IR 05000182/1979002
| ML19296B640 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Purdue University |
| Issue date: | 01/08/1980 |
| From: | Boyd D, Charles Brown NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19296B627 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-182-79-02, 50-182-79-2, NUDOCS 8002210162 | |
| Download: ML19296B640 (3) | |
Text
I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-182/79-02
,D,ocket No. 50-182 License No. R-87 Licensee: Purdue Univeristy West Lafayette, IN 47907 Facility Name:
Purdue I Inspection At:
Same Inspection Conducted: November 27 and 28, 1979 Inspector: C d.
//7/fo
/
/ '
Approved By:
D.'.
y Chief
. d,
.
actor Operations & Nuclear Support,
//
Section 3
-
Inspection Eummary Inspection on November 27 and 28, 1979 (Report No. 50-182/79-02)
Areas Inspected: A routine unannounced inspection of organization, logs and records, procedures, surveillance, requalification training, review and audit, and experiments. The inspection involved 13 inspector hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in these areas.
80 0gg39
/bq
.
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- F.
Clikeman, Director of Nuclear Laboratories
- E. Stansberry, Reactor Supervisor E. Merritt, Technician R. Johnson, Licensed Senior Operator
-.
- Denotes licensee personnel attending the management interview.
2.
Organization, Logs and Records The facility organization was reviewed and verified to be consistent with the Technical Specifications requirements. The minimum staffing was verified to be present during reactor operations. The composition of the personnel (one licensed operator plus another person and one licensed senior operator available) was verified and is consistent with the Technical Specifications.
The logs and records were reviewed and the required logs and records were found to be available.
The required entries were contained in the logs with the significant items denoted. The maintenance activi-ties were found to be consistent with the Technical Specifications and the administrative procedures.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
3.
Review and Audit The review of CORO (Committee on Reactor Operations) minutes indi-cated that the Technical Specifications Review and Audit require-ments were being met.
A quorum was present during the meetings held in 1978 and 1979. The Committee's recommendations had been reviewed and acted on as appro-priate.
No items of n. ncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
4.
Requalification Training The requalification training records were reviewed to verify confor-mance with the facility's approved plan.
The records revealed that the requirements have been met. The records were available and up-to-date.
The required manipulations were documented and the ex-aminations with the individual's answers are being maintained as required. The lectures contain facility changes and revisions to procedures.
2-
.
.
.
The lectures cover license / Technical Specifications in the year that the item occurs.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
.
5.
Procedures
-
~
The operating procedures were reviewed to verify that the procedures
[
are technically adequate and meet the Technical Specifications re-quirements. The review indicated that the revisions that have been issued to the procedures have not changed the technical adequacy of them.
The administrative procedures were found to have clearly stated requirements for the operator's responsibilities and lines of approvals and review.
In discussions held during the inspection the procedures appear to be implemented and are followed.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
6.
Surveillance The surveillance records and program was reviewed to verify that the requirements were being fulfilled. The program appears to have been carried out. The licensee has approved procedures that implement the use of the technical manuals for surveillance and maintenance of the required equipment.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
7.
Experiments The experimental records were reviewed to verify that Technical Specifications and procedural requirements were being followed.
The review indicated that the requirements are being followed and sufficient controls are in effect for radiation and contamination control.
No items of noncomplianct or deviations were identified in this area.
8.
Management Interview A management interview was conducted with the licensee representa-tives denoted in Paragraph #1 at the conclusion of the inspection.
The scope and results of the inspection was discussed.
?
i-3-