drills and exercises, ERO members outside of Operations do not attend. Since these processes are in place and a critique form exists for the simulator, there is no reduction in effectiveness. Planning Standard _I0CFR50.47(b)14_
Program Element _NUREG 0654 II.N_
Appendix E Section
_lV.F.2.g_RERP-Section N, 4.0 FC-EPF-43, Update Report to Off-Site Authorities, Revision 4, FC-EPF-43 was created to fax the dose assessment results to the States and Counties, and this form is now automatically generated by the program. Because of this has been replaced by the program, there is no reduction of effectiveness. Planning Standard _10CFR50.47(b)5_
Program Element _NUREG 0654 II.E.4 _
Appendix E Section _IV.D.1_RERP Section E FC-EPF-34, JIC Manager Checklist, Revision 2, Deleting the FC-EPF-34 from the document checklist and leaving it in the Crisis Communication Plan will still perform the same function as all JIC Managers are trained to use their CCP when reporting (all JIC ERO Members are). The Crisis Communication Plan requires a 50.54q to change and this checklist of duties will remain under this process. Because of this, it is not a reduction in effectiveness to delete this form from this location. Planning Standard _10CFR50.47(b)2_
Program Element _NUREG 0654 IIB.7_
Appendix E Section
_None_RERP Section B, 4.9 FC-EPF-46, RELEASE PATH DIAGNOSTIC FLOW CHART, Revision 0, FC-EPF-46 was made to assist dose assessment personnel is determining the pathway for release and monitors that would be used. It was a visual support for the procedure to help individuals who are visual. Now URI shows a similar picture and Will only allow use of the correct monitors related to that release path. Since URI provides this visual, these forms are no longer needed and this deletion is not a reduction in effectiveness. Planning Standard _10CFR5O.47(b)9_
Program Element _ NUREG 0654 I1.1_
Appendix E Section _ IV.B_RERP Section I" FC-EPF-47, RELEASE PATH DIAGNOSTIC - STEAM FLOW CHART, Revision 0, FC-EPF-47 was made to assist dose assessment personnel is determining the pathway for release and monitors that would be used. It was a visual support for the procedure to help individuals who are visual. Now URI shows a similar picture and will only allow use of the correct monitors related to that release path. Since URI provides this visual, these forms are no longer needed and this deletion is not a reduction in effectiveness. Planning Standard _10CFR5O.47(b)9_
Program Element _ NUREG 0654 I1.1_
Appendix E Section _ IV.B_RERP Section I
mm Omaha Public Power District December 21, 2015 LIC-15-0146 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AT1TN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-40 NRC Docket No. 50-285
SUBJECT:
Emergency Planning Implementing Procedure and Index In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section V, and 10 CFR 50.4(b)(5), please delete the following Forms: FC-EPF-14, FC-EPF-17, FC-EPF-34, FC-EPF-41, FC-EPF-43, FC-EPF-46, and FC-EPF-47 for the Document Control Desk (holder of Copy 165) and the NRC Region IV Plant Support Branch 1 Secretary (holder of Copies 154 and 155). Individual index pages have been removed from plant procedures and are now part of the overall master index.
The document update instructions and summary of changes are included on the Confirmation of Transmittal form (Form EP-
- 1) attached to each controlled copy change package. Please return the Confirmation of Transmittal forms by February 13, 2016.
REMOVE SECTION IINSERT SECTION FC-EPF-14 Rev 14 FC-EPF-17 Rev 4 FC-EPF-34 Rev 2 FC-EPF-41 Rev 2 FC-EPF-43 Rev 4 FC-EPF-46 Rev 0 FC-EPF-47 Rev 0 This change was reviewed and does not constitute a decrease in effectiveness.
No commitments are made in this letter.
If you have any questions regarding the enclosed changes, please contact Mr. Eric Plautz at 402-533-7308.
Sincerly Bradley H. Blome Manager - Site Regulatory Assurance BHB :mec Enclosures 1_
c:
NRC Region IV Plant Support Branch 1 Secretary (2 sets)
A!4S C.F. Lyon, NRC Project Manager (w/o enclosures)
/
- s. M. Schneider, NRC Senior Resident Inspector (w/o enclosures),
0 Emergency Planning Department (w/o enclosures)
I Fort Calhoun Station, P0 Box 550 Fort Calhoun, NE 68023/9610 Power Lane, Blair, NE 68008
EP-1 Confirmation of Transmittal for Page 1 of 1 Rev. 9 Emergency Planning Documents/Information Radioloical EmrgencyEmergency Plan Ee Pann om
[] Rdioogial merenc
[]
Implementing Procedures
[
Emrgency Pann om Response Plan (RERP)
(EPIP)
(EPF)
D] Emergency Planning Department Manual D] Other Emergency Planning Document(s)!/Information (EPDM)
Date:
Transmitted to:
Name:
Document Control Desk Copy No: 165 Date: __________
Plant Support Branch Secretary Copy No: 154 Plant Support Branch Secretary Copy No: 155 The following document(s) / information are forwarded for your manual:
REMOVE SECTION INSERT SECTION FC-EPF-14 Rev 14 FC-EPF-17 Rev 4 FC-EPF-34 Rev 2 FC-EPF-41 Rev 2 FC-EPF-43 Rev 4 FC-EPF-46 Rev 0 FC-EPF-47 Rev 0 Summary of Changes: FC-EPF-14 Rev 14, FC-EPF-17 Rev 4, FC-EPF-34 Rev 2, FC-EPF-41 Rev 2, FC-EPF-43 Rev 4, FC-EPF-46 Rev 0, and FC-EPF-47 Rev 0: have been deleted from procedure.
