IR 05000344/1994002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-344/94-02 on 940411-14.No Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program,Audits,Protected Area Barriers & Detection
ML20029C854
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/20/1994
From: Murray B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20029C853 List:
References
50-344-94-02, 50-344-94-2, NUDOCS 9405020106
Download: ML20029C854 (4)


Text

.__

_ - _ _ _..

_

_

_.

__

-. _.-

__ _.

-

3.

'

h t-7i

.

..,

DOCUMENE CONTAINS*

,

o,,

-..

SAFEGUARDS :,1NFORMATIOW us e,q.;, s

.:

c....

,

,s.g.p m...g,gg g g g g g'gggy g g-4ggggw

-.p: %..

.. g,.

,

.c

,,

APPENDIX (

.. ~,

o

.,

~

~ " ' "

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONi T M.

REGION IV

7, j p,

A;7. n.

'

.

.

..

Inspection Report:

50-344/94-02

-

,

Operating Licenses: NPF-1

\\

,.

Licensee:

Portland General Electric Company 121 S. W. Salmon Street, TB-17 Portland, Oregon 97204

-

.

.

.

,

Facility Name: Trojan Nuclear Plant

,

Inspection At:

Prescott, Oregon Inspection Conducted: April 11-14, 1994 Inspector:

D. W. Schaefer, Physical Security Specialist Approved:

r

~

/%

'

i a ne Mupay, Chief Facilities InspectiongDatek/.

.x i

Programs Branch

?

Inspection Summary Areas' Inspected:

Routine, announced inspection of the physical security program.

The areas inspected included management support, security. program plans, security program audits, protected-area barriers and detection aids, assessment aids, protected area access for personnel and packages, alarm.

station, communication, power supply, testing and maintenance, compensatory <

.

measures', and security training and qualification.

'

.

Results:

The licensee's management organization provided appropriate oversight

and support of the security program (Section 1.1)

Changes to the security programs and plans were being repor ad and

implemented, as required, with no decrease of effectiveness (Section 1.2).

,

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS '

-i UPON SEPARATION THIS.

PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

,

9405020.106 940425 r

.l PDR-ADOCK 05000344 i

O PDR

..

,

.

.

.

..

., -

.-

,

.

..,

.-

-.-

.

_

_..

..

.

-. _...

.

.._ _.

-_ _

. _ _ -.,

_

_. _. __

-

i i

.

Portland General Electric Company-3-DOCUMENT CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS-INFORMATION-

.n...

.

-

.

.+

f@ ;A,. wim@Ms;%ew,@Mntwo R *'r+*o.c t t

.m enudu@c;ECMWWtPF4Mwr#

bec copy of entire report:

L. J. Callan, RA RIV Security File FIPB Security File D. W. Schaefer, WCF0/DRSS/FIBP Elaine Koup, NRR/PSGB (MS 9 024)

Elinor G. Adensam, NRR/ADR4-5 (MS 13 E4)

bec copy of letter and inspection summary only:

DMB IE-04 RIV File MIS FCDB File (Decommissioning)

LeahP.Tremper,OC/LFDCB(MS4503)

,

M. T. Masnik, NRR Project Manager, NRR/0NDB (MS 11 B20)

Stewart W. Brown, NRR Project Manager, NMSS/LLDR (MS 11 BIO)

.-

D. J. Sullivan - E-Mail (DJS) (Only letter and inspection summary only:)

.

e i

l i

i RIV:FIPB /)D61 C: FIPB M ADD: /DRAS D:DRSSM W

BMurrayN b

SJCollinsh DWSchaefer:nh 4/M/94 Y/b/94 4 /22/94 4 /2 3/94

- 1 DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS-

,.

UPON SEPARATION THIS

'

i -

PAGE IS DECONTROLLED L

- !

..,, -

-,,,,e n,

-.. - -. - - - -

.,

,,-,;..,

,,--;..~-...

.. - -..

-

..i.--c,

. _. _

.. _ _ _ _ _

._ __

_. -.. -. _ _ _

_

...

... _ -.

..

_. _.

.

's

.

l'

DOCUMENT CONTAINS

.q.

,

SAFEGUARDS.INFORMATIONt. -.

...

... -,

u

m

, r..w sy.

n eawnp. ;,.. a4,x4ppyyyyntpgqqty:yph

.

ATTAtllMENT

,

.

1 PERSONS CONTACTED 1.1 Licensee Personnel

  • H. Bender, Lead Security Officer S. Bender, Technician, Fitness-for-Duty
  • H. Chernoff, Manager, Licensing
  • B. Eder, Security Watch Supervisor
  • M. Gatlin, Security Operations Supervisor M. Griffith, Lead Security Officer B. Hugo, Compliance Engineer, Technical Functions Department
  • R. Magnuson, Personnel Security Supervisor, Nuclear Security Department

'*H. Mullen, Licensing Engineer D. Nordstrom. General Manager, Nuclear Oversight J. Sinibaldi, Security Watch Supervisor

  • G. Shoemaker, Security Watch Supervisor
  • C. Storms, Lead Security Officer J. Sullivan, Manager, Nuclear Plant Engineering / Decommissioning Department M. Ward, Lead Security Officer P. Yundt, Manager, Plant Support
  • Denotes those that attended the exit meeting.

>

The inspector,also, interviewed other licensee employees. during the inspection.

'

Those employees included members of the licensee's technical and management staff and members of the security organization.

2 EXIT MEETING

<

An exit meeting was conducted on April 14, 1994.

The inspector met with the licensee representatives identified in paragraph 1 above to summarize the:

<

scope and results of this inspection.

.

,

b DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS-

- 1 i

UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED i

i i

.-m, w,- c

,

,

-

n

. -.

,

--

-

. ~,

,,

=

-.

._-

_

_-

.

-2-DOCl,NENT CONTAINS.

g,q, W

..,iAa.

..x,

.q,a :

'

The licensee's audits of the security program were excellent and

provided an effective evaluation of the security program (Section 1.3).

The licensee had an excellent protected area barrier and detection

system (Section 1.4).

The assessment aids system at Door 30 was observed and determined to

provide excellent assessment of the primary access portal into the protected area (Section 1.5).

An Inspection Followup Item was 4 U.atified regarding planned corrective

actions for the cardreader system.

Searching of personnel and packages entering the protected area was excellent (Section 1.6).

The security alarm station and communication system were effective and

  • -

supported the overall security program (Section 1.7).

The licensee's test of the emergency power supply indicated that the

system performed well (Section 1.8).

The licensee's testing and maintenance programs were being conducted in

accordance with the security program plans and were being properly documented (Section 1.9).

The compensatory measures program was effectively implemented.

The

security officers were well trained on the program requirements (Section 1.10).

The licensee's training program was being conducted in accordance with

the security program plans and was being properly documented.

Security officers were knowledgeable and professional in performing their duties (Section 1.11).

_Summarv of Inspection Findinas:

Inspection Followup Item 344/9402-01 was identified (Section 1.6).

  • Attachment:

Attachment - Persons Contacted and Exit Meeting

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS SAFEGilARDS INFORMATION UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED