IR 05000156/1980001
| ML19323B819 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Wisconsin |
| Issue date: | 03/20/1980 |
| From: | Baker K, Charles Brown, Ridgeway K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19323B811 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-156-80-01, 50-156-80-1, NUDOCS 8005140303 | |
| Download: ML19323B819 (3) | |
Text
6005140303
.
k
,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
.
Report No. 80-01 Docket No. 50-156 License No. R-74 Licensee: University of Wisconsin ATTN: Dr. Charles W. Maynard, Reactor Director Nuclear Engineering Department Madison, Wisconsin 53705 Facility Name: University of Wisconsin Nuclear Reactor Inspection Conducted: February 19-22, 1980 Yh u w%
Inspectors:
C. H. Brown 32O, O
K f (February 20, 1980) only
Approved By:
Inspection Summary Inspection on February 19-22, 1980 (Report No. 50-156/80-01)
Area Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of organization, logs and records, procedures, reviews and audit, requalification training, surveillance, and experiments. A tour of the facility was conducted and normt.1 operations were observed. The inspection involved 32 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspector.
Result: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in these areas.
1
,
DETAILS
.
1.
Persons Contacted
- Dr. C. W. Maynard, Reactor Director
,
- R. J. Cashwell, Reactor Supervisor S. Matusewic, Senior Reactor Operator
.
- Denotes licensee personnel attending the management interview.
2.
Logs and Records The facility logs and records were reviewed for selected periods of the previous 12 months. The logs and records were found to contain the required information and enteries. The maintenance records appeared to be complete and adequate. The maintenance procedures had been reviewed on the annual basis.
Organization The facility organization was verified to be essentially the same as stated in the Organization Chart. The licensee is reviewing and revising the titles of the personnel to more closely match the Chart. The minimum personnel required for operation of the reactor were noted to be available.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were iJentified in this area.
3.
Review and Audit The facility's review and audit program was examined via the docu-ments presented to the Reactor Safety Committee (RSC) and the minutes of the meetings. The internal audit results are presented to the Committee periodically. The RSC appeared to be performing satisfac-torily and functioning within tne requirements.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identfied in this area.
4.
Requalification Training Requalitication training as stated in UWNR No. 004 Operator Profici-ency Maintenance Program was reviewed. The review showed the program to be implemented.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
-2-
\\
t
-
-
.
S.
Procedures
,
The following procedures were reviewed:
UWNR NO. 001 Standing Operating Instructions UWNR No. 002 Experiment Standing Operating Instructions
,
UWNR No. 003 Physical Security Plan UWNR UWNR No. 004 Operator Proficiency Maintenance Program UWNR No. 005 UWNR Administrative Guide
UWNR No. 006 UWNR Emergency Plan UWNR No. 020 UWNR Modification Checklist UWNR No. 100 Surveillance Activities UWNR No. 155 Abnormal Operation Procedures (Annunciator Responses)
UWNR No. 156 Abnormal Procedures
-
The review showed that the annual internal review had been performed.
The procedures appear to be in compliance with the Technical Specifi-cations.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
6.
Surveillance
The surveillance records were reviewed and compared to the require-ments of the facility Technical Specifications. The required sur-veillance tests and verifications were found to have been performed in a timely manner.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
7.
Experiments The review of the experiment and irradiation records revealed irra-diation requirements had been met. The experiment request (Request for Isotope Production) form has been revised to include computer verification of the requestor's license status.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this area.
8.
Management interview The inspector held a management interview with the licensee repre-sentatives indicated in Paragraph 1, at the conclusion of the in-spection. The scope and findings of the inspection were summarized.
-3-
.
.
.
._