Maae mergency Planning Ihereby acknowledge receipt of the above documentslinformation and have included them in my assigned manuals.
Signature:
Date:
Please sign above and return by: 02113116 Tammy Collinson Fort Calhoun Station, FC-2-1 Omaha Public Power District 444 South 1 6 th Street Mall Omaha, NE 68102-2247 NOTE: If the document(s)/information contained in this transmittal is no longer requested or needed by the recipient, or has been transferred to another individuals, please fill out the information below.
E] Document(s)/Information No Longer Requested/Needed E] Document(s)/Information Transferred to:
Name: _______________
Mailing Address:
Summary of analysis:
The following is a list of Forms/Procedures/Manuals deleted; a description of how this change still complies with the regulation and has been determined not to be a reduction in effectiveness:
FC-EPF-14, Emergency Response Organization Assignment Form, Revision 1%4, FC-EFP-14, was used to assign individuals to the ERO, and show their qualifications have been completed. This has been replaced with the ERO Roster program software, TQ-FC-113, PQD, and form TQ-FC-113-F001. This is related to EC67058. Since there is a process in place to track ERO assignees to replace this form, there is no reduction in effectiveness. Planning Standard
_1OCFR5O.47(b)1, _10CFR50.47(b)2, _10CFR50.47(b)15_
Program Element _NUREGO654 II.A.1,4, II.B.1,2,3, 11.0. 1-5_
Appendix E Section _ IV.A.2,3,4, IV.F-I _RERP Section A, 2.2, RERP Section B, RERP Section 0 FC-EPF-17, Pager Response Follow-up Questionnaire, Revision 4, FC-EPF-1 7 was used to follow up on why ERO Members did not call-in when paged. The reasoning behind this was to check if pagers were working, and ensure the ERO could have been properly staffed, also may have been used for accountability. Now, Everbridge gives the information needed for staffing, and FCS is using Duty Teams to ensure minimum staffing positions. Since the pager system is no longer used and was taken out of the plan, this form is not needed. The staffing, is still being tracked for both minimum and non-minimum staffing and individuals maintain their own telephone for Corporate. The numbers of responders has significantly increased with Everbridge and since it is a two-way system, the form does not help in this.
See EC63331. Because the deletion of this form will not affect staffing, or ensuring of staffing, this is not a reduction of effectiveness. Planning Standard 10CFR50.47(b)2_and 10CFR50.47(b)1 Program Element _NUREG 0654 IIB.5_
Appendix E Section _IV.A.2.a-c, IV.A.3 RERP Section E, 2.1.2 FC-EPF-41I, Emergency Planning Simulator Critique, Revision 2, FC-EPF-41, Emergency Planning Simulator Critique has been replaced with Exelon procedures, EP-FC-125-1 002 Attachment 1, R.EP.01 AND EPPI.01a-c PI
SUMMARY
and EP-FC-122-300-F-0I. These forms are used for simulator EP sessions and for EP drill/exercise critiques when the ERO including Chemistry and RP are present. In non-EP drills and exercises, ERO members outside of Operations do not attend. Since these processes are in place and a critique form exists for the simulator, there is no reduction in effectiveness. Planning Standard _I0CFR50.47(b)14_
Program Element _NUREG 0654 II.N_
Appendix E Section
_lV.F.2.g_RERP-Section N, 4.0 FC-EPF-43, Update Report to Off-Site Authorities, Revision 4, FC-EPF-43 was created to fax the dose assessment results to the States and Counties, and this form is now automatically generated by the program. Because of this has been replaced by the program, there is no reduction of effectiveness. Planning Standard _10CFR50.47(b)5_
Program Element _NUREG 0654 II.E.4 _
Appendix E Section _IV.D.1_RERP Section E FC-EPF-34, JIC Manager Checklist, Revision 2, Deleting the FC-EPF-34 from the document checklist and leaving it in the Crisis Communication Plan will still perform the same function as all JIC Managers are trained to use their CCP when reporting (all JIC ERO Members are). The Crisis Communication Plan requires a 50.54q to change and this checklist of duties will remain under this process. Because of this, it is not a reduction in effectiveness to delete this form from this location. Planning Standard _10CFR50.47(b)2_
Program Element _NUREG 0654 IIB.7_
Appendix E Section
_None_RERP Section B, 4.9 FC-EPF-46, RELEASE PATH DIAGNOSTIC FLOW CHART, Revision 0, FC-EPF-46 was made to assist dose assessment personnel is determining the pathway for release and monitors that would be used. It was a visual support for the procedure to help individuals who are visual. Now URI shows a similar picture and Will only allow use of the correct monitors related to that release path. Since URI provides this visual, these forms are no longer needed and this deletion is not a reduction in effectiveness. Planning Standard _10CFR5O.47(b)9_
Program Element _ NUREG 0654 I1.1_
Appendix E Section _ IV.B_RERP Section I" FC-EPF-47, RELEASE PATH DIAGNOSTIC - STEAM FLOW CHART, Revision 0, FC-EPF-47 was made to assist dose assessment personnel is determining the pathway for release and monitors that would be used. It was a visual support for the procedure to help individuals who are visual. Now URI shows a similar picture and will only allow use of the correct monitors related to that release path. Since URI provides this visual, these forms are no longer needed and this deletion is not a reduction in effectiveness. Planning Standard _10CFR5O.47(b)9_
Program Element _ NUREG 0654 I1.1_
Appendix E Section _ IV.B_RERP Section I