IR 05000083/1982001

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Safeguards Insp Repts 50-083/82-01 & 70-1068/82-01 on 820729-31.No Nocompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Security Plan,Organization,Access Controls,Records & Repts, Testing & Maint,Locks & Keys.Portions Deleted
ML20140C059
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, 07001068, 05000083
Issue date: 07/19/1984
From: Mcguire D, Moore D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20140C044 List:
References
FOIA-84-227 50-083-82-01, 50-83-82-1, 70-1068-82-01, 70-1068-82-1, NUDOCS 8406190028
Download: ML20140C059 (6)


Text

-

\

. .

.

-

. 2.7C3 INFCRMATION REMOVED ;

,

... JUL 19 E?

Report Nos. 50-83/82-01 and 70-1068/82-91

. Docket Nos. 50-83 and 70-1068 License Nos. R-56 and SNM-1050 Licensee: University of Florida 202 Nuclear Sciences Center Gainesville, FL 22601 Facility Name: University of Florida Training Reactor Inspection at: Gainesville, FL Date of Last Physical Security Inspection Visit: July 29-31, 1982 Type of Inspection: Unannounced Physical Security Inspecto J. m 7[/P[d

'D .~ Moor , Physical Security Inspector

,

Ddte ' Signed Approved by: g p_

D. R. McGuire, Chief, Physical Protection Section Or a te Signed Technical Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection Inspection Summary Areas Inspected: Included review of Security Plan; Security Organization; Access Contr,1s; Records and Reports. Testing and Maintenance; Locks, Keys and Combinations; Physical Barriers; Detection Aids; Communications and Material Control and Accountabilit The inspection involved 16 inspector hours on site by one NRC inspecto .

Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas examined during the inspectio ~

8406190028 840508

,

l PDR FDIA PDR

AFTERGO84-227 2.750 INFORMATION REMOVED f

_h"T2S_f*"."'

...

.....=.

.

_

,.. .

.

l;., u.aeuwa m l?"" - l

- ' (

.

~

.

2.793 INFORMATION REMOVED REPORT DETAILS Report Nos. 50-83/82-01 and 70-1068/82-01

. Key Persons Contacted

  • G. Vernetson, Reactor Manager
  • G. W. Fogle, Reactor Operator

"H. Gogun, Senior Reactor Operator

  • M. Constable, Reactor Operator A. I. Shuler, Chief, University Police Department (UPD)

C. L. Vinson, Dispatcher, UPD The inspector also interviewed several members of the University Police Departmen .

  • Denotes those present at the exit intervie . Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized during an exit meeting held July 1,1982, with those individuals denoted in paragraph one abov During the meeting, the licensee was informed that no violations were identified as a result of this inspection. Discussions were held with licensee management concerning the development of an adequate procedure for conducting 7 day tests of the intrusion detection system The licensee committed to developing such a procedure to assure that alarm points are functioning properl This was listed as an Inspector Follow-up Item and will be reviewed during subsequent inspection . Inspector Follow-up Item Inspector follow-up item (IFI) are matters which the NRC desires to look into again and which will be examined during future inspections. One IFI was identified during this inspectio (0 pen) IFI (82-01-01) The licensee has committed to establishing and following a procedure for testing alarm devices to assure consistency of individuals conducting such test . MC 81N14 - Site Orientation The inspector, accompanied by a reactor operator, toured the University of Florida Training Reactor (UFTR) and University of Florida SPERT Assembly (UFSA) facilities. During the tour, the inspector noted the general layout of the facilities, the location of security areas, controlled access areas, condition of barriers and the types and locations of intrusion detection aids utilized in the facilities. With the exception of additional intrusion alarm devices being installed in the UFSA facility, no major changes have occurred since the last inspectio .790 INFORMATION REMOVED 3 7 T^. _. .m u

-

p- _ ,,.,....-.. --

-

n

-

m____, _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4 -

J"""-~~- -

7 i

.

2 l

R.700 INFORMATION REMOVED

5. MC 81N18 - Security Plan Review of the physical security plan (PSP) for the UFTR facility revealed that changes made in the PSP have been cocumentec and reported to the NRC as revisio.n 5. The inspector determined that this change did not I decrease the overal' effectiveness of the PSP. The inspector expressed l concern with the use of the word "normally" in tne PSP when referring to l the control and storage location of security-relatec keys (Page 12-2 of  !

the PSP). The licensee was informed that the use of such worcs effects the inspectability of the PSP and will be referred to the Licensing i Branch, NM55, for resolution. Review of the UFSA PSP revealed that l several changes to the plan have been initiated based on comments received from a NM55 licensing official who visited the facility on March 19, 198 These tnanges will be reviewed during subsequent inspectio There were no violations of regulatory requirements identified in this

,

area.

l 6. MC 81N22 - Security Organization The inspector verified through review of procedures and interviews with members of the UPD that the licensee has developed and maintains response procedures for responding to safeguard contingencies as specified in the PS The inspector further determined through interviews that individuals responsible for responding to safeguards contingencies have been instructed as to the scope of their duties and were knowledgeable of their assigned responsibilitie There were no violations of regulatory requirements identified in this j are . MC 81N38 - Records and Reports The inspector verified that the licensee has uccated records documenting response agreements made with local law enforcement authoritie The agreement letters reviewed by the inspector were made with the University Police Department dated June 23, 1981, and the City of Gainesville Police Department dated June 30, 198 Records further indicated that lists are maintained of individuals authorized unescorted access to the security area and to security key The inspector also reviewed licensee documentation concerning c - '. _ ' ' .

e ,, , . n.; . , . .; ,

-

.

