L-94-301, Forwards Response to 10CFR50.46, Acceptance Criteria for ECCS in Light Water Power Reactors, Satisfying Annual Reporting Requirements for Util Turkey Point Units 3 & 4

From kanterella
(Redirected from L-94-301)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Response to 10CFR50.46, Acceptance Criteria for ECCS in Light Water Power Reactors, Satisfying Annual Reporting Requirements for Util Turkey Point Units 3 & 4
ML17352A964
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/1994
From: Plunkett T
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-94-301, NUDOCS 9501030020
Download: ML17352A964 (9)


Text

x a.rc)a.awe i

ACCELERATED RIDS PROCESSING)

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION'NBR:9501030020 DOC.DATE: 94/12/15 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-250 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 50-251 Turkey Point Plant, Unit. 4, Florida Power and Light, C AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFIL1ATION PLUNKETT,T.F.

Florida Power 6 Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

DOCKET N

05000250 05000251

SUBJECT:

Discusses 10CFR50.46, "Acceptance Criteria for ECCS in Light Water Power Reactors."

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

A001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal:

General Distribution NOTES:

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 LA CROTEAU,R INTERNA~IEE ENTER NRR DSSA SCSB NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/HDS 3 EXTERNAL: NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

0 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/ DS SA/S PLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 D

N NO'I'E TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE KVASTE!COYTACT'I'HEDOCUifCYTCON'TROL DESK, ROONI P 1-37 IEXT. 504-2083 ) TO ELlihfliATEYOUR X'AifE !TRODI DISTRIDUTIOY. LIS'I'S I'OR DOCI:%1EX'I S YOI.'Oi "I' L'I'.D!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 12 ENCL 11

~

QEC>> 1 5 1994 L-94-301 10 CFR 50.46 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:

Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555 Re:

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 10 CFR 50.46, "Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Cooling Systems in Li ht Water Power Reactors" Gentlemen:

Title 10 CFR 50.46 (a)(3)(ii) requires that licensees report to the Commission each change to or error discovered in an acceptable emergency core cooling system (ECCS) evaluation model, or in the application of such model, that affects the peak clad temperature calculation, and its effect on the limiting ECCS analysis.

If the change results in a peak clad temperature (PCT) difference of more than 50'F, the licensee is required to provide the NRC with a report within 30 days and include with the report the actions required to show compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 requirements.

By letter L-94-073, dated April 11, 1994, Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) transmitted to the NRC the annual report of the ECCS analysis for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4.

On November 7,

1994, Westinghouse transmitted to FPL the results of a recent reanalysis of the worst case large and small break Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) transients for Turkey Point.

The Westinghouse letter identified a reduction in the PCT limit of 12'F for the large break LOCA (LBLOCA) analysis and an increase in the PCT limit of 130 F for the small break LOCA (SBLOCA) analysis.

For Turkey Point, the LBLOCA analysis remains the limiting ECCS analysis.

Since the change in PCT for the limiting LBLOCA analysis is less than 50 FI FPL is not required to make this submittal.

However, since the change in the PCT for the small break LOCA results exceeds 50'F, although not required by the regulations, FPL is providing the enclosed response for your information.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.46 (a)(3)(ii), this transmittal satisfies the annual reporting requirements for FPL Turkey Point Units 3 and 4.

9501030020 9'41215 PDR ADQCK 05000250 R.

PDR an FPL Group company gal

P I

p

L-94-301 Page 2

Should there be any questions, please contact us.

Very truly yours, T. F. Plunkett Vice President Turkey Point Plant TFP/RJT/rt cc:

S.

D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC T.

P. Johnson, Sr. Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point

L-94-3 0.1 Attachment Page 1 of 4 ATTACHMENT Re:

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 10 CFR 50.46, "Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Coolin S stems In Li ht Water Nuclear Power Reactors>>

Lar e Break LOCA LBLOCA By letter L-94-073 dated April 11, 1994, Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) reported a peak clad temperature (PCT) of 2098 F for the worst case LBLOCA transient analysis.

This value included a calculated peak temperature of 2082'F plus a 16'F penalty as reported by FPL in letter L-94-073.

The recent discharge of fuel assemblies with stainless steel fuel rods and the transition to a full core of optimized fuel assemblies have resulted in a decrease in the peak clad temperature for the worst case LBLOCA of 12'F for a total PCT of 2086 F.

The LBLOCA analysis as described in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) was performed by Westinghouse in 1991 using the BART computer code assuming the presence of fuel

,assembly spacer grids.

Small Break LOCA SBLOCA By letter L-94-073, FPL reported a peak clad temperature of 1687'F for the worst case SBLOCA transient analysis.

This value was based upon a new Turkey Point SBLOCA analysis performed by Westinghouse in 1991 using the NOTRUMP digital computer code.

This value included a calculated peak clad temperature of 1749'F plus a 62'F benefit as reported by FPL in letter L-94-073.

The recent discharge of fuel assemblies with stainless steel fuel rods, correction to the Boiling Heat Transfer correlation, Steam Line Isolation Logic, Axial Nodalization, Rod Internal Pressure Model Revision, Burst and Blockage Time in Life and corrections to SBLOCTA computer model have resulted in an increase in the peak clad temperature for the worst case SBLOCA of 130'F for a total PCT of 1817'F.

L-94-3Q1 Attachment Page 2 of 4

~Summar The revised peak clad temperatures of 2086'F for the worst case LBLOCA and 1817'F for the worst case SBLOCA, correcting for the effects discussed above and summarized in the enclosed Tables 1

and 2, are below the 10 CFR 50.46 acceptance limit of 2200~F.

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 remain in compliance with the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) performance criteria specified in 10 CFR 50.46(b).

L-94-301 Attachment Page 3 of 4 TABLE 1 TURKEY POINT UNITS 3

AND 4 PREDICTED PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURES CURRENT LBLOCA EVALUATIONS THAT HAVE ASSESSED PCT PENALTIES Analysis of Record Total LBLOCA PCT specified in FPL Letter L-94-073 2082 F 2098 F Evaluations since issuance of FPL letter L-94-073 Discharged Fuel Assemblies with Stainless Steel Fuel Rods

-2 F Eliminate Transition Core Penalty

-10 F Total Estimated LBLOCA PCT 2086 F

a 4

L-94-301 Attachment Page 4 of 4 TABLE 2 TURKEY POINT UNITS 3

AND 4 PREDICTED PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURES CURRENT SBLOCA EVALUATIONS THAT HAVE ASSESSED PCT PENALTIES Analysis of Record Total SBLOCA PCT specified in FPL Letter L-94-073 1749 F 1687 F Evaluations since issuance of FPL letter L-94-073 Discharged Fuel Assemblies with Stainless Steel Fuel Rods

-2 F Boiling Heat Transfer Correlation Error

-6 F Steam Line Isolation Logic Error 18 F Axial Nodalization, Rod Internal Pressure Model Revision, and SBLOCTA Error Corrections Analysis 105 F Burst and Blockage/Time in Life 15 F Total Estimated SBLOCA PCT 1817 F