IA-85-586, Responds to FOIA Request for Documents Re SECY-85-65. Documents Identified in Encl App Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5).Denial May Be Appealed within 30 Days

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to FOIA Request for Documents Re SECY-85-65. Documents Identified in Encl App Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5).Denial May Be Appealed within 30 Days
ML20136C979
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/28/1985
From: Felton J
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Dove K
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
FOIA-85-586 NUDOCS 8511210200
Download: ML20136C979 (3)


Text

a '$ne o 1

}

. g4

  • 3

-g UNITED STATES i o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E WASHING TON, D. C. 20555

+

.. . OCT 281985 Ms. Kay L. Dove P.O. Box 1575 IN RESPONSE REFER Silver Spring, MD 20902 TO F0IA-85-586

Dear Ms. Dove:

This is in response to your letter dated August 20, 1985, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (F0IA), a copy of SECY-85-65 and any documents that are related to SECY-85-65.

The documents identified on the enclosed appendix are being withheld. The documents contain the predecisional advice, opinions, and recomendations of the Comissioners and the staff on the plan for implementing the quality assurance program. The documents are exempt from mandatory disclosure pursuant to Exemption 5 of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5)) and the Comission's regulations at 10 CFR 9.5(b)(5). Release of the documents would tend to inhibit the open and frank exchange of ideas essential to the deliberative process. The documents do not contain any reasonably segregable factual portions and are being withheld in their entirety.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 and 9.15 of the Comission's regulations, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or dirclosure, and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public int.eres t. The persons responsible for the denial of document 4 are the undersigned and Mr. James M. Taylor, Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement. The person responsible for the denial of document 2 is Mr. John E. Zerbe, Director, Office of Policy Evaluation.. The person responsible for the denial of documents 1, 3, and 5 through 8 is Mr. John C.

Hoyle, Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

The denial by Mr. Taylor and myself may be appealed to the Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. Any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial F0IA Decision." The denials by Mr. Zerbe and Mr. Hoyle may be appealed within 30 days to the Secretary of the Commission and should be addressed to the Secretary of the Comission.

8511210200 851028 PDR FOIA DOVE 85-586 PDR

You may be interested in report NUREG-1055 and records related to that report which are filed in folder F01A-84-293 for public inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555.

Sin r ly, J. M. elton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration

Enclosure:

As stated

~

i

Re: F01A-85-586 APPENDIX

1. 02/25/85 SECY-85-65, " Quality Assurance Program Implementation Plan."

(118 pages)

~

2. 04/12/85 Memo from J. E. Zerbe, OPE, to the Comm., subject: Quality Assurance Implementation (SECY-85-65). .(5 pages)
3. 07/22/85 Chairman Palladino's vote sheet on SECY-85-65. (11 pages)

)

4. 07/23/85 Memo from James Taylor to William Dircks, subject: Closeout of NRC Response to Congress on the Ford Amendment. (1 page) l S. 07/30/85 Memo from T. A. Rehm to S. J. Chilk, subject: Closeout of  !

NRC Response to Congress on the Ford Amendment. (30pages) '

6. 07/31/85 Memo from S. J. Chilk, SECY, to the Commission, subject: ,

SECY-85-65, QA Program Implementation Plan. (1 page)  !

7. 08/14/85 Comm. Bernthal's vote sheet on SECY-85-65. (2 pages) j 8. Undated Undated, unsigned, " Draft Paragraph for Inclusion in i

Bush /0'ileill QA Letter." (1 page) i i

+

4 i

i 9

. . - , - . - ,,. , .- - - . . - - . - , . , - , , - .