IA-87-441, Responds to FOIA Request for Documents.No Addl Documents Located

Responds to FOIA Request for Documents.No Addl Documents Located

ML20235Y563
Person / Time
Issue date:	07/23/1987
From:	Grimsley D NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
To:	Palast G UNION ASSOCIATES
References
FOIA-87-441 NUDOCS 8707250316
Download: ML20235Y563 (1)

Text

f "'agA, s  % s.

FciMP y/

g, '~_

,, , I '/ neseoNst im 6 J

X"'"$^' I I '^"'

! ,5 RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF I

1 -~

(

/' INFORMATION ACT (FO!A) REQUEST #

MEU$

DOCAET NUMBERi$) t/r spAsowl 1

\ .

O l

. .((hQ b/\ -

(Q b(Y\ 5( hb d PART l.-RECORDS R(LEASED OR NOT LOCATED (See checked boxes)

No agency records subject to the request have been located No additional agency records subrect to the request have been located A 0ency records subsect to the request that are identsfeed in Appendix are already evailable for public inspection and copying in the NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, N W., bashington, DC.

Agency records subject to the request that are ido ttifeed in Appendia are being made available for public inspection and copying in the NRC Pubhc Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC, in a folder under this FOIA number and rec uester name.

The nonpropnetary version of the proposal (s) that you agreed to accept en a telephone conversation with a member of my staff is now being mJde available .for public inspection and coying at the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street. N W , Washington, DC, in a folder under this FOIA number and requester name.

Enclosed is information on how you may obtain access to and the chstges for copying records placed in the NRC Pubhc Document Room,1717 H Street, N W., Washington, DC.

Agency records subject to the request are enclomed. Any applicable cha<ge for copies of the records provided and payment procedures are noted in the comments section.

Records subject to the request have been referred to another Federal agencyhes) for review and direct response to you.

In view of NRC's response to ths request, no further action is being taken on appeal letter dated PART ll.A-INFORMATION WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSUf1E I

Certain informaten in the requested records is being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to the FOIA exemptions desenbod in and for the reasons stated in Part 11, sec-tsons B, C and D. Any released portions of the documents for which only part of the record is being withheld are being made available for public inspection and copying in the NRC Pubhc Document Room,1717 H Street, N W., Washington, DC, in a folder under this FOIA number and requester name.

Comments l

l

~

8707250316 870723 PDR FOIA LEWISB7-441 PDR 1

SIG ATUS .H4CT0h DIVI $ RULES AND RECORDS , ,

f !% _<- f'

[c.. s v *-.w. y...

.c. .

~'C

... f. .:l lN NAC FORM 464 (Part il to asi

l UNION A550CIATES 64 Second Avenue, New York, New York 10003 I

.Chius&and New York City (212) 505-5566

) .

. June 29, 1987 Mr. Donnie H. Grimsley Director FREEDOM 0F If1f 0RMUl0fl Division of Rules and Records FT EQUEST i Office of Administration *[ 7*f/k/ )

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission _o g h7 /J . I Washington, D.C. 20555 RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST

Dear Mr. Grimsley:

]

This request is mad'e pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 522, as amended. UNION ASSOCIATES submits this )

request to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to obtain 1 documents regarding the following" )

ROUTIME SAFETY INSPECTIONS OF THE SCREENWELL HOUSE ROOMS AT THE LON3 ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY'S (LIILO) SHOREHAM NUCLFAR PLANT CONDUCTED BETWEEN APRIL 5 - 16, 1983 BY MR. H.

NICHOLAS OF THE NRC. THIS REQUEST REIATES TO INSPECTION NO.

50-322/83-11.

In your response, the NRC should consider " documents" to mean any and all forms of written connunication, including internal NRC staff memoranda. Your response should also include, but not be ,

limited to, the following:

reports, studies, plans, graphs, charts, diagrams, memoranda, correspondence, test results, working papers, meeting notes and minutes, computer records and print-o" , notes and summaries of conversations and interv1= s.

These documents are specifically requested from, but not I limited to, the following offices of the NRC:

1 Office of Investigations Office of Inspection.and Audit Office of Nucleqr Reactor Research Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research -

Office of Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data  ;

Operating Reactors Branch of the Division of Licensing NRC files at King of Prussia NRC fil'es at the Shoreham Nuclear Plant site.

UliION ASSOCIATES requests the NRC to provide all documents prepared or utilized by, in the possession of, or routed through the pg +m 8 7d N q.

e

/ * *.

NRC containing any and all information related to the following.

1. Any LILCO or Stone & Webster personnel who accompanied the NRC representative on the inspection tour.

2. Purpose of this inspection. ,

i

3. Notes, both formal and informal, taken by participants during this inspection.

4. Reports or follow-up correspondence prepared-by the NRC l following this inspection.

5. Follow-up documents filed by LILCO following this inspection.

6. Documents indicating NRC findings which may have prompted this inspection. I

7. Documents filed-by LILCO with NRC following this inspection which indicated compliance.by LILCO of any problems found during this incpection or any prehlems of other areas which may not have been inspected but which had been part of a previous NRC inpsection and which this inspection was a " random sampling" of findings frcm the previous inspection.

In your response, please identify which documents correspond to each request itemized above. If any of the material covered by this request has been destroyed and/or removed, please provide all surrounding documentation, including but not limited to a description of the action (s) taken, relevant date(s) and justification (s) for the action (s). '

For any documents or portions of documents you deny due to a specific FOIA exemption, please provide an index itemizing and describing the documents withheld. Pursuant to Vaugh v. Rosen (I),

484 F.2d 280 (D.C. Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974),

the index is required to provide a detailed justification of your grounds for claiming each exemption and an explanation of why each exemption is relevant to the document or portion of the document withheld.

We look forward to your receipt within ten days. Thank you j

for your attention to this matter.

l

^

Sincerely, Gregory A. Palast i

s