IR 05000335/2012405

IR 05000335-12-405 and 05000389-12-405, on 09/13/2012, Saint Lucie Nuclear Plant - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Physical Security

ML12290A237
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	10/10/2012
From:	Binoy Desai NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB2
To:	Nazar M Florida Power & Light Co
References
IR-12-405
Download: ML12290A237 (5)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ber 10, 2012

SUBJECT:

SAINT LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PHYSICAL SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000335/2012405 AND 05000389/2012405

Dear Mr. Nazar:

On September 13, 2012, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your St. Lucie Nuclear Plant. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed with Mr. J. Jensen and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

This report documents one self-revealing finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the site. Additionally, one licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance is listed in this report. The NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.

The finding also had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Human Performance H.4.(b) because the licensee did not define and effectively communicate expectations regarding procedural compliance and personnel did not follow procedures. If you contest these non-cited violations, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region II; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.

20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant. In addition, if you disagree with the cross-cutting aspect assigned to any finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of the inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, RII, and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agency wide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

However, the material enclosed herewith contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR §2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's Agency wide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). If you choose to provide a response and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related Information - Withhold From Public Disclosure Under 10 CFR §2.390 in accordance with 10 CFR §2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR §2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR §2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Binoy Desai, Chief Plant Support Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-335, 50-389 License No. DPR-67, NPF-16 Enclosure:

NRC Security Inspection Report 05000335/2012405 and 05000389/2012405 W/Att: Supplemental Information (OUO)

cc w/encl.: (See page 3) ML12290A237 X SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE X FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRS/PSB2 RII: DRP/BR3 SIGNATURE RA/JW For JT RA/JW RA/RP - EMAIL RA/BD RA/SS For DR NAME J. Tornow J. Wallo R. Patterson B. Desai D. Rich DATE 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 10/05/2012 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO cc w/encl:

Joseph Jensen Site Vice President St. Lucie Nuclear Plant 6501 S. Ocean Drive Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Eric Katzman Licensing Manager St. Lucie Nuclear Plant 6501 South Ocean Drive Jensen Beach, FL 34957-2000 3 Letter to Mano Nazar from Binoy Desai dated October 10, 2012.

SUBJECT: SAINT LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PHYSICAL SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000335/2012405 AND 05000389/2012405 Distribution w/encl:

RidsNrrPMStLucie Resource C. Evans, RII EICS (Part 72 Only)

L. Douglas, RII EICS (Linda Douglas)

B. Westreich, NSIR (hard copy w/ encl)

R. Albert, NSIR RII S. Coker, NSIR RII RIDSNRRDIRS OE Mail (email address if applicable)

PUBLIC - W/OUT OUO