, ,- .' ;, .. . .. ; .n.# . ;_ , ; :%. q

,

.e

" ' p[-- :4., < .*

, _

p, . j , .s '. . ;nr .(' . / ' _4 j. ;,

'

.x -.,, , .3

.-

. .

j 'f .

. w,z m m: . . . . - .' * ?: .a" , : , .. .

-

- a-j $ *

.,g gr . [~ 'I" "5 j ..,,

i '

' N, b . ,j ,.

- ,.

, , ,

., ,

,o

' (y.3 1. [ , f ,[9 ' g O

+..,. V.,

-

,, .

'

.....e-

.

.

~ ' .7 ,

.

.

. .. .;

v'

~

i' ' 2

[. . # -

-

s

. ,

.

[ : - b . .?

.-.s 3 :. . .

, ....s .

., ,- ' . , s .

-'lt

'

+,'~% .' :

'.. ..'".,.  : ' }^: . .

6 '% .. % ,.

?

. .'

.. , .

~'

.tS .; c -

. <i~ j ' ?y

. y .. .. c .,

.,

, e. _",. 3.'y ;; .

-< t a _-

.- .

_ ' .l ' q .

- .. - _n,,

_

l-l.? Yl

. . . . . ,

.

c, . -? ' i. . -}-

.

~ . ~kl {y .;.f.f&h .

.

. .

.- 2.790 INFORMA7:Dal REMOVED

_ . . _ . . _ _

,,,;; g ;-_-

t" ; _ _ _ _ _ _ . m e n n u m m N

.. .. . -. -

' '

W INFORMATION REMDVED

. .

I rv ~ - - - ..._.e- -

KL ..

-

, J'

.

There were no violations of regulatory requirements identified in this are .

. MC 81N42 - Testing and Maintenance The inspector verified by observation and discussions with reactor operators that a program for testing the operability of the intrusion detection system has been established and is conducted daily in accordo..e with the manufacturer's recommendatio The in or determined that this test confirms the As a result the licensee plans to revise their testing i procedure to include of all There were no violations of regulatory requirements identified in this '

area.

i MC 82N46 - Locks, Keys, and Combinations .

' l l

The inspector confirmed, by physical inventory and review of key control

'

logs, that security-related keys are being controlled in accordance with l

  • the provisions of the UFTR and UFSA physical security plans, i.e., keys Records indicated that a physical inventory of locks and keys were

,

conducted March 11, 1982. Records further indicated that the combination l

to the key repository was changed on the same date.

l l There were no violations of regulatory requirements identified in this categor . MC 81N54 - Physical Barriers The inspector verified by examination of walls, ceilings and floors that the physical barriers surrounding the Reactor Cell, the SPERT fuel assembly storage area and the UFSA subcritical core are constructed of materials as described in the PSP. The inspector determined that SNM is used and stored only within the Controlled Access Areas (CM) and Security Areas (SA) as identified in the PS There were no violation of regulatory requirements identified in this are ,

11. MC 81N70 - Access Control The inspector verified by observation and review of records (Reactor Cell ,

Entry Log) that access to the Reactor Cell is controlled in accordance with established procedures. The licensee has established a screening

'

program for individuals authorized unescorted access to the Reactor Cel E.70C fr#c.*;MATION REMOVED

- ---- ..

, 7...

> _ a.~ n n - --m

- . _ _ . - - _ - -

- . _ -

.

- -

.. . __

l

,.

-

4 (- -

-

'

. l

,

,

j In addition, the inspector verified that a photo identification badge j has been issued to cleared individuals and are being worn while ,

within the are All other individuals require an escor '

.

There were no violations of regulatory requirements identified in this are , l

,

12. MC 81N80 - Detection Aids  !

The inspector verified observation and test he licensee j em s an The inspector also verified, by ob,servation and tests that alarm devices ified in the plan  ;

The_ intrusion alarm sys em was determined to be ,

Wareinstalledass at the I ddition, an emergency power source has been installed ssure continued operabilit- of the system upon loss of primary powe l

-

There were no violations of regulatory requirements identified in this ,

are '

I

.

13. MC 81N88 - Communications for use in emergency or threat situations. Observation of tests conducted by e reactor rator ve fied the capability of commun atio ween mmunications equipment is

There were no violations of regulatory requirements identified in this a re a .-

'

14. MC 85102B - Material Control and Accountability (Reactor)

.

] The inspector verified that SNM is either in t i

for unirradiated fuel or stored in the in l accordance w th provisions of the security plans. T e physica arrier i surrounding the reactor was inspected ano determined to be of substantial

construction to offer penetration resistance which impedes both surreptitious and forced entry.

i Review of the Licensee's material control and accounting program revealed the following:

!

h (a) The licensee has established sufficient item control areas for the

physical and administrative control of SN [ (b) The quantities of SNM in their possession are within total l authorized limits and apparently are not being used for unauthorized l purposes.

I

,

-. - MM PI P M n'm u z w h f

-

_ _ _ - .- WEh.-5 = & ='_==__-_

F '

.

-

W-M

. .

', 3 INFCRMATION g~yy

,

Additionally, the inspector verified the storage locations and cuantities of SNM held under Licensee Numbers R-56 and SNM-105 There were no violations of regulatory requirements identified in this are .

O O

I H.790 INFORMATIOrJ n: MOVED L

.a.,..,

- - .:..

- , .

. . ..

_ .

~ * ~ vw -- . - . - . _ . . . _ , _ _ . , , , _ _ _ _